

			 ***************************
			 **   THE GEM MESSENGER   **
			 ***************************
						     Volume 9, Number 25
						     July 8, 1999
						     
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 Snowmass Workshop Report - Special Sessions on Groundbased Magnetometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Chris Russell (ctrussel at igpp.ucla.edu)

Coordinator: C. T. Russell

At the 1999 Snowmass meeting a special effort was made to convene a set of 
special sessions of importance to the on-going campaigns (Inner Magnetosphere/
Storms and Magnetotail/Substorms), but also of interest to the ground-based 
magnetometer community that has much to provide to the GEM program but had not
been as fully exploited as it could have been in past meetings.  Four special
sessions were arranged: two under the inner magnetosphere storms campaign; one
under the tail substorm campaign and one technical session crossing the 
campaigns boundaries.  The two inner magnetosphere/storm campaigns covered 
magnetic pulsation sounding of the magnetospheric density and SI propagation 
through the magnetosphere.  The tail/substorm session covered the propagation of
Pi2 pulsations.  The technical session reviewed the status and plans of the
ground-based magnetometry community.  Reports on each of these sessions follow
below.

I. Inner Magnetosphere/Storms
=============================

I.1. Magnetic Pulsation Sounding of the Magnetospheric Density

The Newcastle magnetometer group under the leadership of Brian Fraser has 
pioneered the determination of the equatorial mass density using resonating 
magnetic field lines at Pc3 frequencies.  If one can determine the location of
a resonating field line, one can solve for the equatorial mass density, knowing
the "Length of the line" and the frequency of the resonance.  The working group
discussed techniques and the application of these techniques to the
magnetosphere.

The most popular technique uses the phase difference between the H-component
oscillations at two adjacent stations in a meridian chain.  Peter Chi showed
that this phase difference depended on both the distance between stations and
the state of the ionosphere.  This technique requires precise timing.

An alternate technique was discussed by C. T. Russell in which the H-component
power ratio between adjacent stations was examined instead of the phase.  This
approach identifies two resonating field lines (one over each station and does
not require precise timing).

Brian Fraser and Ian Mann demonstrated that the plasma density sounding could
be performed from L=1.5 to over L=7.  Most importantly the location of the
plasmapause could be resolved.  Peter Chi showed that a large magnetic storm
depleted the density in the plasmasphere inside L=2.  And the refilling of the
plasmasphere could be followed over the next few days.

The session revealed that Pc3 resonance sounding had come of age as an effective
tool for monitoring the magnetospheric plasma.  However, some new stations are
needed especially bridging the gap between L=3 and 4 and several longitudes need
coverage, not just one.

I.2. Sudden Impulse Propagation through the Magnetosphere

One of the earliest problems in magnetospheric physics is how the magnetosphere
is compressed when the pressure in the solar wind suddenly increases.  The
change in the boundary condition on the magnetosphere is simple.  The
magnetopause moves closer to the surface of the Earth.

BUT - the geometry is complicated by the dipolar magnetic field
    - the electrical conductivity of the ionosphere is a tensor
    - the mass in the magnetosphere must move when the boundaries move
    - MHD waves propagate in three different modes

The working group concentrated on two different areas:

- first arrival timing and phenomenology (the first minute)
- plasma circulation and currents induced by the compression (the first hour)

The first arrival is a twist in the field at the leading edge of the 
compression.  On the afternoon side this twist leads to a "preliminary reverse
impulse" (PRI).  On the morning side the twist gives a positive H perturbation
that merges with the following compression.  Prior to the advent of modern
magnetometers with high temporal accuracy and rapid sampling it was believed
that the PRI moved at the speed of light.  Present data do not confirm this.
D. H.  Lee showed how these first arrival times could be predicted with a
simple linear model.

The post-compression circulation has been addressed in two ways:

- AMIE modeling using observed current patterns
- MHD modeling from solar wind conditions across the shock as it approaches 
  the Earth.  (The results of both techniques are in substantial agreement
  with each other and with observations).

Both approaches show that the magnetospheric response is dependent on IMF
conditions when the stock hits the magnetosphere.

The session demonstrated that the tools and observations needed to understand
SI effects are now available and the outstanding issues in this area will soon 
be resolved.

