<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Tguild</id>
	<title>gem - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Tguild"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Tguild"/>
	<updated>2026-05-07T20:11:56Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.33.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2501</id>
		<title>2015 Summer Workshop</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2501"/>
		<updated>2015-06-16T21:25:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* [FG] Metrics and Validation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''June 14-19 2015'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Viceroy Hotels, Resorts &amp;amp; Residences, Snowmass, Colorado'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is a ''fluid'' list of speakers provided by the GEM Workshop Coordinator and Focus Groups. The information here serves as a rough guide for those who wish to know the most updated session plans. Due to the nature of the GEM Workshop, Focus Groups may continue to revise their agenda as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All other information about the 2015 Summer Workshop can be found at the [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html GEM Meeting Coordinator Website]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Monday, June 15 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MPS tutorial''' by ''Toshi Nishimura'' -- Fast flow channels in the magnetotail and auroral oval: Reconnection, substorm and beyond&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GSM tutorial''' by ''Alex Glocer'' -- Global modeling of the space environment system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail Environment and Dynamics at Lunar Distances ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hui Zhang: Transient phenomena at tail Bow shock and magnetopause &lt;br /&gt;
* Sheng-Hsien Chen: K-H at the magnetopause and waves at LLBL &lt;br /&gt;
* Denny Oliveria: Tail response to interplanetary shocks&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Stubbs (presented by David Sibeck): Mid-tail structure&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Fear: Magnetotail structure associated with transpolar arcs&lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi: Ion cyclotron waves at the Moon and their connection to the plasma sheet and the lunar exosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* Ivan Vasko:Geotail observations in mid and distant tail&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrei Runov: Reconnection in the mid-tail&lt;br /&gt;
* John Lyon: LFM simulation of bubble formation in mid-tail during growth phase&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: The role of mid-tail in Geospace Systems Science&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Schunk: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 1 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Vince Eccles: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 2 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Abdallah Barakat: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 3 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Katie Garcia-Sage: MFLFM Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Simulation Results (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Lotko: Overview of Recent LFM Modeling and Thoughts for the Future (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Lyons: Review--Hybrid scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Henderson: Review--Inside-out scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Kepko: Review--Outside-in scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Yukinaga Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Phil Pritchett: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Joachim Birn: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Misha Sitnov: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Mostafa El-Alaoui: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Walk-ins welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 1 (Mon, 01:30-03:00 PM, Salon 2):''' “Radiation Belt (RB) observations and modeling results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Weichao Tu and Steve Morley''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Mary Hudson: Recent simulation of the 'St Patrick's Day storm'&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Alexander Drozdov: The VERB code modeling of the St. Patrick’s day Storm&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Dan Baker: Impenetrable Barrier during March 17 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Allison Jaynes: Fast diffusion of ultra-relativistic electrons: 17 March 2015 storm event&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Thiago Brito: Simulations on Radiation Belt Electron Precipitation Response to ULF Waves&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Drew Turner: Storm-time analysis of RB&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Xinlin Li: Deep Injections of 10s – 100s of keV electrons (RBSP observations)&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Jay Albert: Modeling “peculiar” pitch angle distributions with MS waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models Compared to Observations'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionos-Magnetosphere Models for GEM Storms (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn Kistler: Cluster Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: LANL Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Stein Haaland: The Estimation of Cold Plasma Outflow During Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Robert McPherron: Point Processes: Association of Lists&lt;br /&gt;
*Nadine Kalmoni: Auroral dispersion relation&lt;br /&gt;
*Kyle Murphy: tools and methods&lt;br /&gt;
*Eric Donovan: Circle grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 2 (Mon, 03:30-05:00 PM, Salon 2):''' “Various magnetospheric wave characteristics and their global distribution required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Wen Li and Jay Albert''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Ashar Ali: Radial Diffusion Coefficients Using E and B Field Data from the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Seth Claudepierre: Advertisement for the GEM ULF Wave Challenge &lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xinlin Li: Relation between ULF and radial diffusion of RB electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Lauren Blum: The relationship between EMIC waves and radiation belt electron precipitation&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Wen Li: Global distribution of chorus wave intensity using the statistical model and POES technique&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Jay Albert: Nonlinear wave-particle interaction&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Qianli Ma: Evaluation of electron scattering due to typical magnetosonic waves using analytical formula&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Lunjin Chen: The effect of bounce resonance with magnetosonic waves on the radiation belt electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:9.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Storm-induced energization and losses of radiation belt electrons: Effects of wave obliquity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Inter-Model Comparison for GEM Storm Periods and New Measurements'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued Discussion of Merged Models and Measurements Comparison&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura: Ion Outflow Topics (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Varney: Hysteresis Effects in Coupled MFLFM-IPWM Models (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Barbara Giles: Initial Plasma Measurements from MMS (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Krall: Ion Fluxes Into and Out of a Model Plasmasphere During Storm and Plasmasphere Refilling During Quiet Time (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Vassilis Angelopoulos: HSO&lt;br /&gt;
*FG learders: Future planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tuesday, June 16 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Weichao Tu'' -- Quantitative Modeling of Radiation Belt Dynamics: Overview and Challenges&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Seth Claudepierre'' -- Van Allen Probes: Where We've Been and Where We're Going&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 3 (Tue, 10:30-12:15 PM, Salon 2):''' “Seed populations, plasma density, and magnetic field configuration required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jay Albert and Weichao Tu''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Natalia Ganushkina: Low energy electrons in the inner magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Mick Denton: An empirical model of electron and ion fluxes derived from observations at geosynchronous orbit&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Alex Boyd: Quantifying the Radiation Belt Seed Population During the Van Allen Probes Era&lt;br /&gt;
:4.    Jian Yang: RCM-E simulation of energetic electron injections during an idealized storm&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Time Domain Structures: generation mechanisms and effects for electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Xiangrong Fu: Double layers associated with electron/ion acoustic waves&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	James McCollough: DSX is still happening&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Alex Crew: New results from FIREBIRD II&lt;br /&gt;
:9.    Quintin Schiller: A novel technique to apply electron lifetimes to radial diffusion models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''General Discussion of Modeling and Observations and Focus Group Planning'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Omelchenko: Global Multiscale Magnetospheric Simulations: HYPERS (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* John Wygant: The Powering of Highly Efficient Poynting Flux-Driven Wind Using Polar Spacecraft Measurements (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bruce Fritz: Ion Upflow Dependence on Ionospheric Density and Solar Photoionization (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Peterson: A New Look at DE-1 Escaping Ion Observations at Non-Storm Times (10 min) -- Accompanying poster by Kristina Lu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms + Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Shin Ohtani - Morphological mapping based on the stability of the magnetotail&lt;br /&gt;
*Emma Spanswick - Riometer injection&lt;br /&gt;
*Elizabeth Roy - Open-closed boundary&lt;br /&gt;
*Jiang Liu - Current wedge structuring&lt;br /&gt;
*Chao Yue - 3-D magnetic field modeling&lt;br /&gt;
*Chu Xiangning &amp;quot;how does flux transport and pileup change mapping during substorms? &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 4 (Tue, 01:30-03:00 PM, Salon 2):''' “RB &amp;quot;dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;buildup&amp;quot; challenges and Planning for future activities”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Steve Morley and Wen Li''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General short presentations (01:30-02:15 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Yuri Shprits: Recent results of the reanalysis&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Brian Kress: Observations and modeling of rebuilding during storms &lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Zhao Li: 3D test-particle simulation of the 17-18 March, 2013 CME-shock driven storm &lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Shri Kanekal and Dan Baker: Electron bursts during 17 March 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Buildup&amp;quot; Challenges (02:15-03:00 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Drew Turner: Candidate “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	QARBM FG leaders: Discussion of “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:7.    Open discussions and plan for future FG activities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two SIMIC sessions on Tuesday afternoon will focus mainly on the chosen events: 2013-03-17 and 2012-11-01 storms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A tentative list of presenters:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lyons/Nishimura/Gallardo (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bea Gallardo (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Rick Wilder (LASP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Margaret Chen (Aerospace)&lt;br /&gt;
# Gang Lu (NCAR)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jonathan Krall (NRL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Alex Glocer for Mei-Ching Fok (NASA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Liemohn and Roxanne Katus (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu and Vania Jordanova (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Elizabeth MacDonald (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bob Lysak (Univ. Minnesota)&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Schulz&lt;br /&gt;
# James Weygand (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Phil Valek (SwRI) &lt;br /&gt;
# Doug Cramer (UNH)&lt;br /&gt;
# Brian Anderson (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Vassilis Angelopoulos (TIMI), Pontus Brandt (TIMI), John Lyon (TIMI), Frank Toffoletto (TIMI), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene Setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Joachim Birn&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Jim Drake&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks (not in order)&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Slava Merkin - magnetotail stability in the presence of B_z minimum&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Misha Sitnov - new class of equilibria taking into account dipole field and B_z hump&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Misha Sitnov - temperature increase at dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Haoming Liang (w/Ashour-Abdalla and Walker) - oxygen effects on dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:5. Ying Zou - imager observations of PBI triggering by polar cap structures&lt;br /&gt;
:6. Toshi Nishimura - MHD simulation of nightside localized reconnection triggering by lobe flow channels&lt;br /&gt;
:7. Yu Lin - global hybrid simulation of the storm-time magnetotail and reconnection flux ropes&lt;br /&gt;
:8. Phil Pritchett - instability of current sheets with a localized accumulation of magnetic flux&lt;br /&gt;
:9. Phil Pritchett - structure of reconnection flow jets&lt;br /&gt;
:10. Joo Hwang (by David Sibeck) - recent MMS observations of dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:11. Mike Wiltberger - flow channels in global MHD simulations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling + Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 5 (Tue, 03:30-05:00 PM, Salon 2):''' “Joint session with “Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions” FG”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jichun Zhang and Weichao Tu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Wen Li: Quantitative simulation of radiation belt electron dynamics using 3D diffusion code&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Yuri Shprits: Combined Convective and Diffusive Simulation: VERB-4D Results&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xiangrong Fu: Modeling EMIC wave generation from ring current ions&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Anthony Saikin: The geomagnetic condition dependence of the spatial distributions of EMIC waves observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Jacob Bortnik: Generation of chorus waves in a lab plasma&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Xin An: Linear excitation of whistler waves&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Shuo Wu: Hybrid Code Simulations of Whistler Waves in Compressed Dipole Field&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Chih-ping Wang: Multi-point observation of ULF waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Continuing the [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/2015_Summer_Workshop#.5BFG.5D_Storm-time_Inner_Magnetosphere-Ionosphere_Convection SIMIC session at 1330-1500].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Time Lags in Solar Wind-Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Interactions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
speakers will include&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Mick Denton: mass transport&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob McPherron: physical interpretation of time lags&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Roger Varney: ionospheric outflow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Shin Ohtani: circuit timescales&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob Clauer: ionospheric convection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wednesday, June 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Vladimir Papitashvili'' -- Introduction&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Janet Kozyra'' -- NSF GEM Program&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Howard Singer'' -- NOAA Agency Report&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Bill Lotko'' -- Overview of NSF AGS Portfolio Review and Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;wave-particle interactions&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17, Wednesday 10:30-12:15pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mark Engebretson (Challenge event) - Van Allen probes, NOAA, and ground observations of an intense Pc 1 wave event extending 12 hours in MLT and its resulting depletion of the outer radiation belt&lt;br /&gt;
# Justin Lee (Challenge event) - Discussion of Wave-Particle Interactions during the 18-22 Feb 2014 Storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Michael Hartinger -The effect of azimuthal wave number on ULF wave-particle interactions&lt;br /&gt;
# Chen Zhou - Excitation of Dayside Chorus Waves due to Magnetic Field Line Compression in Response to Interplanetary Shocks&lt;br /&gt;
# Homayon Aryan - The distribution of plasmaspheric Hiss and Chorus waves in the inner magnetosphere as functions of geomagnetic activity and solar wind parameters&lt;br /&gt;
# Robert Allen - Statistical study of EMIC waves observed by Cluster&lt;br /&gt;
# Konstantin Gamayunov - Multiscale nature of electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave development in Earth’s magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Vania Jordanova - RAM-SCB simulations of plasma wave dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
# Adam Kellerman - Forecasting the Earth’s radiation environment with GREEP and VERB: a synthesis of empirical- and physics-based modeling across multiple energies and spatial regions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Foreshock and Magnetosheath Phenomena&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Zixu Liu &amp;quot;THEMIS observations of tangential discontinuity-driven foreshock bubbles&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Nick Omidi (presented by Jean Berchem) “Impacts of SHFAs on the Magnetosheath &amp;amp; Magnetopause”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Hui Zhang &amp;quot;Evolution of HFAs: Cluster Observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Olga Gutynska “Density enhancements in the magnetosheath: comparison with simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Narges Ahmadi “Effects of Electron Anisotropy in Mirror Instability Evolution in the Magnetosheath”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #1:  Magnetopause crossing challenge and additional M&amp;amp;V contributions'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter:  Overview and initial results from the Magnetopause Crossing Challenge&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger:  Magnetopause dynamics during the March 17th, 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Redmon:  The future of GOES: Magnetic field and particle observation and modeling to determine magnetopause crossings&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Liemohn:  Assessment of the CCMC Experimental Real-time SWMF-Geospace Results&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Model skill as a function of solar wind driving.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Ilja Honkonen: Data / Model comparisons with GUMICS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''' M&amp;amp;V Wrap up:  Recent highlights and future plans for Metrics &amp;amp; Validation at GEM''' &lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer dicussion lead&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] HSO coordination ====&lt;br /&gt;
''Discussions on science and campaigns for the upcoming HSO satellite-ground coordination.''&lt;br /&gt;
*Vassilis Angelopoulos (Intro, an overview and THEMIS-MMS coordination, THEMIS plans)&lt;br /&gt;
*Toshi Nishimura (a PPT on coordination: times, geometry, tentative assets)&lt;br /&gt;
*Marilia Samara (on MMS and ground based?)&lt;br /&gt;
*Brian Anderson (AMPERE)&lt;br /&gt;
*Eric Donovan (TREx)&lt;br /&gt;
*Stephen Mende (AGOs)&lt;br /&gt;
*Jo Baker (SuperDARN)&lt;br /&gt;
*Yukinaga Miyashita (ERG)&lt;br /&gt;
*Naritoshi Kitamura (Geotail)&lt;br /&gt;
*Sasha Ukhorsky (Van Allen Probes)&lt;br /&gt;
*Marc Lessard (WAIS)&lt;br /&gt;
*Peter Chi (ULTIMA)&lt;br /&gt;
*Drew Turner, Seth Claudepierre, Jacob Bortnik, Mike Hartinger, Shin Ohtani, Jimmy Raeder, Wen Li, Bill Lotko, Rick Chappell, Liz McDonald, Frank Toffoletto, Paul Cassak (Science comments)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;plasma-field coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 1:30-3:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith - Plasmaspheric Suprathermal Heating from Cyclotron Resonance with Equatorial Noise&lt;br /&gt;
# Raluca Ilie - Calculating the Inductive electric fields in the terrestrial magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Samuel Califf - Van Allen Probes observations of SAPS during the 28 June 2013 geomagnetic storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Hong Zhao - The evolution of ring current ion energy density and energy content during geomagnetic storms based on Van Allen Probes measurements&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang	- “Trunk-like” heavy ion structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
# Cristian Ferradas -	Ion nose spectral structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. David Sibeck “The Solar wind Magnetosphere Ionosphere Link Explorer (SMILE) Mission”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Michael Hartinger “The global structure and time evolution of dayside magnetopause surface eigenmodes”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Brian Walsh “KH waves at the dayside magnetopause”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Chih-Ping Wang “The hot electron enhancement in mid-tail magnetosheath and its dawn-dusk asymmetry”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Sun-Hee Lee (Presented by Hui Zhang) “Cold dense plasma observed at the Dayside Magnetopause and their dependence on solar wind and geomagnetic conditions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #2:  ULF Wave Challenge - 10 minutes per talk, please...'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Seth Claudepierre: ULF Wave Challenge overview and addressable science questions&lt;br /&gt;
'' Observations'' &lt;br /&gt;
* Ian Mann: Preliminary challenge time periods based on ground magnetometers&lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi: Global distribution of ULF power from ULTIMA, and in-situ observations of poloidal waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Ashar Ali: From Van Allen Probes E &amp;amp; B measurements to radial diffusion coefficients.&lt;br /&gt;
* Chih-Ping Wang:  Observations (RBSP, THEMIS, Geotail) and simulations (LFM) of a 2-hour ULF wave interval.&lt;br /&gt;
'' Simulations ''&lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter:  Newly developed CCMC analysis tools supporting the ULF Challenge, and initial results&lt;br /&gt;
* Colin Komar:  ULF power in the BATSRUS model and resonance conditions with electrons&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Lysak: ULF waves in local MHD model &lt;br /&gt;
* Slava Merkin: ULF waves in the LFM. &lt;br /&gt;
* Scot Elkington:  Mode structure calculations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] SPEDAS Software ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Topic: &amp;quot;magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 3:30-5:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Dan Welling - Relationship between ionospheric outflow and the ring current&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov - Superthermal Electrons Magnetosphere – Ionosphere Coupling in the Regions of Diffuse Aurora&lt;br /&gt;
# Megan Gillies - Investigating pulsating aurora at low electron energies&lt;br /&gt;
# Ryan Mcgranaghan - Modes of high-latitude conductance variability derived from DMSP F6-F8 and F16-F18 energetic electron precipitation observations: Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis&lt;br /&gt;
# Alexa Halford  (challenge event) - BARREL Observations of long period precipitation on Jan 26th 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang   (challenge event) - EMIC waves and associated relativistic electron precipitation on 25-26 January 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu  (challenge event) - Modeling ionospheric electron precipitation due to wave particle interactions in the ring current during the 25-26 January 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
# Yi-Jiun Su (challenge event) -RBSP/MagEIS observations: Local electron acceleration in the inner radiation belt?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Hyunju Connor “Thermospheric heating in the high-latitude dayside regions after the sudden enhancement of solar wind dynamic pressure: OpenGGCM-CTIM results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Denny Oliveira &amp;lt;dennymauricio@gmail.com&amp;gt; “Impact angle control of IP shock geoeffectiveness: results of simulations and observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Michael Hartinger “The effect of northern-southern hemisphere conductivity asymmetries on ground magnetic responses during a large solar wind transient”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Christina Chu “Hot Flow Anomalies at the Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere + Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Masha Kuznetsova (CCMC), Lutz Rastaetter (CCMC), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection), &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) satellites were recently launched to measure the electron dissipation region during magnetic reconnection.  NASA's Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC), a repository of codes and models with runs-on-request, is pursuing support of MMS science, including the implementation of particle-in-cell simulations to their portfolio.  This session will include a discussion of what capabilities members of the community (modelers and observers alike) would like from CCMC for MMS science.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] TDAS demo ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thursday, June 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''SWMI tutorial''' by ''Robert Fear'' -- Flux transfer events: Looking ahead to MMS&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Student-invited tutorial''' by ''Barbara Giles'' -- Engage in NASA's newest flagship to understand the fundamental process of magnetic reconnection -- Magnetospheric Multiscale&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Analysis of Extreme Events”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surja Sharma: overview talk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jeff Love: Dst statistics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slava Merkin: ionospheric turbulence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allison Jaynes: seed populations of relativistic electrons&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Challenge work in progress, OCB work especially welcome&lt;br /&gt;
*Speakers including Peter Porazik 'Modification of the loss cone for energetic particles', Raluca Ilie &amp;quot;mapping isotropic boundaries to the tail&amp;quot;, Phil Valek &amp;quot;TWINS/RBSP comparison on Nov 14., 2012 storm, Liz MacDonald &amp;quot;OCB scenario Nov 14 2012&amp;quot;, Alexa Halford &amp;quot;BARREL OCB observations,&amp;quot; Chu Xiangning &amp;quot;&amp;quot; and more&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics include overlap with TIMI (role of entropy bubbles in the inner magnetosphere), as well as other topics relevant to both focus groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presenters: &amp;lt;presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Wiltberger&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Henderson(LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Sheng-Hsien (Sean) Chen (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Matina Gkioulidou (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Xueling Shi (VTech)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jian Yang (Rice U.)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bing Yang (U. Calgary)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Geospace Systems Science + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Joe Borovsky (Systems), Bill Lotko (Systems), Vadim Uritsky (Systems), Juan Valdivia (Systems), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Binzheng Zhang&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Colin Komar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Misha Sitnov - tearing stability criterion'&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Bill Lotko - effects of auroral (low-altitude) field-aligned potential drops on nightside reconnection and energy flow in MI coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*The final session, surveying progress and the path forward!&lt;br /&gt;
*Ideas to consider: EOS or review article, new focus group (and topics?), upcoming BARREL-SWEDEN campaign&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Drew Turner, (Aerospace)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Sasha Ukhorskiy, (JHU/APL), “Proton Acceleration at Injection Fronts in the Inner Magnetosphere”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Chih-Ping Wang, (UCLA) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Christine Gabrielse, (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Larry Lyons (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Jian Yang, (Rice)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Systems-Science Tools, Methodologies, and Results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jacob Bortnik: Machine learning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Misha Balikhin: New model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Konstantin Gamayunov: System-based approach to EMIC waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delores Knipp: Estimating uncertainty in DMSP Poynting&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lutz Rastatter: Modeling joule heat in the ionosphere&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Colby Haggerty, heating during reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Shan Wang - Electron heating during magnetotail reconnection: deriving the heating coefficient and effects of unloading&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Liang Wang - Integrating a multi-fluid moment code into OpenGGCM&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Rick Wilder, moving X-line in cusp&lt;br /&gt;
:5. Paul Cassak, asymmetric reconnection with flow shear&lt;br /&gt;
:6. Jason Shuster, the microphysics of how electrons are energized by the reconnection process&lt;br /&gt;
:7. Yi-Hsin Liu, Orientation of x-line in asymmetric reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
1. Jodie Barker Ream (UCLA), “Pi2 propagation in global MHD simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Aaron Schutza, (Rice), &amp;quot;Thin filament simulations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Roxanne Katus, (Univ. Michigan), “Magnetospheric ion temperature derived from TWINS flux data”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. John Wygant, (Univ. Minnesota)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Zhengwei Cheng, (UNH), , “A case study of the particle carriers of field-aligned currents in the magnetotail during a substorm: Cluster observation.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Jiang Liu (UCLA), “Asymmetric FACs of dipolarizing flux bundles and how they form the substorm current wedge”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friday, June 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MIC tutorial''' by ''Stein Haaland'' -- Cold ion outflow from the polar cap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Behavior of the Geospace System”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jonathan Krall: SAMI3 simulations of M-I-T coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wen Li: solar wind and the radiation belts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vania Jordanova: multiple connections in the magnetosphere in the SHIELDS project&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Borovsky: behavior modes from global correlation analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2500</id>
		<title>2015 Summer Workshop</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2500"/>
		<updated>2015-06-16T21:24:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* [FG] Metrics and Validation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''June 14-19 2015'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Viceroy Hotels, Resorts &amp;amp; Residences, Snowmass, Colorado'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is a ''fluid'' list of speakers provided by the GEM Workshop Coordinator and Focus Groups. The information here serves as a rough guide for those who wish to know the most updated session plans. Due to the nature of the GEM Workshop, Focus Groups may continue to revise their agenda as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All other information about the 2015 Summer Workshop can be found at the [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html GEM Meeting Coordinator Website]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Monday, June 15 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MPS tutorial''' by ''Toshi Nishimura'' -- Fast flow channels in the magnetotail and auroral oval: Reconnection, substorm and beyond&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GSM tutorial''' by ''Alex Glocer'' -- Global modeling of the space environment system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail Environment and Dynamics at Lunar Distances ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hui Zhang: Transient phenomena at tail Bow shock and magnetopause &lt;br /&gt;
* Sheng-Hsien Chen: K-H at the magnetopause and waves at LLBL &lt;br /&gt;
* Denny Oliveria: Tail response to interplanetary shocks&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Stubbs (presented by David Sibeck): Mid-tail structure&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Fear: Magnetotail structure associated with transpolar arcs&lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi: Ion cyclotron waves at the Moon and their connection to the plasma sheet and the lunar exosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* Ivan Vasko:Geotail observations in mid and distant tail&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrei Runov: Reconnection in the mid-tail&lt;br /&gt;
* John Lyon: LFM simulation of bubble formation in mid-tail during growth phase&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: The role of mid-tail in Geospace Systems Science&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Schunk: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 1 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Vince Eccles: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 2 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Abdallah Barakat: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 3 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Katie Garcia-Sage: MFLFM Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Simulation Results (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Lotko: Overview of Recent LFM Modeling and Thoughts for the Future (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Lyons: Review--Hybrid scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Henderson: Review--Inside-out scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Kepko: Review--Outside-in scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Yukinaga Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Phil Pritchett: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Joachim Birn: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Misha Sitnov: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Mostafa El-Alaoui: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Walk-ins welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 1 (Mon, 01:30-03:00 PM, Salon 2):''' “Radiation Belt (RB) observations and modeling results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Weichao Tu and Steve Morley''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Mary Hudson: Recent simulation of the 'St Patrick's Day storm'&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Alexander Drozdov: The VERB code modeling of the St. Patrick’s day Storm&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Dan Baker: Impenetrable Barrier during March 17 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Allison Jaynes: Fast diffusion of ultra-relativistic electrons: 17 March 2015 storm event&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Thiago Brito: Simulations on Radiation Belt Electron Precipitation Response to ULF Waves&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Drew Turner: Storm-time analysis of RB&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Xinlin Li: Deep Injections of 10s – 100s of keV electrons (RBSP observations)&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Jay Albert: Modeling “peculiar” pitch angle distributions with MS waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models Compared to Observations'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionos-Magnetosphere Models for GEM Storms (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn Kistler: Cluster Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: LANL Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Stein Haaland: The Estimation of Cold Plasma Outflow During Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Robert McPherron: Point Processes: Association of Lists&lt;br /&gt;
*Nadine Kalmoni: Auroral dispersion relation&lt;br /&gt;
*Kyle Murphy: tools and methods&lt;br /&gt;
*Eric Donovan: Circle grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 2 (Mon, 03:30-05:00 PM, Salon 2):''' “Various magnetospheric wave characteristics and their global distribution required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Wen Li and Jay Albert''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Ashar Ali: Radial Diffusion Coefficients Using E and B Field Data from the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Seth Claudepierre: Advertisement for the GEM ULF Wave Challenge &lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xinlin Li: Relation between ULF and radial diffusion of RB electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Lauren Blum: The relationship between EMIC waves and radiation belt electron precipitation&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Wen Li: Global distribution of chorus wave intensity using the statistical model and POES technique&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Jay Albert: Nonlinear wave-particle interaction&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Qianli Ma: Evaluation of electron scattering due to typical magnetosonic waves using analytical formula&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Lunjin Chen: The effect of bounce resonance with magnetosonic waves on the radiation belt electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:9.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Storm-induced energization and losses of radiation belt electrons: Effects of wave obliquity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Inter-Model Comparison for GEM Storm Periods and New Measurements'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued Discussion of Merged Models and Measurements Comparison&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura: Ion Outflow Topics (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Varney: Hysteresis Effects in Coupled MFLFM-IPWM Models (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Barbara Giles: Initial Plasma Measurements from MMS (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Krall: Ion Fluxes Into and Out of a Model Plasmasphere During Storm and Plasmasphere Refilling During Quiet Time (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Vassilis Angelopoulos: HSO&lt;br /&gt;
*FG learders: Future planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tuesday, June 16 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Weichao Tu'' -- Quantitative Modeling of Radiation Belt Dynamics: Overview and Challenges&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Seth Claudepierre'' -- Van Allen Probes: Where We've Been and Where We're Going&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 3 (Tue, 10:30-12:15 PM, Salon 2):''' “Seed populations, plasma density, and magnetic field configuration required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jay Albert and Weichao Tu''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Natalia Ganushkina: Low energy electrons in the inner magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Mick Denton: An empirical model of electron and ion fluxes derived from observations at geosynchronous orbit&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Alex Boyd: Quantifying the Radiation Belt Seed Population During the Van Allen Probes Era&lt;br /&gt;
:4.    Jian Yang: RCM-E simulation of energetic electron injections during an idealized storm&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Time Domain Structures: generation mechanisms and effects for electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Xiangrong Fu: Double layers associated with electron/ion acoustic waves&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	James McCollough: DSX is still happening&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Alex Crew: New results from FIREBIRD II&lt;br /&gt;
:9.    Quintin Schiller: A novel technique to apply electron lifetimes to radial diffusion models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''General Discussion of Modeling and Observations and Focus Group Planning'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Omelchenko: Global Multiscale Magnetospheric Simulations: HYPERS (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* John Wygant: The Powering of Highly Efficient Poynting Flux-Driven Wind Using Polar Spacecraft Measurements (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bruce Fritz: Ion Upflow Dependence on Ionospheric Density and Solar Photoionization (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Peterson: A New Look at DE-1 Escaping Ion Observations at Non-Storm Times (10 min) -- Accompanying poster by Kristina Lu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms + Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Shin Ohtani - Morphological mapping based on the stability of the magnetotail&lt;br /&gt;
*Emma Spanswick - Riometer injection&lt;br /&gt;
*Elizabeth Roy - Open-closed boundary&lt;br /&gt;
*Jiang Liu - Current wedge structuring&lt;br /&gt;
*Chao Yue - 3-D magnetic field modeling&lt;br /&gt;
*Chu Xiangning &amp;quot;how does flux transport and pileup change mapping during substorms? &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 4 (Tue, 01:30-03:00 PM, Salon 2):''' “RB &amp;quot;dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;buildup&amp;quot; challenges and Planning for future activities”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Steve Morley and Wen Li''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General short presentations (01:30-02:15 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Yuri Shprits: Recent results of the reanalysis&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Brian Kress: Observations and modeling of rebuilding during storms &lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Zhao Li: 3D test-particle simulation of the 17-18 March, 2013 CME-shock driven storm &lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Shri Kanekal and Dan Baker: Electron bursts during 17 March 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Buildup&amp;quot; Challenges (02:15-03:00 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Drew Turner: Candidate “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	QARBM FG leaders: Discussion of “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:7.    Open discussions and plan for future FG activities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two SIMIC sessions on Tuesday afternoon will focus mainly on the chosen events: 2013-03-17 and 2012-11-01 storms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A tentative list of presenters:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lyons/Nishimura/Gallardo (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bea Gallardo (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Rick Wilder (LASP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Margaret Chen (Aerospace)&lt;br /&gt;
# Gang Lu (NCAR)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jonathan Krall (NRL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Alex Glocer for Mei-Ching Fok (NASA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Liemohn and Roxanne Katus (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu and Vania Jordanova (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Elizabeth MacDonald (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bob Lysak (Univ. Minnesota)&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Schulz&lt;br /&gt;
# James Weygand (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Phil Valek (SwRI) &lt;br /&gt;
# Doug Cramer (UNH)&lt;br /&gt;
# Brian Anderson (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Vassilis Angelopoulos (TIMI), Pontus Brandt (TIMI), John Lyon (TIMI), Frank Toffoletto (TIMI), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene Setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Joachim Birn&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Jim Drake&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks (not in order)&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Slava Merkin - magnetotail stability in the presence of B_z minimum&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Misha Sitnov - new class of equilibria taking into account dipole field and B_z hump&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Misha Sitnov - temperature increase at dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Haoming Liang (w/Ashour-Abdalla and Walker) - oxygen effects on dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:5. Ying Zou - imager observations of PBI triggering by polar cap structures&lt;br /&gt;
:6. Toshi Nishimura - MHD simulation of nightside localized reconnection triggering by lobe flow channels&lt;br /&gt;
:7. Yu Lin - global hybrid simulation of the storm-time magnetotail and reconnection flux ropes&lt;br /&gt;
:8. Phil Pritchett - instability of current sheets with a localized accumulation of magnetic flux&lt;br /&gt;
:9. Phil Pritchett - structure of reconnection flow jets&lt;br /&gt;
:10. Joo Hwang (by David Sibeck) - recent MMS observations of dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:11. Mike Wiltberger - flow channels in global MHD simulations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling + Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 5 (Tue, 03:30-05:00 PM, Salon 2):''' “Joint session with “Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions” FG”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jichun Zhang and Weichao Tu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Wen Li: Quantitative simulation of radiation belt electron dynamics using 3D diffusion code&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Yuri Shprits: Combined Convective and Diffusive Simulation: VERB-4D Results&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xiangrong Fu: Modeling EMIC wave generation from ring current ions&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Anthony Saikin: The geomagnetic condition dependence of the spatial distributions of EMIC waves observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Jacob Bortnik: Generation of chorus waves in a lab plasma&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Xin An: Linear excitation of whistler waves&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Shuo Wu: Hybrid Code Simulations of Whistler Waves in Compressed Dipole Field&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Chih-ping Wang: Multi-point observation of ULF waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Continuing the [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/2015_Summer_Workshop#.5BFG.5D_Storm-time_Inner_Magnetosphere-Ionosphere_Convection SIMIC session at 1330-1500].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Time Lags in Solar Wind-Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Interactions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
speakers will include&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Mick Denton: mass transport&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob McPherron: physical interpretation of time lags&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Roger Varney: ionospheric outflow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Shin Ohtani: circuit timescales&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob Clauer: ionospheric convection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wednesday, June 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Vladimir Papitashvili'' -- Introduction&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Janet Kozyra'' -- NSF GEM Program&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Howard Singer'' -- NOAA Agency Report&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Bill Lotko'' -- Overview of NSF AGS Portfolio Review and Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;wave-particle interactions&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17, Wednesday 10:30-12:15pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mark Engebretson (Challenge event) - Van Allen probes, NOAA, and ground observations of an intense Pc 1 wave event extending 12 hours in MLT and its resulting depletion of the outer radiation belt&lt;br /&gt;
# Justin Lee (Challenge event) - Discussion of Wave-Particle Interactions during the 18-22 Feb 2014 Storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Michael Hartinger -The effect of azimuthal wave number on ULF wave-particle interactions&lt;br /&gt;
# Chen Zhou - Excitation of Dayside Chorus Waves due to Magnetic Field Line Compression in Response to Interplanetary Shocks&lt;br /&gt;
# Homayon Aryan - The distribution of plasmaspheric Hiss and Chorus waves in the inner magnetosphere as functions of geomagnetic activity and solar wind parameters&lt;br /&gt;
# Robert Allen - Statistical study of EMIC waves observed by Cluster&lt;br /&gt;
# Konstantin Gamayunov - Multiscale nature of electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave development in Earth’s magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Vania Jordanova - RAM-SCB simulations of plasma wave dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
# Adam Kellerman - Forecasting the Earth’s radiation environment with GREEP and VERB: a synthesis of empirical- and physics-based modeling across multiple energies and spatial regions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Foreshock and Magnetosheath Phenomena&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Zixu Liu &amp;quot;THEMIS observations of tangential discontinuity-driven foreshock bubbles&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Nick Omidi (presented by Jean Berchem) “Impacts of SHFAs on the Magnetosheath &amp;amp; Magnetopause”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Hui Zhang &amp;quot;Evolution of HFAs: Cluster Observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Olga Gutynska “Density enhancements in the magnetosheath: comparison with simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Narges Ahmadi “Effects of Electron Anisotropy in Mirror Instability Evolution in the Magnetosheath”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #1:  Magnetopause crossing challenge and additional M&amp;amp;V contributions'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter:  Overview and initial results from the Magnetopause Crossing Challenge&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger:  Magnetopause dynamics during the March 17th, 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Redmon:  The future of GOES: Magnetic field and particle observation and modeling to determine magnetopause crossings&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Liemohn:  Assessment of the CCMC Experimental Real-time SWMF-Geospace Results&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Model skill as a function of solar wind driving.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Ilja Honkonen: Data / Model comparisons with GUMICS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''' M&amp;amp;V Wrap up:  Recent highlights and future plans for Metrics &amp;amp; Validation at GEM''' &lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer dicussion lead&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] HSO coordination ====&lt;br /&gt;
''Discussions on science and campaigns for the upcoming HSO satellite-ground coordination.''&lt;br /&gt;
