
			 ***************************
			 **   THE GEM MESSENGER   **
			 ***************************
						     Volume 7, Number 27
						     July 8, 1997

--------------------------------------------------
1997 SNOWMASS REPORT: TAIL/SUBSTORM CAMPAIGN WG 1:
--------------------------------------------------
From: Larry Lyons <larry at atmos.ucla.edu>

*************************************************************
Our working group proposed the following more focused goal:

Develop a phenomenological picture of substorms in time and space.  This
picture should be:

1.  Observationally based, and not biased by particular substorm models

2. Eventually turned over to the GGCM community as a challenge for testing
models.

3.  Used to open doors for people (include those new to the substorm
community) to add new information into the picture

The above goal of developing a phenomenological picture of substorms was
adopted by the steering committee, and new working group chairmen are being
selected.  We anticipate that some of our working groups studies will be
useful for the phenomenological model development and that some of the
events may be appropriate for "challenges" of  the modeling community. We
thank all those that have participated in our working group for their
efforts during the past few years, and we encourage the completion of
studies that have been initiated.

*************************************************************

WE HAD THREE 2-hr SESSIONS AS FOLLOWS:

A. MONDAY 16 JUNE 10-12:  Ad-hoc GEM intervals

LUI:  results from classic isolated substorm at 0430 UT on 9 Feb. 1995 with
comprehensive ISTP observations.  Apparently triggered by the IMF.  Total
pressure decreases at GEOTAIL (x ~ - 30 RE) at onset.  No evidence for
neutral line in association with onset.

WINGLEE:  Modeled Lui event.  Reproduced large-scale GEOTAIL B, but not
substorm effects on B.

RODGER:  Nice isolated substorm on March  9, 1995, at 0248 UT  with
excellent ISTP data and a 1 hr and 20 min growth phase.  (NO DISCUSSION
since Alan Rodger could not attend)

SANCHEZ:  Analyzed data from onsets at ~2230,~2250, and ~2310 UT on Feb. 7,
1996.  Found pulsations with 1.5 mHz response at three widely spaced
location (ground, geosynchronous orbit, and GEOTAIL at x ~ - 25 RE) in
association with onset

R. NAKAMURA: GEOTAIL (x ~ - 25 RE) tail response to the IMF and to isolated
substorm onsets on Nov. 22, 1995.  Found total pressur up in tail when
solar wind E went up prior to substorms, and total P down after onset.  The
total P also went up for one event when the IMF Bz stayed positive and for
which there was no substorm.

REEVES:  Evaluated substorm onset timing using very conjugate ground and
geosynchronous observations. Found that it is essentially impossible to
discern onsets to < 3 min, and in particular that two ground stations ~2
degrees in longitude apart saw 3 min different Pi 2 and ground delta-H
onsets.

LYONS: a.  Compiled set of 20-30 onsets with GEOTAIL-CANOPUS conjunctions.
Initial examination suggests that total pressure in tail (x = -13 to -31
RE) goes down in association with all but one of the onsets.  To be
analyzed in more detail in collaboration with T. Nagai.

       b.  Compiled set of onsets of classical substorms in N. America
sector (20) and in Scandinavian sector (9).  To be used to evaluate ground
convection and geosynchronous pressure response to substorms in
collaboration with. A. Steen, R. Greenwald, K. Baker, and G. Reeves.

SANCHEZ  Discussed data from 0000 to 0400 UT on the Sept. 10, 1996 with
onset at 0207 UT.  Has Sondrestrom flows and POLAR images, so can relate
flows to conductivities.

B.  MONDAY 16 JUNE 3:30-5:30 p.m.:  GEM intervals during WIND perigee passes.

SLAVIN (MAYNARD):  Three satellites in tail for three major onsets on April
18, 1996.  See responses over wide range in y, which implies that a large
y-extent of the tail is involved in onset.

SANCHEZ:  Initiating study of 2215 UT onset on Sept. 16. 1995.  WIND saw
dipolarization at ~2245 UT.

ELSEN: Showed data from a well observed (UVI, AKR, ground, geosynch.) onset
at 0400 UT on May 10, 1996.  WIND dipolarization observed also.

BAKER:  Found that flows observed by SuperDARN decreased throughout
night-side during 8-10 min interval following 040 UT onset on May 10, 1996.

ANGELOPOLOUS (TEMERIN):  Did BBF study when GEOTAIL and WIND 3 RE apart
from 9-14 UT on March 27, 1996. Found that not all BBF's are associated
with magnetic bays, but found a UV emission response to all detected BBF's.

MCPHERRON:  Studied 0353 UT onset on Nov. 28, 1995.  Found that GEOTAIL at
x = -30 RE saw tailward flow for 15 min prior to onset.  At the same time B
was almost entirely in the y direction.

C. TUESDAY 17 JUNE 10-11:00 am: New ISTP events

January 1,2, 1997

FOX overview: GEOTAIL and IMP cross midnight together at ~30
and ~ 38 RE.  Very small onsets at ~2145, 2200 on the 1st.  A well defined
but moderately small onset at 0157 on the 2nd.

LUI:  No evidence for neutral line signatures ( Bz < 0 or tailward flows)
at x ~ 30 RE and y ~ 0 prior to onsets.

Good examples of small events;  data to be put on line for all
(http://www-spof.gsfc.nasa.gov/istp/events/gem/)

D. April 7-11, 1997
(http://www-spof.gsfc.nasa.gov/istp/event_apr97/index.html)

FOSTER:  Overview of available good ground coverage

LYONS:  Good period for studying IMF-substorm relations for  non-ideal
events, because of good ground and IMF coverage, (April 10-11)
_____________________________

Nelson Maynard (nmaynard at mrcnh.com)
Larry Lyons (Larry at atmos.ucla.edu)



+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|To add name to the mailing list, send a message to: editor at igpp.ucla.edu |
|For message to whole GEM mailing list, send to:   gem at igpp.ucla.edu      |
|                                                                         |
|URL of GEM Home Page: http://igpp.ucla.edu/gem/Welcome.html              |
|Please update your e-mail address.                                       |
|CAUTION: Do not send messages to gem at igpp.ucla.edu unless you want       |
|         your message to go to everyone in the GEM mailing list!         |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