II. Tail/Substorm 
=================

Pi2 Propagation

Summary

Pi2 waves are very helpful in substorm studies because they can be detected far
from their source BUT
      - substorms can occur without observations of Pi2s
      - Pi2s can occur without the occurrence of substorms.

Thus we need to understand the factors that control the source and propagation
of these waves in the magnetosphere.  This session focussed on propagation
effects.

Propagation through the magnetosphere adds a transit time delay to the signal
and alters the waveform of the signal as it passes through resonant and
'virtually' resonant regions.  In particular the density in the plasmasphere
significantly delays the signals, causes "anomalously" late arrivals and creates
a resonant cavity.

*  We need to understand better both theoretically and observationally

    - the propagation delays in order to time substorm onsets
    - the alteration of the signal wave form

*  We need to devise better means of deriving the first arrived times of pi2
   waves from our observations

The workshop caught this topic at a moment where progress is being made rapidly
but with more work yet to be done.

III. Technical Session on Ground-based Magnetometry
===================================================

Ground-based magnetic records have long played a crucial role in understanding
the behavior of the magnetosphere and ionosphere.  Our understanding of the
magnetosphere has reached a stage where we need timing accuracies of 1 second 
or better and often sub nT precision.  Moreover, it is no longer enough to have
single sites, or even chains, but rather two dimensional arrays are needed. 
Fortunately, it is possible to build such precision instruments relatively
inexpensively, and many groups have done so.  Yet some regions are not
adequately covered.  In this session we reviewed the status of operating
networks, their data availability, their sampling frequency and future plans.

Arrays discussed included the MACGS array, the Danish Greenland array,
the Magic and Antarctic arrays, the CPMN array, SAMNET, the Newcastle array,
the MEASURE array, the SMALL array, the Chimag array, the Mexican array,
the USGS array and proposals for floating magnetometers on the ice cap and a
new array in South America.  Material was submitted to the session by several
who could not attend and reported to the attendees by the chairman.  This
material included discussions of the IMAGE array, the French magnetometer
stations, Lucent Technologies sites and the Italian stations.

It was clear from the scientific presentations that much new was being learned
from the ground-based measurements but that additional sites and renovations
were needed to fully exploit the techniques now available to probe the 
ionosphere and magnetosphere from the ground.  For example Brian Fraser reported
that resonance sounding of the plasmaspheric density could be performed as low
as an L value of 1.3 and Ian Mann showed that the same technique could be used
as high as L=7.  Brian Fraser noted that he had been able to look for the last
closed field line with stations near L=9.  Peter Chi showed that you could also
determine the Q of the ionosphere with these data.  The various presentations
on SI and Pi2 propagation were equally as revealing.  It was clear that 
velocities of the disturbances could be measured with timing resolution of 1s
or better.

It was very obvious that  a time resolution of 1 second with accurate timing 
was now essential for magnetospheric studies and many groups announced their
plans to do so.  It was also obvious that meridian chains useful for resonance
sounding were not yet adequate.  IMAGE and the Alaskan chains might cover the
region from L=4 to 7 and MEASURE might cover L=2 to 3 but there was a gap
between L=3 and 4 and we needed full L value coverage at several longitudes
before we could adequately cover the filling and emptying of the magnetosphere.

Other recommendations resulting from the session included continued improvements
in the numerical models of wave propagation, increasing the sample rate to 2 Hz
to include the study of Pi1 pulsations, filling in the Russian sector and the
undertaking of conjugate point studies.  The proposal to study the IMF through
a longitudinal chain of stations near 80 deg was also presented.  This
technique holds the promise of providing the IMF By and Bz components averaged
over a period of 30 minutes.  Depending on the rapidity of changes that affect
substorms this may or may not assist in substorm studies.

In summary, the session was both well attended and very interactive.  The 
material gathered from the various presenters will be assembled and posted
on the web to facilitate collaboration and data exchange.  We recommend that a
similar coordinated approach to the organization of magnetometer-specific
sessions and the discussion of technical issues be followed at the next GEM
meeting.

+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|To add name to the mailing list or for a message to the GEM community    |
| please contact: editor at igpp.ucla.edu                                    |
|                                                                         |
|URL of GEM Home Page: http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/gem/Welcome.html      |
|Please update your e-mail address.                                       |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