*Vassilis Angelopoulos (Intro, an overview and THEMIS-MMS coordination, THEMIS plans)&lt;br /&gt;
*Toshi Nishimura (a PPT on coordination: times, geometry, tentative assets)&lt;br /&gt;
*Marilia Samara (on MMS and ground based?)&lt;br /&gt;
*Brian Anderson (AMPERE)&lt;br /&gt;
*Eric Donovan (TREx)&lt;br /&gt;
*Stephen Mende (AGOs)&lt;br /&gt;
*Jo Baker (SuperDARN)&lt;br /&gt;
*Yukinaga Miyashita (ERG)&lt;br /&gt;
*Naritoshi Kitamura (Geotail)&lt;br /&gt;
*Sasha Ukhorsky (Van Allen Probes)&lt;br /&gt;
*Marc Lessard (WAIS)&lt;br /&gt;
*Peter Chi (ULTIMA)&lt;br /&gt;
*Drew Turner, Seth Claudepierre, Jacob Bortnik, Mike Hartinger, Shin Ohtani, Jimmy Raeder, Wen Li, Bill Lotko, Rick Chappell, Liz McDonald, Frank Toffoletto, Paul Cassak (Science comments)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;plasma-field coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 1:30-3:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith - Plasmaspheric Suprathermal Heating from Cyclotron Resonance with Equatorial Noise&lt;br /&gt;
# Raluca Ilie - Calculating the Inductive electric fields in the terrestrial magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Samuel Califf - Van Allen Probes observations of SAPS during the 28 June 2013 geomagnetic storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Hong Zhao - The evolution of ring current ion energy density and energy content during geomagnetic storms based on Van Allen Probes measurements&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang	- “Trunk-like” heavy ion structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
# Cristian Ferradas -	Ion nose spectral structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. David Sibeck “The Solar wind Magnetosphere Ionosphere Link Explorer (SMILE) Mission”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Michael Hartinger “The global structure and time evolution of dayside magnetopause surface eigenmodes”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Brian Walsh “KH waves at the dayside magnetopause”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Chih-Ping Wang “The hot electron enhancement in mid-tail magnetosheath and its dawn-dusk asymmetry”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Sun-Hee Lee (Presented by Hui Zhang) “Cold dense plasma observed at the Dayside Magnetopause and their dependence on solar wind and geomagnetic conditions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #2:  ULF Wave Challenge - 10 minutes per talk, please...'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Seth Claudepierre: ULF Wave Challenge overview and addressable science questions&lt;br /&gt;
'' Observations'' &lt;br /&gt;
* Ian Mann: Preliminary challenge time periods based on ground magnetometers&lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi: Global distribution of ULF power from ULTIMA, and in-situ observations of poloidal waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Ashar Ali: From Van Allen Probes E &amp;amp; B measurements to radial diffusion coefficients.&lt;br /&gt;
* Chih-Ping Wang:  Observations (RBSP, THEMIS, Geotail) and simulations (LFM) of a 2-hour ULF wave interval.&lt;br /&gt;
'' Simulations ''&lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter:  Newly developed CCMC analysis tools supporting the ULF Challenge, and initial results&lt;br /&gt;
* Colin Komar:  ULF power in the BATSRUS model and resonance conditions with electrons&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Lysak: Complementary ULF model  &lt;br /&gt;
* Slava Merkin: ULF waves in the LFM. &lt;br /&gt;
* Scot Elkington:  Mode structure calculations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] SPEDAS Software ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Topic: &amp;quot;magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 3:30-5:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Dan Welling - Relationship between ionospheric outflow and the ring current&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov - Superthermal Electrons Magnetosphere – Ionosphere Coupling in the Regions of Diffuse Aurora&lt;br /&gt;
# Megan Gillies - Investigating pulsating aurora at low electron energies&lt;br /&gt;
# Ryan Mcgranaghan - Modes of high-latitude conductance variability derived from DMSP F6-F8 and F16-F18 energetic electron precipitation observations: Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis&lt;br /&gt;
# Alexa Halford  (challenge event) - BARREL Observations of long period precipitation on Jan 26th 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang   (challenge event) - EMIC waves and associated relativistic electron precipitation on 25-26 January 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu  (challenge event) - Modeling ionospheric electron precipitation due to wave particle interactions in the ring current during the 25-26 January 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
# Yi-Jiun Su (challenge event) -RBSP/MagEIS observations: Local electron acceleration in the inner radiation belt?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Hyunju Connor “Thermospheric heating in the high-latitude dayside regions after the sudden enhancement of solar wind dynamic pressure: OpenGGCM-CTIM results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Denny Oliveira &amp;lt;dennymauricio@gmail.com&amp;gt; “Impact angle control of IP shock geoeffectiveness: results of simulations and observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Michael Hartinger “The effect of northern-southern hemisphere conductivity asymmetries on ground magnetic responses during a large solar wind transient”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Christina Chu “Hot Flow Anomalies at the Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere + Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Masha Kuznetsova (CCMC), Lutz Rastaetter (CCMC), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection), &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) satellites were recently launched to measure the electron dissipation region during magnetic reconnection.  NASA's Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC), a repository of codes and models with runs-on-request, is pursuing support of MMS science, including the implementation of particle-in-cell simulations to their portfolio.  This session will include a discussion of what capabilities members of the community (modelers and observers alike) would like from CCMC for MMS science.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] TDAS demo ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thursday, June 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''SWMI tutorial''' by ''Robert Fear'' -- Flux transfer events: Looking ahead to MMS&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Student-invited tutorial''' by ''Barbara Giles'' -- Engage in NASA's newest flagship to understand the fundamental process of magnetic reconnection -- Magnetospheric Multiscale&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Analysis of Extreme Events”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surja Sharma: overview talk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jeff Love: Dst statistics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slava Merkin: ionospheric turbulence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allison Jaynes: seed populations of relativistic electrons&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Challenge work in progress, OCB work especially welcome&lt;br /&gt;
*Speakers including Peter Porazik 'Modification of the loss cone for energetic particles', Raluca Ilie &amp;quot;mapping isotropic boundaries to the tail&amp;quot;, Phil Valek &amp;quot;TWINS/RBSP comparison on Nov 14., 2012 storm, Liz MacDonald &amp;quot;OCB scenario Nov 14 2012&amp;quot;, Alexa Halford &amp;quot;BARREL OCB observations,&amp;quot; Chu Xiangning &amp;quot;&amp;quot; and more&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics include overlap with TIMI (role of entropy bubbles in the inner magnetosphere), as well as other topics relevant to both focus groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presenters: &amp;lt;presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Wiltberger&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Henderson(LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Sheng-Hsien (Sean) Chen (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Matina Gkioulidou (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Xueling Shi (VTech)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jian Yang (Rice U.)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bing Yang (U. Calgary)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Geospace Systems Science + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Joe Borovsky (Systems), Bill Lotko (Systems), Vadim Uritsky (Systems), Juan Valdivia (Systems), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Binzheng Zhang&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Colin Komar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Misha Sitnov - tearing stability criterion'&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Bill Lotko - effects of auroral (low-altitude) field-aligned potential drops on nightside reconnection and energy flow in MI coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*The final session, surveying progress and the path forward!&lt;br /&gt;
*Ideas to consider: EOS or review article, new focus group (and topics?), upcoming BARREL-SWEDEN campaign&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Drew Turner, (Aerospace)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Sasha Ukhorskiy, (JHU/APL), “Proton Acceleration at Injection Fronts in the Inner Magnetosphere”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Chih-Ping Wang, (UCLA) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Christine Gabrielse, (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Larry Lyons (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Jian Yang, (Rice)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Systems-Science Tools, Methodologies, and Results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jacob Bortnik: Machine learning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Misha Balikhin: New model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Konstantin Gamayunov: System-based approach to EMIC waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delores Knipp: Estimating uncertainty in DMSP Poynting&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lutz Rastatter: Modeling joule heat in the ionosphere&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Colby Haggerty, heating during reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Shan Wang - Electron heating during magnetotail reconnection: deriving the heating coefficient and effects of unloading&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Liang Wang - Integrating a multi-fluid moment code into OpenGGCM&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Rick Wilder, moving X-line in cusp&lt;br /&gt;
:5. Paul Cassak, asymmetric reconnection with flow shear&lt;br /&gt;
:6. Jason Shuster, the microphysics of how electrons are energized by the reconnection process&lt;br /&gt;
:7. Yi-Hsin Liu, Orientation of x-line in asymmetric reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
1. Jodie Barker Ream (UCLA), “Pi2 propagation in global MHD simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Aaron Schutza, (Rice), &amp;quot;Thin filament simulations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Roxanne Katus, (Univ. Michigan), “Magnetospheric ion temperature derived from TWINS flux data”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. John Wygant, (Univ. Minnesota)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Zhengwei Cheng, (UNH), , “A case study of the particle carriers of field-aligned currents in the magnetotail during a substorm: Cluster observation.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Jiang Liu (UCLA), “Asymmetric FACs of dipolarizing flux bundles and how they form the substorm current wedge”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friday, June 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MIC tutorial''' by ''Stein Haaland'' -- Cold ion outflow from the polar cap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Behavior of the Geospace System”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jonathan Krall: SAMI3 simulations of M-I-T coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wen Li: solar wind and the radiation belts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vania Jordanova: multiple connections in the magnetosphere in the SHIELDS project&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Borovsky: behavior modes from global correlation analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2499</id>
		<title>2015 Summer Workshop</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2499"/>
		<updated>2015-06-16T21:24:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* [FG] Metrics and Validation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''June 14-19 2015'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Viceroy Hotels, Resorts &amp;amp; Residences, Snowmass, Colorado'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is a ''fluid'' list of speakers provided by the GEM Workshop Coordinator and Focus Groups. The information here serves as a rough guide for those who wish to know the most updated session plans. Due to the nature of the GEM Workshop, Focus Groups may continue to revise their agenda as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All other information about the 2015 Summer Workshop can be found at the [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html GEM Meeting Coordinator Website]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Monday, June 15 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MPS tutorial''' by ''Toshi Nishimura'' -- Fast flow channels in the magnetotail and auroral oval: Reconnection, substorm and beyond&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GSM tutorial''' by ''Alex Glocer'' -- Global modeling of the space environment system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail Environment and Dynamics at Lunar Distances ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hui Zhang: Transient phenomena at tail Bow shock and magnetopause &lt;br /&gt;
* Sheng-Hsien Chen: K-H at the magnetopause and waves at LLBL &lt;br /&gt;
* Denny Oliveria: Tail response to interplanetary shocks&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Stubbs (presented by David Sibeck): Mid-tail structure&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Fear: Magnetotail structure associated with transpolar arcs&lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi: Ion cyclotron waves at the Moon and their connection to the plasma sheet and the lunar exosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* Ivan Vasko:Geotail observations in mid and distant tail&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrei Runov: Reconnection in the mid-tail&lt;br /&gt;
* John Lyon: LFM simulation of bubble formation in mid-tail during growth phase&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: The role of mid-tail in Geospace Systems Science&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Schunk: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 1 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Vince Eccles: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 2 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Abdallah Barakat: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 3 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Katie Garcia-Sage: MFLFM Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Simulation Results (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Lotko: Overview of Recent LFM Modeling and Thoughts for the Future (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Lyons: Review--Hybrid scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Henderson: Review--Inside-out scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Kepko: Review--Outside-in scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Yukinaga Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Phil Pritchett: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Joachim Birn: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Misha Sitnov: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Mostafa El-Alaoui: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Walk-ins welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 1 (Mon, 01:30-03:00 PM, Salon 2):''' “Radiation Belt (RB) observations and modeling results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Weichao Tu and Steve Morley''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Mary Hudson: Recent simulation of the 'St Patrick's Day storm'&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Alexander Drozdov: The VERB code modeling of the St. Patrick’s day Storm&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Dan Baker: Impenetrable Barrier during March 17 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Allison Jaynes: Fast diffusion of ultra-relativistic electrons: 17 March 2015 storm event&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Thiago Brito: Simulations on Radiation Belt Electron Precipitation Response to ULF Waves&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Drew Turner: Storm-time analysis of RB&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Xinlin Li: Deep Injections of 10s – 100s of keV electrons (RBSP observations)&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Jay Albert: Modeling “peculiar” pitch angle distributions with MS waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models Compared to Observations'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionos-Magnetosphere Models for GEM Storms (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn Kistler: Cluster Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: LANL Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Stein Haaland: The Estimation of Cold Plasma Outflow During Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Robert McPherron: Point Processes: Association of Lists&lt;br /&gt;
*Nadine Kalmoni: Auroral dispersion relation&lt;br /&gt;
*Kyle Murphy: tools and methods&lt;br /&gt;
*Eric Donovan: Circle grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 2 (Mon, 03:30-05:00 PM, Salon 2):''' “Various magnetospheric wave characteristics and their global distribution required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Wen Li and Jay Albert''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Ashar Ali: Radial Diffusion Coefficients Using E and B Field Data from the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Seth Claudepierre: Advertisement for the GEM ULF Wave Challenge &lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xinlin Li: Relation between ULF and radial diffusion of RB electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Lauren Blum: The relationship between EMIC waves and radiation belt electron precipitation&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Wen Li: Global distribution of chorus wave intensity using the statistical model and POES technique&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Jay Albert: Nonlinear wave-particle interaction&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Qianli Ma: Evaluation of electron scattering due to typical magnetosonic waves using analytical formula&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Lunjin Chen: The effect of bounce resonance with magnetosonic waves on the radiation belt electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:9.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Storm-induced energization and losses of radiation belt electrons: Effects of wave obliquity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Inter-Model Comparison for GEM Storm Periods and New Measurements'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued Discussion of Merged Models and Measurements Comparison&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura: Ion Outflow Topics (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Varney: Hysteresis Effects in Coupled MFLFM-IPWM Models (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Barbara Giles: Initial Plasma Measurements from MMS (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Krall: Ion Fluxes Into and Out of a Model Plasmasphere During Storm and Plasmasphere Refilling During Quiet Time (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Vassilis Angelopoulos: HSO&lt;br /&gt;
*FG learders: Future planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tuesday, June 16 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Weichao Tu'' -- Quantitative Modeling of Radiation Belt Dynamics: Overview and Challenges&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Seth Claudepierre'' -- Van Allen Probes: Where We've Been and Where We're Going&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 3 (Tue, 10:30-12:15 PM, Salon 2):''' “Seed populations, plasma density, and magnetic field configuration required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jay Albert and Weichao Tu''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Natalia Ganushkina: Low energy electrons in the inner magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Mick Denton: An empirical model of electron and ion fluxes derived from observations at geosynchronous orbit&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Alex Boyd: Quantifying the Radiation Belt Seed Population During the Van Allen Probes Era&lt;br /&gt;
:4.    Jian Yang: RCM-E simulation of energetic electron injections during an idealized storm&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Time Domain Structures: generation mechanisms and effects for electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Xiangrong Fu: Double layers associated with electron/ion acoustic waves&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	James McCollough: DSX is still happening&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Alex Crew: New results from FIREBIRD II&lt;br /&gt;
:9.    Quintin Schiller: A novel technique to apply electron lifetimes to radial diffusion models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''General Discussion of Modeling and Observations and Focus Group Planning'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Omelchenko: Global Multiscale Magnetospheric Simulations: HYPERS (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* John Wygant: The Powering of Highly Efficient Poynting Flux-Driven Wind Using Polar Spacecraft Measurements (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bruce Fritz: Ion Upflow Dependence on Ionospheric Density and Solar Photoionization (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Peterson: A New Look at DE-1 Escaping Ion Observations at Non-Storm Times (10 min) -- Accompanying poster by Kristina Lu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms + Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Shin Ohtani - Morphological mapping based on the stability of the magnetotail&lt;br /&gt;
*Emma Spanswick - Riometer injection&lt;br /&gt;
*Elizabeth Roy - Open-closed boundary&lt;br /&gt;
*Jiang Liu - Current wedge structuring&lt;br /&gt;
*Chao Yue - 3-D magnetic field modeling&lt;br /&gt;
*Chu Xiangning &amp;quot;how does flux transport and pileup change mapping during substorms? &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 4 (Tue, 01:30-03:00 PM, Salon 2):''' “RB &amp;quot;dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;buildup&amp;quot; challenges and Planning for future activities”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Steve Morley and Wen Li''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General short presentations (01:30-02:15 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Yuri Shprits: Recent results of the reanalysis&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Brian Kress: Observations and modeling of rebuilding during storms &lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Zhao Li: 3D test-particle simulation of the 17-18 March, 2013 CME-shock driven storm &lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Shri Kanekal and Dan Baker: Electron bursts during 17 March 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Buildup&amp;quot; Challenges (02:15-03:00 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Drew Turner: Candidate “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	QARBM FG leaders: Discussion of “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:7.    Open discussions and plan for future FG activities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two SIMIC sessions on Tuesday afternoon will focus mainly on the chosen events: 2013-03-17 and 2012-11-01 storms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A tentative list of presenters:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lyons/Nishimura/Gallardo (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bea Gallardo (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Rick Wilder (LASP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Margaret Chen (Aerospace)&lt;br /&gt;
# Gang Lu (NCAR)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jonathan Krall (NRL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Alex Glocer for Mei-Ching Fok (NASA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Liemohn and Roxanne Katus (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu and Vania Jordanova (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Elizabeth MacDonald (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bob Lysak (Univ. Minnesota)&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Schulz&lt;br /&gt;
# James Weygand (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Phil Valek (SwRI) &lt;br /&gt;
# Doug Cramer (UNH)&lt;br /&gt;
# Brian Anderson (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Vassilis Angelopoulos (TIMI), Pontus Brandt (TIMI), John Lyon (TIMI), Frank Toffoletto (TIMI), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene Setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Joachim Birn&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Jim Drake&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks (not in order)&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Slava Merkin - magnetotail stability in the presence of B_z minimum&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Misha Sitnov - new class of equilibria taking into account dipole field and B_z hump&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Misha Sitnov - temperature increase at dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Haoming Liang (w/Ashour-Abdalla and Walker) - oxygen effects on dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:5. Ying Zou - imager observations of PBI triggering by polar cap structures&lt;br /&gt;
:6. Toshi Nishimura - MHD simulation of nightside localized reconnection triggering by lobe flow channels&lt;br /&gt;
:7. Yu Lin - global hybrid simulation of the storm-time magnetotail and reconnection flux ropes&lt;br /&gt;
:8. Phil Pritchett - instability of current sheets with a localized accumulation of magnetic flux&lt;br /&gt;
:9. Phil Pritchett - structure of reconnection flow jets&lt;br /&gt;
:10. Joo Hwang (by David Sibeck) - recent MMS observations of dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:11. Mike Wiltberger - flow channels in global MHD simulations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling + Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 5 (Tue, 03:30-05:00 PM, Salon 2):''' “Joint session with “Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions” FG”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jichun Zhang and Weichao Tu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Wen Li: Quantitative simulation of radiation belt electron dynamics using 3D diffusion code&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Yuri Shprits: Combined Convective and Diffusive Simulation: VERB-4D Results&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xiangrong Fu: Modeling EMIC wave generation from ring current ions&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Anthony Saikin: The geomagnetic condition dependence of the spatial distributions of EMIC waves observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Jacob Bortnik: Generation of chorus waves in a lab plasma&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Xin An: Linear excitation of whistler waves&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Shuo Wu: Hybrid Code Simulations of Whistler Waves in Compressed Dipole Field&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Chih-ping Wang: Multi-point observation of ULF waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Continuing the [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/2015_Summer_Workshop#.5BFG.5D_Storm-time_Inner_Magnetosphere-Ionosphere_Convection SIMIC session at 1330-1500].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Time Lags in Solar Wind-Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Interactions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
speakers will include&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Mick Denton: mass transport&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob McPherron: physical interpretation of time lags&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Roger Varney: ionospheric outflow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Shin Ohtani: circuit timescales&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob Clauer: ionospheric convection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wednesday, June 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Vladimir Papitashvili'' -- Introduction&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Janet Kozyra'' -- NSF GEM Program&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Howard Singer'' -- NOAA Agency Report&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Bill Lotko'' -- Overview of NSF AGS Portfolio Review and Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;wave-particle interactions&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17, Wednesday 10:30-12:15pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mark Engebretson (Challenge event) - Van Allen probes, NOAA, and ground observations of an intense Pc 1 wave event extending 12 hours in MLT and its resulting depletion of the outer radiation belt&lt;br /&gt;
# Justin Lee (Challenge event) - Discussion of Wave-Particle Interactions during the 18-22 Feb 2014 Storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Michael Hartinger -The effect of azimuthal wave number on ULF wave-particle interactions&lt;br /&gt;
# Chen Zhou - Excitation of Dayside Chorus Waves due to Magnetic Field Line Compression in Response to Interplanetary Shocks&lt;br /&gt;
# Homayon Aryan - The distribution of plasmaspheric Hiss and Chorus waves in the inner magnetosphere as functions of geomagnetic activity and solar wind parameters&lt;br /&gt;
# Robert Allen - Statistical study of EMIC waves observed by Cluster&lt;br /&gt;
# Konstantin Gamayunov - Multiscale nature of electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave development in Earth’s magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Vania Jordanova - RAM-SCB simulations of plasma wave dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
# Adam Kellerman - Forecasting the Earth’s radiation environment with GREEP and VERB: a synthesis of empirical- and physics-based modeling across multiple energies and spatial regions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Foreshock and Magnetosheath Phenomena&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Zixu Liu &amp;quot;THEMIS observations of tangential discontinuity-driven foreshock bubbles&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Nick Omidi (presented by Jean Berchem) “Impacts of SHFAs on the Magnetosheath &amp;amp; Magnetopause”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Hui Zhang &amp;quot;Evolution of HFAs: Cluster Observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Olga Gutynska “Density enhancements in the magnetosheath: comparison with simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Narges Ahmadi “Effects of Electron Anisotropy in Mirror Instability Evolution in the Magnetosheath”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #1:  Magnetopause crossing challenge and additional M&amp;amp;V contributions'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter:  Overview and initial results from the Magnetopause Crossing Challenge&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger:  Magnetopause dynamics during the March 17th, 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Redmon:  The future of GOES: Magnetic field and particle observation and modeling to determine magnetopause crossings&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Liemohn:  Assessment of the CCMC Experimental Real-time SWMF-Geospace Results&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Model skill as a function of solar wind driving.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Ilja Honkonen: Data / Model comparisons with GUMICS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''' M&amp;amp;V Wrap up:  Recent highlights and future plans for Metrics &amp;amp; Validation at GEM''' &lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer dicussion lead&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] HSO coordination ====&lt;br /&gt;
''Discussions on science and campaigns for the upcoming HSO satellite-ground coordination.''&lt;br /&gt;
*Vassilis Angelopoulos (Intro, an overview and THEMIS-MMS coordination, THEMIS plans)&lt;br /&gt;
*Toshi Nishimura (a PPT on coordination: times, geometry, tentative assets)&lt;br /&gt;
*Marilia Samara (on MMS and ground based?)&lt;br /&gt;
*Brian Anderson (AMPERE)&lt;br /&gt;
*Eric Donovan (TREx)&lt;br /&gt;
*Stephen Mende (AGOs)&lt;br /&gt;
*Jo Baker (SuperDARN)&lt;br /&gt;
*Yukinaga Miyashita (ERG)&lt;br /&gt;
*Naritoshi Kitamura (Geotail)&lt;br /&gt;
*Sasha Ukhorsky (Van Allen Probes)&lt;br /&gt;
*Marc Lessard (WAIS)&lt;br /&gt;
*Peter Chi (ULTIMA)&lt;br /&gt;
*Drew Turner, Seth Claudepierre, Jacob Bortnik, Mike Hartinger, Shin Ohtani, Jimmy Raeder, Wen Li, Bill Lotko, Rick Chappell, Liz McDonald, Frank Toffoletto, Paul Cassak (Science comments)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;plasma-field coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 1:30-3:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith - Plasmaspheric Suprathermal Heating from Cyclotron Resonance with Equatorial Noise&lt;br /&gt;
# Raluca Ilie - Calculating the Inductive electric fields in the terrestrial magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Samuel Califf - Van Allen Probes observations of SAPS during the 28 June 2013 geomagnetic storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Hong Zhao - The evolution of ring current ion energy density and energy content during geomagnetic storms based on Van Allen Probes measurements&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang	- “Trunk-like” heavy ion structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
# Cristian Ferradas -	Ion nose spectral structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. David Sibeck “The Solar wind Magnetosphere Ionosphere Link Explorer (SMILE) Mission”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Michael Hartinger “The global structure and time evolution of dayside magnetopause surface eigenmodes”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Brian Walsh “KH waves at the dayside magnetopause”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Chih-Ping Wang “The hot electron enhancement in mid-tail magnetosheath and its dawn-dusk asymmetry”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Sun-Hee Lee (Presented by Hui Zhang) “Cold dense plasma observed at the Dayside Magnetopause and their dependence on solar wind and geomagnetic conditions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #2:  ULF Wave Challenge'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Seth Claudepierre: ULF Wave Challenge overview and addressable science questions&lt;br /&gt;
'' Observations'' &lt;br /&gt;
* Ian Mann: Preliminary challenge time periods based on ground magnetometers&lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi: Global distribution of ULF power from ULTIMA, and in-situ observations of poloidal waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Ashar Ali: From Van Allen Probes E &amp;amp; B measurements to radial diffusion coefficients.&lt;br /&gt;
* Chih-Ping Wang:  Observations (RBSP, THEMIS, Geotail) and simulations (LFM) of a 2-hour ULF wave interval.&lt;br /&gt;
'' Simulations ''&lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter:  Newly developed CCMC analysis tools supporting the ULF Challenge, and initial results&lt;br /&gt;
* Colin Komar:  ULF power in the BATSRUS model and resonance conditions with electrons&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Lysak: Complementary ULF model  &lt;br /&gt;
* Slava Merkin: ULF waves in the LFM. &lt;br /&gt;
* Scot Elkington:  Mode structure calculations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] SPEDAS Software ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Topic: &amp;quot;magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 3:30-5:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Dan Welling - Relationship between ionospheric outflow and the ring current&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov - Superthermal Electrons Magnetosphere – Ionosphere Coupling in the Regions of Diffuse Aurora&lt;br /&gt;
# Megan Gillies - Investigating pulsating aurora at low electron energies&lt;br /&gt;
# Ryan Mcgranaghan - Modes of high-latitude conductance variability derived from DMSP F6-F8 and F16-F18 energetic electron precipitation observations: Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis&lt;br /&gt;
# Alexa Halford  (challenge event) - BARREL Observations of long period precipitation on Jan 26th 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang   (challenge event) - EMIC waves and associated relativistic electron precipitation on 25-26 January 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu  (challenge event) - Modeling ionospheric electron precipitation due to wave particle interactions in the ring current during the 25-26 January 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
# Yi-Jiun Su (challenge event) -RBSP/MagEIS observations: Local electron acceleration in the inner radiation belt?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Hyunju Connor “Thermospheric heating in the high-latitude dayside regions after the sudden enhancement of solar wind dynamic pressure: OpenGGCM-CTIM results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Denny Oliveira &amp;lt;dennymauricio@gmail.com&amp;gt; “Impact angle control of IP shock geoeffectiveness: results of simulations and observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Michael Hartinger “The effect of northern-southern hemisphere conductivity asymmetries on ground magnetic responses during a large solar wind transient”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Christina Chu “Hot Flow Anomalies at the Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere + Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Masha Kuznetsova (CCMC), Lutz Rastaetter (CCMC), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection), &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) satellites were recently launched to measure the electron dissipation region during magnetic reconnection.  NASA's Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC), a repository of codes and models with runs-on-request, is pursuing support of MMS science, including the implementation of particle-in-cell simulations to their portfolio.  This session will include a discussion of what capabilities members of the community (modelers and observers alike) would like from CCMC for MMS science.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] TDAS demo ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thursday, June 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''SWMI tutorial''' by ''Robert Fear'' -- Flux transfer events: Looking ahead to MMS&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Student-invited tutorial''' by ''Barbara Giles'' -- Engage in NASA's newest flagship to understand the fundamental process of magnetic reconnection -- Magnetospheric Multiscale&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Analysis of Extreme Events”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surja Sharma: overview talk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jeff Love: Dst statistics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slava Merkin: ionospheric turbulence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allison Jaynes: seed populations of relativistic electrons&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Challenge work in progress, OCB work especially welcome&lt;br /&gt;
*Speakers including Peter Porazik 'Modification of the loss cone for energetic particles', Raluca Ilie &amp;quot;mapping isotropic boundaries to the tail&amp;quot;, Phil Valek &amp;quot;TWINS/RBSP comparison on Nov 14., 2012 storm, Liz MacDonald &amp;quot;OCB scenario Nov 14 2012&amp;quot;, Alexa Halford &amp;quot;BARREL OCB observations,&amp;quot; Chu Xiangning &amp;quot;&amp;quot; and more&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics include overlap with TIMI (role of entropy bubbles in the inner magnetosphere), as well as other topics relevant to both focus groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presenters: &amp;lt;presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Wiltberger&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Henderson(LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Sheng-Hsien (Sean) Chen (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Matina Gkioulidou (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Xueling Shi (VTech)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jian Yang (Rice U.)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bing Yang (U. Calgary)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Geospace Systems Science + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Joe Borovsky (Systems), Bill Lotko (Systems), Vadim Uritsky (Systems), Juan Valdivia (Systems), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Binzheng Zhang&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Colin Komar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Misha Sitnov - tearing stability criterion'&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Bill Lotko - effects of auroral (low-altitude) field-aligned potential drops on nightside reconnection and energy flow in MI coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*The final session, surveying progress and the path forward!&lt;br /&gt;
*Ideas to consider: EOS or review article, new focus group (and topics?), upcoming BARREL-SWEDEN campaign&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Drew Turner, (Aerospace)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Sasha Ukhorskiy, (JHU/APL), “Proton Acceleration at Injection Fronts in the Inner Magnetosphere”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Chih-Ping Wang, (UCLA) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Christine Gabrielse, (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Larry Lyons (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Jian Yang, (Rice)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Systems-Science Tools, Methodologies, and Results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jacob Bortnik: Machine learning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Misha Balikhin: New model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Konstantin Gamayunov: System-based approach to EMIC waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delores Knipp: Estimating uncertainty in DMSP Poynting&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lutz Rastatter: Modeling joule heat in the ionosphere&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Colby Haggerty, heating during reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Shan Wang - Electron heating during magnetotail reconnection: deriving the heating coefficient and effects of unloading&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Liang Wang - Integrating a multi-fluid moment code into OpenGGCM&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Rick Wilder, moving X-line in cusp&lt;br /&gt;
:5. Paul Cassak, asymmetric reconnection with flow shear&lt;br /&gt;
:6. Jason Shuster, the microphysics of how electrons are energized by the reconnection process&lt;br /&gt;
:7. Yi-Hsin Liu, Orientation of x-line in asymmetric reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
1. Jodie Barker Ream (UCLA), “Pi2 propagation in global MHD simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Aaron Schutza, (Rice), &amp;quot;Thin filament simulations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Roxanne Katus, (Univ. Michigan), “Magnetospheric ion temperature derived from TWINS flux data”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. John Wygant, (Univ. Minnesota)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Zhengwei Cheng, (UNH), , “A case study of the particle carriers of field-aligned currents in the magnetotail during a substorm: Cluster observation.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Jiang Liu (UCLA), “Asymmetric FACs of dipolarizing flux bundles and how they form the substorm current wedge”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friday, June 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MIC tutorial''' by ''Stein Haaland'' -- Cold ion outflow from the polar cap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Behavior of the Geospace System”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jonathan Krall: SAMI3 simulations of M-I-T coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wen Li: solar wind and the radiation belts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vania Jordanova: multiple connections in the magnetosphere in the SHIELDS project&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Borovsky: behavior modes from global correlation analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2498</id>
		<title>2015 Summer Workshop</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2498"/>
		<updated>2015-06-16T21:23:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* [FG] Metrics and Validation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''June 14-19 2015'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Viceroy Hotels, Resorts &amp;amp; Residences, Snowmass, Colorado'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is a ''fluid'' list of speakers provided by the GEM Workshop Coordinator and Focus Groups. The information here serves as a rough guide for those who wish to know the most updated session plans. Due to the nature of the GEM Workshop, Focus Groups may continue to revise their agenda as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All other information about the 2015 Summer Workshop can be found at the [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html GEM Meeting Coordinator Website]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Monday, June 15 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MPS tutorial''' by ''Toshi Nishimura'' -- Fast flow channels in the magnetotail and auroral oval: Reconnection, substorm and beyond&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GSM tutorial''' by ''Alex Glocer'' -- Global modeling of the space environment system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail Environment and Dynamics at Lunar Distances ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hui Zhang: Transient phenomena at tail Bow shock and magnetopause &lt;br /&gt;
* Sheng-Hsien Chen: K-H at the magnetopause and waves at LLBL &lt;br /&gt;
* Denny Oliveria: Tail response to interplanetary shocks&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Stubbs (presented by David Sibeck): Mid-tail structure&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Fear: Magnetotail structure associated with transpolar arcs&lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi: Ion cyclotron waves at the Moon and their connection to the plasma sheet and the lunar exosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* Ivan Vasko:Geotail observations in mid and distant tail&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrei Runov: Reconnection in the mid-tail&lt;br /&gt;
* John Lyon: LFM simulation of bubble formation in mid-tail during growth phase&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: The role of mid-tail in Geospace Systems Science&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Schunk: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 1 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Vince Eccles: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 2 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Abdallah Barakat: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 3 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Katie Garcia-Sage: MFLFM Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Simulation Results (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Lotko: Overview of Recent LFM Modeling and Thoughts for the Future (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Lyons: Review--Hybrid scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Henderson: Review--Inside-out scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Kepko: Review--Outside-in scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Yukinaga Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Phil Pritchett: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Joachim Birn: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Misha Sitnov: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Mostafa El-Alaoui: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Walk-ins welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 1 (Mon, 01:30-03:00 PM, Salon 2):''' “Radiation Belt (RB) observations and modeling results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Weichao Tu and Steve Morley''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Mary Hudson: Recent simulation of the 'St Patrick's Day storm'&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Alexander Drozdov: The VERB code modeling of the St. Patrick’s day Storm&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Dan Baker: Impenetrable Barrier during March 17 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Allison Jaynes: Fast diffusion of ultra-relativistic electrons: 17 March 2015 storm event&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Thiago Brito: Simulations on Radiation Belt Electron Precipitation Response to ULF Waves&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Drew Turner: Storm-time analysis of RB&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Xinlin Li: Deep Injections of 10s – 100s of keV electrons (RBSP observations)&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Jay Albert: Modeling “peculiar” pitch angle distributions with MS waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models Compared to Observations'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionos-Magnetosphere Models for GEM Storms (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn Kistler: Cluster Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: LANL Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Stein Haaland: The Estimation of Cold Plasma Outflow During Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Robert McPherron: Point Processes: Association of Lists&lt;br /&gt;
*Nadine Kalmoni: Auroral dispersion relation&lt;br /&gt;
*Kyle Murphy: tools and methods&lt;br /&gt;
*Eric Donovan: Circle grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 2 (Mon, 03:30-05:00 PM, Salon 2):''' “Various magnetospheric wave characteristics and their global distribution required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Wen Li and Jay Albert''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Ashar Ali: Radial Diffusion Coefficients Using E and B Field Data from the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Seth Claudepierre: Advertisement for the GEM ULF Wave Challenge &lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xinlin Li: Relation between ULF and radial diffusion of RB electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Lauren Blum: The relationship between EMIC waves and radiation belt electron precipitation&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Wen Li: Global distribution of chorus wave intensity using the statistical model and POES technique&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Jay Albert: Nonlinear wave-particle interaction&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Qianli Ma: Evaluation of electron scattering due to typical magnetosonic waves using analytical formula&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Lunjin Chen: The effect of bounce resonance with magnetosonic waves on the radiation belt electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:9.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Storm-induced energization and losses of radiation belt electrons: Effects of wave obliquity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Inter-Model Comparison for GEM Storm Periods and New Measurements'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued Discussion of Merged Models and Measurements Comparison&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura: Ion Outflow Topics (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Varney: Hysteresis Effects in Coupled MFLFM-IPWM Models (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Barbara Giles: Initial Plasma Measurements from MMS (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Krall: Ion Fluxes Into and Out of a Model Plasmasphere During Storm and Plasmasphere Refilling During Quiet Time (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Vassilis Angelopoulos: HSO&lt;br /&gt;
