--------------------------------------------- Report on the Dec. 5, 1993 GEM Mini-Workshops --------------------------------------------- GEM WORKING GROUP 2: PARTICLE ENTRY, BOUNDARY STRUCTURE, AND TRANSPORT Lou Lee and Pat Newell (Co-chairs) During this mini-workshop, several of the controversial topics from the 1993 Snowmass Workshop were reconsidered. The workshop also provided a progress report on topics which have been suggested for study during the Snowmass meeting. Topics addressed during the workshop are 1) Whether FTE's are driven or form spontaneously. (J. Jacob, G. Le) 2) Categories and properties of poleward moving auroral forms. (G. Fasel) 3) Whether FTE's provide sufficient flux transport to explain the polar cap potential. (P.T. Newell and D. Sibeck) 4) Slow mode shocks at the magnetopause (D. Walthour) and the influence of shear flow on the reconnection layer (Y. Lin). 5) Simulations of a magnetic re-reconnection process (A. Otto) 6) Observations (P. Song) and simulations (M. Yan) of slow mode waves in the magnetosheath 7) Simulations of small scale turbulence at the magnetopause (J. Drake) 8) Closure of anisotropic MHD for the magnetosheath (P. Gary) 9) GEM Magnetopause Catalogue (P. Song) All of the contributions and the discussion illustrated considerable progress on many of the topics from the last Snowmass workshop. Several of the suggested studies from the Snowmass workshop have already produced interesting new results (4, 5, 6, 7). The discussion in the contributions 1 and 2 illustrated that the formation and the importance of FTE's are still open questions. The mini workshop also illustrated the need for cross scale coupling of the various processes. Important questions which were raised during the workshop address - the formation of FTE's (1) and role of FTE's for the global flux transport(3). - the relation between the small scale turbulence and larger scale FTE's. - the relation between quasi-stationary structures (4) and time dependent processes (5). - how are small and local scale processes (4, 5, 6, 7) related to ionospheric observations (2) and how could they possibly be incorporated into a global magnetosphere/ionosphere model?