*************************** ** THE GEM MESSENGER ** *************************** Volume 11, Number 23 August 3, 2001 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Reports of 2001 GEM Snowmass Workshops Report of the GGCM Steering Committee to the GEM Steering Committee ------------------------------------------------------------------- From: George Siscoe, Chair, GGCM Steering Committee I. GGCM Metrics Challenge The metrics challenge that Rich Behnke presented to the Steering Committee last year has been successfully completed. The results were presented and discussed at a GGCM metrics session. Based on the experience of this challenge, the Steering Committee recommends the following: 1. Continue periodic metrics challenges with a period (initially at least) of 2 years, to be adjusted as experience warrants. 2. Maintain the present metric. It worked satisfactorily. 3. Add new metrics: 1. Integral potential along CUSP trajectory between pre- established points. 2. Magnetic field perturbation along trajectory (100 km averages) 3. Pattern-recognition metric based on locating convection reversals. 4. In addition to absolute errors used in the 1st challenge, compute skill score based on Weimer 2000 potentials and field perturbations. 5. Compute such skill scores for the results of the 1st challenge. 6. Make subsequent challenges as "blind" as possible. 7. Submit a report to Rich Behnke on the results of the 1st challenge that contains: 1. View graphs prepared by Michael Hesse that summarize the results of the challenge and that contain further recommendations aimed at standardizing the procedure and at illuminating problems that arose during the 1st challenge. 2. Recommendations (above) of the Steering Committee. 3. A description of the CUSP instruments and the uncertainties of the measurements. This request will be distributed to all challenge participants. 8. Publish a joint paper on the results of the challenge. II. Recommendation to NSF regarding a GGCM motivated effort to design an architecture for interfacing at CCMC, independently created codes - establish a task group to recommend on the merits of existing architectures designed for this purpose. The recommendations should be to the CCMC Steering Committee. Chuck Goodrich would be a good chair of such a task group. III. Relation between GEM and CCMC. CCMC has now achieved the goal of the GGCM 3-phased implementation plan. It is extending its capabilities in this area beyond GGCM's preview to include also ionospheric and heliospheric codes. The Steering Committee therefore recommends that GEM interface itself with CCMC in a way that insures that the interests of GEM are maintained and promoted. Steering Committee recommends the following plan to achieve this end. 1. Dissolve the GGCM Steering Committee, since CCMC has accomplished the job that the Steering Committee was created to achieve. Now the Steering Committee is too weak a link between GEM and CCMC. 2. Appoint the CCMC director as an ex officio member of the GEM Steering Committee. 3. Establish 2 GGCM working groups, one, a GGCM Issues working group, to run sessions on metrics, CCMC issues, etc., and one, a GGCM Models working group to arrange session that demonstrates the capabilities of models and their applications to other GEM campaigns. The Steering Committee recommends that the CCMC director be an appointed leader of the Model WG. Further recommendations regarding WG leaders are the following: Models WG - Michael Wiltberger. Issues WG - Aaron Ridley and Chuck Goodrich as backup, the names of Margaret Chen and Gang Lu are suggested. Respectfully submitted, George Siscoe Chair, GGCM Steering Committee +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |To add name to the mailing list or for a message to the GEM community | | please contact: editor at igpp.ucla.edu | | | |URL of GEM Home Page: http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/gem/Welcome.html | |Please update your e-mail address. | +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+