*FG learders: Future planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tuesday, June 16 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Weichao Tu'' -- Quantitative Modeling of Radiation Belt Dynamics: Overview and Challenges&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Seth Claudepierre'' -- Van Allen Probes: Where We've Been and Where We're Going&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 3 (Tue, 10:30-12:15 PM, Salon 2):''' “Seed populations, plasma density, and magnetic field configuration required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jay Albert and Weichao Tu''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Natalia Ganushkina: Low energy electrons in the inner magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Mick Denton: An empirical model of electron and ion fluxes derived from observations at geosynchronous orbit&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Alex Boyd: Quantifying the Radiation Belt Seed Population During the Van Allen Probes Era&lt;br /&gt;
:4.    Jian Yang: RCM-E simulation of energetic electron injections during an idealized storm&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Time Domain Structures: generation mechanisms and effects for electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Xiangrong Fu: Double layers associated with electron/ion acoustic waves&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	James McCollough: DSX is still happening&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Alex Crew: New results from FIREBIRD II&lt;br /&gt;
:9.    Quintin Schiller: A novel technique to apply electron lifetimes to radial diffusion models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''General Discussion of Modeling and Observations and Focus Group Planning'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Omelchenko: Global Multiscale Magnetospheric Simulations: HYPERS (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* John Wygant: The Powering of Highly Efficient Poynting Flux-Driven Wind Using Polar Spacecraft Measurements (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bruce Fritz: Ion Upflow Dependence on Ionospheric Density and Solar Photoionization (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Peterson: A New Look at DE-1 Escaping Ion Observations at Non-Storm Times (10 min) -- Accompanying poster by Kristina Lu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms + Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Shin Ohtani - Morphological mapping based on the stability of the magnetotail&lt;br /&gt;
*Emma Spanswick - Riometer injection&lt;br /&gt;
*Elizabeth Roy - Open-closed boundary&lt;br /&gt;
*Jiang Liu - Current wedge structuring&lt;br /&gt;
*Chao Yue - 3-D magnetic field modeling&lt;br /&gt;
*Chu Xiangning &amp;quot;how does flux transport and pileup change mapping during substorms? &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 4 (Tue, 01:30-03:00 PM, Salon 2):''' “RB &amp;quot;dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;buildup&amp;quot; challenges and Planning for future activities”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Steve Morley and Wen Li''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General short presentations (01:30-02:15 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Yuri Shprits: Recent results of the reanalysis&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Brian Kress: Observations and modeling of rebuilding during storms &lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Zhao Li: 3D test-particle simulation of the 17-18 March, 2013 CME-shock driven storm &lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Shri Kanekal and Dan Baker: Electron bursts during 17 March 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Buildup&amp;quot; Challenges (02:15-03:00 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Drew Turner: Candidate “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	QARBM FG leaders: Discussion of “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:7.    Open discussions and plan for future FG activities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two SIMIC sessions on Tuesday afternoon will focus mainly on the chosen events: 2013-03-17 and 2012-11-01 storms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A tentative list of presenters:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lyons/Nishimura/Gallardo (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bea Gallardo (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Rick Wilder (LASP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Margaret Chen (Aerospace)&lt;br /&gt;
# Gang Lu (NCAR)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jonathan Krall (NRL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Alex Glocer for Mei-Ching Fok (NASA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Liemohn and Roxanne Katus (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu and Vania Jordanova (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Elizabeth MacDonald (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bob Lysak (Univ. Minnesota)&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Schulz&lt;br /&gt;
# James Weygand (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Phil Valek (SwRI) &lt;br /&gt;
# Doug Cramer (UNH)&lt;br /&gt;
# Brian Anderson (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Vassilis Angelopoulos (TIMI), Pontus Brandt (TIMI), John Lyon (TIMI), Frank Toffoletto (TIMI), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene Setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Joachim Birn&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Jim Drake&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks (not in order)&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Slava Merkin - magnetotail stability in the presence of B_z minimum&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Misha Sitnov - new class of equilibria taking into account dipole field and B_z hump&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Misha Sitnov - temperature increase at dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Haoming Liang (w/Ashour-Abdalla and Walker) - oxygen effects on dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:5. Ying Zou - imager observations of PBI triggering by polar cap structures&lt;br /&gt;
:6. Toshi Nishimura - MHD simulation of nightside localized reconnection triggering by lobe flow channels&lt;br /&gt;
:7. Yu Lin - global hybrid simulation of the storm-time magnetotail and reconnection flux ropes&lt;br /&gt;
:8. Phil Pritchett - instability of current sheets with a localized accumulation of magnetic flux&lt;br /&gt;
:9. Phil Pritchett - structure of reconnection flow jets&lt;br /&gt;
:10. Joo Hwang (by David Sibeck) - recent MMS observations of dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:11. Mike Wiltberger - flow channels in global MHD simulations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling + Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 5 (Tue, 03:30-05:00 PM, Salon 2):''' “Joint session with “Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions” FG”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jichun Zhang and Weichao Tu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Wen Li: Quantitative simulation of radiation belt electron dynamics using 3D diffusion code&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Yuri Shprits: Combined Convective and Diffusive Simulation: VERB-4D Results&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xiangrong Fu: Modeling EMIC wave generation from ring current ions&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Anthony Saikin: The geomagnetic condition dependence of the spatial distributions of EMIC waves observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Jacob Bortnik: Generation of chorus waves in a lab plasma&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Xin An: Linear excitation of whistler waves&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Shuo Wu: Hybrid Code Simulations of Whistler Waves in Compressed Dipole Field&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Chih-ping Wang: Multi-point observation of ULF waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Continuing the [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/2015_Summer_Workshop#.5BFG.5D_Storm-time_Inner_Magnetosphere-Ionosphere_Convection SIMIC session at 1330-1500].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Time Lags in Solar Wind-Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Interactions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
speakers will include&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Mick Denton: mass transport&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob McPherron: physical interpretation of time lags&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Roger Varney: ionospheric outflow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Shin Ohtani: circuit timescales&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob Clauer: ionospheric convection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wednesday, June 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Vladimir Papitashvili'' -- Introduction&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Janet Kozyra'' -- NSF GEM Program&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Howard Singer'' -- NOAA Agency Report&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Bill Lotko'' -- Overview of NSF AGS Portfolio Review and Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;wave-particle interactions&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17, Wednesday 10:30-12:15pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mark Engebretson (Challenge event) - Van Allen probes, NOAA, and ground observations of an intense Pc 1 wave event extending 12 hours in MLT and its resulting depletion of the outer radiation belt&lt;br /&gt;
# Justin Lee (Challenge event) - Discussion of Wave-Particle Interactions during the 18-22 Feb 2014 Storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Michael Hartinger -The effect of azimuthal wave number on ULF wave-particle interactions&lt;br /&gt;
# Chen Zhou - Excitation of Dayside Chorus Waves due to Magnetic Field Line Compression in Response to Interplanetary Shocks&lt;br /&gt;
# Homayon Aryan - The distribution of plasmaspheric Hiss and Chorus waves in the inner magnetosphere as functions of geomagnetic activity and solar wind parameters&lt;br /&gt;
# Robert Allen - Statistical study of EMIC waves observed by Cluster&lt;br /&gt;
# Konstantin Gamayunov - Multiscale nature of electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave development in Earth’s magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Vania Jordanova - RAM-SCB simulations of plasma wave dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
# Adam Kellerman - Forecasting the Earth’s radiation environment with GREEP and VERB: a synthesis of empirical- and physics-based modeling across multiple energies and spatial regions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Foreshock and Magnetosheath Phenomena&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Zixu Liu &amp;quot;THEMIS observations of tangential discontinuity-driven foreshock bubbles&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Nick Omidi (presented by Jean Berchem) “Impacts of SHFAs on the Magnetosheath &amp;amp; Magnetopause”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Hui Zhang &amp;quot;Evolution of HFAs: Cluster Observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Olga Gutynska “Density enhancements in the magnetosheath: comparison with simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Narges Ahmadi “Effects of Electron Anisotropy in Mirror Instability Evolution in the Magnetosheath”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #1:  Magnetopause crossing challenge and additional M&amp;amp;V contributions'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter:  Overview and initial results from the Magnetopause Crossing Challenge&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger:  Magnetopause dynamics during the March 17th, 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Redmon:  The future of GOES: Magnetic field and particle observation and modeling to determine magnetopause crossings&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Liemohn:  Assessment of the CCMC Experimental Real-time SWMF-Geospace Results&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Model skill as a function of solar wind driving.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Ilja Honkonen: Data / Model comparisons with GUMICS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''' M&amp;amp;V Wrap up:  Recent highlights and future plans for Metrics &amp;amp; Validation at GEM''' &lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer dicussion lead&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] HSO coordination ====&lt;br /&gt;
''Discussions on science and campaigns for the upcoming HSO satellite-ground coordination.''&lt;br /&gt;
*Vassilis Angelopoulos (Intro, an overview and THEMIS-MMS coordination, THEMIS plans)&lt;br /&gt;
*Toshi Nishimura (a PPT on coordination: times, geometry, tentative assets)&lt;br /&gt;
*Marilia Samara (on MMS and ground based?)&lt;br /&gt;
*Brian Anderson (AMPERE)&lt;br /&gt;
*Eric Donovan (TREx)&lt;br /&gt;
*Stephen Mende (AGOs)&lt;br /&gt;
*Jo Baker (SuperDARN)&lt;br /&gt;
*Yukinaga Miyashita (ERG)&lt;br /&gt;
*Naritoshi Kitamura (Geotail)&lt;br /&gt;
*Sasha Ukhorsky (Van Allen Probes)&lt;br /&gt;
*Marc Lessard (WAIS)&lt;br /&gt;
*Peter Chi (ULTIMA)&lt;br /&gt;
*Drew Turner, Seth Claudepierre, Jacob Bortnik, Mike Hartinger, Shin Ohtani, Jimmy Raeder, Wen Li, Bill Lotko, Rick Chappell, Liz McDonald, Frank Toffoletto, Paul Cassak (Science comments)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;plasma-field coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 1:30-3:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith - Plasmaspheric Suprathermal Heating from Cyclotron Resonance with Equatorial Noise&lt;br /&gt;
# Raluca Ilie - Calculating the Inductive electric fields in the terrestrial magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Samuel Califf - Van Allen Probes observations of SAPS during the 28 June 2013 geomagnetic storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Hong Zhao - The evolution of ring current ion energy density and energy content during geomagnetic storms based on Van Allen Probes measurements&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang	- “Trunk-like” heavy ion structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
# Cristian Ferradas -	Ion nose spectral structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. David Sibeck “The Solar wind Magnetosphere Ionosphere Link Explorer (SMILE) Mission”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Michael Hartinger “The global structure and time evolution of dayside magnetopause surface eigenmodes”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Brian Walsh “KH waves at the dayside magnetopause”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Chih-Ping Wang “The hot electron enhancement in mid-tail magnetosheath and its dawn-dusk asymmetry”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Sun-Hee Lee (Presented by Hui Zhang) “Cold dense plasma observed at the Dayside Magnetopause and their dependence on solar wind and geomagnetic conditions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #2:  ULF Wave Challenge'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Seth Claudepierre: ULF Wave Challenge overview and addressable science questions&lt;br /&gt;
''' Observations''' &lt;br /&gt;
* Ian Mann: Preliminary challenge time periods based on ground magnetometers&lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi: Global distribution of ULF power from ULTIMA, and in-situ observations of poloidal waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Ashar Ali: From Van Allen Probes E &amp;amp; B measurements to radial diffusion coefficients.&lt;br /&gt;
* Chih-Ping Wang:  Observations (RBSP, THEMIS, Geotail) and simulations (LFM) of a 2-hour ULF wave interval.&lt;br /&gt;
''' Simulations '''&lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter:  Newly developed CCMC analysis tools supporting the ULF Challenge, and initial results&lt;br /&gt;
* Colin Komar:  ULF power in the BATSRUS model and resonance conditions with electrons&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Lysak: Complementary ULF model  &lt;br /&gt;
* Slava Merkin: ULF waves in the LFM. &lt;br /&gt;
* Scot Elkington:  Mode structure calculations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] SPEDAS Software ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Topic: &amp;quot;magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 3:30-5:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Dan Welling - Relationship between ionospheric outflow and the ring current&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov - Superthermal Electrons Magnetosphere – Ionosphere Coupling in the Regions of Diffuse Aurora&lt;br /&gt;
# Megan Gillies - Investigating pulsating aurora at low electron energies&lt;br /&gt;
# Ryan Mcgranaghan - Modes of high-latitude conductance variability derived from DMSP F6-F8 and F16-F18 energetic electron precipitation observations: Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis&lt;br /&gt;
# Alexa Halford  (challenge event) - BARREL Observations of long period precipitation on Jan 26th 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang   (challenge event) - EMIC waves and associated relativistic electron precipitation on 25-26 January 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu  (challenge event) - Modeling ionospheric electron precipitation due to wave particle interactions in the ring current during the 25-26 January 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
# Yi-Jiun Su (challenge event) -RBSP/MagEIS observations: Local electron acceleration in the inner radiation belt?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Hyunju Connor “Thermospheric heating in the high-latitude dayside regions after the sudden enhancement of solar wind dynamic pressure: OpenGGCM-CTIM results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Denny Oliveira &amp;lt;dennymauricio@gmail.com&amp;gt; “Impact angle control of IP shock geoeffectiveness: results of simulations and observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Michael Hartinger “The effect of northern-southern hemisphere conductivity asymmetries on ground magnetic responses during a large solar wind transient”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Christina Chu “Hot Flow Anomalies at the Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere + Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Masha Kuznetsova (CCMC), Lutz Rastaetter (CCMC), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection), &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) satellites were recently launched to measure the electron dissipation region during magnetic reconnection.  NASA's Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC), a repository of codes and models with runs-on-request, is pursuing support of MMS science, including the implementation of particle-in-cell simulations to their portfolio.  This session will include a discussion of what capabilities members of the community (modelers and observers alike) would like from CCMC for MMS science.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] TDAS demo ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thursday, June 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''SWMI tutorial''' by ''Robert Fear'' -- Flux transfer events: Looking ahead to MMS&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Student-invited tutorial''' by ''Barbara Giles'' -- Engage in NASA's newest flagship to understand the fundamental process of magnetic reconnection -- Magnetospheric Multiscale&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Analysis of Extreme Events”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surja Sharma: overview talk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jeff Love: Dst statistics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slava Merkin: ionospheric turbulence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allison Jaynes: seed populations of relativistic electrons&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Challenge work in progress, OCB work especially welcome&lt;br /&gt;
*Speakers including Peter Porazik 'Modification of the loss cone for energetic particles', Raluca Ilie &amp;quot;mapping isotropic boundaries to the tail&amp;quot;, Phil Valek &amp;quot;TWINS/RBSP comparison on Nov 14., 2012 storm, Liz MacDonald &amp;quot;OCB scenario Nov 14 2012&amp;quot;, Alexa Halford &amp;quot;BARREL OCB observations,&amp;quot; Chu Xiangning &amp;quot;&amp;quot; and more&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics include overlap with TIMI (role of entropy bubbles in the inner magnetosphere), as well as other topics relevant to both focus groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presenters: &amp;lt;presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Wiltberger&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Henderson(LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Sheng-Hsien (Sean) Chen (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Matina Gkioulidou (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Xueling Shi (VTech)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jian Yang (Rice U.)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bing Yang (U. Calgary)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Geospace Systems Science + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Joe Borovsky (Systems), Bill Lotko (Systems), Vadim Uritsky (Systems), Juan Valdivia (Systems), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Binzheng Zhang&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Colin Komar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Misha Sitnov - tearing stability criterion'&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Bill Lotko - effects of auroral (low-altitude) field-aligned potential drops on nightside reconnection and energy flow in MI coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*The final session, surveying progress and the path forward!&lt;br /&gt;
*Ideas to consider: EOS or review article, new focus group (and topics?), upcoming BARREL-SWEDEN campaign&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Drew Turner, (Aerospace)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	Sasha Ukhorskiy, (JHU/APL), “Proton Acceleration at Injection Fronts in the Inner Magnetosphere”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	Chih-Ping Wang, (UCLA) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	Christine Gabrielse, (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	Larry Lyons (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	Jian Yang, (Rice)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Systems-Science Tools, Methodologies, and Results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jacob Bortnik: Machine learning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Misha Balikhin: New model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Konstantin Gamayunov: System-based approach to EMIC waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delores Knipp: Estimating uncertainty in DMSP Poynting&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lutz Rastatter: Modeling joule heat in the ionosphere&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Colby Haggerty, heating during reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Shan Wang - Electron heating during magnetotail reconnection: deriving the heating coefficient and effects of unloading&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Liang Wang - Integrating a multi-fluid moment code into OpenGGCM&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Rick Wilder, moving X-line in cusp&lt;br /&gt;
:5. Paul Cassak, asymmetric reconnection with flow shear&lt;br /&gt;
:6. Jason Shuster, the microphysics of how electrons are energized by the reconnection process&lt;br /&gt;
:7. Yi-Hsin Liu, Orientation of x-line in asymmetric reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
1. Jodie Barker Ream (UCLA), “Pi2 propagation in global MHD simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Aaron Schutza, (Rice), &amp;quot;Thin filament simulations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Roxanne Katus, (Univ. Michigan), “Magnetospheric ion temperature derived from TWINS flux data”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. John Wygant, (Univ. Minnesota)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Zhengwei Cheng, (UNH), , “A case study of the particle carriers of field-aligned currents in the magnetotail during a substorm: Cluster observation.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Jiang Liu (UCLA), “Asymmetric FACs of dipolarizing flux bundles and how they form the substorm current wedge”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friday, June 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MIC tutorial''' by ''Stein Haaland'' -- Cold ion outflow from the polar cap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Behavior of the Geospace System”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jonathan Krall: SAMI3 simulations of M-I-T coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wen Li: solar wind and the radiation belts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vania Jordanova: multiple connections in the magnetosphere in the SHIELDS project&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Borovsky: behavior modes from global correlation analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2433</id>
		<title>2015 Summer Workshop</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2433"/>
		<updated>2015-06-12T13:14:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* [FG] Metrics and Validation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''June 14-19 2015'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Viceroy Hotels, Resorts &amp;amp; Residences, Snowmass, Colorado'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is a ''fluid'' list of speakers provided by the GEM Workshop Coordinator and Focus Groups. The information here serves as a rough guide for those who wish to know the most updated session plans. Due to the nature of the GEM Workshop, Focus Groups may continue to revise their agenda as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All other information about the 2015 Summer Workshop can be found at the [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html GEM Meeting Coordinator Website]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Monday, June 15 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MPS tutorial''' by ''Toshi Nishimura'' -- Fast flow channels in the magnetotail and auroral oval: Reconnection, substorm and beyond&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GSM tutorial''' by ''Alex Glocer'' -- Global modeling of the space environment system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail Environment and Dynamics at Lunar Distances ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hui Zhang: Transient phenomena at tail Bow shock and magnetopause &lt;br /&gt;
* Sheng-Hsien Chen: K-H at the magnetopause and waves at LLBL &lt;br /&gt;
* Denny Oliveria: Tail response to interplanetary shocks&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Stubbs (presented by David Sibeck): Mid-tail structure&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Fear: Magnetotail structure associated with transpolar arcs&lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi: Ion cyclotron waves at the Moon and their connection to the plasma sheet and the lunar exosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* Ivan Vasko:Geotail observations in mid and distant tail&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrei Runov: Reconnection in the mid-tail&lt;br /&gt;
* John Lyon: LFM simulation of bubble formation in mid-tail during growth phase&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: The role of mid-tail in Geospace Systems Science&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Schunk: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 1 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Vince Eccles: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 2 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Abdallah Barakat: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 3 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Katie Garcia-Sage: MFLFM Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Simulation Results (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Lotko: Overview of Recent LFM Modeling and Thoughts for the Future (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Lyons: Review--Hybrid scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Henderson: Review--Inside-out scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Kepko: Review--Outside-in scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Yukinaga Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Phil Pritchett: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Joachim Birn: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Misha Sitnov: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Mostafa El-Alaoui: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Walk-ins welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 1 (Mon, 01:30-03:00 PM):''' “Radiation Belt (RB) observations and modeling results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Weichao Tu and Steve Morley''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Mary Hudson: Recent simulation of the 'St Patrick's Day storm'&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Alexander Drozdov: The VERB code modeling of the St. Patrick’s day Storm&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Dan Baker: Impenetrable Barrier during March 17 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Allison Jaynes: Fast diffusion of ultra-relativistic electrons: 17 March 2015 storm event&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Thiago Brito: Simulations on Radiation Belt Electron Precipitation Response to ULF Waves&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Drew Turner: Storm-time analysis of RB&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Xinlin Li: Deep Injections of 10s – 100s of keV electrons (RBSP observations)&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Jay Albert: Modeling “peculiar” pitch angle distributions with MS waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models Compared to Observations'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionos-Magnetosphere Models for GEM Storms (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn Kistler: Cluster Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: LANL Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Stein Haaland: The Estimation of Cold Plasma Outflow During Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Robert McPherron: Point Processes: Association of Lists&lt;br /&gt;
*Nadine Kalmoni: Auroral dispersion relation&lt;br /&gt;
*Kyle Murphy: tools and methods&lt;br /&gt;
*Eric Donovan: Circle grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 2 (Mon, 03:30-05:00 PM):''' “Various magnetospheric wave characteristics and their global distribution required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Wen Li and Jay Albert''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Ashar Ali: Radial Diffusion Coefficients Using E and B Field Data from the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Seth Claudepierre: Advertisement for the GEM ULF Wave Challenge &lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xinlin Li: Relation between ULF and radial diffusion of RB electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Lauren Blum: The relationship between EMIC waves and radiation belt electron precipitation&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Wen Li: Global distribution of chorus wave intensity using the statistical model and POES technique&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Jay Albert: Nonlinear wave-particle interaction&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Qianli Ma: Evaluation of electron scattering due to typical magnetosonic waves using analytical formula&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Lunjin Chen: The effect of bounce resonance with magnetosonic waves on the radiation belt electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:9.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Storm-induced energization and losses of radiation belt electrons: Effects of wave obliquity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Inter-Model Comparison for GEM Storm Periods and New Measurements'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued Discussion of Merged Models and Measurements Comparison&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura: Ion Outflow Topics (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Varney: Hysteresis Effects in Coupled MFLFM-IPWM Models (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Barbara Giles: Initial Plasma Measurements from MMS (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Krall: Ion Fluxes Into and Out of a Model Plasmasphere During Storm and Plasmasphere Refilling During Quiet Time (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Vassilis Angelopoulos: HSO&lt;br /&gt;
*FG learders: Future planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tuesday, June 16 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Weichao Tu'' -- title&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Seth Claudepierre'' -- title&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 3 (Tue, 10:30-12:15 PM):''' “Seed populations, plasma density, and magnetic field configuration required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jay Albert and Weichao Tu''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Natalia Ganushkina: Low energy electrons in the inner magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Mick Denton: An empirical model of electron and ion fluxes derived from observations at geosynchronous orbit&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Alex Boyd: Quantifying the Radiation Belt Seed Population During the Van Allen Probes Era&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Time Domain Structures: generation mechanisms and effects for electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Xiangrong Fu: Double layers associated with electron/ion acoustic waves&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Zhao Li: 3D test-particle simulation of the 17-18 March, 2013 CME-shock driven storm&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	James McCollough: DSX is still happening&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Alex Crew: New results from FIREBIRD II&lt;br /&gt;
:9.    Quintin Schiller: A novel technique to apply electron lifetimes to radial diffusion models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''General Discussion of Modeling and Observations and Focus Group Planning'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Omelchenko: Global Multiscale Magnetospheric Simulations: HYPERS (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* John Wygant: The Powering of Highly Efficient Poynting Flux-Driven Wind Using Polar Spacecraft Measurements (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bruce Fritz: Ion Upflow Dependence on Ionospheric Density and Solar Photoionization (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Peterson: A New Look at DE-1 Escaping Ion Observations at Non-Storm Times (10 min) -- Accompanying poster by Kristina Lu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms + Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Shin Ohtani - Morphological mapping based on the stability of the magnetotail&lt;br /&gt;
*Emma Spanswick - Riometer injection&lt;br /&gt;
*Elizabeth Roy - Open-closed boundary&lt;br /&gt;
*Jiang Liu - Current wedge structuring&lt;br /&gt;
*Chao Yue - 3-D magnetic field modeling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 4 (Tue, 01:30-03:00 PM):''' “RB &amp;quot;dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;buildup&amp;quot; challenges and Planning for future activities”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Steve Morley and Wen Li''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General short presentations (01:30-02:00 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Yuri Shprits: Recent results of the reanalysis&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Shri Kanekal and Dan Baker: Electron bursts during 17 March 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Brian Kress: Observations and modeling of rebuilding during storms &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Buildup&amp;quot; Challenges (02:00-03:00 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Drew Turner: Candidate “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	QARBM FG leaders: Discussion of “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:6.    Open discussions and plan for future FG activities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two SIMIC sessions on Tuesday afternoon will focus mainly on the chosen events: 2013-03-17 and 2012-11-01 storms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A tentative list of presenters:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lyons/Nishimura/Gallardo (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Rick Wilder (LASP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Margaret Chen (Aerospace)&lt;br /&gt;
# Gang Lu (NCAR)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jonathan Krall (NRL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Peter Chi (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Alex Glocer for Mei-Ching Fok (NASA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Liemohn and Roxanne Katus (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu and Vania Jordanova (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
#. Elizabeth MacDonald (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
#. Bob Lysak (Univ. Minnesota)&lt;br /&gt;
#. Mike Schulz&lt;br /&gt;
#. James Weygand (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jerry Goldstein (SwRI) &lt;br /&gt;
# Jimmy Raeder (UNH)&lt;br /&gt;
# Dave Sibeck (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Brian Anderson (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Vassilis Angelopoulos (TIMI), Pontus Brandt (TIMI), John Lyon (TIMI), Frank Toffoletto (TIMI), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene Setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Joachim Birn&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Jim Drake&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Slava Merkin - magnetotail stability in the presence of B_z minimum&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Misha Sitnov - new class of equilibria taking into account dipole field and B_z hump&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Misha Sitnov - temperature increase at dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Haoming Liang (w/Ashour-Abdalla and Walker) - oxygen effects on dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:5. Ying Zou - imager observations of PBI triggering by polar cap structures&lt;br /&gt;
:6. Toshi Nishimura - MHD simulation of nightside localized reconnection triggering by lobe flow channels&lt;br /&gt;
:7. Yu Lin - global hybrid simulation of the storm-time magnetotail and reconnection flux ropes&lt;br /&gt;
:8. Phil Pritchett - instability of current sheets with a localized accumulation of magnetic flux&lt;br /&gt;
:9.Phil Pritchett - structure of reconnection flow jets&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling + Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 5 (Tue, 03:30-05:00 PM):''' “Joint session with “Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions” FG”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jichun Zhang and Weichao Tu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Wen Li: Quantitative simulation of radiation belt electron dynamics using 3D diffusion code&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Yuri Shprits: Combined Convective and Diffusive Simulation: VERB-4D Results&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xiangrong Fu: Modeling EMIC wave generation from ring current ions&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Anthony Saikin: The geomagnetic condition dependence of the spatial distributions of EMIC waves observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Jacob Bortnik: Generation of chorus waves in a lab plasma&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Xin An: Linear excitation of whistler waves&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Shuo Wu: Hybrid Code Simulations of Whistler Waves in Compressed Dipole Field&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Chih-ping Wang: Multi-point observation of ULF waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Continuing the [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/2015_Summer_Workshop#.5BFG.5D_Storm-time_Inner_Magnetosphere-Ionosphere_Convection SIMIC session at 1330-1500].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Time Lags in Solar Wind-Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Interactions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
speakers will include&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Mick Denton: mass transport&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob McPherron: physical interpretation of time lags&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Roger Varney: ionospheric outflow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Shin Ohtani: circuit timescales&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob Clauer: ionospheric convection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wednesday, June 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Vladimir Papitashvili'' -- Introduction&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Janet Kozyra'' -- NSF GEM Program&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Howard Singer'' -- NOAA Agency Report&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Bill Lotko'' -- Overview of NSF AGS Portfolio Review and Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;wave-particle interactions&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17, Wednesday 10:30-12:15pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mark Engebretson (Challenge event) - Van Allen probes, NOAA, and ground observations of an intense Pc 1 wave event extending 12 hours in MLT and its resulting depletion of the outer radiation belt&lt;br /&gt;
# Justin Lee (Challenge event) - Discussion of Wave-Particle Interactions during the 18-22 Feb 2014 Storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Michael Hartinger -The effect of azimuthal wave number on ULF wave-particle interactions&lt;br /&gt;
# Chen Zhou - Excitation of Dayside Chorus Waves due to Magnetic Field Line Compression in Response to Interplanetary Shocks&lt;br /&gt;
# Homayon Aryan - The distribution of plasmaspheric Hiss and Chorus waves in the inner magnetosphere as functions of geomagnetic activity and solar wind parameters&lt;br /&gt;
# Robert Allen - Statistical study of EMIC waves observed by Cluster&lt;br /&gt;
# Konstantin Gamayunov - Multiscale nature of electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave development in Earth’s magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Vania Jordanova - RAM-SCB simulations of plasma wave dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
# Adam Kellerman - Forecasting the Earth’s radiation environment with GREEP and VERB: a synthesis of empirical- and physics-based modeling across multiple energies and spatial regions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Foreshock Phenomena&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Zixu Liu &amp;quot;THEMIS observations of tangential discontinuity-driven foreshock bubbles&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Nick Omidi (presented by Jean Berchem) “Impacts of SHFAs on the Magnetosheath &amp;amp; Magnetopause”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Hui Zhang &amp;quot;Evolution of HFAs: Cluster Observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Olga Gutynska “Density enhancements in the magnetosheath: comparison with simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #1:  Magnetopause crossing challenge and additional M&amp;amp;V contributions'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter:  Overview and initial results from the Magnetopause Crossing Challenge&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger:  Magnetopause dynamics during the March 17th, 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Redmon:  The future of GOES: Magnetic field and particle observation and modeling to determine magnetopause crossings&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Liemohn:  Assessment of the CCMC Experimental Real-time SWMF-Geospace Results&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Model skill as a function of solar wind driving.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Ilja Honkonen: Data / Model comparisons with GUMICS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''' M&amp;amp;V Wrap up:  Recent highlights and future plans for Metrics &amp;amp; Validation at GEM''' &lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer dicussion lead&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] HSO coordination ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;plasma-field coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 1:30-3:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith - Plasmaspheric Suprathermal Heating from Cyclotron Resonance with Equatorial Noise&lt;br /&gt;
# Raluca Ilie - Calculating the Inductive electric fields in the terrestrial magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Samuel Califf - Van Allen Probes observations of SAPS during the 28 June 2013 geomagnetic storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Hong Zhao - The evolution of ring current ion energy density and energy content during geomagnetic storms based on Van Allen Probes measurements&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang	- “Trunk-like” heavy ion structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
# Cristian Ferradas -	Ion nose spectral structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Magnetopause Phenomena&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Hyunju Connor “Thermospheric heating in the high-latitude dayside regions after the sudden enhancement of solar wind dynamic pressure: OpenGGCM-CTIM results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Denny Oliveira &amp;lt;dennymauricio@gmail.com&amp;gt; “Impact angle control of IP shock geoeffectiveness: results of simulations and observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Michael Hartinger “The global structure and time evolution of dayside magnetopause surface eigenmodes”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Chih-Ping Wang “The hot electron enhancement in mid-tail magnetosheath and its dawn-dusk asymmetry”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Sun-Hee Lee (Presented by Hui Zhang) “Cold dense plasma observed at the Dayside Magnetopause and their dependence on solar wind and geomagnetic conditions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #2:  ULF Wave Challenge'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Seth Claudepierre: ULF Wave Challenge overview and addressable science questions&lt;br /&gt;
* Ian Mann: Preliminary challenge time periods based on ground magnetometers&lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi: Global distribution of ULF power from ULTIMA, and in-situ observations of poloidal waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter:  Newly developed CCMC analysis tools supporting the ULF Challenge, and initial results&lt;br /&gt;
* Colin Komar:  ULF power in the BATSRUS model and resonance conditions with electrons&lt;br /&gt;
* Scot Elkington:  Mode structure calculations&lt;br /&gt;
* Seth Claudepierre:  a few walk on slides&lt;br /&gt;
* Ashar Ali: From Van Allen Probes E &amp;amp; B measurements to radial diffusion coefficients.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Slava Merkin: ULF waves in the LFM. &lt;br /&gt;
* Chih-Ping Wang:  Observations (RBSP, THEMIS, Geotail) and simulations (LFM) of a 2-hour ULF wave interval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] SPEDAS Software ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Topic: &amp;quot;magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 3:30-5:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Dan Welling - Relationship between ionospheric outflow and the ring current&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov - Superthermal Electrons Magnetosphere – Ionosphere Coupling in the Regions of Diffuse Aurora&lt;br /&gt;
# Megan Gillies - Investigating pulsating aurora at low electron energies&lt;br /&gt;
# Ryan Mcgranaghan - Modes of high-latitude conductance variability derived from DMSP F6-F8 and F16-F18 energetic electron precipitation observations: Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis&lt;br /&gt;
# Alexa Halford  (challenge event) - BARREL Observations of long period precipitation on Jan 26th 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang   (challenge event) - EMIC waves and associated relativistic electron precipitation on 25-26 January 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu  (challenge event) - Modeling ionospheric electron precipitation due to wave particle interactions in the ring current during the 25-26 January 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
# Yi-Jiun Su (challenge event) -RBSP/MagEIS observations: Local electron acceleration in the inner radiation belt?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Ground Signatures&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Michael Hartinger “The effect of northern-southern hemisphere conductivity asymmetries on ground magnetic responses during a large solar wind transient”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Christina Chu “Hot Flow Anomalies at the Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere + Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection), Tim Guild (Metrics), Masha Kuznetsova (Metrics), Lutz Rastaetter (Metrics), Aaron Ridley (Metrics), Howard Singer (Metrics)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Discussion of finding the electron diffusion region (with MMS)&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Discussion of PIC simulations into CCMC&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Liang Wang - Integrating a multi-fluid moment code into OpenGGCM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] TDAS demo ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thursday, June 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''SWMI tutorial''' by ''Robert Fear'' -- Flux transfer events: Looking ahead to MMS&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Student-invited tutorial''' by ''Barbara Giles'' -- title&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Analysis of Extreme Events”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surja Sharma: overview talk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jeff Love: Dst statistics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slava Merkin: ionospheric turbulence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics include overlap with TIMI (role of entropy bubbles in the inner magnetosphere), as well as other topics relevant to both focus groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presenters: &amp;lt;presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Wiltberger&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Henderson(LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Natalia Ganushkina and Stepan Dubyagin&lt;br /&gt;
# Sheng-Hsien (Sean) Chen (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bob Schunk (USU) &lt;br /&gt;
# Matina Gkioulidou (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Xueling Shi (VTech)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Geospace Systems Science + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Joe Borovsky (Systems), Bill Lotko (Systems), Vadim Uritsky (Systems), Juan Valdivia (Systems), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Binzheng Zhang&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Colin Komar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Misha Sitnov - tearing stability criterion'&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Bill Lotko - effects of auroral (low-altitude) field-aligned potential drops on nightside reconnection and energy flow in MI coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Systems-Science Tools, Methodologies, and Results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jacob Bortnik: Machine learning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Konstantin Gamayunov: System-based approach to EMIC waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delores Knipp: Estimating uncertainty in DMSP Poynting&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lutz Rastatter: Modeling joule heat in the ionosphere&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Colby Haggerty, heating during reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Shan Wang - Electron heating during magnetotail reconnection: deriving the heating coefficient and effects of unloading&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Rick Wilder, moving X-line in cusp&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Paul Cassak, asymmetric reconnection with flow shear&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friday, June 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MIC tutorial''' by ''Stein Haaland'' -- Cold ion outflow from the polar cap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Behavior of the Geospace System”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jonathan Krall: SAMI3 simulations of M-I-T coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wen Li: solar wind and the radiation belts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vania Jordanova: multiple connections in the magnetosphere in the SHIELDS project&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Borovsky: behavior modes from global correlation analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2432</id>
		<title>2015 Summer Workshop</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2432"/>
		<updated>2015-06-12T13:14:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* [FG] Metrics and Validation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''June 14-19 2015'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Viceroy Hotels, Resorts &amp;amp; Residences, Snowmass, Colorado'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is a ''fluid'' list of speakers provided by the GEM Workshop Coordinator and Focus Groups. The information here serves as a rough guide for those who wish to know the most updated session plans. Due to the nature of the GEM Workshop, Focus Groups may continue to revise their agenda as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All other information about the 2015 Summer Workshop can be found at the [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html GEM Meeting Coordinator Website]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Monday, June 15 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MPS tutorial''' by ''Toshi Nishimura'' -- Fast flow channels in the magnetotail and auroral oval: Reconnection, substorm and beyond&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GSM tutorial''' by ''Alex Glocer'' -- Global modeling of the space environment system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail Environment and Dynamics at Lunar Distances ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hui Zhang: Transient phenomena at tail Bow shock and magnetopause &lt;br /&gt;
* Sheng-Hsien Chen: K-H at the magnetopause and waves at LLBL &lt;br /&gt;
* Denny Oliveria: Tail response to interplanetary shocks&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Stubbs (presented by David Sibeck): Mid-tail structure&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Fear: Magnetotail structure associated with transpolar arcs&lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi: Ion cyclotron waves at the Moon and their connection to the plasma sheet and the lunar exosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* Ivan Vasko:Geotail observations in mid and distant tail&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrei Runov: Reconnection in the mid-tail&lt;br /&gt;
* John Lyon: LFM simulation of bubble formation in mid-tail during growth phase&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: The role of mid-tail in Geospace Systems Science&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Schunk: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 1 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Vince Eccles: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 2 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Abdallah Barakat: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 3 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Katie Garcia-Sage: MFLFM Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Simulation Results (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Lotko: Overview of Recent LFM Modeling and Thoughts for the Future (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Lyons: Review--Hybrid scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Henderson: Review--Inside-out scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Kepko: Review--Outside-in scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Yukinaga Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Phil Pritchett: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Joachim Birn: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Misha Sitnov: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Mostafa El-Alaoui: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Walk-ins welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 1 (Mon, 01:30-03:00 PM):''' “Radiation Belt (RB) observations and modeling results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Weichao Tu and Steve Morley''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Mary Hudson: Recent simulation of the 'St Patrick's Day storm'&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Alexander Drozdov: The VERB code modeling of the St. Patrick’s day Storm&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Dan Baker: Impenetrable Barrier during March 17 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Allison Jaynes: Fast diffusion of ultra-relativistic electrons: 17 March 2015 storm event&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Thiago Brito: Simulations on Radiation Belt Electron Precipitation Response to ULF Waves&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Drew Turner: Storm-time analysis of RB&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Xinlin Li: Deep Injections of 10s – 100s of keV electrons (RBSP observations)&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Jay Albert: Modeling “peculiar” pitch angle distributions with MS waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models Compared to Observations'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionos-Magnetosphere Models for GEM Storms (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn Kistler: Cluster Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: LANL Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Stein Haaland: The Estimation of Cold Plasma Outflow During Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Robert McPherron: Point Processes: Association of Lists&lt;br /&gt;
*Nadine Kalmoni: Auroral dispersion relation&lt;br /&gt;
*Kyle Murphy: tools and methods&lt;br /&gt;
*Eric Donovan: Circle grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 2 (Mon, 03:30-05:00 PM):''' “Various magnetospheric wave characteristics and their global distribution required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Wen Li and Jay Albert''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Ashar Ali: Radial Diffusion Coefficients Using E and B Field Data from the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Seth Claudepierre: Advertisement for the GEM ULF Wave Challenge &lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xinlin Li: Relation between ULF and radial diffusion of RB electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Lauren Blum: The relationship between EMIC waves and radiation belt electron precipitation&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Wen Li: Global distribution of chorus wave intensity using the statistical model and POES technique&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Jay Albert: Nonlinear wave-particle interaction&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Qianli Ma: Evaluation of electron scattering due to typical magnetosonic waves using analytical formula&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Lunjin Chen: The effect of bounce resonance with magnetosonic waves on the radiation belt electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:9.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Storm-induced energization and losses of radiation belt electrons: Effects of wave obliquity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Inter-Model Comparison for GEM Storm Periods and New Measurements'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued Discussion of Merged Models and Measurements Comparison&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura: Ion Outflow Topics (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Varney: Hysteresis Effects in Coupled MFLFM-IPWM Models (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Barbara Giles: Initial Plasma Measurements from MMS (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Krall: Ion Fluxes Into and Out of a Model Plasmasphere During Storm and Plasmasphere Refilling During Quiet Time (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Vassilis Angelopoulos: HSO&lt;br /&gt;
*FG learders: Future planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tuesday, June 16 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Weichao Tu'' -- title&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Seth Claudepierre'' -- title&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 3 (Tue, 10:30-12:15 PM):''' “Seed populations, plasma density, and magnetic field configuration required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jay Albert and Weichao Tu''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Natalia Ganushkina: Low energy electrons in the inner magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Mick Denton: An empirical model of electron and ion fluxes derived from observations at geosynchronous orbit&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Alex Boyd: Quantifying the Radiation Belt Seed Population During the Van Allen Probes Era&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Time Domain Structures: generation mechanisms and effects for electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Xiangrong Fu: Double layers associated with electron/ion acoustic waves&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Zhao Li: 3D test-particle simulation of the 17-18 March, 2013 CME-shock driven storm&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	James McCollough: DSX is still happening&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Alex Crew: New results from FIREBIRD II&lt;br /&gt;
:9.    Quintin Schiller: A novel technique to apply electron lifetimes to radial diffusion models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''General Discussion of Modeling and Observations and Focus Group Planning'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Omelchenko: Global Multiscale Magnetospheric Simulations: HYPERS (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* John Wygant: The Powering of Highly Efficient Poynting Flux-Driven Wind Using Polar Spacecraft Measurements (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bruce Fritz: Ion Upflow Dependence on Ionospheric Density and Solar Photoionization (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Peterson: A New Look at DE-1 Escaping Ion Observations at Non-Storm Times (10 min) -- Accompanying poster by Kristina Lu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms + Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Shin Ohtani - Morphological mapping based on the stability of the magnetotail&lt;br /&gt;
*Emma Spanswick - Riometer injection&lt;br /&gt;
*Elizabeth Roy - Open-closed boundary&lt;br /&gt;
*Jiang Liu - Current wedge structuring&lt;br /&gt;
*Chao Yue - 3-D magnetic field modeling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 4 (Tue, 01:30-03:00 PM):''' “RB &amp;quot;dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;buildup&amp;quot; challenges and Planning for future activities”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Steve Morley and Wen Li''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General short presentations (01:30-02:00 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Yuri Shprits: Recent results of the reanalysis&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Shri Kanekal and Dan Baker: Electron bursts during 17 March 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Brian Kress: Observations and modeling of rebuilding during storms &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Buildup&amp;quot; Challenges (02:00-03:00 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Drew Turner: Candidate “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	QARBM FG leaders: Discussion of “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:6.    Open discussions and plan for future FG activities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two SIMIC sessions on Tuesday afternoon will focus mainly on the chosen events: 2013-03-17 and 2012-11-01 storms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A tentative list of presenters:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lyons/Nishimura/Gallardo (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Rick Wilder (LASP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Margaret Chen (Aerospace)&lt;br /&gt;
# Gang Lu (NCAR)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jonathan Krall (NRL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Peter Chi (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Alex Glocer for Mei-Ching Fok (NASA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Liemohn and Roxanne Katus (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu and Vania Jordanova (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
#. Elizabeth MacDonald (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
#. Bob Lysak (Univ. Minnesota)&lt;br /&gt;
#. Mike Schulz&lt;br /&gt;
#. James Weygand (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jerry Goldstein (SwRI) &lt;br /&gt;
# Jimmy Raeder (UNH)&lt;br /&gt;
# Dave Sibeck (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Brian Anderson (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Vassilis Angelopoulos (TIMI), Pontus Brandt (TIMI), John Lyon (TIMI), Frank Toffoletto (TIMI), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene Setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Joachim Birn&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Jim Drake&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Slava Merkin - magnetotail stability in the presence of B_z minimum&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Misha Sitnov - new class of equilibria taking into account dipole field and B_z hump&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Misha Sitnov - temperature increase at dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Haoming Liang (w/Ashour-Abdalla and Walker) - oxygen effects on dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:5. Ying Zou - imager observations of PBI triggering by polar cap structures&lt;br /&gt;
:6. Toshi Nishimura - MHD simulation of nightside localized reconnection triggering by lobe flow channels&lt;br /&gt;
:7. Yu Lin - global hybrid simulation of the storm-time magnetotail and reconnection flux ropes&lt;br /&gt;
:8. Phil Pritchett - instability of current sheets with a localized accumulation of magnetic flux&lt;br /&gt;
:9.Phil Pritchett - structure of reconnection flow jets&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling + Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 5 (Tue, 03:30-05:00 PM):''' “Joint session with “Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions” FG”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jichun Zhang and Weichao Tu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Wen Li: Quantitative simulation of radiation belt electron dynamics using 3D diffusion code&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Yuri Shprits: Combined Convective and Diffusive Simulation: VERB-4D Results&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xiangrong Fu: Modeling EMIC wave generation from ring current ions&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Anthony Saikin: The geomagnetic condition dependence of the spatial distributions of EMIC waves observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Jacob Bortnik: Generation of chorus waves in a lab plasma&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Xin An: Linear excitation of whistler waves&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Shuo Wu: Hybrid Code Simulations of Whistler Waves in Compressed Dipole Field&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Chih-ping Wang: Multi-point observation of ULF waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Continuing the [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/2015_Summer_Workshop#.5BFG.5D_Storm-time_Inner_Magnetosphere-Ionosphere_Convection SIMIC session at 1330-1500].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Time Lags in Solar Wind-Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Interactions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
speakers will include&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Mick Denton: mass transport&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob McPherron: physical interpretation of time lags&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Roger Varney: ionospheric outflow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Shin Ohtani: circuit timescales&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob Clauer: ionospheric convection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wednesday, June 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Vladimir Papitashvili'' -- Introduction&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Janet Kozyra'' -- NSF GEM Program&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Howard Singer'' -- NOAA Agency Report&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Bill Lotko'' -- Overview of NSF AGS Portfolio Review and Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;wave-particle interactions&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17, Wednesday 10:30-12:15pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mark Engebretson (Challenge event) - Van Allen probes, NOAA, and ground observations of an intense Pc 1 wave event extending 12 hours in MLT and its resulting depletion of the outer radiation belt&lt;br /&gt;
# Justin Lee (Challenge event) - Discussion of Wave-Particle Interactions during the 18-22 Feb 2014 Storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Michael Hartinger -The effect of azimuthal wave number on ULF wave-particle interactions&lt;br /&gt;
# Chen Zhou - Excitation of Dayside Chorus Waves due to Magnetic Field Line Compression in Response to Interplanetary Shocks&lt;br /&gt;
# Homayon Aryan - The distribution of plasmaspheric Hiss and Chorus waves in the inner magnetosphere as functions of geomagnetic activity and solar wind parameters&lt;br /&gt;
# Robert Allen - Statistical study of EMIC waves observed by Cluster&lt;br /&gt;
# Konstantin Gamayunov - Multiscale nature of electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave development in Earth’s magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Vania Jordanova - RAM-SCB simulations of plasma wave dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
# Adam Kellerman - Forecasting the Earth’s radiation environment with GREEP and VERB: a synthesis of empirical- and physics-based modeling across multiple energies and spatial regions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Foreshock Phenomena&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Zixu Liu &amp;quot;THEMIS observations of tangential discontinuity-driven foreshock bubbles&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Nick Omidi (presented by Jean Berchem) “Impacts of SHFAs on the Magnetosheath &amp;amp; Magnetopause”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Hui Zhang &amp;quot;Evolution of HFAs: Cluster Observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Olga Gutynska “Density enhancements in the magnetosheath: comparison with simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #1:  Magnetopause crossing challenge and additional M&amp;amp;V contributions'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter:  Overview and initial results from the Magnetopause Crossing Challenge&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger:  Magnetopause dynamics during the March 17th, 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Redmon:  The future of GOES: Magnetic field and particle observation and modeling to determine magnetopause crossings&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Liemohn:  Assessment of the CCMC Experimental Real-time SWMF-Geospace Results&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Model skill as a function of solar wind driving.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Ilja Honkonen: Data / Model comparisons with GUMICS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''' M&amp;amp;V Wrap up:  Recent highlights and future plans for Metrics &amp;amp; Validation at GEM''' &lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer dicussion lead&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] HSO coordination ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;plasma-field coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 1:30-3:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith - Plasmaspheric Suprathermal Heating from Cyclotron Resonance with Equatorial Noise&lt;br /&gt;
# Raluca Ilie - Calculating the Inductive electric fields in the terrestrial magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Samuel Califf - Van Allen Probes observations of SAPS during the 28 June 2013 geomagnetic storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Hong Zhao - The evolution of ring current ion energy density and energy content during geomagnetic storms based on Van Allen Probes measurements&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang	- “Trunk-like” heavy ion structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
# Cristian Ferradas -	Ion nose spectral structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Magnetopause Phenomena&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Hyunju Connor “Thermospheric heating in the high-latitude dayside regions after the sudden enhancement of solar wind dynamic pressure: OpenGGCM-CTIM results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Denny Oliveira &amp;lt;dennymauricio@gmail.com&amp;gt; “Impact angle control of IP shock geoeffectiveness: results of simulations and observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Michael Hartinger “The global structure and time evolution of dayside magnetopause surface eigenmodes”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Chih-Ping Wang “The hot electron enhancement in mid-tail magnetosheath and its dawn-dusk asymmetry”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Sun-Hee Lee (Presented by Hui Zhang) “Cold dense plasma observed at the Dayside Magnetopause and their dependence on solar wind and geomagnetic conditions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #2:  ULF Wave Challenge'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Seth Claudepierre: ULF Wave Challenge overview and addressable science questions&lt;br /&gt;
* Ian Mann: Preliminary challenge time periods based on ground magnetometers&lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter:  Newly developed CCMC analysis tools supporting the ULF Challenge, and initial results&lt;br /&gt;
* Colin Komar:  ULF power in the BATSRUS model and resonance conditions with electrons&lt;br /&gt;
* Scot Elkington:  Mode structure calculations&lt;br /&gt;
* Seth Claudepierre:  a few walk on slides&lt;br /&gt;
* Ashar Ali: From Van Allen Probes E &amp;amp; B measurements to radial diffusion coefficients.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi: Global distribution of ULF power from ULTIMA, and in-situ observations of poloidal waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Slava Merkin: ULF waves in the LFM. &lt;br /&gt;
* Chih-Ping Wang:  Observations (RBSP, THEMIS, Geotail) and simulations (LFM) of a 2-hour ULF wave interval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] SPEDAS Software ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Topic: &amp;quot;magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 3:30-5:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Dan Welling - Relationship between ionospheric outflow and the ring current&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov - Superthermal Electrons Magnetosphere – Ionosphere Coupling in the Regions of Diffuse Aurora&lt;br /&gt;
# Megan Gillies - Investigating pulsating aurora at low electron energies&lt;br /&gt;
# Ryan Mcgranaghan - Modes of high-latitude conductance variability derived from DMSP F6-F8 and F16-F18 energetic electron precipitation observations: Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis&lt;br /&gt;
# Alexa Halford  (challenge event) - BARREL Observations of long period precipitation on Jan 26th 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang   (challenge event) - EMIC waves and associated relativistic electron precipitation on 25-26 January 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu  (challenge event) - Modeling ionospheric electron precipitation due to wave particle interactions in the ring current during the 25-26 January 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
# Yi-Jiun Su (challenge event) -RBSP/MagEIS observations: Local electron acceleration in the inner radiation belt?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Ground Signatures&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Michael Hartinger “The effect of northern-southern hemisphere conductivity asymmetries on ground magnetic responses during a large solar wind transient”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Christina Chu “Hot Flow Anomalies at the Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere + Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection), Tim Guild (Metrics), Masha Kuznetsova (Metrics), Lutz Rastaetter (Metrics), Aaron Ridley (Metrics), Howard Singer (Metrics)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Discussion of finding the electron diffusion region (with MMS)&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Discussion of PIC simulations into CCMC&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Liang Wang - Integrating a multi-fluid moment code into OpenGGCM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] TDAS demo ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thursday, June 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''SWMI tutorial''' by ''Robert Fear'' -- Flux transfer events: Looking ahead to MMS&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Student-invited tutorial''' by ''Barbara Giles'' -- title&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Analysis of Extreme Events”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surja Sharma: overview talk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jeff Love: Dst statistics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slava Merkin: ionospheric turbulence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics include overlap with TIMI (role of entropy bubbles in the inner magnetosphere), as well as other topics relevant to both focus groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presenters: &amp;lt;presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Wiltberger&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Henderson(LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Natalia Ganushkina and Stepan Dubyagin&lt;br /&gt;
# Sheng-Hsien (Sean) Chen (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bob Schunk (USU) &lt;br /&gt;
# Matina Gkioulidou (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Xueling Shi (VTech)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Geospace Systems Science + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Joe Borovsky (Systems), Bill Lotko (Systems), Vadim Uritsky (Systems), Juan Valdivia (Systems), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Binzheng Zhang&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Colin Komar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Misha Sitnov - tearing stability criterion'&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Bill Lotko - effects of auroral (low-altitude) field-aligned potential drops on nightside reconnection and energy flow in MI coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Systems-Science Tools, Methodologies, and Results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jacob Bortnik: Machine learning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Konstantin Gamayunov: System-based approach to EMIC waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delores Knipp: Estimating uncertainty in DMSP Poynting&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lutz Rastatter: Modeling joule heat in the ionosphere&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Colby Haggerty, heating during reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Shan Wang - Electron heating during magnetotail reconnection: deriving the heating coefficient and effects of unloading&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Rick Wilder, moving X-line in cusp&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Paul Cassak, asymmetric reconnection with flow shear&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friday, June 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MIC tutorial''' by ''Stein Haaland'' -- Cold ion outflow from the polar cap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Behavior of the Geospace System”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jonathan Krall: SAMI3 simulations of M-I-T coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wen Li: solar wind and the radiation belts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vania Jordanova: multiple connections in the magnetosphere in the SHIELDS project&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Borovsky: behavior modes from global correlation analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2431</id>
		<title>2015 Summer Workshop</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2431"/>
		<updated>2015-06-12T12:59:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* [FG] Metrics and Validation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''June 14-19 2015'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Viceroy Hotels, Resorts &amp;amp; Residences, Snowmass, Colorado'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is a ''fluid'' list of speakers provided by the GEM Workshop Coordinator and Focus Groups. The information here serves as a rough guide for those who wish to know the most updated session plans. Due to the nature of the GEM Workshop, Focus Groups may continue to revise their agenda as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All other information about the 2015 Summer Workshop can be found at the [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html GEM Meeting Coordinator Website]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Monday, June 15 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MPS tutorial''' by ''Toshi Nishimura'' -- Fast flow channels in the magnetotail and auroral oval: Reconnection, substorm and beyond&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GSM tutorial''' by ''Alex Glocer'' -- Global modeling of the space environment system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail Environment and Dynamics at Lunar Distances ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hui Zhang: Transient phenomena at tail Bow shock and magnetopause &lt;br /&gt;
* Sheng-Hsien Chen: K-H at the magnetopause and waves at LLBL &lt;br /&gt;
* Denny Oliveria: Tail response to interplanetary shocks&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Stubbs (presented by David Sibeck): Mid-tail structure&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Fear: Magnetotail structure associated with transpolar arcs&lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi: Ion cyclotron waves at the Moon and their connection to the plasma sheet and the lunar exosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* Ivan Vasko:Geotail observations in mid and distant tail&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrei Runov: Reconnection in the mid-tail&lt;br /&gt;
* John Lyon: LFM simulation of bubble formation in mid-tail during growth phase&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: The role of mid-tail in Geospace Systems Science&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Schunk: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 1 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Vince Eccles: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 2 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Abdallah Barakat: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 3 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Katie Garcia-Sage: MFLFM Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Simulation Results (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Lotko: Overview of Recent LFM Modeling and Thoughts for the Future (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Lyons: Review--Hybrid scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Henderson: Review--Inside-out scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Kepko: Review--Outside-in scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Yukinaga Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Phil Pritchett: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Joachim Birn: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Misha Sitnov: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Mostafa El-Alaoui: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Walk-ins welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 1 (Mon, 01:30-03:00 PM):''' “Radiation Belt (RB) observations and modeling results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Weichao Tu and Steve Morley''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Mary Hudson: Recent simulation of the 'St Patrick's Day storm'&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Alexander Drozdov: The VERB code modeling of the St. Patrick’s day Storm&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Dan Baker: Impenetrable Barrier during March 17 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Allison Jaynes: Fast diffusion of ultra-relativistic electrons: 17 March 2015 storm event&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Thiago Brito: Simulations on Radiation Belt Electron Precipitation Response to ULF Waves&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Drew Turner: Storm-time analysis of RB&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Xinlin Li: Deep Injections of 10s – 100s of keV electrons (RBSP observations)&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Jay Albert: Modeling “peculiar” pitch angle distributions with MS waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models Compared to Observations'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionos-Magnetosphere Models for GEM Storms (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn Kistler: Cluster Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: LANL Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Stein Haaland: The Estimation of Cold Plasma Outflow During Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Robert McPherron: Point Processes: Association of Lists&lt;br /&gt;
*Nadine Kalmoni: Auroral dispersion relation&lt;br /&gt;
*Kyle Murphy: tools and methods&lt;br /&gt;
*Eric Donovan: Circle grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 2 (Mon, 03:30-05:00 PM):''' “Various magnetospheric wave characteristics and their global distribution required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Wen Li and Jay Albert''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Ashar Ali: Radial Diffusion Coefficients Using E and B Field Data from the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Seth Claudepierre: Advertisement for the GEM ULF Wave Challenge &lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xinlin Li: Relation between ULF and radial diffusion of RB electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Lauren Blum: The relationship between EMIC waves and radiation belt electron precipitation&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Wen Li: Global distribution of chorus wave intensity using the statistical model and POES technique&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Jay Albert: Nonlinear wave-particle interaction&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Qianli Ma: Evaluation of electron scattering due to typical magnetosonic waves using analytical formula&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Lunjin Chen: The effect of bounce resonance with magnetosonic waves on the radiation belt electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:9.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Storm-induced energization and losses of radiation belt electrons: Effects of wave obliquity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Inter-Model Comparison for GEM Storm Periods and New Measurements'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued Discussion of Merged Models and Measurements Comparison&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura: Ion Outflow Topics (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Varney: Hysteresis Effects in Coupled MFLFM-IPWM Models (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Barbara Giles: Initial Plasma Measurements from MMS (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Krall: Ion Fluxes Into and Out of a Model Plasmasphere During Storm and Plasmasphere Refilling During Quiet Time (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Vassilis Angelopoulos: HSO&lt;br /&gt;
*FG learders: Future planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tuesday, June 16 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Weichao Tu'' -- title&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Seth Claudepierre'' -- title&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 3 (Tue, 10:30-12:15 PM):''' “Seed populations, plasma density, and magnetic field configuration required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jay Albert and Weichao Tu''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Natalia Ganushkina: Low energy electrons in the inner magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Mick Denton: An empirical model of electron and ion fluxes derived from observations at geosynchronous orbit&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Alex Boyd: Quantifying the Radiation Belt Seed Population During the Van Allen Probes Era&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Time Domain Structures: generation mechanisms and effects for electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Xiangrong Fu: Double layers associated with electron/ion acoustic waves&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Zhao Li: 3D test-particle simulation of the 17-18 March, 2013 CME-shock driven storm&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	James McCollough: DSX is still happening&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Alex Crew: New results from FIREBIRD II&lt;br /&gt;
:9.    Quintin Schiller: A novel technique to apply electron lifetimes to radial diffusion models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''General Discussion of Modeling and Observations and Focus Group Planning'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Omelchenko: Global Multiscale Magnetospheric Simulations: HYPERS (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* John Wygant: The Powering of Highly Efficient Poynting Flux-Driven Wind Using Polar Spacecraft Measurements (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bruce Fritz: Ion Upflow Dependence on Ionospheric Density and Solar Photoionization (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Peterson: A New Look at DE-1 Escaping Ion Observations at Non-Storm Times (10 min) -- Accompanying poster by Kristina Lu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms + Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Shin Ohtani - Morphological mapping based on the stability of the magnetotail&lt;br /&gt;
*Emma Spanswick - Riometer injection&lt;br /&gt;
*Elizabeth Roy - Open-closed boundary&lt;br /&gt;
*Jiang Liu - Current wedge structuring&lt;br /&gt;
*Chao Yue - 3-D magnetic field modeling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 4 (Tue, 01:30-03:00 PM):''' “RB &amp;quot;dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;buildup&amp;quot; challenges and Planning for future activities”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Steve Morley and Wen Li''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General short presentations (01:30-02:00 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Yuri Shprits: Recent results of the reanalysis&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Shri Kanekal and Dan Baker: Electron bursts during 17 March 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Brian Kress: Observations and modeling of rebuilding during storms &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Buildup&amp;quot; Challenges (02:00-03:00 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Drew Turner: Candidate “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	QARBM FG leaders: Discussion of “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:6.    Open discussions and plan for future FG activities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two SIMIC sessions on Tuesday afternoon will focus mainly on the chosen events: 2013-03-17 and 2012-11-01 storms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A tentative list of presenters:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lyons/Nishimura/Gallardo (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Rick Wilder (LASP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Margaret Chen (Aerospace)&lt;br /&gt;
# Gang Lu (NCAR)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jonathan Krall (NRL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Peter Chi (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Alex Glocer for Mei-Ching Fok (NASA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Liemohn and Roxanne Katus (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu and Vania Jordanova (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
#. Elizabeth MacDonald (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
#. Bob Lysak (Univ. Minnesota)&lt;br /&gt;
#. Mike Schulz&lt;br /&gt;
#. James Weygand (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jerry Goldstein (SwRI) &lt;br /&gt;
# Jimmy Raeder (UNH)&lt;br /&gt;
# Dave Sibeck (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Brian Anderson (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Vassilis Angelopoulos (TIMI), Pontus Brandt (TIMI), John Lyon (TIMI), Frank Toffoletto (TIMI), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene Setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Joachim Birn&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Jim Drake&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Slava Merkin - magnetotail stability in the presence of B_z minimum&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Misha Sitnov - new class of equilibria taking into account dipole field and B_z hump&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Misha Sitnov - temperature increase at dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Haoming Liang (w/Ashour-Abdalla and Walker) - oxygen effects on dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:5. Ying Zou - imager observations of PBI triggering by polar cap structures&lt;br /&gt;
:6. Toshi Nishimura - MHD simulation of nightside localized reconnection triggering by lobe flow channels&lt;br /&gt;
:7. Yu Lin - global hybrid simulation of the storm-time magnetotail and reconnection flux ropes&lt;br /&gt;
:8. Phil Pritchett - instability of current sheets with a localized accumulation of magnetic flux&lt;br /&gt;
:9.Phil Pritchett - structure of reconnection flow jets&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling + Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 5 (Tue, 03:30-05:00 PM):''' “Joint session with “Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions” FG”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jichun Zhang and Weichao Tu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Wen Li: Quantitative simulation of radiation belt electron dynamics using 3D diffusion code&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Yuri Shprits: Combined Convective and Diffusive Simulation: VERB-4D Results&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xiangrong Fu: Modeling EMIC wave generation from ring current ions&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Anthony Saikin: The geomagnetic condition dependence of the spatial distributions of EMIC waves observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Jacob Bortnik: Generation of chorus waves in a lab plasma&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Xin An: Linear excitation of whistler waves&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Shuo Wu: Hybrid Code Simulations of Whistler Waves in Compressed Dipole Field&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Chih-ping Wang: Multi-point observation of ULF waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Continuing the [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/2015_Summer_Workshop#.5BFG.5D_Storm-time_Inner_Magnetosphere-Ionosphere_Convection SIMIC session at 1330-1500].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Time Lags in Solar Wind-Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Interactions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
speakers will include&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Mick Denton: mass transport&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob McPherron: physical interpretation of time lags&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Roger Varney: ionospheric outflow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Shin Ohtani: circuit timescales&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob Clauer: ionospheric convection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wednesday, June 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Vladimir Papitashvili'' -- Introduction&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Janet Kozyra'' -- NSF GEM Program&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Howard Singer'' -- NOAA Agency Report&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Bill Lotko'' -- Overview of NSF AGS Portfolio Review and Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;wave-particle interactions&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17, Wednesday 10:30-12:15pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mark Engebretson (Challenge event) - Van Allen probes, NOAA, and ground observations of an intense Pc 1 wave event extending 12 hours in MLT and its resulting depletion of the outer radiation belt&lt;br /&gt;
# Justin Lee (Challenge event) - Discussion of Wave-Particle Interactions during the 18-22 Feb 2014 Storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Michael Hartinger -The effect of azimuthal wave number on ULF wave-particle interactions&lt;br /&gt;
# Chen Zhou - Excitation of Dayside Chorus Waves due to Magnetic Field Line Compression in Response to Interplanetary Shocks&lt;br /&gt;
# Homayon Aryan - The distribution of plasmaspheric Hiss and Chorus waves in the inner magnetosphere as functions of geomagnetic activity and solar wind parameters&lt;br /&gt;
# Robert Allen - Statistical study of EMIC waves observed by Cluster&lt;br /&gt;
# Konstantin Gamayunov - Multiscale nature of electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave development in Earth’s magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Vania Jordanova - RAM-SCB simulations of plasma wave dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
# Adam Kellerman - Forecasting the Earth’s radiation environment with GREEP and VERB: a synthesis of empirical- and physics-based modeling across multiple energies and spatial regions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Foreshock Phenomena&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Zixu Liu &amp;quot;THEMIS observations of tangential discontinuity-driven foreshock bubbles&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Nick Omidi (presented by Jean Berchem) “Impacts of SHFAs on the Magnetosheath &amp;amp; Magnetopause”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Hui Zhang &amp;quot;Evolution of HFAs: Cluster Observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Olga Gutynska “Density enhancements in the magnetosheath: comparison with simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #1:  Magnetopause crossing challenge and additional M&amp;amp;V contributions'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter:  Overview and initial results from the Magnetopause Crossing Challenge&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger:  Magnetopause dynamics during the March 17th, 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Redmon:  The future of GOES: Magnetic field and particle observation and modeling to determine magnetopause crossings&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Liemohn:  Assessment of the CCMC Experimental Real-time SWMF-Geospace Results&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Model skill as a function of solar wind driving.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Ilja Honkonen: Data / Model comparisons with GUMICS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''' M&amp;amp;V Wrap up:  Recent highlights and future plans for Metrics &amp;amp; Validation at GEM''' &lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer dicussion lead&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] HSO coordination ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;plasma-field coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 1:30-3:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith - Plasmaspheric Suprathermal Heating from Cyclotron Resonance with Equatorial Noise&lt;br /&gt;
# Raluca Ilie - Calculating the Inductive electric fields in the terrestrial magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Samuel Califf - Van Allen Probes observations of SAPS during the 28 June 2013 geomagnetic storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Hong Zhao - The evolution of ring current ion energy density and energy content during geomagnetic storms based on Van Allen Probes measurements&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang	- “Trunk-like” heavy ion structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
# Cristian Ferradas -	Ion nose spectral structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Magnetopause Phenomena&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Hyunju Connor “Thermospheric heating in the high-latitude dayside regions after the sudden enhancement of solar wind dynamic pressure: OpenGGCM-CTIM results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Denny Oliveira &amp;lt;dennymauricio@gmail.com&amp;gt; “Impact angle control of IP shock geoeffectiveness: results of simulations and observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Michael Hartinger “The global structure and time evolution of dayside magnetopause surface eigenmodes”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Chih-Ping Wang “The hot electron enhancement in mid-tail magnetosheath and its dawn-dusk asymmetry”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Sun-Hee Lee (Presented by Hui Zhang) “Cold dense plasma observed at the Dayside Magnetopause and their dependence on solar wind and geomagnetic conditions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #2:  ULF Wave Challenge'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Seth Claudepierre:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] SPEDAS Software ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Topic: &amp;quot;magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 3:30-5:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Dan Welling - Relationship between ionospheric outflow and the ring current&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov - Superthermal Electrons Magnetosphere – Ionosphere Coupling in the Regions of Diffuse Aurora&lt;br /&gt;
# Megan Gillies - Investigating pulsating aurora at low electron energies&lt;br /&gt;
# Ryan Mcgranaghan - Modes of high-latitude conductance variability derived from DMSP F6-F8 and F16-F18 energetic electron precipitation observations: Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis&lt;br /&gt;
# Alexa Halford  (challenge event) - BARREL Observations of long period precipitation on Jan 26th 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang   (challenge event) - EMIC waves and associated relativistic electron precipitation on 25-26 January 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu  (challenge event) - Modeling ionospheric electron precipitation due to wave particle interactions in the ring current during the 25-26 January 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
# Yi-Jiun Su (challenge event) -RBSP/MagEIS observations: Local electron acceleration in the inner radiation belt?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Ground Signatures&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Michael Hartinger “The effect of northern-southern hemisphere conductivity asymmetries on ground magnetic responses during a large solar wind transient”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Christina Chu “Hot Flow Anomalies at the Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere + Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection), Tim Guild (Metrics), Masha Kuznetsova (Metrics), Lutz Rastaetter (Metrics), Aaron Ridley (Metrics), Howard Singer (Metrics)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Discussion of finding the electron diffusion region (with MMS)&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Discussion of PIC simulations into CCMC&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Liang Wang - Integrating a multi-fluid moment code into OpenGGCM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] TDAS demo ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thursday, June 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''SWMI tutorial''' by ''Robert Fear'' -- Flux transfer events: Looking ahead to MMS&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Student-invited tutorial''' by ''Barbara Giles'' -- title&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Analysis of Extreme Events”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surja Sharma: overview talk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jeff Love: Dst statistics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slava Merkin: ionospheric turbulence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics include overlap with TIMI (role of entropy bubbles in the inner magnetosphere), as well as other topics relevant to both focus groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presenters: &amp;lt;presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Wiltberger&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Henderson(LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Natalia Ganushkina and Stepan Dubyagin&lt;br /&gt;
# Sheng-Hsien (Sean) Chen (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bob Schunk (USU) &lt;br /&gt;
# Matina Gkioulidou (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Xueling Shi (VTech)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Geospace Systems Science + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Joe Borovsky (Systems), Bill Lotko (Systems), Vadim Uritsky (Systems), Juan Valdivia (Systems), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Binzheng Zhang&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Colin Komar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Misha Sitnov - tearing stability criterion'&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Bill Lotko - effects of auroral (low-altitude) field-aligned potential drops on nightside reconnection and energy flow in MI coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Systems-Science Tools, Methodologies, and Results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jacob Bortnik: Machine learning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Konstantin Gamayunov: System-based approach to EMIC waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delores Knipp: Estimating uncertainty in DMSP Poynting&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lutz Rastatter: Modeling joule heat in the ionosphere&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Colby Haggerty, heating during reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Shan Wang - Electron heating during magnetotail reconnection: deriving the heating coefficient and effects of unloading&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Rick Wilder, moving X-line in cusp&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Paul Cassak, asymmetric reconnection with flow shear&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friday, June 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MIC tutorial''' by ''Stein Haaland'' -- Cold ion outflow from the polar cap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Behavior of the Geospace System”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jonathan Krall: SAMI3 simulations of M-I-T coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wen Li: solar wind and the radiation belts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vania Jordanova: multiple connections in the magnetosphere in the SHIELDS project&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Borovsky: behavior modes from global correlation analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2430</id>
		<title>2015 Summer Workshop</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2430"/>
		<updated>2015-06-12T12:58:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* [FG] Metrics and Validation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''June 14-19 2015'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Viceroy Hotels, Resorts &amp;amp; Residences, Snowmass, Colorado'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is a ''fluid'' list of speakers provided by the GEM Workshop Coordinator and Focus Groups. The information here serves as a rough guide for those who wish to know the most updated session plans. Due to the nature of the GEM Workshop, Focus Groups may continue to revise their agenda as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All other information about the 2015 Summer Workshop can be found at the [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html GEM Meeting Coordinator Website]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Monday, June 15 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MPS tutorial''' by ''Toshi Nishimura'' -- Fast flow channels in the magnetotail and auroral oval: Reconnection, substorm and beyond&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GSM tutorial''' by ''Alex Glocer'' -- Global modeling of the space environment system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail Environment and Dynamics at Lunar Distances ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hui Zhang: Transient phenomena at tail Bow shock and magnetopause &lt;br /&gt;
* Sheng-Hsien Chen: K-H at the magnetopause and waves at LLBL &lt;br /&gt;
* Denny Oliveria: Tail response to interplanetary shocks&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Stubbs (presented by David Sibeck): Mid-tail structure&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Fear: Magnetotail structure associated with transpolar arcs&lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi: Ion cyclotron waves at the Moon and their connection to the plasma sheet and the lunar exosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* Ivan Vasko:Geotail observations in mid and distant tail&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrei Runov: Reconnection in the mid-tail&lt;br /&gt;
* John Lyon: LFM simulation of bubble formation in mid-tail during growth phase&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: The role of mid-tail in Geospace Systems Science&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Schunk: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 1 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Vince Eccles: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 2 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Abdallah Barakat: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 3 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Katie Garcia-Sage: MFLFM Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Simulation Results (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Lotko: Overview of Recent LFM Modeling and Thoughts for the Future (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Lyons: Review--Hybrid scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Henderson: Review--Inside-out scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Kepko: Review--Outside-in scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Yukinaga Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Phil Pritchett: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Joachim Birn: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Misha Sitnov: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Mostafa El-Alaoui: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Walk-ins welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 1 (Mon, 01:30-03:00 PM):''' “Radiation Belt (RB) observations and modeling results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Weichao Tu and Steve Morley''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Mary Hudson: Recent simulation of the 'St Patrick's Day storm'&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Alexander Drozdov: The VERB code modeling of the St. Patrick’s day Storm&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Dan Baker: Impenetrable Barrier during March 17 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Allison Jaynes: Fast diffusion of ultra-relativistic electrons: 17 March 2015 storm event&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Thiago Brito: Simulations on Radiation Belt Electron Precipitation Response to ULF Waves&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Drew Turner: Storm-time analysis of RB&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Xinlin Li: Deep Injections of 10s – 100s of keV electrons (RBSP observations)&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Jay Albert: Modeling “peculiar” pitch angle distributions with MS waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models Compared to Observations'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionos-Magnetosphere Models for GEM Storms (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn Kistler: Cluster Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: LANL Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Stein Haaland: The Estimation of Cold Plasma Outflow During Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Robert McPherron: Point Processes: Association of Lists&lt;br /&gt;
*Nadine Kalmoni: Auroral dispersion relation&lt;br /&gt;
*Kyle Murphy: tools and methods&lt;br /&gt;
*Eric Donovan: Circle grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 2 (Mon, 03:30-05:00 PM):''' “Various magnetospheric wave characteristics and their global distribution required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Wen Li and Jay Albert''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Ashar Ali: Radial Diffusion Coefficients Using E and B Field Data from the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Seth Claudepierre: Advertisement for the GEM ULF Wave Challenge &lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xinlin Li: Relation between ULF and radial diffusion of RB electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Lauren Blum: The relationship between EMIC waves and radiation belt electron precipitation&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Wen Li: Global distribution of chorus wave intensity using the statistical model and POES technique&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Jay Albert: Nonlinear wave-particle interaction&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Qianli Ma: Evaluation of electron scattering due to typical magnetosonic waves using analytical formula&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Lunjin Chen: The effect of bounce resonance with magnetosonic waves on the radiation belt electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:9.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Storm-induced energization and losses of radiation belt electrons: Effects of wave obliquity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Inter-Model Comparison for GEM Storm Periods and New Measurements'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued Discussion of Merged Models and Measurements Comparison&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura: Ion Outflow Topics (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Varney: Hysteresis Effects in Coupled MFLFM-IPWM Models (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Barbara Giles: Initial Plasma Measurements from MMS (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Krall: Ion Fluxes Into and Out of a Model Plasmasphere During Storm and Plasmasphere Refilling During Quiet Time (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Vassilis Angelopoulos: HSO&lt;br /&gt;
*FG learders: Future planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tuesday, June 16 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Weichao Tu'' -- title&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Seth Claudepierre'' -- title&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 3 (Tue, 10:30-12:15 PM):''' “Seed populations, plasma density, and magnetic field configuration required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jay Albert and Weichao Tu''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Natalia Ganushkina: Low energy electrons in the inner magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Mick Denton: An empirical model of electron and ion fluxes derived from observations at geosynchronous orbit&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Alex Boyd: Quantifying the Radiation Belt Seed Population During the Van Allen Probes Era&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Time Domain Structures: generation mechanisms and effects for electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Xiangrong Fu: Double layers associated with electron/ion acoustic waves&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Zhao Li: 3D test-particle simulation of the 17-18 March, 2013 CME-shock driven storm&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	James McCollough: DSX is still happening&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Alex Crew: New results from FIREBIRD II&lt;br /&gt;
:9.    Quintin Schiller: A novel technique to apply electron lifetimes to radial diffusion models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''General Discussion of Modeling and Observations and Focus Group Planning'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Omelchenko: Global Multiscale Magnetospheric Simulations: HYPERS (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* John Wygant: The Powering of Highly Efficient Poynting Flux-Driven Wind Using Polar Spacecraft Measurements (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bruce Fritz: Ion Upflow Dependence on Ionospheric Density and Solar Photoionization (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Peterson: A New Look at DE-1 Escaping Ion Observations at Non-Storm Times (10 min) -- Accompanying poster by Kristina Lu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms + Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Shin Ohtani - Morphological mapping based on the stability of the magnetotail&lt;br /&gt;
*Emma Spanswick - Riometer injection&lt;br /&gt;
*Elizabeth Roy - Open-closed boundary&lt;br /&gt;
*Jiang Liu - Current wedge structuring&lt;br /&gt;
*Chao Yue - 3-D magnetic field modeling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 4 (Tue, 01:30-03:00 PM):''' “RB &amp;quot;dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;buildup&amp;quot; challenges and Planning for future activities”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Steve Morley and Wen Li''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General short presentations (01:30-02:00 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Yuri Shprits: Recent results of the reanalysis&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Shri Kanekal and Dan Baker: Electron bursts during 17 March 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Brian Kress: Observations and modeling of rebuilding during storms &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Buildup&amp;quot; Challenges (02:00-03:00 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Drew Turner: Candidate “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	QARBM FG leaders: Discussion of “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:6.    Open discussions and plan for future FG activities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two SIMIC sessions on Tuesday afternoon will focus mainly on the chosen events: 2013-03-17 and 2012-11-01 storms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A tentative list of presenters:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lyons/Nishimura/Gallardo (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Rick Wilder (LASP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Margaret Chen (Aerospace)&lt;br /&gt;
# Gang Lu (NCAR)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jonathan Krall (NRL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Peter Chi (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Alex Glocer for Mei-Ching Fok (NASA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Liemohn and Roxanne Katus (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu and Vania Jordanova (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
#. Elizabeth MacDonald (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
#. Bob Lysak (Univ. Minnesota)&lt;br /&gt;
#. Mike Schulz&lt;br /&gt;
#. James Weygand (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jerry Goldstein (SwRI) &lt;br /&gt;
# Jimmy Raeder (UNH)&lt;br /&gt;
# Dave Sibeck (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Brian Anderson (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Vassilis Angelopoulos (TIMI), Pontus Brandt (TIMI), John Lyon (TIMI), Frank Toffoletto (TIMI), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene Setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Joachim Birn&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Jim Drake&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Slava Merkin - magnetotail stability in the presence of B_z minimum&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Misha Sitnov - new class of equilibria taking into account dipole field and B_z hump&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Misha Sitnov - temperature increase at dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Haoming Liang (w/Ashour-Abdalla and Walker) - oxygen effects on dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:5. Ying Zou - imager observations of PBI triggering by polar cap structures&lt;br /&gt;
:6. Toshi Nishimura - MHD simulation of nightside localized reconnection triggering by lobe flow channels&lt;br /&gt;
:7. Yu Lin - global hybrid simulation of the storm-time magnetotail and reconnection flux ropes&lt;br /&gt;
:8. Phil Pritchett - instability of current sheets with a localized accumulation of magnetic flux&lt;br /&gt;
:9.Phil Pritchett - structure of reconnection flow jets&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling + Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 5 (Tue, 03:30-05:00 PM):''' “Joint session with “Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions” FG”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jichun Zhang and Weichao Tu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Wen Li: Quantitative simulation of radiation belt electron dynamics using 3D diffusion code&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Yuri Shprits: Combined Convective and Diffusive Simulation: VERB-4D Results&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xiangrong Fu: Modeling EMIC wave generation from ring current ions&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Anthony Saikin: The geomagnetic condition dependence of the spatial distributions of EMIC waves observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Jacob Bortnik: Generation of chorus waves in a lab plasma&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Xin An: Linear excitation of whistler waves&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Shuo Wu: Hybrid Code Simulations of Whistler Waves in Compressed Dipole Field&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Chih-ping Wang: Multi-point observation of ULF waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Continuing the [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/2015_Summer_Workshop#.5BFG.5D_Storm-time_Inner_Magnetosphere-Ionosphere_Convection SIMIC session at 1330-1500].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Time Lags in Solar Wind-Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Interactions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
speakers will include&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Mick Denton: mass transport&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob McPherron: physical interpretation of time lags&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Roger Varney: ionospheric outflow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Shin Ohtani: circuit timescales&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob Clauer: ionospheric convection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wednesday, June 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Vladimir Papitashvili'' -- Introduction&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Janet Kozyra'' -- NSF GEM Program&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Howard Singer'' -- NOAA Agency Report&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Bill Lotko'' -- Overview of NSF AGS Portfolio Review and Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;wave-particle interactions&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17, Wednesday 10:30-12:15pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mark Engebretson (Challenge event) - Van Allen probes, NOAA, and ground observations of an intense Pc 1 wave event extending 12 hours in MLT and its resulting depletion of the outer radiation belt&lt;br /&gt;
# Justin Lee (Challenge event) - Discussion of Wave-Particle Interactions during the 18-22 Feb 2014 Storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Michael Hartinger -The effect of azimuthal wave number on ULF wave-particle interactions&lt;br /&gt;
# Chen Zhou - Excitation of Dayside Chorus Waves due to Magnetic Field Line Compression in Response to Interplanetary Shocks&lt;br /&gt;
# Homayon Aryan - The distribution of plasmaspheric Hiss and Chorus waves in the inner magnetosphere as functions of geomagnetic activity and solar wind parameters&lt;br /&gt;
# Robert Allen - Statistical study of EMIC waves observed by Cluster&lt;br /&gt;
# Konstantin Gamayunov - Multiscale nature of electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave development in Earth’s magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Vania Jordanova - RAM-SCB simulations of plasma wave dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
# Adam Kellerman - Forecasting the Earth’s radiation environment with GREEP and VERB: a synthesis of empirical- and physics-based modeling across multiple energies and spatial regions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Foreshock Phenomena&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Zixu Liu &amp;quot;THEMIS observations of tangential discontinuity-driven foreshock bubbles&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Nick Omidi (presented by Jean Berchem) “Impacts of SHFAs on the Magnetosheath &amp;amp; Magnetopause”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Hui Zhang &amp;quot;Evolution of HFAs: Cluster Observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Olga Gutynska “Density enhancements in the magnetosheath: comparison with simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #1:  Magnetopause crossing challenge and additional M&amp;amp;V contributions'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter:  Overview and initial results from the Magnetopause Crossing Challenge&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger:  Magnetopause dynamics during the March 17th, 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Redmon:  The future of GOES: Magnetic field and particle observation and modeling to determine magnetopause crossings&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Liemohn:  Assessment of the CCMC Experimental Real-time SWMF-Geospace Results&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Model skill as a function of solar wind driving.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Ilja Honkonen: Data / Model comparisons with GUMICS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''' M&amp;amp;V Wrap up:  Recent highlights and future plans for Metrics &amp;amp; Validation at GEM''' &lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer dicussion lead&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] HSO coordination ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;plasma-field coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 1:30-3:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith - Plasmaspheric Suprathermal Heating from Cyclotron Resonance with Equatorial Noise&lt;br /&gt;
# Raluca Ilie - Calculating the Inductive electric fields in the terrestrial magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Samuel Califf - Van Allen Probes observations of SAPS during the 28 June 2013 geomagnetic storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Hong Zhao - The evolution of ring current ion energy density and energy content during geomagnetic storms based on Van Allen Probes measurements&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang	- “Trunk-like” heavy ion structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
# Cristian Ferradas -	Ion nose spectral structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Magnetopause Phenomena&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Hyunju Connor “Thermospheric heating in the high-latitude dayside regions after the sudden enhancement of solar wind dynamic pressure: OpenGGCM-CTIM results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Denny Oliveira &amp;lt;dennymauricio@gmail.com&amp;gt; “Impact angle control of IP shock geoeffectiveness: results of simulations and observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Michael Hartinger “The global structure and time evolution of dayside magnetopause surface eigenmodes”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Chih-Ping Wang “The hot electron enhancement in mid-tail magnetosheath and its dawn-dusk asymmetry”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Sun-Hee Lee (Presented by Hui Zhang) “Cold dense plasma observed at the Dayside Magnetopause and their dependence on solar wind and geomagnetic conditions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #1:  Magnetopause crossing challenge and additional M&amp;amp;V contributions'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter:  Overview and initial results from the Magnetopause Crossing Challenge&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger:  Magnetopause dynamics during the March 17th, 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Redmon:  The future of GOES: Magnetic field and particle observation and modeling to determine magnetopause crossings&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Liemohn:  Assessment of the CCMC Experimental Real-time SWMF-Geospace Results&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Model skill as a function of solar wind driving.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Ilja Honkonen: Data / Model comparisons with GUMICS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''' M&amp;amp;V Wrap up:  Recent highlights and future plans for Metrics &amp;amp; Validation at GEM''' &lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer dicussion lead&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] SPEDAS Software ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Topic: &amp;quot;magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 3:30-5:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Dan Welling - Relationship between ionospheric outflow and the ring current&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov - Superthermal Electrons Magnetosphere – Ionosphere Coupling in the Regions of Diffuse Aurora&lt;br /&gt;
# Megan Gillies - Investigating pulsating aurora at low electron energies&lt;br /&gt;
# Ryan Mcgranaghan - Modes of high-latitude conductance variability derived from DMSP F6-F8 and F16-F18 energetic electron precipitation observations: Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis&lt;br /&gt;
# Alexa Halford  (challenge event) - BARREL Observations of long period precipitation on Jan 26th 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang   (challenge event) - EMIC waves and associated relativistic electron precipitation on 25-26 January 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu  (challenge event) - Modeling ionospheric electron precipitation due to wave particle interactions in the ring current during the 25-26 January 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
# Yi-Jiun Su (challenge event) -RBSP/MagEIS observations: Local electron acceleration in the inner radiation belt?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Ground Signatures&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Michael Hartinger “The effect of northern-southern hemisphere conductivity asymmetries on ground magnetic responses during a large solar wind transient”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Christina Chu “Hot Flow Anomalies at the Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere + Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection), Tim Guild (Metrics), Masha Kuznetsova (Metrics), Lutz Rastaetter (Metrics), Aaron Ridley (Metrics), Howard Singer (Metrics)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Discussion of finding the electron diffusion region (with MMS)&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Discussion of PIC simulations into CCMC&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Liang Wang - Integrating a multi-fluid moment code into OpenGGCM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] TDAS demo ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thursday, June 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''SWMI tutorial''' by ''Robert Fear'' -- Flux transfer events: Looking ahead to MMS&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Student-invited tutorial''' by ''Barbara Giles'' -- title&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Analysis of Extreme Events”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surja Sharma: overview talk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jeff Love: Dst statistics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slava Merkin: ionospheric turbulence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics include overlap with TIMI (role of entropy bubbles in the inner magnetosphere), as well as other topics relevant to both focus groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presenters: &amp;lt;presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Wiltberger&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Henderson(LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Natalia Ganushkina and Stepan Dubyagin&lt;br /&gt;
# Sheng-Hsien (Sean) Chen (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bob Schunk (USU) &lt;br /&gt;
# Matina Gkioulidou (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Xueling Shi (VTech)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Geospace Systems Science + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Joe Borovsky (Systems), Bill Lotko (Systems), Vadim Uritsky (Systems), Juan Valdivia (Systems), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Binzheng Zhang&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Colin Komar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Misha Sitnov - tearing stability criterion'&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Bill Lotko - effects of auroral (low-altitude) field-aligned potential drops on nightside reconnection and energy flow in MI coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Systems-Science Tools, Methodologies, and Results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jacob Bortnik: Machine learning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Konstantin Gamayunov: System-based approach to EMIC waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delores Knipp: Estimating uncertainty in DMSP Poynting&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lutz Rastatter: Modeling joule heat in the ionosphere&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Colby Haggerty, heating during reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Shan Wang - Electron heating during magnetotail reconnection: deriving the heating coefficient and effects of unloading&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Rick Wilder, moving X-line in cusp&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Paul Cassak, asymmetric reconnection with flow shear&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friday, June 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MIC tutorial''' by ''Stein Haaland'' -- Cold ion outflow from the polar cap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Behavior of the Geospace System”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jonathan Krall: SAMI3 simulations of M-I-T coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wen Li: solar wind and the radiation belts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vania Jordanova: multiple connections in the magnetosphere in the SHIELDS project&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Borovsky: behavior modes from global correlation analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2429</id>
		<title>2015 Summer Workshop</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=2429"/>
		<updated>2015-06-12T12:58:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* [FG] Metrics and Validation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''June 14-19 2015'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Viceroy Hotels, Resorts &amp;amp; Residences, Snowmass, Colorado'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is a ''fluid'' list of speakers provided by the GEM Workshop Coordinator and Focus Groups. The information here serves as a rough guide for those who wish to know the most updated session plans. Due to the nature of the GEM Workshop, Focus Groups may continue to revise their agenda as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All other information about the 2015 Summer Workshop can be found at the [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html GEM Meeting Coordinator Website]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Monday, June 15 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MPS tutorial''' by ''Toshi Nishimura'' -- Fast flow channels in the magnetotail and auroral oval: Reconnection, substorm and beyond&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GSM tutorial''' by ''Alex Glocer'' -- Global modeling of the space environment system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail Environment and Dynamics at Lunar Distances ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hui Zhang: Transient phenomena at tail Bow shock and magnetopause &lt;br /&gt;
* Sheng-Hsien Chen: K-H at the magnetopause and waves at LLBL &lt;br /&gt;
* Denny Oliveria: Tail response to interplanetary shocks&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Stubbs (presented by David Sibeck): Mid-tail structure&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Fear: Magnetotail structure associated with transpolar arcs&lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi: Ion cyclotron waves at the Moon and their connection to the plasma sheet and the lunar exosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* Ivan Vasko:Geotail observations in mid and distant tail&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrei Runov: Reconnection in the mid-tail&lt;br /&gt;
* John Lyon: LFM simulation of bubble formation in mid-tail during growth phase&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: The role of mid-tail in Geospace Systems Science&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Schunk: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 1 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Vince Eccles: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 2 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Abdallah Barakat: Generalized Polar Wind Models of GEM Storms, 3 (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Katie Garcia-Sage: MFLFM Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Simulation Results (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Lotko: Overview of Recent LFM Modeling and Thoughts for the Future (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Lyons: Review--Hybrid scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Henderson: Review--Inside-out scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry Kepko: Review--Outside-in scenario&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Yukinaga Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Phil Pritchett: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Joachim Birn: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Misha Sitnov: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Mostafa El-Alaoui: Comments from modeler&lt;br /&gt;
*Walk-ins welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 1 (Mon, 01:30-03:00 PM):''' “Radiation Belt (RB) observations and modeling results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Weichao Tu and Steve Morley''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Mary Hudson: Recent simulation of the 'St Patrick's Day storm'&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Alexander Drozdov: The VERB code modeling of the St. Patrick’s day Storm&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Dan Baker: Impenetrable Barrier during March 17 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Allison Jaynes: Fast diffusion of ultra-relativistic electrons: 17 March 2015 storm event&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Thiago Brito: Simulations on Radiation Belt Electron Precipitation Response to ULF Waves&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Drew Turner: Storm-time analysis of RB&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Xinlin Li: Deep Injections of 10s – 100s of keV electrons (RBSP observations)&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Jay Albert: Modeling “peculiar” pitch angle distributions with MS waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Merged Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Models Compared to Observations'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Merged Ionos-Magnetosphere Models for GEM Storms (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn Kistler: Cluster Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: LANL Measurement/Model Comparisons During GEM Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Stein Haaland: The Estimation of Cold Plasma Outflow During Storms (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Robert McPherron: Point Processes: Association of Lists&lt;br /&gt;
*Nadine Kalmoni: Auroral dispersion relation&lt;br /&gt;
*Kyle Murphy: tools and methods&lt;br /&gt;
*Eric Donovan: Circle grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 2 (Mon, 03:30-05:00 PM):''' “Various magnetospheric wave characteristics and their global distribution required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Wen Li and Jay Albert''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Ashar Ali: Radial Diffusion Coefficients Using E and B Field Data from the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Seth Claudepierre: Advertisement for the GEM ULF Wave Challenge &lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xinlin Li: Relation between ULF and radial diffusion of RB electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Lauren Blum: The relationship between EMIC waves and radiation belt electron precipitation&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Wen Li: Global distribution of chorus wave intensity using the statistical model and POES technique&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Jay Albert: Nonlinear wave-particle interaction&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Qianli Ma: Evaluation of electron scattering due to typical magnetosonic waves using analytical formula&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Lunjin Chen: The effect of bounce resonance with magnetosonic waves on the radiation belt electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:9.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Storm-induced energization and losses of radiation belt electrons: Effects of wave obliquity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Inter-Model Comparison for GEM Storm Periods and New Measurements'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued Discussion of Merged Models and Measurements Comparison&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura: Ion Outflow Topics (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Varney: Hysteresis Effects in Coupled MFLFM-IPWM Models (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Barbara Giles: Initial Plasma Measurements from MMS (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Krall: Ion Fluxes Into and Out of a Model Plasmasphere During Storm and Plasmasphere Refilling During Quiet Time (20 min)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohtani/Motoba: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Miyashita: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy/Mann/Rae: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Nishimura/Lyons: Event presentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Vassilis Angelopoulos: HSO&lt;br /&gt;
*FG learders: Future planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tuesday, June 16 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Weichao Tu'' -- title&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMAG tutorial''' by ''Seth Claudepierre'' -- title&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 3 (Tue, 10:30-12:15 PM):''' “Seed populations, plasma density, and magnetic field configuration required in RB modeling”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jay Albert and Weichao Tu''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Natalia Ganushkina: Low energy electrons in the inner magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Mick Denton: An empirical model of electron and ion fluxes derived from observations at geosynchronous orbit&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Alex Boyd: Quantifying the Radiation Belt Seed Population During the Van Allen Probes Era&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Oleksiy Agapitov: Time Domain Structures: generation mechanisms and effects for electrons&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Xiangrong Fu: Double layers associated with electron/ion acoustic waves&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Zhao Li: 3D test-particle simulation of the 17-18 March, 2013 CME-shock driven storm&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	James McCollough: DSX is still happening&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Alex Crew: New results from FIREBIRD II&lt;br /&gt;
:9.    Quintin Schiller: A novel technique to apply electron lifetimes to radial diffusion models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''General Discussion of Modeling and Observations and Focus Group Planning'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Omelchenko: Global Multiscale Magnetospheric Simulations: HYPERS (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* John Wygant: The Powering of Highly Efficient Poynting Flux-Driven Wind Using Polar Spacecraft Measurements (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bruce Fritz: Ion Upflow Dependence on Ionospheric Density and Solar Photoionization (15 min)&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Peterson: A New Look at DE-1 Escaping Ion Observations at Non-Storm Times (10 min) -- Accompanying poster by Kristina Lu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Testing Proposed Links between Mesoscale Auroral and Polar Cap Dynamics and Substorms + Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Shin Ohtani - Morphological mapping based on the stability of the magnetotail&lt;br /&gt;
*Emma Spanswick - Riometer injection&lt;br /&gt;
*Elizabeth Roy - Open-closed boundary&lt;br /&gt;
*Jiang Liu - Current wedge structuring&lt;br /&gt;
*Chao Yue - 3-D magnetic field modeling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 4 (Tue, 01:30-03:00 PM):''' “RB &amp;quot;dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;buildup&amp;quot; challenges and Planning for future activities”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Steve Morley and Wen Li''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General short presentations (01:30-02:00 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Yuri Shprits: Recent results of the reanalysis&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Shri Kanekal and Dan Baker: Electron bursts during 17 March 2015 storm&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Brian Kress: Observations and modeling of rebuilding during storms &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Dropout&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Buildup&amp;quot; Challenges (02:00-03:00 PM)&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Drew Turner: Candidate “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	QARBM FG leaders: Discussion of “Dropout” and “Buildup” challenge events&lt;br /&gt;
:6.    Open discussions and plan for future FG activities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two SIMIC sessions on Tuesday afternoon will focus mainly on the chosen events: 2013-03-17 and 2012-11-01 storms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A tentative list of presenters:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lyons/Nishimura/Gallardo (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Rick Wilder (LASP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Margaret Chen (Aerospace)&lt;br /&gt;
# Gang Lu (NCAR)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jonathan Krall (NRL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Peter Chi (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Alex Glocer for Mei-Ching Fok (NASA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Liemohn and Roxanne Katus (Michigan)&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu and Vania Jordanova (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
#. Elizabeth MacDonald (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
#. Bob Lysak (Univ. Minnesota)&lt;br /&gt;
#. Mike Schulz&lt;br /&gt;
#. James Weygand (UCLA)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jerry Goldstein (SwRI) &lt;br /&gt;
# Jimmy Raeder (UNH)&lt;br /&gt;
# Dave Sibeck (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Brian Anderson (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Vassilis Angelopoulos (TIMI), Pontus Brandt (TIMI), John Lyon (TIMI), Frank Toffoletto (TIMI), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene Setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Joachim Birn&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Jim Drake&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Slava Merkin - magnetotail stability in the presence of B_z minimum&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Misha Sitnov - new class of equilibria taking into account dipole field and B_z hump&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Misha Sitnov - temperature increase at dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Haoming Liang (w/Ashour-Abdalla and Walker) - oxygen effects on dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
:5. Ying Zou - imager observations of PBI triggering by polar cap structures&lt;br /&gt;
:6. Toshi Nishimura - MHD simulation of nightside localized reconnection triggering by lobe flow channels&lt;br /&gt;
:7. Yu Lin - global hybrid simulation of the storm-time magnetotail and reconnection flux ropes&lt;br /&gt;
:8. Phil Pritchett - instability of current sheets with a localized accumulation of magnetic flux&lt;br /&gt;
:9.Phil Pritchett - structure of reconnection flow jets&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling + Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 5 (Tue, 03:30-05:00 PM):''' “Joint session with “Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions” FG”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Jichun Zhang and Weichao Tu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1.	Wen Li: Quantitative simulation of radiation belt electron dynamics using 3D diffusion code&lt;br /&gt;
:2.	Yuri Shprits: Combined Convective and Diffusive Simulation: VERB-4D Results&lt;br /&gt;
:3.	Xiangrong Fu: Modeling EMIC wave generation from ring current ions&lt;br /&gt;
:4.	Anthony Saikin: The geomagnetic condition dependence of the spatial distributions of EMIC waves observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
:5.	Jacob Bortnik: Generation of chorus waves in a lab plasma&lt;br /&gt;
:6.	Xin An: Linear excitation of whistler waves&lt;br /&gt;
:7.	Shuo Wu: Hybrid Code Simulations of Whistler Waves in Compressed Dipole Field&lt;br /&gt;
:8.	Chih-ping Wang: Multi-point observation of ULF waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Continuing the [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/2015_Summer_Workshop#.5BFG.5D_Storm-time_Inner_Magnetosphere-Ionosphere_Convection SIMIC session at 1330-1500].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Time Lags in Solar Wind-Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Interactions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
speakers will include&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Mick Denton: mass transport&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob McPherron: physical interpretation of time lags&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Roger Varney: ionospheric outflow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Shin Ohtani: circuit timescales&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Bob Clauer: ionospheric convection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wednesday, June 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Vladimir Papitashvili'' -- Introduction&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Janet Kozyra'' -- NSF GEM Program&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency report''' by ''Howard Singer'' -- NOAA Agency Report&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Bill Lotko'' -- Overview of NSF AGS Portfolio Review and Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;wave-particle interactions&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17, Wednesday 10:30-12:15pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mark Engebretson (Challenge event) - Van Allen probes, NOAA, and ground observations of an intense Pc 1 wave event extending 12 hours in MLT and its resulting depletion of the outer radiation belt&lt;br /&gt;
# Justin Lee (Challenge event) - Discussion of Wave-Particle Interactions during the 18-22 Feb 2014 Storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Michael Hartinger -The effect of azimuthal wave number on ULF wave-particle interactions&lt;br /&gt;
# Chen Zhou - Excitation of Dayside Chorus Waves due to Magnetic Field Line Compression in Response to Interplanetary Shocks&lt;br /&gt;
# Homayon Aryan - The distribution of plasmaspheric Hiss and Chorus waves in the inner magnetosphere as functions of geomagnetic activity and solar wind parameters&lt;br /&gt;
# Robert Allen - Statistical study of EMIC waves observed by Cluster&lt;br /&gt;
# Konstantin Gamayunov - Multiscale nature of electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave development in Earth’s magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Vania Jordanova - RAM-SCB simulations of plasma wave dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
# Adam Kellerman - Forecasting the Earth’s radiation environment with GREEP and VERB: a synthesis of empirical- and physics-based modeling across multiple energies and spatial regions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Foreshock Phenomena&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Zixu Liu &amp;quot;THEMIS observations of tangential discontinuity-driven foreshock bubbles&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Nick Omidi (presented by Jean Berchem) “Impacts of SHFAs on the Magnetosheath &amp;amp; Magnetopause”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Hui Zhang &amp;quot;Evolution of HFAs: Cluster Observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Olga Gutynska “Density enhancements in the magnetosheath: comparison with simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] HSO coordination ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Topic: &amp;quot;plasma-field coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 1:30-3:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Lois Smith - Plasmaspheric Suprathermal Heating from Cyclotron Resonance with Equatorial Noise&lt;br /&gt;
# Raluca Ilie - Calculating the Inductive electric fields in the terrestrial magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
# Samuel Califf - Van Allen Probes observations of SAPS during the 28 June 2013 geomagnetic storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Hong Zhao - The evolution of ring current ion energy density and energy content during geomagnetic storms based on Van Allen Probes measurements&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang	- “Trunk-like” heavy ion structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
# Cristian Ferradas -	Ion nose spectral structures observed by the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Magnetopause Phenomena&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Hyunju Connor “Thermospheric heating in the high-latitude dayside regions after the sudden enhancement of solar wind dynamic pressure: OpenGGCM-CTIM results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Denny Oliveira &amp;lt;dennymauricio@gmail.com&amp;gt; “Impact angle control of IP shock geoeffectiveness: results of simulations and observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Michael Hartinger “The global structure and time evolution of dayside magnetopause surface eigenmodes”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Chih-Ping Wang “The hot electron enhancement in mid-tail magnetosheath and its dawn-dusk asymmetry”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Sun-Hee Lee (Presented by Hui Zhang) “Cold dense plasma observed at the Dayside Magnetopause and their dependence on solar wind and geomagnetic conditions”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session #1:  Magnetopause crossing challenge and additional M&amp;amp;V contributions'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter:  Overview and initial results from the Magnetopause Crossing Challenge&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger:  Magnetopause dynamics during the March 17th, 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob Redmon:  The future of GOES: Magnetic field and particle observation and modeling to determine magnetopause crossings&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Liemohn:  Assessment of the CCMC Experimental Real-time SWMF-Geospace Results&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Model skill as a function of solar wind driving.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Ilja Honkonen: Data / Model comparisons with GUMICS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''' M&amp;amp;V Wrap up:  Recent highlights and future plans for Metrics &amp;amp; Validation at GEM''' &lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer dicussion lead&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] SPEDAS Software ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Topic: &amp;quot;magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
June 17 Wednesday 3:30-5:00pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Dan Welling - Relationship between ionospheric outflow and the ring current&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov - Superthermal Electrons Magnetosphere – Ionosphere Coupling in the Regions of Diffuse Aurora&lt;br /&gt;
# Megan Gillies - Investigating pulsating aurora at low electron energies&lt;br /&gt;
# Ryan Mcgranaghan - Modes of high-latitude conductance variability derived from DMSP F6-F8 and F16-F18 energetic electron precipitation observations: Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis&lt;br /&gt;
# Alexa Halford  (challenge event) - BARREL Observations of long period precipitation on Jan 26th 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang   (challenge event) - EMIC waves and associated relativistic electron precipitation on 25-26 January 2013&lt;br /&gt;
# Yiqun Yu  (challenge event) - Modeling ionospheric electron precipitation due to wave particle interactions in the ring current during the 25-26 January 2013 event&lt;br /&gt;
# Yi-Jiun Su (challenge event) -RBSP/MagEIS observations: Local electron acceleration in the inner radiation belt?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topic: Ground Signatures&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Michael Hartinger “The effect of northern-southern hemisphere conductivity asymmetries on ground magnetic responses during a large solar wind transient”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Christina Chu “Hot Flow Anomalies at the Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere + Metrics and Validation ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection), Tim Guild (Metrics), Masha Kuznetsova (Metrics), Lutz Rastaetter (Metrics), Aaron Ridley (Metrics), Howard Singer (Metrics)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Discussion of finding the electron diffusion region (with MMS)&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Discussion of PIC simulations into CCMC&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Liang Wang - Integrating a multi-fluid moment code into OpenGGCM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] TDAS demo ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thursday, June 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''SWMI tutorial''' by ''Robert Fear'' -- Flux transfer events: Looking ahead to MMS&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Student-invited tutorial''' by ''Barbara Giles'' -- title&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Analysis of Extreme Events”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surja Sharma: overview talk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jeff Love: Dst statistics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slava Merkin: ionospheric turbulence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions + Storm-time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics include overlap with TIMI (role of entropy bubbles in the inner magnetosphere), as well as other topics relevant to both focus groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presenters: &amp;lt;presentation titles omitted&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Wiltberger&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Henderson(LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
# George Khazanov (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Natalia Ganushkina and Stepan Dubyagin&lt;br /&gt;
# Sheng-Hsien (Sean) Chen (GSFC)&lt;br /&gt;
# Bob Schunk (USU) &lt;br /&gt;
# Matina Gkioulidou (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani (JHU/APL)&lt;br /&gt;
# Xueling Shi (VTech)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] (Joint) Geospace Systems Science + Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Joe Borovsky (Systems), Bill Lotko (Systems), Vadim Uritsky (Systems), Juan Valdivia (Systems), Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scene setting talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Binzheng Zhang&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Colin Komar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributed talks&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Misha Sitnov - tearing stability criterion'&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Bill Lotko - effects of auroral (low-altitude) field-aligned potential drops on nightside reconnection and energy flow in MI coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Systems-Science Tools, Methodologies, and Results”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jacob Bortnik: Machine learning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Konstantin Gamayunov: System-based approach to EMIC waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delores Knipp: Estimating uncertainty in DMSP Poynting&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lutz Rastatter: Modeling joule heat in the ionosphere&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Chairs: Paul Cassak (Reconnection), Yi-Hsin Liu (Reconnection), Andrei Runov (Reconnection), Brian Walsh (Reconnection)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Colby Haggerty, heating during reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Shan Wang - Electron heating during magnetotail reconnection: deriving the heating coefficient and effects of unloading&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Rick Wilder, moving X-line in cusp&lt;br /&gt;
:4. Paul Cassak, asymmetric reconnection with flow shear&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friday, June 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000: Plenary Session ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MIC tutorial''' by ''Stein Haaland'' -- Cold ion outflow from the polar cap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030-1215: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [FG] Geospace Systems Science ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Behavior of the Geospace System”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jonathan Krall: SAMI3 simulations of M-I-T coupling&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wen Li: solar wind and the radiation belts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vania Jordanova: multiple connections in the magnetosphere in the SHIELDS project&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Borovsky: behavior modes from global correlation analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience Discussion&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2196</id>
		<title>FG: Metrics and Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2196"/>
		<updated>2015-01-26T18:54:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* Models */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Co-Chairs: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ULF Wave Modeling Challenge == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models to reproduce ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere, and ultimately if those ULF fields can radially diffuse an existing electron population from L~5.5 to L~4.5 in two weeks.  To get there, we can split the question into two distinct ones:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Can global models of the magnetosphere reproduce the observed persistent, solar wind driven, low mode number ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere? and...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Are those waves capable of producing  the observed energetic radiation belt population evolution observed during the first two weeks of March 2013 as observed by Van Allen Probes? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:radialDiffusionInterval.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figure above is the REPT flux from http://www.rbsp-ect.lanl.gov/science/LTPlots/RBSP-ECT_LT_Mission_plot.pdf with the interval I mentioned circled in pink.  Tick marks in time (x-axis) are one month in duration.  The modest electron belt which starts out at L~5.5 seems to diffuse inward a whole L in two weeks.  I would think that a key aspect of that question which MHD models could uniquely constrain is the fraction of the diffusion which is accomplished by solar wind driving alone. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1st question above may be divided into two basic ULF wave challenges dealing with (Level 0) a idealized continuum of solar wind frequencies [Claudepierre et al., 2010, Paragraph 12] and (Level 1) the real solar wind input from 1-16 March 2013.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Observations === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Remotely sensed ULF wave fields from magnetometers (U. Alberta)&lt;br /&gt;
* Space-based ULF wave power from March, 2013 (Sarris/Schiller)&lt;br /&gt;
* EMFISIS wave fields from Van Allen Probes (who?)  &lt;br /&gt;
* ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Models === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* LFM (Claudepierre)&lt;br /&gt;
* BATS-R-US (Hartinger)&lt;br /&gt;
* OpenGGCM (CCMC)&lt;br /&gt;
* GUMICS (?)&lt;br /&gt;
* Empirical Magnetic field models &lt;br /&gt;
* ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Coordination / short term progress ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* CCMC for runs/analysis (Lutz with Claudepierre &amp;amp; Hartinger tools)&lt;br /&gt;
* What should we compare first?&lt;br /&gt;
 * Idealized runs at CCMC with Alberta empirical PSD?&lt;br /&gt;
 * March 1-15 runs at CCMC with which data?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paragraph 12 of Claudepierre et al., 2010 discusses &amp;quot;continuum&amp;quot; of solar wind frequencies&lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2010JA015399/full#jgra20604-sec-0002&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ozeke &amp;amp; Mann 2008, Paragraph 3 available here:   &lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2007JA012468/full#jgra18928-sec-0001&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2195</id>
		<title>FG: Metrics and Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2195"/>
		<updated>2015-01-26T18:50:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* Coordination / short term progress */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Co-Chairs: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ULF Wave Modeling Challenge == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models to reproduce ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere, and ultimately if those ULF fields can radially diffuse an existing electron population from L~5.5 to L~4.5 in two weeks.  To get there, we can split the question into two distinct ones:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Can global models of the magnetosphere reproduce the observed persistent, solar wind driven, low mode number ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere? and...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Are those waves capable of producing  the observed energetic radiation belt population evolution observed during the first two weeks of March 2013 as observed by Van Allen Probes? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:radialDiffusionInterval.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figure above is the REPT flux from http://www.rbsp-ect.lanl.gov/science/LTPlots/RBSP-ECT_LT_Mission_plot.pdf with the interval I mentioned circled in pink.  Tick marks in time (x-axis) are one month in duration.  The modest electron belt which starts out at L~5.5 seems to diffuse inward a whole L in two weeks.  I would think that a key aspect of that question which MHD models could uniquely constrain is the fraction of the diffusion which is accomplished by solar wind driving alone. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1st question above may be divided into two basic ULF wave challenges dealing with (Level 0) a idealized continuum of solar wind frequencies [Claudepierre et al., 2010, Paragraph 12] and (Level 1) the real solar wind input from 1-16 March 2013.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Observations === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Remotely sensed ULF wave fields from magnetometers (U. Alberta)&lt;br /&gt;
* Space-based ULF wave power from March, 2013 (Sarris/Schiller)&lt;br /&gt;
* EMFISIS wave fields from Van Allen Probes (who?)  &lt;br /&gt;
* ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Models === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* LFM (Claudepierre)&lt;br /&gt;
* BATS-R-US (Hartinger)&lt;br /&gt;
* OpenGGCM (Raeder)&lt;br /&gt;
* Empirical Magnetic field models &lt;br /&gt;
* ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Coordination / short term progress ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* CCMC for runs/analysis (Lutz with Claudepierre &amp;amp; Hartinger tools)&lt;br /&gt;
* What should we compare first?&lt;br /&gt;
 * Idealized runs at CCMC with Alberta empirical PSD?&lt;br /&gt;
 * March 1-15 runs at CCMC with which data?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paragraph 12 of Claudepierre et al., 2010 discusses &amp;quot;continuum&amp;quot; of solar wind frequencies&lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2010JA015399/full#jgra20604-sec-0002&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ozeke &amp;amp; Mann 2008, Paragraph 3 available here:   &lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2007JA012468/full#jgra18928-sec-0001&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2194</id>
		<title>FG: Metrics and Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2194"/>
		<updated>2015-01-26T18:49:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* Coordination / short term progress */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Co-Chairs: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ULF Wave Modeling Challenge == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models to reproduce ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere, and ultimately if those ULF fields can radially diffuse an existing electron population from L~5.5 to L~4.5 in two weeks.  To get there, we can split the question into two distinct ones:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Can global models of the magnetosphere reproduce the observed persistent, solar wind driven, low mode number ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere? and...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Are those waves capable of producing  the observed energetic radiation belt population evolution observed during the first two weeks of March 2013 as observed by Van Allen Probes? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:radialDiffusionInterval.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figure above is the REPT flux from http://www.rbsp-ect.lanl.gov/science/LTPlots/RBSP-ECT_LT_Mission_plot.pdf with the interval I mentioned circled in pink.  Tick marks in time (x-axis) are one month in duration.  The modest electron belt which starts out at L~5.5 seems to diffuse inward a whole L in two weeks.  I would think that a key aspect of that question which MHD models could uniquely constrain is the fraction of the diffusion which is accomplished by solar wind driving alone. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1st question above may be divided into two basic ULF wave challenges dealing with (Level 0) a idealized continuum of solar wind frequencies [Claudepierre et al., 2010, Paragraph 12] and (Level 1) the real solar wind input from 1-16 March 2013.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Observations === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Remotely sensed ULF wave fields from magnetometers (U. Alberta)&lt;br /&gt;
* Space-based ULF wave power from March, 2013 (Sarris/Schiller)&lt;br /&gt;
* EMFISIS wave fields from Van Allen Probes (who?)  &lt;br /&gt;
* ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Models === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* LFM (Claudepierre)&lt;br /&gt;
* BATS-R-US (Hartinger)&lt;br /&gt;
* OpenGGCM (Raeder)&lt;br /&gt;
* Empirical Magnetic field models &lt;br /&gt;
* ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Coordination / short term progress ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* CCMC for runs/analysis (Lutz with Claudepierre &amp;amp; Hartinger tools)&lt;br /&gt;
* What should we compare first?&lt;br /&gt;
  * Idealized runs at CCMC with Alberta empirical PSD?&lt;br /&gt;
  * March 1-15 runs at CCMC with which data?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paragraph 12 of Claudepierre et al., 2010 discusses &amp;quot;continuum&amp;quot; of solar wind frequencies&lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2010JA015399/full#jgra20604-sec-0002&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ozeke &amp;amp; Mann 2008, Paragraph 3 available here:   &lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2007JA012468/full#jgra18928-sec-0001&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2193</id>
		<title>FG: Metrics and Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2193"/>
		<updated>2015-01-26T18:49:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* ULF Wave Modeling Challenge */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Co-Chairs: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ULF Wave Modeling Challenge == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models to reproduce ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere, and ultimately if those ULF fields can radially diffuse an existing electron population from L~5.5 to L~4.5 in two weeks.  To get there, we can split the question into two distinct ones:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Can global models of the magnetosphere reproduce the observed persistent, solar wind driven, low mode number ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere? and...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Are those waves capable of producing  the observed energetic radiation belt population evolution observed during the first two weeks of March 2013 as observed by Van Allen Probes? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:radialDiffusionInterval.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figure above is the REPT flux from http://www.rbsp-ect.lanl.gov/science/LTPlots/RBSP-ECT_LT_Mission_plot.pdf with the interval I mentioned circled in pink.  Tick marks in time (x-axis) are one month in duration.  The modest electron belt which starts out at L~5.5 seems to diffuse inward a whole L in two weeks.  I would think that a key aspect of that question which MHD models could uniquely constrain is the fraction of the diffusion which is accomplished by solar wind driving alone. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1st question above may be divided into two basic ULF wave challenges dealing with (Level 0) a idealized continuum of solar wind frequencies [Claudepierre et al., 2010, Paragraph 12] and (Level 1) the real solar wind input from 1-16 March 2013.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Observations === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Remotely sensed ULF wave fields from magnetometers (U. Alberta)&lt;br /&gt;
* Space-based ULF wave power from March, 2013 (Sarris/Schiller)&lt;br /&gt;
* EMFISIS wave fields from Van Allen Probes (who?)  &lt;br /&gt;
* ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Models === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* LFM (Claudepierre)&lt;br /&gt;
* BATS-R-US (Hartinger)&lt;br /&gt;
* OpenGGCM (Raeder)&lt;br /&gt;
* Empirical Magnetic field models &lt;br /&gt;
* ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Coordination / short term progress ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* CCMC for runs/analysis (Lutz with Claudepierre &amp;amp; Hartinger tools)&lt;br /&gt;
* What should we compare first?&lt;br /&gt;
   * Idealized runs at CCMC with Alberta empirical PSD?&lt;br /&gt;
   * March 1-15 runs at CCMC with which data?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paragraph 12 of Claudepierre et al., 2010 discusses &amp;quot;continuum&amp;quot; of solar wind frequencies&lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2010JA015399/full#jgra20604-sec-0002&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ozeke &amp;amp; Mann 2008, Paragraph 3 available here:   &lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2007JA012468/full#jgra18928-sec-0001&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2192</id>
		<title>FG: Metrics and Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2192"/>
		<updated>2015-01-26T18:48:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* Observations */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Co-Chairs: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ULF Wave Modeling Challenge == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models to reproduce ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere, and ultimately if those ULF fields can radially diffuse an existing electron population from L~5.5 to L~4.5 in two weeks.  To get there, we can split the question into two distinct ones:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Can global models of the magnetosphere reproduce the observed persistent, solar wind driven, low mode number ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere? and...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Are those waves capable of producing  the observed energetic radiation belt population evolution observed during the first two weeks of March 2013 as observed by Van Allen Probes? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:radialDiffusionInterval.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figure above is the REPT flux from http://www.rbsp-ect.lanl.gov/science/LTPlots/RBSP-ECT_LT_Mission_plot.pdf with the interval I mentioned circled in pink.  Tick marks in time (x-axis) are one month in duration.  The modest electron belt which starts out at L~5.5 seems to diffuse inward a whole L in two weeks.  I would think that a key aspect of that question which MHD models could uniquely constrain is the fraction of the diffusion which is accomplished by solar wind driving alone. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1st question above may be divided into two basic ULF wave challenges dealing with (Level 0) a idealized continuum of solar wind frequencies [Claudepierre et al., 2010, Paragraph 12] and (Level 1) the real solar wind input from 1-16 March 2013.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Observations === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Remotely sensed ULF wave fields from magnetometers (U. Alberta)&lt;br /&gt;
* Space-based ULF wave power from March, 2013 (Sarris/Schiller)&lt;br /&gt;
* EMFISIS wave fields from Van Allen Probes (who?)  &lt;br /&gt;
* ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Models === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* LFM (Claudepierre)&lt;br /&gt;
* BATS-R-US (Hartinger)&lt;br /&gt;
* OpenGGCM (Raeder)&lt;br /&gt;
* Empirical Magnetic field models &lt;br /&gt;
* ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paragraph 12 of Claudepierre et al., 2010 discusses &amp;quot;continuum&amp;quot; of solar wind frequencies&lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2010JA015399/full#jgra20604-sec-0002&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ozeke &amp;amp; Mann 2008, Paragraph 3 available here:   &lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2007JA012468/full#jgra18928-sec-0001&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2182</id>
		<title>FG: Metrics and Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2182"/>
		<updated>2014-12-02T17:58:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Co-Chairs: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ULF Wave Modeling Challenge == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models to reproduce ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere, and ultimately if those ULF fields can radially diffuse an existing electron population from L~5.5 to L~4.5 in two weeks.  To get there, we can split the question into two distinct ones:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Can global models of the magnetosphere reproduce the observed persistent, solar wind driven, low mode number ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere? and...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Are those waves capable of producing  the observed energetic radiation belt population evolution observed during the first two weeks of March 2013 as observed by Van Allen Probes? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:radialDiffusionInterval.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figure above is the REPT flux from http://www.rbsp-ect.lanl.gov/science/LTPlots/RBSP-ECT_LT_Mission_plot.pdf with the interval I mentioned circled in pink.  Tick marks in time (x-axis) are one month in duration.  The modest electron belt which starts out at L~5.5 seems to diffuse inward a whole L in two weeks.  I would think that a key aspect of that question which MHD models could uniquely constrain is the fraction of the diffusion which is accomplished by solar wind driving alone. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1st question above may be divided into two basic ULF wave challenges dealing with (Level 0) a idealized continuum of solar wind frequencies [Claudepierre et al., 2010, Paragraph 12] and (Level 1) the real solar wind input from 1-16 March 2013.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Observations === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* EMFISIS wave fields from Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
* Remotely sensed ULF wave fields from magnetometers (U. Alberta)&lt;br /&gt;
* ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Models === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* LFM (Claudepierre)&lt;br /&gt;
* BATS-R-US (Hartinger)&lt;br /&gt;
* OpenGGCM (Raeder)&lt;br /&gt;
* Empirical Magnetic field models &lt;br /&gt;
* ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paragraph 12 of Claudepierre et al., 2010 discusses &amp;quot;continuum&amp;quot; of solar wind frequencies&lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2010JA015399/full#jgra20604-sec-0002&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ozeke &amp;amp; Mann 2008, Paragraph 3 available here:   &lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2007JA012468/full#jgra18928-sec-0001&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2181</id>
		<title>FG: Metrics and Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2181"/>
		<updated>2014-12-02T17:56:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Co-Chairs: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ULF Wave Modeling Challenge == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models to reproduce ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere, and ultimately if those ULF fields can radially diffuse an existing electron population from L~5.5 to L~4.5 in two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Can global models of the magnetosphere reproduce the observed persistent, solar wind driven, low mode number ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Are those waves capable of producing  the observed energetic radiation belt population evolution observed during the first two weeks of March 2013 as observed by Van Allen Probes? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:radialDiffusionInterval.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figure above is the REPT flux from http://www.rbsp-ect.lanl.gov/science/LTPlots/RBSP-ECT_LT_Mission_plot.pdf with the interval I mentioned circled in pink.  Tick marks in time (x-axis) are one month in duration.  The modest electron belt which starts out at L~5.5 seems to diffuse inward a whole L in two weeks.  I would think that a key aspect of that question which MHD models could uniquely constrain is the fraction of the diffusion which is accomplished by solar wind driving alone. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1st question above may be divided into two basic ULF wave challenges dealing with (Level 0) a idealized continuum of solar wind frequencies [Claudepierre et al., 2010, Paragraph 12] and (Level 1) the real solar wind input from 1-16 March 2013.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Observations === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* EMFISIS wave fields from Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
* Remotely sensed ULF wave fields from magnetometers (U. Alberta)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Models === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* LFM (Claudepierre)&lt;br /&gt;
* BATS-R-US (Hartinger)&lt;br /&gt;
* OpenGGCM (Raeder)&lt;br /&gt;
* Empirical Magnetic field models &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paragraph 12 of Claudepierre et al., 2010 discusses &amp;quot;continuum&amp;quot; of solar wind frequencies&lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2010JA015399/full#jgra20604-sec-0002&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ozeke &amp;amp; Mann 2008, Paragraph 3 available here:   &lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2007JA012468/full#jgra18928-sec-0001&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2180</id>
		<title>FG: Metrics and Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2180"/>
		<updated>2014-12-02T17:50:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Co-Chairs: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ULF Wave Modeling Challenge == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models to reproduce ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere, and ultimately if those ULF fields can radially diffuse an existing electron population from L~5.5 to L~4.5 in two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Can global models of the magnetosphere reproduce the observed persistent, solar wind driven, low mode number ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Are those waves capable of producing  the observed energetic radiation belt population evolution observed during the first two weeks of March 2013 as observed by Van Allen Probes? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:radialDiffusionInterval.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figure above is the REPT flux from http://www.rbsp-ect.lanl.gov/science/LTPlots/RBSP-ECT_LT_Mission_plot.pdf with the interval I mentioned circled in pink.  Tick marks in time (x-axis) are one month in duration.  The modest electron belt which starts out at L~5.5 seems to diffuse inward a whole L in two weeks.  I would think that a key aspect of that question which MHD models could uniquely constrain is the fraction of the diffusion which is accomplished by solar wind driving alone. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Observations === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* EMFISIS wave fields from Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
* Remotely sensed ULF wave fields from magnetometers (U. Alberta)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Models === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* LFM (Claudepierre)&lt;br /&gt;
* BATS-R-US (Hartinger)&lt;br /&gt;
* OpenGGCM (Raeder)&lt;br /&gt;
* Empirical Magnetic field models &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paragraph 12 of Claudepierre et al., 2010 discusses &amp;quot;continuum&amp;quot; of solar wind frequencies&lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2010JA015399/full#jgra20604-sec-0002&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ozeke &amp;amp; Mann 2008, Paragraph 3 available here:   &lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2007JA012468/full#jgra18928-sec-0001&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2153</id>
		<title>FG: Metrics and Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2153"/>
		<updated>2014-09-30T14:16:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* ULF Wave Modeling Challenge */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Co-Chairs: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ULF Wave Modeling Challenge == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models to reproduce ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere, and ultimately if those ULF fields can radially diffuse an existing electron population from L~5.5 to L~4.5 in two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Can global models of the magnetosphere reproduce the observed persistent, solar wind driven, low mode number ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Are those waves capable of producing  the observed energetic radiation belt population evolution observed during the first two weeks of March 2013 as observed by Van Allen Probes? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:radialDiffusionInterval.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figure above is the REPT flux from http://www.rbsp-ect.lanl.gov/science/LTPlots/RBSP-ECT_LT_Mission_plot.pdf with the interval I mentioned circled in pink.  Tick marks in time (x-axis) are one month in duration.  The modest electron belt which starts out at L~5.5 seems to diffuse inward a whole L in two weeks.  I would think that a key aspect of that question which MHD models could uniquely constrain is the fraction of the diffusion which is accomplished by solar wind driving alone. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Observations === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* EMFISIS wave fields from Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
* Remotely sensed ULF wave fields from magnetometers (U. Alberta)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Models === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* LFM (Claudepierre)&lt;br /&gt;
* BATS-R-US (Hartinger)&lt;br /&gt;
* OpenGGCM (Raeder)&lt;br /&gt;
* Empirical Magnetic field models &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paragraph 12 of Claudepierre et al., 2010 discusses &amp;quot;continuum&amp;quot; of solar wind frequencies&lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2010JA015399/full#jgra20604-sec-0002&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ozeke &amp;amp; Mann 2008, Paragraph 3 available here:   &lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2007JA012468/full#jgra18928-sec-0001&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sessions at the 2013 Summer Workshop ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(''We welcome additional contributions.'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 1: New Validation Results and Methods====&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 1:30 PM – 3:00 PM (Chair: Tim Guild)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit short presentations focusing on all aspects of data-model comparisons.  Welcomed themes could include geospace model validation using regional ground magnetometer indices, model responses to dynamic magnetopause boundaries, long-term &amp;quot;climatological&amp;quot; model validation, using multi-variate metrics to assess model performance, or any related contribution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank Toffoletto:  Initial result from LFM RCM for Oct 2012 Storm &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter and Howard Singer: dB/dt study (MHD and empirical) results / discussion&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer: Calculation of K index values from model magnetic perturbations&lt;br /&gt;
* Victoir Veibell and Bob Weigel (presented by Tim Guild): Climatological analysis of 12 months of MHD simulated ground magnetometer measurements&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabor Facsko:  GUMICS-4 verification and footprint determination using static and dynamic global MHD simulations of the ECLAT project&lt;br /&gt;
* Roxanne Katus and Michael Liemohn: Climatological Validation of the HEIDI Ring Current Model&lt;br /&gt;
* Haje Korth:  Statistical maps of TIMED/GUVI auroral emissions as a new global MHD validation data source&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These next two talks may move to the beginning of the next session (Thursday 3:30-5:00).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Josh Rigler:  Metrics derived from multi-variate statistical distributions   &lt;br /&gt;
* Asher Pembroke:  Interpolating into &amp;quot;Hard to reach places&amp;quot; of MHD volumes for more accurate DST&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 2: How Validation Studies Guide Model Improvements====&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 03:30 PM – 5:00 PM: (Chair: Howard Singer) &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
In this session, we solicit short presentations on specific examples of how discrepancies between models and observations have led to a better understanding of the physics that needs to be incorporated into models. Studies, or ideas, on studies involving model sensitivity to inputs and various model parameters are welcome. The session will include a discussion on better ways to design metrics and validation studies to uncover missing physics in models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer: Session Intro and Comments on Ensemble Modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling : Multi-Model Validation with the Space Weather Modeling Framework&lt;br /&gt;
* Margaret Chen: The effect of uncertain boundary conditions on ring current model validation  &lt;br /&gt;
* Andrey Samsonov: Large-scale flow vortices following a magnetospheric sudden impulse (Simulations were done with SWMF, OpenGGCM and LFM.)&lt;br /&gt;
* Slava Merkin: Lessons from MHD-AMPERE comparisons        &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter: Magnetopause Challenge of 2010 and steps from there: Eents for future MP challenge&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 3: Validation of MHD models coupled with other modules such as the Ring Current and Polar Outflow====&lt;br /&gt;
Friday: 10:30 AM – 12:15 PM (Chair: Lutz Rastaetter)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we will investigate recent advances in the development of coupled models of the magnetosphere, inner magnetosphere, the plasmasphere/polar wind, and the ionosphere/thermosphere.  We solicit short presentations on methods to link models, validate the outputs and constrain coupled model systems using observations.  Emphasis should be placed on new physical processes that are described by the coupled models and on effects that remain out of scope and that limit the effectiveness and stability of the coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Raeder (co-authors Gilson &amp;amp; Toffoletto),  OpenGGCM - RCM validations&lt;br /&gt;
* Raluca Ilie: Coupling of SWMF magnetosphere and Heidi Ring Current&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Wiltberger: Validation of MFLFM Outflow Simulations &lt;br /&gt;
* All: Discussion on future Metrics and Validation Activities to Support GEM goals&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have topics for discussion, please consider communicating them to the conveners before the session.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Focus Group Proposal (December 2010) ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/Proposal_MV_12012010.pdf Metrics and Validation] by Masha Kuznetsova, Aaron Ridley, Tim Guild, Lutz Rastaetter, and Howard Singer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Metrics and Validation Focus Group''' &lt;br /&gt;
'''Status Report'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Current Co-Chairs (2005-2012): Masha Kuznetsova (CCMC), Aaron Ridley (Univ. of Michigan).&lt;br /&gt;
New Co-Chairs (2012-2015); Tim Guild (Aerospace Corp), Lutz Rastaetter (CCMC), Howard Singer (NOAA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summer 2008 the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group initiated the GGCM modeling Challenge. The goals of the Challenge:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Evaluate the current state of the space science models and track model improvements over time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate interaction between research and operation communities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate collaboration among modelers and data providers and research communities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate further model improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project focuses on various scientific and operational aspects of GGCM model performance and addresses challenges of model-data comparisons and metrics studies (e.g., model output and observational time series preparation for comparison, measurement uncertainty, metrics selection). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following model/data comparisons (Matrics Studies) are involved in the Modeling Challenge:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 1: Magnetic field at geosynchronous orbit (GOES)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 2: Magnetopause crossings by geosynchronous satellite (GOES and LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 3: Plasma density/temperature at geosynchronous orbit (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 4: Ground magnetic perturbations (ground based magnetometers)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 5: Dst index (added at  2009 summer workshop) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 6: Heat flux into ionosphere (added at 2010 summer workshop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics Study 7: Auroral oval position (study of interest to US Airforce, details to be discussed at fall 2010 mini-workshop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four events were selected at the GEM 2008 Workshop:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 1: Oct 29, 2003 06:00 UT - Oct  30,  06:00 UT (Kp = 9, Dst_min=-353nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 2: Dec 14, 2006 12:00 UT - Dec 16,  00:00 UT (Kp = 8, Dst_min=-139nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 3: Aug 31, 2001 00:00 UT - Sep  01, 00:00 UT (Kp = 4, Dst_min=-40nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 4: Aug 31, 2005 10:00 UT - Sep  01, 12:00 UT (Kp = 7, Dst_min=-131nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two more events were added in summer 2010 for metrics study 6 on request of Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition focus group: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 5: May 15, 2005 00:00 UT - May 16, 2005, 00:00 UT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 6: July 9, 2005 00:00 UT - July 12, 2005, 00:00 UT &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/status.pdf Status of on-going metrics studies and future plans:]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Ground magnetic perturbations and magnetic field at geosynchronous orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
The first results of metrics studies 1 and 4 discussed at GEM 2009 and 2010 summer workshops are available at the CCMC website and at the GEM wiki. Two papers (with all Challenge participants as co-authors) are submitted to the Space Weather Journal.  &lt;br /&gt;
Pulkkinen, A., M. Kuznetsova, A. Ridley, J. Raeder, A. Vapirev, D. Weimer, R. Weigel, M. Wiltberger, G. Millward8, L. Rastaetter, M.Hesse, H. J. Singer and A. Chulaki, GEM 2008-2009 Challenge: ground magnetic field perturbations, submitted to Space Weather Journal, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
Rastatter,  L., M. M. Kuznetsova, A. Vapirev, A. Ridley, V. G. Merkin,&lt;br /&gt;
A. Pulkkinen M. Hesse, H. J. Singer, GEM 2008-2009 Challenge: magnetic fjelds at geosynchronous satellite positions, submitted to Space Weather Journal, 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
The principal conclusion of these studies is that ranking of the models is strongly dependent on the type of metric (the way how observational and modeled time series are compared) used to evaluate the model performance. Type of metrics to be used depends on the application and should be defined by model science and operational users. Metrics 4 is suggested for the Operational Metrics by NOAA SWPC. On NOAA SWPC request metrics format will be modified to focus on regional Kp  and dB/dt.  CCMC is working with the community to develop an automated system that will allow repeating the exercise on regular basis. We will continue dialog with the operations community to refine the metrics format. The second round of model-data comparison is planned for spring 2012 with the first report on model improvement over time to be presented at 2012 2ummer workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Plasma parameters at the geosynchronous orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To proceed with the study SOPA ion corrections for MPA are needed for pressure comparison. A group of LANL scientists are working on removal of electron contamination from the low- energy ion channels of SOPA. We exxpected completion of the first round of model-data comparison before the end of 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Magnetopause crossings by geosynchronous satellite.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary analysis of Challenge results demonstrated significant differences between observations and model predictions. The unexpected result is that magnetopause standoff distance varies significantly for different global MHD codes. To address the issue in more details we initiated baseline model comparison study, when researchers run different MHD codes with different settings for various solar wind and IMF conditions and compare the results.  &lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary analysis of the results at 2010 summer workshop excluded a number of possible sources for disagreement (e.g., such as grid resolution or value of anomalous resistivity). The latest idea is that the most likely source for the discrepancies are differences in inner boundary conditions. The decision was made to continue the study with the goal to resolve the issue within the next two years.  We plan to initiate collaborations on this topic with FGs in magnetopause research area and with FG  magnetic reconnection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) Dst index.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dst index Challenge originated in summer 2009 is a joint project with Inner Magnetisphere Focus group (liaison Dan Welling). The preliminary results were discussed at 2010 summer workshop. Report on the first round of study will be presented at the fall 2010 mini-workshop.  Different ways of Dst index calculations are currently being analyzed. We plan to finalize the paper to be submitted to the Space Weather Journal before the summer workshop 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5) Heat flux into ionosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat flux into ionosphere metrics study was initiated in summer 2010. This is a joint project with Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition focus group (liaison Stefan Eriksson). The study involves comparison with Poynting flux time series derived from DMSP observations. To facilitate the research two additional events were added to the original four GEM events.  This study is of potential interest to CEDAR community (as was agreed at the CEDAR 2010 summer workshop).  Simulations, data preparation, and tool development for model output postrocessing are currently on the way. We plan to present the first results for the discussion at summer workshop 2011. We expect this project to continue until the end of 2012 and beyond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6) Auroral oval position. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summer 2010 we agreed on the importance to include auroral oval position metrics study. This metrics study is of primary interest to a number of GGCM model operational users including US Air Force. This study is also of a potential interest to the CEDAR community.  The discussion on the details of this challenge is planned for the fall 2010 mini Workshop. We plan to continue this study beyond 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joint GEM-CEDAR Challenge'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To analyze the effects geospace environment on the ionosphere we are planning to involve CEDAR Community to the Modeling Challenge.  This activity is especially relevant due to upcoming joint GEM-CEDAR Workshop in 2011. Preliminary discussion with ionosphere modelers at CEDAR was held at CEDAR 2009 and 2010 Workshops.  GEM M&amp;amp;V FG co-chairs were involved in the organizing of the CEDAR Electrodynamics-Thermosphere-Ionosphere Challenge. CEDAR modelers included GEM challenge events for the series of planned comparative studies.  Further, many of the magnetospheric models are coupled to ionosphere-thermosphere models, therefore, the metrics can be conducted for both coupled and uncoupled simulations on both models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Baseline model comparison'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An aspect of validating models is to determine how well they solve the equation set that they are supposed to be solving.  This type of validation has to do with checking the numerics of the codes.  The method in which this validation will be conducted is to have researchers run different MHD codes for various solar wind and IMF conditions and compare the results.  For this, we have requested that modelers run a time period in which the solar wind stays constant at 5/cc and -400 km/s, while the IMF Bz drops every few hours from -5, -10, -20, -30, -35, to -40 nT.  The ionospheric conductance was held constant at 5 mhos. Another series of runs will change the  solar wind ram pressure, while keeping the IMF Bz equal to – 10 nt. Initial simulation results were presented at 2009 and 2010 summer workshops.  It was shown that many of the models had significant differences.  It was decided upon that the subsolar magnetopause location, the cusp location, and the current structures at the magnetopause will be investigated under the different IMF conditions.  Further investigations will include (1) examining the reconnection rate in the different codes to determine how each handles reconnection for the different IMF orientations; (2) examining the tail length, the amount of open flux in the polar caps and the plasma sheet density during the different intervals; &lt;br /&gt;
(3) the cross polar cap potential; and (4) the Dst as a function of time. With these types of comparisons, the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group can collaborate with other focus groups within the GEM community.  It is expected that  the FG will arrange a special issue of a journal to capture the results of these comparisons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2152</id>
		<title>FG: Metrics and Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2152"/>
		<updated>2014-09-30T14:13:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* ULF Wave Modeling Challenge */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Co-Chairs: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ULF Wave Modeling Challenge == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models to reproduce ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere, and ultimately if those ULF fields can radially diffuse an existing electron population from L~5.5 to L~4.5 in two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Can global models of the magnetosphere reproduce the observed persistent, solar wind driven, low mode number ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Are those waves capable of producing  the observed energetic radiation belt population evolution observed during the first two weeks of March 2013 as observed by Van Allen Probes? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:radialDiffusionInterval.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figure above is the REPT flux from http://www.rbsp-ect.lanl.gov/science/LTPlots/RBSP-ECT_LT_Mission_plot.pdf with the interval I mentioned circled in pink.  Tick marks in time (x-axis) are one month in duration.  The modest electron belt which starts out at L~5.5 seems to diffuse inward a whole L in two weeks.  I would think that a key aspect of that question which MHD models could uniquely constrain is the fraction of the diffusion which is accomplished by solar wind driving alone. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Observations === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- EMFISIS wave fields from Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
- Remotely sensed ULF wave fields from magnetometers (U. Alberta)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Models === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- LFM (Claudepierre)&lt;br /&gt;
- BATS-R-US (Hartinger)&lt;br /&gt;
- OpenGGCM (Raeder)&lt;br /&gt;
- Empirical Magnetic field models &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paragraph 12 of Claudepierre et al., 2010 discusses &amp;quot;continuum&amp;quot; of solar wind frequencies&lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2010JA015399/full#jgra20604-sec-0002&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ozeke &amp;amp; Mann 2008, Paragraph 3 available here:   &lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2007JA012468/full#jgra18928-sec-0001&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sessions at the 2013 Summer Workshop ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(''We welcome additional contributions.'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 1: New Validation Results and Methods====&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 1:30 PM – 3:00 PM (Chair: Tim Guild)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit short presentations focusing on all aspects of data-model comparisons.  Welcomed themes could include geospace model validation using regional ground magnetometer indices, model responses to dynamic magnetopause boundaries, long-term &amp;quot;climatological&amp;quot; model validation, using multi-variate metrics to assess model performance, or any related contribution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank Toffoletto:  Initial result from LFM RCM for Oct 2012 Storm &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter and Howard Singer: dB/dt study (MHD and empirical) results / discussion&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer: Calculation of K index values from model magnetic perturbations&lt;br /&gt;
* Victoir Veibell and Bob Weigel (presented by Tim Guild): Climatological analysis of 12 months of MHD simulated ground magnetometer measurements&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabor Facsko:  GUMICS-4 verification and footprint determination using static and dynamic global MHD simulations of the ECLAT project&lt;br /&gt;
* Roxanne Katus and Michael Liemohn: Climatological Validation of the HEIDI Ring Current Model&lt;br /&gt;
* Haje Korth:  Statistical maps of TIMED/GUVI auroral emissions as a new global MHD validation data source&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These next two talks may move to the beginning of the next session (Thursday 3:30-5:00).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Josh Rigler:  Metrics derived from multi-variate statistical distributions   &lt;br /&gt;
* Asher Pembroke:  Interpolating into &amp;quot;Hard to reach places&amp;quot; of MHD volumes for more accurate DST&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 2: How Validation Studies Guide Model Improvements====&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 03:30 PM – 5:00 PM: (Chair: Howard Singer) &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
In this session, we solicit short presentations on specific examples of how discrepancies between models and observations have led to a better understanding of the physics that needs to be incorporated into models. Studies, or ideas, on studies involving model sensitivity to inputs and various model parameters are welcome. The session will include a discussion on better ways to design metrics and validation studies to uncover missing physics in models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer: Session Intro and Comments on Ensemble Modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling : Multi-Model Validation with the Space Weather Modeling Framework&lt;br /&gt;
* Margaret Chen: The effect of uncertain boundary conditions on ring current model validation  &lt;br /&gt;
* Andrey Samsonov: Large-scale flow vortices following a magnetospheric sudden impulse (Simulations were done with SWMF, OpenGGCM and LFM.)&lt;br /&gt;
* Slava Merkin: Lessons from MHD-AMPERE comparisons        &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter: Magnetopause Challenge of 2010 and steps from there: Eents for future MP challenge&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 3: Validation of MHD models coupled with other modules such as the Ring Current and Polar Outflow====&lt;br /&gt;
Friday: 10:30 AM – 12:15 PM (Chair: Lutz Rastaetter)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we will investigate recent advances in the development of coupled models of the magnetosphere, inner magnetosphere, the plasmasphere/polar wind, and the ionosphere/thermosphere.  We solicit short presentations on methods to link models, validate the outputs and constrain coupled model systems using observations.  Emphasis should be placed on new physical processes that are described by the coupled models and on effects that remain out of scope and that limit the effectiveness and stability of the coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Raeder (co-authors Gilson &amp;amp; Toffoletto),  OpenGGCM - RCM validations&lt;br /&gt;
* Raluca Ilie: Coupling of SWMF magnetosphere and Heidi Ring Current&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Wiltberger: Validation of MFLFM Outflow Simulations &lt;br /&gt;
* All: Discussion on future Metrics and Validation Activities to Support GEM goals&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have topics for discussion, please consider communicating them to the conveners before the session.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Focus Group Proposal (December 2010) ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/Proposal_MV_12012010.pdf Metrics and Validation] by Masha Kuznetsova, Aaron Ridley, Tim Guild, Lutz Rastaetter, and Howard Singer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Metrics and Validation Focus Group''' &lt;br /&gt;
'''Status Report'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Current Co-Chairs (2005-2012): Masha Kuznetsova (CCMC), Aaron Ridley (Univ. of Michigan).&lt;br /&gt;
New Co-Chairs (2012-2015); Tim Guild (Aerospace Corp), Lutz Rastaetter (CCMC), Howard Singer (NOAA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summer 2008 the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group initiated the GGCM modeling Challenge. The goals of the Challenge:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Evaluate the current state of the space science models and track model improvements over time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate interaction between research and operation communities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate collaboration among modelers and data providers and research communities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate further model improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project focuses on various scientific and operational aspects of GGCM model performance and addresses challenges of model-data comparisons and metrics studies (e.g., model output and observational time series preparation for comparison, measurement uncertainty, metrics selection). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following model/data comparisons (Matrics Studies) are involved in the Modeling Challenge:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 1: Magnetic field at geosynchronous orbit (GOES)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 2: Magnetopause crossings by geosynchronous satellite (GOES and LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 3: Plasma density/temperature at geosynchronous orbit (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 4: Ground magnetic perturbations (ground based magnetometers)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 5: Dst index (added at  2009 summer workshop) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 6: Heat flux into ionosphere (added at 2010 summer workshop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics Study 7: Auroral oval position (study of interest to US Airforce, details to be discussed at fall 2010 mini-workshop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four events were selected at the GEM 2008 Workshop:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 1: Oct 29, 2003 06:00 UT - Oct  30,  06:00 UT (Kp = 9, Dst_min=-353nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 2: Dec 14, 2006 12:00 UT - Dec 16,  00:00 UT (Kp = 8, Dst_min=-139nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 3: Aug 31, 2001 00:00 UT - Sep  01, 00:00 UT (Kp = 4, Dst_min=-40nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 4: Aug 31, 2005 10:00 UT - Sep  01, 12:00 UT (Kp = 7, Dst_min=-131nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two more events were added in summer 2010 for metrics study 6 on request of Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition focus group: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 5: May 15, 2005 00:00 UT - May 16, 2005, 00:00 UT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 6: July 9, 2005 00:00 UT - July 12, 2005, 00:00 UT &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/status.pdf Status of on-going metrics studies and future plans:]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Ground magnetic perturbations and magnetic field at geosynchronous orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
The first results of metrics studies 1 and 4 discussed at GEM 2009 and 2010 summer workshops are available at the CCMC website and at the GEM wiki. Two papers (with all Challenge participants as co-authors) are submitted to the Space Weather Journal.  &lt;br /&gt;
Pulkkinen, A., M. Kuznetsova, A. Ridley, J. Raeder, A. Vapirev, D. Weimer, R. Weigel, M. Wiltberger, G. Millward8, L. Rastaetter, M.Hesse, H. J. Singer and A. Chulaki, GEM 2008-2009 Challenge: ground magnetic field perturbations, submitted to Space Weather Journal, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
Rastatter,  L., M. M. Kuznetsova, A. Vapirev, A. Ridley, V. G. Merkin,&lt;br /&gt;
A. Pulkkinen M. Hesse, H. J. Singer, GEM 2008-2009 Challenge: magnetic fjelds at geosynchronous satellite positions, submitted to Space Weather Journal, 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
The principal conclusion of these studies is that ranking of the models is strongly dependent on the type of metric (the way how observational and modeled time series are compared) used to evaluate the model performance. Type of metrics to be used depends on the application and should be defined by model science and operational users. Metrics 4 is suggested for the Operational Metrics by NOAA SWPC. On NOAA SWPC request metrics format will be modified to focus on regional Kp  and dB/dt.  CCMC is working with the community to develop an automated system that will allow repeating the exercise on regular basis. We will continue dialog with the operations community to refine the metrics format. The second round of model-data comparison is planned for spring 2012 with the first report on model improvement over time to be presented at 2012 2ummer workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Plasma parameters at the geosynchronous orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To proceed with the study SOPA ion corrections for MPA are needed for pressure comparison. A group of LANL scientists are working on removal of electron contamination from the low- energy ion channels of SOPA. We exxpected completion of the first round of model-data comparison before the end of 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Magnetopause crossings by geosynchronous satellite.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary analysis of Challenge results demonstrated significant differences between observations and model predictions. The unexpected result is that magnetopause standoff distance varies significantly for different global MHD codes. To address the issue in more details we initiated baseline model comparison study, when researchers run different MHD codes with different settings for various solar wind and IMF conditions and compare the results.  &lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary analysis of the results at 2010 summer workshop excluded a number of possible sources for disagreement (e.g., such as grid resolution or value of anomalous resistivity). The latest idea is that the most likely source for the discrepancies are differences in inner boundary conditions. The decision was made to continue the study with the goal to resolve the issue within the next two years.  We plan to initiate collaborations on this topic with FGs in magnetopause research area and with FG  magnetic reconnection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) Dst index.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dst index Challenge originated in summer 2009 is a joint project with Inner Magnetisphere Focus group (liaison Dan Welling). The preliminary results were discussed at 2010 summer workshop. Report on the first round of study will be presented at the fall 2010 mini-workshop.  Different ways of Dst index calculations are currently being analyzed. We plan to finalize the paper to be submitted to the Space Weather Journal before the summer workshop 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5) Heat flux into ionosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat flux into ionosphere metrics study was initiated in summer 2010. This is a joint project with Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition focus group (liaison Stefan Eriksson). The study involves comparison with Poynting flux time series derived from DMSP observations. To facilitate the research two additional events were added to the original four GEM events.  This study is of potential interest to CEDAR community (as was agreed at the CEDAR 2010 summer workshop).  Simulations, data preparation, and tool development for model output postrocessing are currently on the way. We plan to present the first results for the discussion at summer workshop 2011. We expect this project to continue until the end of 2012 and beyond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6) Auroral oval position. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summer 2010 we agreed on the importance to include auroral oval position metrics study. This metrics study is of primary interest to a number of GGCM model operational users including US Air Force. This study is also of a potential interest to the CEDAR community.  The discussion on the details of this challenge is planned for the fall 2010 mini Workshop. We plan to continue this study beyond 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joint GEM-CEDAR Challenge'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To analyze the effects geospace environment on the ionosphere we are planning to involve CEDAR Community to the Modeling Challenge.  This activity is especially relevant due to upcoming joint GEM-CEDAR Workshop in 2011. Preliminary discussion with ionosphere modelers at CEDAR was held at CEDAR 2009 and 2010 Workshops.  GEM M&amp;amp;V FG co-chairs were involved in the organizing of the CEDAR Electrodynamics-Thermosphere-Ionosphere Challenge. CEDAR modelers included GEM challenge events for the series of planned comparative studies.  Further, many of the magnetospheric models are coupled to ionosphere-thermosphere models, therefore, the metrics can be conducted for both coupled and uncoupled simulations on both models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Baseline model comparison'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An aspect of validating models is to determine how well they solve the equation set that they are supposed to be solving.  This type of validation has to do with checking the numerics of the codes.  The method in which this validation will be conducted is to have researchers run different MHD codes for various solar wind and IMF conditions and compare the results.  For this, we have requested that modelers run a time period in which the solar wind stays constant at 5/cc and -400 km/s, while the IMF Bz drops every few hours from -5, -10, -20, -30, -35, to -40 nT.  The ionospheric conductance was held constant at 5 mhos. Another series of runs will change the  solar wind ram pressure, while keeping the IMF Bz equal to – 10 nt. Initial simulation results were presented at 2009 and 2010 summer workshops.  It was shown that many of the models had significant differences.  It was decided upon that the subsolar magnetopause location, the cusp location, and the current structures at the magnetopause will be investigated under the different IMF conditions.  Further investigations will include (1) examining the reconnection rate in the different codes to determine how each handles reconnection for the different IMF orientations; (2) examining the tail length, the amount of open flux in the polar caps and the plasma sheet density during the different intervals; &lt;br /&gt;
(3) the cross polar cap potential; and (4) the Dst as a function of time. With these types of comparisons, the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group can collaborate with other focus groups within the GEM community.  It is expected that  the FG will arrange a special issue of a journal to capture the results of these comparisons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2151</id>
		<title>FG: Metrics and Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2151"/>
		<updated>2014-09-30T14:05:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* ULF Wave Modeling Challenge */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Co-Chairs: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ULF Wave Modeling Challenge == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models to reproduce ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere, and ultimately if those ULF fields can radially diffuse an existing electron population from L~5.5 to L~4.5 in two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Can global models of the magnetosphere reproduce the observed persistent, solar wind driven, low mode number ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Are those waves capable of producing  the observed energetic radiation belt population evolution observed during the first two weeks of March 2013 as observed by Van Allen Probes? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:radialDiffusionInterval.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figure above is the REPT flux from http://www.rbsp-ect.lanl.gov/science/LTPlots/RBSP-ECT_LT_Mission_plot.pdf with the interval I mentioned circled in pink.  Tick marks in time (x-axis) are one month in duration.  The modest electron belt which starts out at L~5.5 seems to diffuse inward a whole L in two weeks.  I would think that a key aspect of that question which MHD models could uniquely constrain is the fraction of the diffusion which is accomplished by solar wind driving alone. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paragraph 12 of Claudepierre et al., 2010 discusses &amp;quot;continuum&amp;quot; of solar wind frequencies&lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2010JA015399/full#jgra20604-sec-0002&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ozeke &amp;amp; Mann 2008, Paragraph 3 available here:   &lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2007JA012468/full#jgra18928-sec-0001&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sessions at the 2013 Summer Workshop ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(''We welcome additional contributions.'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 1: New Validation Results and Methods====&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 1:30 PM – 3:00 PM (Chair: Tim Guild)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit short presentations focusing on all aspects of data-model comparisons.  Welcomed themes could include geospace model validation using regional ground magnetometer indices, model responses to dynamic magnetopause boundaries, long-term &amp;quot;climatological&amp;quot; model validation, using multi-variate metrics to assess model performance, or any related contribution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank Toffoletto:  Initial result from LFM RCM for Oct 2012 Storm &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter and Howard Singer: dB/dt study (MHD and empirical) results / discussion&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer: Calculation of K index values from model magnetic perturbations&lt;br /&gt;
* Victoir Veibell and Bob Weigel (presented by Tim Guild): Climatological analysis of 12 months of MHD simulated ground magnetometer measurements&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabor Facsko:  GUMICS-4 verification and footprint determination using static and dynamic global MHD simulations of the ECLAT project&lt;br /&gt;
* Roxanne Katus and Michael Liemohn: Climatological Validation of the HEIDI Ring Current Model&lt;br /&gt;
* Haje Korth:  Statistical maps of TIMED/GUVI auroral emissions as a new global MHD validation data source&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These next two talks may move to the beginning of the next session (Thursday 3:30-5:00).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Josh Rigler:  Metrics derived from multi-variate statistical distributions   &lt;br /&gt;
* Asher Pembroke:  Interpolating into &amp;quot;Hard to reach places&amp;quot; of MHD volumes for more accurate DST&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 2: How Validation Studies Guide Model Improvements====&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 03:30 PM – 5:00 PM: (Chair: Howard Singer) &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
In this session, we solicit short presentations on specific examples of how discrepancies between models and observations have led to a better understanding of the physics that needs to be incorporated into models. Studies, or ideas, on studies involving model sensitivity to inputs and various model parameters are welcome. The session will include a discussion on better ways to design metrics and validation studies to uncover missing physics in models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer: Session Intro and Comments on Ensemble Modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling : Multi-Model Validation with the Space Weather Modeling Framework&lt;br /&gt;
* Margaret Chen: The effect of uncertain boundary conditions on ring current model validation  &lt;br /&gt;
* Andrey Samsonov: Large-scale flow vortices following a magnetospheric sudden impulse (Simulations were done with SWMF, OpenGGCM and LFM.)&lt;br /&gt;
* Slava Merkin: Lessons from MHD-AMPERE comparisons        &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter: Magnetopause Challenge of 2010 and steps from there: Eents for future MP challenge&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 3: Validation of MHD models coupled with other modules such as the Ring Current and Polar Outflow====&lt;br /&gt;
Friday: 10:30 AM – 12:15 PM (Chair: Lutz Rastaetter)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we will investigate recent advances in the development of coupled models of the magnetosphere, inner magnetosphere, the plasmasphere/polar wind, and the ionosphere/thermosphere.  We solicit short presentations on methods to link models, validate the outputs and constrain coupled model systems using observations.  Emphasis should be placed on new physical processes that are described by the coupled models and on effects that remain out of scope and that limit the effectiveness and stability of the coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Raeder (co-authors Gilson &amp;amp; Toffoletto),  OpenGGCM - RCM validations&lt;br /&gt;
* Raluca Ilie: Coupling of SWMF magnetosphere and Heidi Ring Current&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Wiltberger: Validation of MFLFM Outflow Simulations &lt;br /&gt;
* All: Discussion on future Metrics and Validation Activities to Support GEM goals&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have topics for discussion, please consider communicating them to the conveners before the session.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Focus Group Proposal (December 2010) ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/Proposal_MV_12012010.pdf Metrics and Validation] by Masha Kuznetsova, Aaron Ridley, Tim Guild, Lutz Rastaetter, and Howard Singer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Metrics and Validation Focus Group''' &lt;br /&gt;
'''Status Report'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Current Co-Chairs (2005-2012): Masha Kuznetsova (CCMC), Aaron Ridley (Univ. of Michigan).&lt;br /&gt;
New Co-Chairs (2012-2015); Tim Guild (Aerospace Corp), Lutz Rastaetter (CCMC), Howard Singer (NOAA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summer 2008 the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group initiated the GGCM modeling Challenge. The goals of the Challenge:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Evaluate the current state of the space science models and track model improvements over time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate interaction between research and operation communities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate collaboration among modelers and data providers and research communities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate further model improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project focuses on various scientific and operational aspects of GGCM model performance and addresses challenges of model-data comparisons and metrics studies (e.g., model output and observational time series preparation for comparison, measurement uncertainty, metrics selection). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following model/data comparisons (Matrics Studies) are involved in the Modeling Challenge:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 1: Magnetic field at geosynchronous orbit (GOES)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 2: Magnetopause crossings by geosynchronous satellite (GOES and LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 3: Plasma density/temperature at geosynchronous orbit (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 4: Ground magnetic perturbations (ground based magnetometers)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 5: Dst index (added at  2009 summer workshop) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 6: Heat flux into ionosphere (added at 2010 summer workshop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics Study 7: Auroral oval position (study of interest to US Airforce, details to be discussed at fall 2010 mini-workshop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four events were selected at the GEM 2008 Workshop:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 1: Oct 29, 2003 06:00 UT - Oct  30,  06:00 UT (Kp = 9, Dst_min=-353nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 2: Dec 14, 2006 12:00 UT - Dec 16,  00:00 UT (Kp = 8, Dst_min=-139nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 3: Aug 31, 2001 00:00 UT - Sep  01, 00:00 UT (Kp = 4, Dst_min=-40nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 4: Aug 31, 2005 10:00 UT - Sep  01, 12:00 UT (Kp = 7, Dst_min=-131nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two more events were added in summer 2010 for metrics study 6 on request of Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition focus group: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 5: May 15, 2005 00:00 UT - May 16, 2005, 00:00 UT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 6: July 9, 2005 00:00 UT - July 12, 2005, 00:00 UT &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/status.pdf Status of on-going metrics studies and future plans:]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Ground magnetic perturbations and magnetic field at geosynchronous orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
The first results of metrics studies 1 and 4 discussed at GEM 2009 and 2010 summer workshops are available at the CCMC website and at the GEM wiki. Two papers (with all Challenge participants as co-authors) are submitted to the Space Weather Journal.  &lt;br /&gt;
Pulkkinen, A., M. Kuznetsova, A. Ridley, J. Raeder, A. Vapirev, D. Weimer, R. Weigel, M. Wiltberger, G. Millward8, L. Rastaetter, M.Hesse, H. J. Singer and A. Chulaki, GEM 2008-2009 Challenge: ground magnetic field perturbations, submitted to Space Weather Journal, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
Rastatter,  L., M. M. Kuznetsova, A. Vapirev, A. Ridley, V. G. Merkin,&lt;br /&gt;
A. Pulkkinen M. Hesse, H. J. Singer, GEM 2008-2009 Challenge: magnetic fjelds at geosynchronous satellite positions, submitted to Space Weather Journal, 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
The principal conclusion of these studies is that ranking of the models is strongly dependent on the type of metric (the way how observational and modeled time series are compared) used to evaluate the model performance. Type of metrics to be used depends on the application and should be defined by model science and operational users. Metrics 4 is suggested for the Operational Metrics by NOAA SWPC. On NOAA SWPC request metrics format will be modified to focus on regional Kp  and dB/dt.  CCMC is working with the community to develop an automated system that will allow repeating the exercise on regular basis. We will continue dialog with the operations community to refine the metrics format. The second round of model-data comparison is planned for spring 2012 with the first report on model improvement over time to be presented at 2012 2ummer workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Plasma parameters at the geosynchronous orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To proceed with the study SOPA ion corrections for MPA are needed for pressure comparison. A group of LANL scientists are working on removal of electron contamination from the low- energy ion channels of SOPA. We exxpected completion of the first round of model-data comparison before the end of 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Magnetopause crossings by geosynchronous satellite.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary analysis of Challenge results demonstrated significant differences between observations and model predictions. The unexpected result is that magnetopause standoff distance varies significantly for different global MHD codes. To address the issue in more details we initiated baseline model comparison study, when researchers run different MHD codes with different settings for various solar wind and IMF conditions and compare the results.  &lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary analysis of the results at 2010 summer workshop excluded a number of possible sources for disagreement (e.g., such as grid resolution or value of anomalous resistivity). The latest idea is that the most likely source for the discrepancies are differences in inner boundary conditions. The decision was made to continue the study with the goal to resolve the issue within the next two years.  We plan to initiate collaborations on this topic with FGs in magnetopause research area and with FG  magnetic reconnection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) Dst index.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dst index Challenge originated in summer 2009 is a joint project with Inner Magnetisphere Focus group (liaison Dan Welling). The preliminary results were discussed at 2010 summer workshop. Report on the first round of study will be presented at the fall 2010 mini-workshop.  Different ways of Dst index calculations are currently being analyzed. We plan to finalize the paper to be submitted to the Space Weather Journal before the summer workshop 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5) Heat flux into ionosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat flux into ionosphere metrics study was initiated in summer 2010. This is a joint project with Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition focus group (liaison Stefan Eriksson). The study involves comparison with Poynting flux time series derived from DMSP observations. To facilitate the research two additional events were added to the original four GEM events.  This study is of potential interest to CEDAR community (as was agreed at the CEDAR 2010 summer workshop).  Simulations, data preparation, and tool development for model output postrocessing are currently on the way. We plan to present the first results for the discussion at summer workshop 2011. We expect this project to continue until the end of 2012 and beyond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6) Auroral oval position. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summer 2010 we agreed on the importance to include auroral oval position metrics study. This metrics study is of primary interest to a number of GGCM model operational users including US Air Force. This study is also of a potential interest to the CEDAR community.  The discussion on the details of this challenge is planned for the fall 2010 mini Workshop. We plan to continue this study beyond 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joint GEM-CEDAR Challenge'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To analyze the effects geospace environment on the ionosphere we are planning to involve CEDAR Community to the Modeling Challenge.  This activity is especially relevant due to upcoming joint GEM-CEDAR Workshop in 2011. Preliminary discussion with ionosphere modelers at CEDAR was held at CEDAR 2009 and 2010 Workshops.  GEM M&amp;amp;V FG co-chairs were involved in the organizing of the CEDAR Electrodynamics-Thermosphere-Ionosphere Challenge. CEDAR modelers included GEM challenge events for the series of planned comparative studies.  Further, many of the magnetospheric models are coupled to ionosphere-thermosphere models, therefore, the metrics can be conducted for both coupled and uncoupled simulations on both models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Baseline model comparison'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An aspect of validating models is to determine how well they solve the equation set that they are supposed to be solving.  This type of validation has to do with checking the numerics of the codes.  The method in which this validation will be conducted is to have researchers run different MHD codes for various solar wind and IMF conditions and compare the results.  For this, we have requested that modelers run a time period in which the solar wind stays constant at 5/cc and -400 km/s, while the IMF Bz drops every few hours from -5, -10, -20, -30, -35, to -40 nT.  The ionospheric conductance was held constant at 5 mhos. Another series of runs will change the  solar wind ram pressure, while keeping the IMF Bz equal to – 10 nt. Initial simulation results were presented at 2009 and 2010 summer workshops.  It was shown that many of the models had significant differences.  It was decided upon that the subsolar magnetopause location, the cusp location, and the current structures at the magnetopause will be investigated under the different IMF conditions.  Further investigations will include (1) examining the reconnection rate in the different codes to determine how each handles reconnection for the different IMF orientations; (2) examining the tail length, the amount of open flux in the polar caps and the plasma sheet density during the different intervals; &lt;br /&gt;
(3) the cross polar cap potential; and (4) the Dst as a function of time. With these types of comparisons, the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group can collaborate with other focus groups within the GEM community.  It is expected that  the FG will arrange a special issue of a journal to capture the results of these comparisons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2150</id>
		<title>FG: Metrics and Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2150"/>
		<updated>2014-09-30T14:05:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* ULF Wave Modeling Challenge */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Co-Chairs: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ULF Wave Modeling Challenge == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models to reproduce ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere, and ultimately if those ULF fields can radially diffuse an existing electron population from L~5.5 to L~4.5 in two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Can global models of the magnetosphere reproduce the observed persistent, solar wind driven, low mode number ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Are those waves capable of producing  the observed energetic radiation belt population evolution observed during the first two weeks of March 2013 as observed by Van Allen Probes? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:radialDiffusionInterval.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
The figure above is the REPT flux from http://www.rbsp-ect.lanl.gov/science/LTPlots/RBSP-ECT_LT_Mission_plot.pdf with the interval I mentioned circled in pink.  Tick marks in time (x-axis) are one month in duration.  The modest electron belt which starts out at L~5.5 seems to diffuse inward a whole L in two weeks.  I would think that a key aspect of that question which MHD models could uniquely constrain is the fraction of the diffusion which is accomplished by solar wind driving alone. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paragraph 12 of Claudepierre et al., 2010 discusses &amp;quot;continuum&amp;quot; of solar wind frequencies&lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2010JA015399/full#jgra20604-sec-0002&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ozeke &amp;amp; Mann 2008, Paragraph 3 available here:   &lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2007JA012468/full#jgra18928-sec-0001&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sessions at the 2013 Summer Workshop ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(''We welcome additional contributions.'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 1: New Validation Results and Methods====&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 1:30 PM – 3:00 PM (Chair: Tim Guild)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit short presentations focusing on all aspects of data-model comparisons.  Welcomed themes could include geospace model validation using regional ground magnetometer indices, model responses to dynamic magnetopause boundaries, long-term &amp;quot;climatological&amp;quot; model validation, using multi-variate metrics to assess model performance, or any related contribution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank Toffoletto:  Initial result from LFM RCM for Oct 2012 Storm &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter and Howard Singer: dB/dt study (MHD and empirical) results / discussion&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer: Calculation of K index values from model magnetic perturbations&lt;br /&gt;
* Victoir Veibell and Bob Weigel (presented by Tim Guild): Climatological analysis of 12 months of MHD simulated ground magnetometer measurements&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabor Facsko:  GUMICS-4 verification and footprint determination using static and dynamic global MHD simulations of the ECLAT project&lt;br /&gt;
* Roxanne Katus and Michael Liemohn: Climatological Validation of the HEIDI Ring Current Model&lt;br /&gt;
* Haje Korth:  Statistical maps of TIMED/GUVI auroral emissions as a new global MHD validation data source&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These next two talks may move to the beginning of the next session (Thursday 3:30-5:00).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Josh Rigler:  Metrics derived from multi-variate statistical distributions   &lt;br /&gt;
* Asher Pembroke:  Interpolating into &amp;quot;Hard to reach places&amp;quot; of MHD volumes for more accurate DST&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 2: How Validation Studies Guide Model Improvements====&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 03:30 PM – 5:00 PM: (Chair: Howard Singer) &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
In this session, we solicit short presentations on specific examples of how discrepancies between models and observations have led to a better understanding of the physics that needs to be incorporated into models. Studies, or ideas, on studies involving model sensitivity to inputs and various model parameters are welcome. The session will include a discussion on better ways to design metrics and validation studies to uncover missing physics in models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer: Session Intro and Comments on Ensemble Modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling : Multi-Model Validation with the Space Weather Modeling Framework&lt;br /&gt;
* Margaret Chen: The effect of uncertain boundary conditions on ring current model validation  &lt;br /&gt;
* Andrey Samsonov: Large-scale flow vortices following a magnetospheric sudden impulse (Simulations were done with SWMF, OpenGGCM and LFM.)&lt;br /&gt;
* Slava Merkin: Lessons from MHD-AMPERE comparisons        &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter: Magnetopause Challenge of 2010 and steps from there: Eents for future MP challenge&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 3: Validation of MHD models coupled with other modules such as the Ring Current and Polar Outflow====&lt;br /&gt;
Friday: 10:30 AM – 12:15 PM (Chair: Lutz Rastaetter)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we will investigate recent advances in the development of coupled models of the magnetosphere, inner magnetosphere, the plasmasphere/polar wind, and the ionosphere/thermosphere.  We solicit short presentations on methods to link models, validate the outputs and constrain coupled model systems using observations.  Emphasis should be placed on new physical processes that are described by the coupled models and on effects that remain out of scope and that limit the effectiveness and stability of the coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Raeder (co-authors Gilson &amp;amp; Toffoletto),  OpenGGCM - RCM validations&lt;br /&gt;
* Raluca Ilie: Coupling of SWMF magnetosphere and Heidi Ring Current&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Wiltberger: Validation of MFLFM Outflow Simulations &lt;br /&gt;
* All: Discussion on future Metrics and Validation Activities to Support GEM goals&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have topics for discussion, please consider communicating them to the conveners before the session.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Focus Group Proposal (December 2010) ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/Proposal_MV_12012010.pdf Metrics and Validation] by Masha Kuznetsova, Aaron Ridley, Tim Guild, Lutz Rastaetter, and Howard Singer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Metrics and Validation Focus Group''' &lt;br /&gt;
'''Status Report'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Current Co-Chairs (2005-2012): Masha Kuznetsova (CCMC), Aaron Ridley (Univ. of Michigan).&lt;br /&gt;
New Co-Chairs (2012-2015); Tim Guild (Aerospace Corp), Lutz Rastaetter (CCMC), Howard Singer (NOAA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summer 2008 the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group initiated the GGCM modeling Challenge. The goals of the Challenge:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Evaluate the current state of the space science models and track model improvements over time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate interaction between research and operation communities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate collaboration among modelers and data providers and research communities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate further model improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project focuses on various scientific and operational aspects of GGCM model performance and addresses challenges of model-data comparisons and metrics studies (e.g., model output and observational time series preparation for comparison, measurement uncertainty, metrics selection). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following model/data comparisons (Matrics Studies) are involved in the Modeling Challenge:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 1: Magnetic field at geosynchronous orbit (GOES)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 2: Magnetopause crossings by geosynchronous satellite (GOES and LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 3: Plasma density/temperature at geosynchronous orbit (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 4: Ground magnetic perturbations (ground based magnetometers)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 5: Dst index (added at  2009 summer workshop) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 6: Heat flux into ionosphere (added at 2010 summer workshop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics Study 7: Auroral oval position (study of interest to US Airforce, details to be discussed at fall 2010 mini-workshop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four events were selected at the GEM 2008 Workshop:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 1: Oct 29, 2003 06:00 UT - Oct  30,  06:00 UT (Kp = 9, Dst_min=-353nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 2: Dec 14, 2006 12:00 UT - Dec 16,  00:00 UT (Kp = 8, Dst_min=-139nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 3: Aug 31, 2001 00:00 UT - Sep  01, 00:00 UT (Kp = 4, Dst_min=-40nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 4: Aug 31, 2005 10:00 UT - Sep  01, 12:00 UT (Kp = 7, Dst_min=-131nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two more events were added in summer 2010 for metrics study 6 on request of Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition focus group: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 5: May 15, 2005 00:00 UT - May 16, 2005, 00:00 UT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 6: July 9, 2005 00:00 UT - July 12, 2005, 00:00 UT &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/status.pdf Status of on-going metrics studies and future plans:]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Ground magnetic perturbations and magnetic field at geosynchronous orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
The first results of metrics studies 1 and 4 discussed at GEM 2009 and 2010 summer workshops are available at the CCMC website and at the GEM wiki. Two papers (with all Challenge participants as co-authors) are submitted to the Space Weather Journal.  &lt;br /&gt;
Pulkkinen, A., M. Kuznetsova, A. Ridley, J. Raeder, A. Vapirev, D. Weimer, R. Weigel, M. Wiltberger, G. Millward8, L. Rastaetter, M.Hesse, H. J. Singer and A. Chulaki, GEM 2008-2009 Challenge: ground magnetic field perturbations, submitted to Space Weather Journal, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
Rastatter,  L., M. M. Kuznetsova, A. Vapirev, A. Ridley, V. G. Merkin,&lt;br /&gt;
A. Pulkkinen M. Hesse, H. J. Singer, GEM 2008-2009 Challenge: magnetic fjelds at geosynchronous satellite positions, submitted to Space Weather Journal, 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
The principal conclusion of these studies is that ranking of the models is strongly dependent on the type of metric (the way how observational and modeled time series are compared) used to evaluate the model performance. Type of metrics to be used depends on the application and should be defined by model science and operational users. Metrics 4 is suggested for the Operational Metrics by NOAA SWPC. On NOAA SWPC request metrics format will be modified to focus on regional Kp  and dB/dt.  CCMC is working with the community to develop an automated system that will allow repeating the exercise on regular basis. We will continue dialog with the operations community to refine the metrics format. The second round of model-data comparison is planned for spring 2012 with the first report on model improvement over time to be presented at 2012 2ummer workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Plasma parameters at the geosynchronous orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To proceed with the study SOPA ion corrections for MPA are needed for pressure comparison. A group of LANL scientists are working on removal of electron contamination from the low- energy ion channels of SOPA. We exxpected completion of the first round of model-data comparison before the end of 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Magnetopause crossings by geosynchronous satellite.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary analysis of Challenge results demonstrated significant differences between observations and model predictions. The unexpected result is that magnetopause standoff distance varies significantly for different global MHD codes. To address the issue in more details we initiated baseline model comparison study, when researchers run different MHD codes with different settings for various solar wind and IMF conditions and compare the results.  &lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary analysis of the results at 2010 summer workshop excluded a number of possible sources for disagreement (e.g., such as grid resolution or value of anomalous resistivity). The latest idea is that the most likely source for the discrepancies are differences in inner boundary conditions. The decision was made to continue the study with the goal to resolve the issue within the next two years.  We plan to initiate collaborations on this topic with FGs in magnetopause research area and with FG  magnetic reconnection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) Dst index.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dst index Challenge originated in summer 2009 is a joint project with Inner Magnetisphere Focus group (liaison Dan Welling). The preliminary results were discussed at 2010 summer workshop. Report on the first round of study will be presented at the fall 2010 mini-workshop.  Different ways of Dst index calculations are currently being analyzed. We plan to finalize the paper to be submitted to the Space Weather Journal before the summer workshop 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5) Heat flux into ionosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat flux into ionosphere metrics study was initiated in summer 2010. This is a joint project with Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition focus group (liaison Stefan Eriksson). The study involves comparison with Poynting flux time series derived from DMSP observations. To facilitate the research two additional events were added to the original four GEM events.  This study is of potential interest to CEDAR community (as was agreed at the CEDAR 2010 summer workshop).  Simulations, data preparation, and tool development for model output postrocessing are currently on the way. We plan to present the first results for the discussion at summer workshop 2011. We expect this project to continue until the end of 2012 and beyond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6) Auroral oval position. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summer 2010 we agreed on the importance to include auroral oval position metrics study. This metrics study is of primary interest to a number of GGCM model operational users including US Air Force. This study is also of a potential interest to the CEDAR community.  The discussion on the details of this challenge is planned for the fall 2010 mini Workshop. We plan to continue this study beyond 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joint GEM-CEDAR Challenge'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To analyze the effects geospace environment on the ionosphere we are planning to involve CEDAR Community to the Modeling Challenge.  This activity is especially relevant due to upcoming joint GEM-CEDAR Workshop in 2011. Preliminary discussion with ionosphere modelers at CEDAR was held at CEDAR 2009 and 2010 Workshops.  GEM M&amp;amp;V FG co-chairs were involved in the organizing of the CEDAR Electrodynamics-Thermosphere-Ionosphere Challenge. CEDAR modelers included GEM challenge events for the series of planned comparative studies.  Further, many of the magnetospheric models are coupled to ionosphere-thermosphere models, therefore, the metrics can be conducted for both coupled and uncoupled simulations on both models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Baseline model comparison'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An aspect of validating models is to determine how well they solve the equation set that they are supposed to be solving.  This type of validation has to do with checking the numerics of the codes.  The method in which this validation will be conducted is to have researchers run different MHD codes for various solar wind and IMF conditions and compare the results.  For this, we have requested that modelers run a time period in which the solar wind stays constant at 5/cc and -400 km/s, while the IMF Bz drops every few hours from -5, -10, -20, -30, -35, to -40 nT.  The ionospheric conductance was held constant at 5 mhos. Another series of runs will change the  solar wind ram pressure, while keeping the IMF Bz equal to – 10 nt. Initial simulation results were presented at 2009 and 2010 summer workshops.  It was shown that many of the models had significant differences.  It was decided upon that the subsolar magnetopause location, the cusp location, and the current structures at the magnetopause will be investigated under the different IMF conditions.  Further investigations will include (1) examining the reconnection rate in the different codes to determine how each handles reconnection for the different IMF orientations; (2) examining the tail length, the amount of open flux in the polar caps and the plasma sheet density during the different intervals; &lt;br /&gt;
(3) the cross polar cap potential; and (4) the Dst as a function of time. With these types of comparisons, the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group can collaborate with other focus groups within the GEM community.  It is expected that  the FG will arrange a special issue of a journal to capture the results of these comparisons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2149</id>
		<title>FG: Metrics and Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2149"/>
		<updated>2014-09-30T14:02:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* ULF Wave Modeling Challenge */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Co-Chairs: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ULF Wave Modeling Challenge == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models to reproduce ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere, and ultimately if those ULF fields can radially diffuse an existing electron population from L~5.5 to L~4.5 in two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:radialDiffusionInterval.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paragraph 12 of Claudepierre et al., 2010 discusses &amp;quot;continuum&amp;quot; of solar wind frequencies&lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2010JA015399/full#jgra20604-sec-0002&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ozeke &amp;amp; Mann 2008, Paragraph 3 available here:   &lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2007JA012468/full#jgra18928-sec-0001&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sessions at the 2013 Summer Workshop ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(''We welcome additional contributions.'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 1: New Validation Results and Methods====&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 1:30 PM – 3:00 PM (Chair: Tim Guild)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit short presentations focusing on all aspects of data-model comparisons.  Welcomed themes could include geospace model validation using regional ground magnetometer indices, model responses to dynamic magnetopause boundaries, long-term &amp;quot;climatological&amp;quot; model validation, using multi-variate metrics to assess model performance, or any related contribution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank Toffoletto:  Initial result from LFM RCM for Oct 2012 Storm &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter and Howard Singer: dB/dt study (MHD and empirical) results / discussion&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer: Calculation of K index values from model magnetic perturbations&lt;br /&gt;
* Victoir Veibell and Bob Weigel (presented by Tim Guild): Climatological analysis of 12 months of MHD simulated ground magnetometer measurements&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabor Facsko:  GUMICS-4 verification and footprint determination using static and dynamic global MHD simulations of the ECLAT project&lt;br /&gt;
* Roxanne Katus and Michael Liemohn: Climatological Validation of the HEIDI Ring Current Model&lt;br /&gt;
* Haje Korth:  Statistical maps of TIMED/GUVI auroral emissions as a new global MHD validation data source&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These next two talks may move to the beginning of the next session (Thursday 3:30-5:00).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Josh Rigler:  Metrics derived from multi-variate statistical distributions   &lt;br /&gt;
* Asher Pembroke:  Interpolating into &amp;quot;Hard to reach places&amp;quot; of MHD volumes for more accurate DST&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 2: How Validation Studies Guide Model Improvements====&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 03:30 PM – 5:00 PM: (Chair: Howard Singer) &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
In this session, we solicit short presentations on specific examples of how discrepancies between models and observations have led to a better understanding of the physics that needs to be incorporated into models. Studies, or ideas, on studies involving model sensitivity to inputs and various model parameters are welcome. The session will include a discussion on better ways to design metrics and validation studies to uncover missing physics in models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer: Session Intro and Comments on Ensemble Modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling : Multi-Model Validation with the Space Weather Modeling Framework&lt;br /&gt;
* Margaret Chen: The effect of uncertain boundary conditions on ring current model validation  &lt;br /&gt;
* Andrey Samsonov: Large-scale flow vortices following a magnetospheric sudden impulse (Simulations were done with SWMF, OpenGGCM and LFM.)&lt;br /&gt;
* Slava Merkin: Lessons from MHD-AMPERE comparisons        &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter: Magnetopause Challenge of 2010 and steps from there: Eents for future MP challenge&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 3: Validation of MHD models coupled with other modules such as the Ring Current and Polar Outflow====&lt;br /&gt;
Friday: 10:30 AM – 12:15 PM (Chair: Lutz Rastaetter)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we will investigate recent advances in the development of coupled models of the magnetosphere, inner magnetosphere, the plasmasphere/polar wind, and the ionosphere/thermosphere.  We solicit short presentations on methods to link models, validate the outputs and constrain coupled model systems using observations.  Emphasis should be placed on new physical processes that are described by the coupled models and on effects that remain out of scope and that limit the effectiveness and stability of the coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Raeder (co-authors Gilson &amp;amp; Toffoletto),  OpenGGCM - RCM validations&lt;br /&gt;
* Raluca Ilie: Coupling of SWMF magnetosphere and Heidi Ring Current&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Wiltberger: Validation of MFLFM Outflow Simulations &lt;br /&gt;
* All: Discussion on future Metrics and Validation Activities to Support GEM goals&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have topics for discussion, please consider communicating them to the conveners before the session.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Focus Group Proposal (December 2010) ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/Proposal_MV_12012010.pdf Metrics and Validation] by Masha Kuznetsova, Aaron Ridley, Tim Guild, Lutz Rastaetter, and Howard Singer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Metrics and Validation Focus Group''' &lt;br /&gt;
'''Status Report'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Current Co-Chairs (2005-2012): Masha Kuznetsova (CCMC), Aaron Ridley (Univ. of Michigan).&lt;br /&gt;
New Co-Chairs (2012-2015); Tim Guild (Aerospace Corp), Lutz Rastaetter (CCMC), Howard Singer (NOAA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summer 2008 the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group initiated the GGCM modeling Challenge. The goals of the Challenge:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Evaluate the current state of the space science models and track model improvements over time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate interaction between research and operation communities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate collaboration among modelers and data providers and research communities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate further model improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project focuses on various scientific and operational aspects of GGCM model performance and addresses challenges of model-data comparisons and metrics studies (e.g., model output and observational time series preparation for comparison, measurement uncertainty, metrics selection). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following model/data comparisons (Matrics Studies) are involved in the Modeling Challenge:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 1: Magnetic field at geosynchronous orbit (GOES)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 2: Magnetopause crossings by geosynchronous satellite (GOES and LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 3: Plasma density/temperature at geosynchronous orbit (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 4: Ground magnetic perturbations (ground based magnetometers)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 5: Dst index (added at  2009 summer workshop) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 6: Heat flux into ionosphere (added at 2010 summer workshop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics Study 7: Auroral oval position (study of interest to US Airforce, details to be discussed at fall 2010 mini-workshop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four events were selected at the GEM 2008 Workshop:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 1: Oct 29, 2003 06:00 UT - Oct  30,  06:00 UT (Kp = 9, Dst_min=-353nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 2: Dec 14, 2006 12:00 UT - Dec 16,  00:00 UT (Kp = 8, Dst_min=-139nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 3: Aug 31, 2001 00:00 UT - Sep  01, 00:00 UT (Kp = 4, Dst_min=-40nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 4: Aug 31, 2005 10:00 UT - Sep  01, 12:00 UT (Kp = 7, Dst_min=-131nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two more events were added in summer 2010 for metrics study 6 on request of Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition focus group: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 5: May 15, 2005 00:00 UT - May 16, 2005, 00:00 UT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 6: July 9, 2005 00:00 UT - July 12, 2005, 00:00 UT &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/status.pdf Status of on-going metrics studies and future plans:]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Ground magnetic perturbations and magnetic field at geosynchronous orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
The first results of metrics studies 1 and 4 discussed at GEM 2009 and 2010 summer workshops are available at the CCMC website and at the GEM wiki. Two papers (with all Challenge participants as co-authors) are submitted to the Space Weather Journal.  &lt;br /&gt;
Pulkkinen, A., M. Kuznetsova, A. Ridley, J. Raeder, A. Vapirev, D. Weimer, R. Weigel, M. Wiltberger, G. Millward8, L. Rastaetter, M.Hesse, H. J. Singer and A. Chulaki, GEM 2008-2009 Challenge: ground magnetic field perturbations, submitted to Space Weather Journal, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
Rastatter,  L., M. M. Kuznetsova, A. Vapirev, A. Ridley, V. G. Merkin,&lt;br /&gt;
A. Pulkkinen M. Hesse, H. J. Singer, GEM 2008-2009 Challenge: magnetic fjelds at geosynchronous satellite positions, submitted to Space Weather Journal, 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
The principal conclusion of these studies is that ranking of the models is strongly dependent on the type of metric (the way how observational and modeled time series are compared) used to evaluate the model performance. Type of metrics to be used depends on the application and should be defined by model science and operational users. Metrics 4 is suggested for the Operational Metrics by NOAA SWPC. On NOAA SWPC request metrics format will be modified to focus on regional Kp  and dB/dt.  CCMC is working with the community to develop an automated system that will allow repeating the exercise on regular basis. We will continue dialog with the operations community to refine the metrics format. The second round of model-data comparison is planned for spring 2012 with the first report on model improvement over time to be presented at 2012 2ummer workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Plasma parameters at the geosynchronous orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To proceed with the study SOPA ion corrections for MPA are needed for pressure comparison. A group of LANL scientists are working on removal of electron contamination from the low- energy ion channels of SOPA. We exxpected completion of the first round of model-data comparison before the end of 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Magnetopause crossings by geosynchronous satellite.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary analysis of Challenge results demonstrated significant differences between observations and model predictions. The unexpected result is that magnetopause standoff distance varies significantly for different global MHD codes. To address the issue in more details we initiated baseline model comparison study, when researchers run different MHD codes with different settings for various solar wind and IMF conditions and compare the results.  &lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary analysis of the results at 2010 summer workshop excluded a number of possible sources for disagreement (e.g., such as grid resolution or value of anomalous resistivity). The latest idea is that the most likely source for the discrepancies are differences in inner boundary conditions. The decision was made to continue the study with the goal to resolve the issue within the next two years.  We plan to initiate collaborations on this topic with FGs in magnetopause research area and with FG  magnetic reconnection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) Dst index.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dst index Challenge originated in summer 2009 is a joint project with Inner Magnetisphere Focus group (liaison Dan Welling). The preliminary results were discussed at 2010 summer workshop. Report on the first round of study will be presented at the fall 2010 mini-workshop.  Different ways of Dst index calculations are currently being analyzed. We plan to finalize the paper to be submitted to the Space Weather Journal before the summer workshop 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5) Heat flux into ionosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat flux into ionosphere metrics study was initiated in summer 2010. This is a joint project with Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition focus group (liaison Stefan Eriksson). The study involves comparison with Poynting flux time series derived from DMSP observations. To facilitate the research two additional events were added to the original four GEM events.  This study is of potential interest to CEDAR community (as was agreed at the CEDAR 2010 summer workshop).  Simulations, data preparation, and tool development for model output postrocessing are currently on the way. We plan to present the first results for the discussion at summer workshop 2011. We expect this project to continue until the end of 2012 and beyond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6) Auroral oval position. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summer 2010 we agreed on the importance to include auroral oval position metrics study. This metrics study is of primary interest to a number of GGCM model operational users including US Air Force. This study is also of a potential interest to the CEDAR community.  The discussion on the details of this challenge is planned for the fall 2010 mini Workshop. We plan to continue this study beyond 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joint GEM-CEDAR Challenge'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To analyze the effects geospace environment on the ionosphere we are planning to involve CEDAR Community to the Modeling Challenge.  This activity is especially relevant due to upcoming joint GEM-CEDAR Workshop in 2011. Preliminary discussion with ionosphere modelers at CEDAR was held at CEDAR 2009 and 2010 Workshops.  GEM M&amp;amp;V FG co-chairs were involved in the organizing of the CEDAR Electrodynamics-Thermosphere-Ionosphere Challenge. CEDAR modelers included GEM challenge events for the series of planned comparative studies.  Further, many of the magnetospheric models are coupled to ionosphere-thermosphere models, therefore, the metrics can be conducted for both coupled and uncoupled simulations on both models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Baseline model comparison'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An aspect of validating models is to determine how well they solve the equation set that they are supposed to be solving.  This type of validation has to do with checking the numerics of the codes.  The method in which this validation will be conducted is to have researchers run different MHD codes for various solar wind and IMF conditions and compare the results.  For this, we have requested that modelers run a time period in which the solar wind stays constant at 5/cc and -400 km/s, while the IMF Bz drops every few hours from -5, -10, -20, -30, -35, to -40 nT.  The ionospheric conductance was held constant at 5 mhos. Another series of runs will change the  solar wind ram pressure, while keeping the IMF Bz equal to – 10 nt. Initial simulation results were presented at 2009 and 2010 summer workshops.  It was shown that many of the models had significant differences.  It was decided upon that the subsolar magnetopause location, the cusp location, and the current structures at the magnetopause will be investigated under the different IMF conditions.  Further investigations will include (1) examining the reconnection rate in the different codes to determine how each handles reconnection for the different IMF orientations; (2) examining the tail length, the amount of open flux in the polar caps and the plasma sheet density during the different intervals; &lt;br /&gt;
(3) the cross polar cap potential; and (4) the Dst as a function of time. With these types of comparisons, the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group can collaborate with other focus groups within the GEM community.  It is expected that  the FG will arrange a special issue of a journal to capture the results of these comparisons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2148</id>
		<title>FG: Metrics and Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2148"/>
		<updated>2014-09-30T13:54:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* ULF Wave Modeling Challenge */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Co-Chairs: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ULF Wave Modeling Challenge == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models to reproduce ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere, and ultimately if those ULF fields can radially diffuse an existing electron population from L~5.5 to L~4.5 in two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:radialDiffusionInterval.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paragraph 12 of Claudepierre et al., 2010 discusses &amp;quot;continuum&amp;quot; of solar wind frequencies&lt;br /&gt;
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2010JA015399/full#jgra20604-sec-0002&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sessions at the 2013 Summer Workshop ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(''We welcome additional contributions.'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 1: New Validation Results and Methods====&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 1:30 PM – 3:00 PM (Chair: Tim Guild)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit short presentations focusing on all aspects of data-model comparisons.  Welcomed themes could include geospace model validation using regional ground magnetometer indices, model responses to dynamic magnetopause boundaries, long-term &amp;quot;climatological&amp;quot; model validation, using multi-variate metrics to assess model performance, or any related contribution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank Toffoletto:  Initial result from LFM RCM for Oct 2012 Storm &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter and Howard Singer: dB/dt study (MHD and empirical) results / discussion&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer: Calculation of K index values from model magnetic perturbations&lt;br /&gt;
* Victoir Veibell and Bob Weigel (presented by Tim Guild): Climatological analysis of 12 months of MHD simulated ground magnetometer measurements&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabor Facsko:  GUMICS-4 verification and footprint determination using static and dynamic global MHD simulations of the ECLAT project&lt;br /&gt;
* Roxanne Katus and Michael Liemohn: Climatological Validation of the HEIDI Ring Current Model&lt;br /&gt;
* Haje Korth:  Statistical maps of TIMED/GUVI auroral emissions as a new global MHD validation data source&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These next two talks may move to the beginning of the next session (Thursday 3:30-5:00).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Josh Rigler:  Metrics derived from multi-variate statistical distributions   &lt;br /&gt;
* Asher Pembroke:  Interpolating into &amp;quot;Hard to reach places&amp;quot; of MHD volumes for more accurate DST&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 2: How Validation Studies Guide Model Improvements====&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 03:30 PM – 5:00 PM: (Chair: Howard Singer) &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
In this session, we solicit short presentations on specific examples of how discrepancies between models and observations have led to a better understanding of the physics that needs to be incorporated into models. Studies, or ideas, on studies involving model sensitivity to inputs and various model parameters are welcome. The session will include a discussion on better ways to design metrics and validation studies to uncover missing physics in models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer: Session Intro and Comments on Ensemble Modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling : Multi-Model Validation with the Space Weather Modeling Framework&lt;br /&gt;
* Margaret Chen: The effect of uncertain boundary conditions on ring current model validation  &lt;br /&gt;
* Andrey Samsonov: Large-scale flow vortices following a magnetospheric sudden impulse (Simulations were done with SWMF, OpenGGCM and LFM.)&lt;br /&gt;
* Slava Merkin: Lessons from MHD-AMPERE comparisons        &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter: Magnetopause Challenge of 2010 and steps from there: Eents for future MP challenge&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 3: Validation of MHD models coupled with other modules such as the Ring Current and Polar Outflow====&lt;br /&gt;
Friday: 10:30 AM – 12:15 PM (Chair: Lutz Rastaetter)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we will investigate recent advances in the development of coupled models of the magnetosphere, inner magnetosphere, the plasmasphere/polar wind, and the ionosphere/thermosphere.  We solicit short presentations on methods to link models, validate the outputs and constrain coupled model systems using observations.  Emphasis should be placed on new physical processes that are described by the coupled models and on effects that remain out of scope and that limit the effectiveness and stability of the coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Raeder (co-authors Gilson &amp;amp; Toffoletto),  OpenGGCM - RCM validations&lt;br /&gt;
* Raluca Ilie: Coupling of SWMF magnetosphere and Heidi Ring Current&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Wiltberger: Validation of MFLFM Outflow Simulations &lt;br /&gt;
* All: Discussion on future Metrics and Validation Activities to Support GEM goals&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have topics for discussion, please consider communicating them to the conveners before the session.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Focus Group Proposal (December 2010) ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/Proposal_MV_12012010.pdf Metrics and Validation] by Masha Kuznetsova, Aaron Ridley, Tim Guild, Lutz Rastaetter, and Howard Singer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Metrics and Validation Focus Group''' &lt;br /&gt;
'''Status Report'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Current Co-Chairs (2005-2012): Masha Kuznetsova (CCMC), Aaron Ridley (Univ. of Michigan).&lt;br /&gt;
New Co-Chairs (2012-2015); Tim Guild (Aerospace Corp), Lutz Rastaetter (CCMC), Howard Singer (NOAA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summer 2008 the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group initiated the GGCM modeling Challenge. The goals of the Challenge:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Evaluate the current state of the space science models and track model improvements over time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate interaction between research and operation communities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate collaboration among modelers and data providers and research communities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate further model improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project focuses on various scientific and operational aspects of GGCM model performance and addresses challenges of model-data comparisons and metrics studies (e.g., model output and observational time series preparation for comparison, measurement uncertainty, metrics selection). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following model/data comparisons (Matrics Studies) are involved in the Modeling Challenge:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 1: Magnetic field at geosynchronous orbit (GOES)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 2: Magnetopause crossings by geosynchronous satellite (GOES and LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 3: Plasma density/temperature at geosynchronous orbit (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 4: Ground magnetic perturbations (ground based magnetometers)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 5: Dst index (added at  2009 summer workshop) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 6: Heat flux into ionosphere (added at 2010 summer workshop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics Study 7: Auroral oval position (study of interest to US Airforce, details to be discussed at fall 2010 mini-workshop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four events were selected at the GEM 2008 Workshop:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 1: Oct 29, 2003 06:00 UT - Oct  30,  06:00 UT (Kp = 9, Dst_min=-353nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 2: Dec 14, 2006 12:00 UT - Dec 16,  00:00 UT (Kp = 8, Dst_min=-139nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 3: Aug 31, 2001 00:00 UT - Sep  01, 00:00 UT (Kp = 4, Dst_min=-40nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 4: Aug 31, 2005 10:00 UT - Sep  01, 12:00 UT (Kp = 7, Dst_min=-131nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two more events were added in summer 2010 for metrics study 6 on request of Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition focus group: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 5: May 15, 2005 00:00 UT - May 16, 2005, 00:00 UT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 6: July 9, 2005 00:00 UT - July 12, 2005, 00:00 UT &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/status.pdf Status of on-going metrics studies and future plans:]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Ground magnetic perturbations and magnetic field at geosynchronous orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
The first results of metrics studies 1 and 4 discussed at GEM 2009 and 2010 summer workshops are available at the CCMC website and at the GEM wiki. Two papers (with all Challenge participants as co-authors) are submitted to the Space Weather Journal.  &lt;br /&gt;
Pulkkinen, A., M. Kuznetsova, A. Ridley, J. Raeder, A. Vapirev, D. Weimer, R. Weigel, M. Wiltberger, G. Millward8, L. Rastaetter, M.Hesse, H. J. Singer and A. Chulaki, GEM 2008-2009 Challenge: ground magnetic field perturbations, submitted to Space Weather Journal, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
Rastatter,  L., M. M. Kuznetsova, A. Vapirev, A. Ridley, V. G. Merkin,&lt;br /&gt;
A. Pulkkinen M. Hesse, H. J. Singer, GEM 2008-2009 Challenge: magnetic fjelds at geosynchronous satellite positions, submitted to Space Weather Journal, 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
The principal conclusion of these studies is that ranking of the models is strongly dependent on the type of metric (the way how observational and modeled time series are compared) used to evaluate the model performance. Type of metrics to be used depends on the application and should be defined by model science and operational users. Metrics 4 is suggested for the Operational Metrics by NOAA SWPC. On NOAA SWPC request metrics format will be modified to focus on regional Kp  and dB/dt.  CCMC is working with the community to develop an automated system that will allow repeating the exercise on regular basis. We will continue dialog with the operations community to refine the metrics format. The second round of model-data comparison is planned for spring 2012 with the first report on model improvement over time to be presented at 2012 2ummer workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Plasma parameters at the geosynchronous orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To proceed with the study SOPA ion corrections for MPA are needed for pressure comparison. A group of LANL scientists are working on removal of electron contamination from the low- energy ion channels of SOPA. We exxpected completion of the first round of model-data comparison before the end of 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Magnetopause crossings by geosynchronous satellite.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary analysis of Challenge results demonstrated significant differences between observations and model predictions. The unexpected result is that magnetopause standoff distance varies significantly for different global MHD codes. To address the issue in more details we initiated baseline model comparison study, when researchers run different MHD codes with different settings for various solar wind and IMF conditions and compare the results.  &lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary analysis of the results at 2010 summer workshop excluded a number of possible sources for disagreement (e.g., such as grid resolution or value of anomalous resistivity). The latest idea is that the most likely source for the discrepancies are differences in inner boundary conditions. The decision was made to continue the study with the goal to resolve the issue within the next two years.  We plan to initiate collaborations on this topic with FGs in magnetopause research area and with FG  magnetic reconnection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) Dst index.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dst index Challenge originated in summer 2009 is a joint project with Inner Magnetisphere Focus group (liaison Dan Welling). The preliminary results were discussed at 2010 summer workshop. Report on the first round of study will be presented at the fall 2010 mini-workshop.  Different ways of Dst index calculations are currently being analyzed. We plan to finalize the paper to be submitted to the Space Weather Journal before the summer workshop 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5) Heat flux into ionosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat flux into ionosphere metrics study was initiated in summer 2010. This is a joint project with Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition focus group (liaison Stefan Eriksson). The study involves comparison with Poynting flux time series derived from DMSP observations. To facilitate the research two additional events were added to the original four GEM events.  This study is of potential interest to CEDAR community (as was agreed at the CEDAR 2010 summer workshop).  Simulations, data preparation, and tool development for model output postrocessing are currently on the way. We plan to present the first results for the discussion at summer workshop 2011. We expect this project to continue until the end of 2012 and beyond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6) Auroral oval position. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summer 2010 we agreed on the importance to include auroral oval position metrics study. This metrics study is of primary interest to a number of GGCM model operational users including US Air Force. This study is also of a potential interest to the CEDAR community.  The discussion on the details of this challenge is planned for the fall 2010 mini Workshop. We plan to continue this study beyond 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joint GEM-CEDAR Challenge'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To analyze the effects geospace environment on the ionosphere we are planning to involve CEDAR Community to the Modeling Challenge.  This activity is especially relevant due to upcoming joint GEM-CEDAR Workshop in 2011. Preliminary discussion with ionosphere modelers at CEDAR was held at CEDAR 2009 and 2010 Workshops.  GEM M&amp;amp;V FG co-chairs were involved in the organizing of the CEDAR Electrodynamics-Thermosphere-Ionosphere Challenge. CEDAR modelers included GEM challenge events for the series of planned comparative studies.  Further, many of the magnetospheric models are coupled to ionosphere-thermosphere models, therefore, the metrics can be conducted for both coupled and uncoupled simulations on both models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Baseline model comparison'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An aspect of validating models is to determine how well they solve the equation set that they are supposed to be solving.  This type of validation has to do with checking the numerics of the codes.  The method in which this validation will be conducted is to have researchers run different MHD codes for various solar wind and IMF conditions and compare the results.  For this, we have requested that modelers run a time period in which the solar wind stays constant at 5/cc and -400 km/s, while the IMF Bz drops every few hours from -5, -10, -20, -30, -35, to -40 nT.  The ionospheric conductance was held constant at 5 mhos. Another series of runs will change the  solar wind ram pressure, while keeping the IMF Bz equal to – 10 nt. Initial simulation results were presented at 2009 and 2010 summer workshops.  It was shown that many of the models had significant differences.  It was decided upon that the subsolar magnetopause location, the cusp location, and the current structures at the magnetopause will be investigated under the different IMF conditions.  Further investigations will include (1) examining the reconnection rate in the different codes to determine how each handles reconnection for the different IMF orientations; (2) examining the tail length, the amount of open flux in the polar caps and the plasma sheet density during the different intervals; &lt;br /&gt;
(3) the cross polar cap potential; and (4) the Dst as a function of time. With these types of comparisons, the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group can collaborate with other focus groups within the GEM community.  It is expected that  the FG will arrange a special issue of a journal to capture the results of these comparisons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=File:RadialDiffusionInterval.png&amp;diff=2147</id>
		<title>File:RadialDiffusionInterval.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=File:RadialDiffusionInterval.png&amp;diff=2147"/>
		<updated>2014-09-30T13:35:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2146</id>
		<title>FG: Metrics and Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2146"/>
		<updated>2014-09-30T13:35:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* ULF Wave Modeling Challenge */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Co-Chairs: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ULF Wave Modeling Challenge == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models to reproduce ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere, and ultimately if those ULF fields can radially diffuse an existing electron population from L~5.5 to L~4.5 in two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:radialDiffusionInterval.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sessions at the 2013 Summer Workshop ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(''We welcome additional contributions.'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 1: New Validation Results and Methods====&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 1:30 PM – 3:00 PM (Chair: Tim Guild)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit short presentations focusing on all aspects of data-model comparisons.  Welcomed themes could include geospace model validation using regional ground magnetometer indices, model responses to dynamic magnetopause boundaries, long-term &amp;quot;climatological&amp;quot; model validation, using multi-variate metrics to assess model performance, or any related contribution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank Toffoletto:  Initial result from LFM RCM for Oct 2012 Storm &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter and Howard Singer: dB/dt study (MHD and empirical) results / discussion&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer: Calculation of K index values from model magnetic perturbations&lt;br /&gt;
* Victoir Veibell and Bob Weigel (presented by Tim Guild): Climatological analysis of 12 months of MHD simulated ground magnetometer measurements&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabor Facsko:  GUMICS-4 verification and footprint determination using static and dynamic global MHD simulations of the ECLAT project&lt;br /&gt;
* Roxanne Katus and Michael Liemohn: Climatological Validation of the HEIDI Ring Current Model&lt;br /&gt;
* Haje Korth:  Statistical maps of TIMED/GUVI auroral emissions as a new global MHD validation data source&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These next two talks may move to the beginning of the next session (Thursday 3:30-5:00).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Josh Rigler:  Metrics derived from multi-variate statistical distributions   &lt;br /&gt;
* Asher Pembroke:  Interpolating into &amp;quot;Hard to reach places&amp;quot; of MHD volumes for more accurate DST&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 2: How Validation Studies Guide Model Improvements====&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 03:30 PM – 5:00 PM: (Chair: Howard Singer) &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
In this session, we solicit short presentations on specific examples of how discrepancies between models and observations have led to a better understanding of the physics that needs to be incorporated into models. Studies, or ideas, on studies involving model sensitivity to inputs and various model parameters are welcome. The session will include a discussion on better ways to design metrics and validation studies to uncover missing physics in models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer: Session Intro and Comments on Ensemble Modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling : Multi-Model Validation with the Space Weather Modeling Framework&lt;br /&gt;
* Margaret Chen: The effect of uncertain boundary conditions on ring current model validation  &lt;br /&gt;
* Andrey Samsonov: Large-scale flow vortices following a magnetospheric sudden impulse (Simulations were done with SWMF, OpenGGCM and LFM.)&lt;br /&gt;
* Slava Merkin: Lessons from MHD-AMPERE comparisons        &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter: Magnetopause Challenge of 2010 and steps from there: Eents for future MP challenge&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 3: Validation of MHD models coupled with other modules such as the Ring Current and Polar Outflow====&lt;br /&gt;
Friday: 10:30 AM – 12:15 PM (Chair: Lutz Rastaetter)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we will investigate recent advances in the development of coupled models of the magnetosphere, inner magnetosphere, the plasmasphere/polar wind, and the ionosphere/thermosphere.  We solicit short presentations on methods to link models, validate the outputs and constrain coupled model systems using observations.  Emphasis should be placed on new physical processes that are described by the coupled models and on effects that remain out of scope and that limit the effectiveness and stability of the coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Raeder (co-authors Gilson &amp;amp; Toffoletto),  OpenGGCM - RCM validations&lt;br /&gt;
* Raluca Ilie: Coupling of SWMF magnetosphere and Heidi Ring Current&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Wiltberger: Validation of MFLFM Outflow Simulations &lt;br /&gt;
* All: Discussion on future Metrics and Validation Activities to Support GEM goals&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have topics for discussion, please consider communicating them to the conveners before the session.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Focus Group Proposal (December 2010) ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/Proposal_MV_12012010.pdf Metrics and Validation] by Masha Kuznetsova, Aaron Ridley, Tim Guild, Lutz Rastaetter, and Howard Singer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Metrics and Validation Focus Group''' &lt;br /&gt;
'''Status Report'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Current Co-Chairs (2005-2012): Masha Kuznetsova (CCMC), Aaron Ridley (Univ. of Michigan).&lt;br /&gt;
New Co-Chairs (2012-2015); Tim Guild (Aerospace Corp), Lutz Rastaetter (CCMC), Howard Singer (NOAA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summer 2008 the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group initiated the GGCM modeling Challenge. The goals of the Challenge:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Evaluate the current state of the space science models and track model improvements over time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate interaction between research and operation communities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate collaboration among modelers and data providers and research communities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate further model improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project focuses on various scientific and operational aspects of GGCM model performance and addresses challenges of model-data comparisons and metrics studies (e.g., model output and observational time series preparation for comparison, measurement uncertainty, metrics selection). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following model/data comparisons (Matrics Studies) are involved in the Modeling Challenge:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 1: Magnetic field at geosynchronous orbit (GOES)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 2: Magnetopause crossings by geosynchronous satellite (GOES and LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 3: Plasma density/temperature at geosynchronous orbit (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 4: Ground magnetic perturbations (ground based magnetometers)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 5: Dst index (added at  2009 summer workshop) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 6: Heat flux into ionosphere (added at 2010 summer workshop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics Study 7: Auroral oval position (study of interest to US Airforce, details to be discussed at fall 2010 mini-workshop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four events were selected at the GEM 2008 Workshop:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 1: Oct 29, 2003 06:00 UT - Oct  30,  06:00 UT (Kp = 9, Dst_min=-353nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 2: Dec 14, 2006 12:00 UT - Dec 16,  00:00 UT (Kp = 8, Dst_min=-139nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 3: Aug 31, 2001 00:00 UT - Sep  01, 00:00 UT (Kp = 4, Dst_min=-40nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 4: Aug 31, 2005 10:00 UT - Sep  01, 12:00 UT (Kp = 7, Dst_min=-131nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two more events were added in summer 2010 for metrics study 6 on request of Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition focus group: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 5: May 15, 2005 00:00 UT - May 16, 2005, 00:00 UT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 6: July 9, 2005 00:00 UT - July 12, 2005, 00:00 UT &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/status.pdf Status of on-going metrics studies and future plans:]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Ground magnetic perturbations and magnetic field at geosynchronous orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
The first results of metrics studies 1 and 4 discussed at GEM 2009 and 2010 summer workshops are available at the CCMC website and at the GEM wiki. Two papers (with all Challenge participants as co-authors) are submitted to the Space Weather Journal.  &lt;br /&gt;
Pulkkinen, A., M. Kuznetsova, A. Ridley, J. Raeder, A. Vapirev, D. Weimer, R. Weigel, M. Wiltberger, G. Millward8, L. Rastaetter, M.Hesse, H. J. Singer and A. Chulaki, GEM 2008-2009 Challenge: ground magnetic field perturbations, submitted to Space Weather Journal, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
Rastatter,  L., M. M. Kuznetsova, A. Vapirev, A. Ridley, V. G. Merkin,&lt;br /&gt;
A. Pulkkinen M. Hesse, H. J. Singer, GEM 2008-2009 Challenge: magnetic fjelds at geosynchronous satellite positions, submitted to Space Weather Journal, 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
The principal conclusion of these studies is that ranking of the models is strongly dependent on the type of metric (the way how observational and modeled time series are compared) used to evaluate the model performance. Type of metrics to be used depends on the application and should be defined by model science and operational users. Metrics 4 is suggested for the Operational Metrics by NOAA SWPC. On NOAA SWPC request metrics format will be modified to focus on regional Kp  and dB/dt.  CCMC is working with the community to develop an automated system that will allow repeating the exercise on regular basis. We will continue dialog with the operations community to refine the metrics format. The second round of model-data comparison is planned for spring 2012 with the first report on model improvement over time to be presented at 2012 2ummer workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Plasma parameters at the geosynchronous orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To proceed with the study SOPA ion corrections for MPA are needed for pressure comparison. A group of LANL scientists are working on removal of electron contamination from the low- energy ion channels of SOPA. We exxpected completion of the first round of model-data comparison before the end of 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Magnetopause crossings by geosynchronous satellite.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary analysis of Challenge results demonstrated significant differences between observations and model predictions. The unexpected result is that magnetopause standoff distance varies significantly for different global MHD codes. To address the issue in more details we initiated baseline model comparison study, when researchers run different MHD codes with different settings for various solar wind and IMF conditions and compare the results.  &lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary analysis of the results at 2010 summer workshop excluded a number of possible sources for disagreement (e.g., such as grid resolution or value of anomalous resistivity). The latest idea is that the most likely source for the discrepancies are differences in inner boundary conditions. The decision was made to continue the study with the goal to resolve the issue within the next two years.  We plan to initiate collaborations on this topic with FGs in magnetopause research area and with FG  magnetic reconnection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) Dst index.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dst index Challenge originated in summer 2009 is a joint project with Inner Magnetisphere Focus group (liaison Dan Welling). The preliminary results were discussed at 2010 summer workshop. Report on the first round of study will be presented at the fall 2010 mini-workshop.  Different ways of Dst index calculations are currently being analyzed. We plan to finalize the paper to be submitted to the Space Weather Journal before the summer workshop 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5) Heat flux into ionosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat flux into ionosphere metrics study was initiated in summer 2010. This is a joint project with Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition focus group (liaison Stefan Eriksson). The study involves comparison with Poynting flux time series derived from DMSP observations. To facilitate the research two additional events were added to the original four GEM events.  This study is of potential interest to CEDAR community (as was agreed at the CEDAR 2010 summer workshop).  Simulations, data preparation, and tool development for model output postrocessing are currently on the way. We plan to present the first results for the discussion at summer workshop 2011. We expect this project to continue until the end of 2012 and beyond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6) Auroral oval position. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summer 2010 we agreed on the importance to include auroral oval position metrics study. This metrics study is of primary interest to a number of GGCM model operational users including US Air Force. This study is also of a potential interest to the CEDAR community.  The discussion on the details of this challenge is planned for the fall 2010 mini Workshop. We plan to continue this study beyond 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joint GEM-CEDAR Challenge'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To analyze the effects geospace environment on the ionosphere we are planning to involve CEDAR Community to the Modeling Challenge.  This activity is especially relevant due to upcoming joint GEM-CEDAR Workshop in 2011. Preliminary discussion with ionosphere modelers at CEDAR was held at CEDAR 2009 and 2010 Workshops.  GEM M&amp;amp;V FG co-chairs were involved in the organizing of the CEDAR Electrodynamics-Thermosphere-Ionosphere Challenge. CEDAR modelers included GEM challenge events for the series of planned comparative studies.  Further, many of the magnetospheric models are coupled to ionosphere-thermosphere models, therefore, the metrics can be conducted for both coupled and uncoupled simulations on both models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Baseline model comparison'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An aspect of validating models is to determine how well they solve the equation set that they are supposed to be solving.  This type of validation has to do with checking the numerics of the codes.  The method in which this validation will be conducted is to have researchers run different MHD codes for various solar wind and IMF conditions and compare the results.  For this, we have requested that modelers run a time period in which the solar wind stays constant at 5/cc and -400 km/s, while the IMF Bz drops every few hours from -5, -10, -20, -30, -35, to -40 nT.  The ionospheric conductance was held constant at 5 mhos. Another series of runs will change the  solar wind ram pressure, while keeping the IMF Bz equal to – 10 nt. Initial simulation results were presented at 2009 and 2010 summer workshops.  It was shown that many of the models had significant differences.  It was decided upon that the subsolar magnetopause location, the cusp location, and the current structures at the magnetopause will be investigated under the different IMF conditions.  Further investigations will include (1) examining the reconnection rate in the different codes to determine how each handles reconnection for the different IMF orientations; (2) examining the tail length, the amount of open flux in the polar caps and the plasma sheet density during the different intervals; &lt;br /&gt;
(3) the cross polar cap potential; and (4) the Dst as a function of time. With these types of comparisons, the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group can collaborate with other focus groups within the GEM community.  It is expected that  the FG will arrange a special issue of a journal to capture the results of these comparisons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2145</id>
		<title>FG: Metrics and Validation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=FG:_Metrics_and_Validation&amp;diff=2145"/>
		<updated>2014-09-30T13:29:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* Sessions at the 2013 Summer Workshop */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Co-Chairs: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ULF Wave Modeling Challenge == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models to reproduce ULF wave fields in the magnetosphere, and ultimately if those ULF fields can radially diffuse an existing electron population from L~5.5 to L~4.5 in two weeks.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sessions at the 2013 Summer Workshop ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(''We welcome additional contributions.'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 1: New Validation Results and Methods====&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 1:30 PM – 3:00 PM (Chair: Tim Guild)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit short presentations focusing on all aspects of data-model comparisons.  Welcomed themes could include geospace model validation using regional ground magnetometer indices, model responses to dynamic magnetopause boundaries, long-term &amp;quot;climatological&amp;quot; model validation, using multi-variate metrics to assess model performance, or any related contribution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank Toffoletto:  Initial result from LFM RCM for Oct 2012 Storm &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter and Howard Singer: dB/dt study (MHD and empirical) results / discussion&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer: Calculation of K index values from model magnetic perturbations&lt;br /&gt;
* Victoir Veibell and Bob Weigel (presented by Tim Guild): Climatological analysis of 12 months of MHD simulated ground magnetometer measurements&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabor Facsko:  GUMICS-4 verification and footprint determination using static and dynamic global MHD simulations of the ECLAT project&lt;br /&gt;
* Roxanne Katus and Michael Liemohn: Climatological Validation of the HEIDI Ring Current Model&lt;br /&gt;
* Haje Korth:  Statistical maps of TIMED/GUVI auroral emissions as a new global MHD validation data source&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These next two talks may move to the beginning of the next session (Thursday 3:30-5:00).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Josh Rigler:  Metrics derived from multi-variate statistical distributions   &lt;br /&gt;
* Asher Pembroke:  Interpolating into &amp;quot;Hard to reach places&amp;quot; of MHD volumes for more accurate DST&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 2: How Validation Studies Guide Model Improvements====&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 03:30 PM – 5:00 PM: (Chair: Howard Singer) &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
In this session, we solicit short presentations on specific examples of how discrepancies between models and observations have led to a better understanding of the physics that needs to be incorporated into models. Studies, or ideas, on studies involving model sensitivity to inputs and various model parameters are welcome. The session will include a discussion on better ways to design metrics and validation studies to uncover missing physics in models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer: Session Intro and Comments on Ensemble Modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling : Multi-Model Validation with the Space Weather Modeling Framework&lt;br /&gt;
* Margaret Chen: The effect of uncertain boundary conditions on ring current model validation  &lt;br /&gt;
* Andrey Samsonov: Large-scale flow vortices following a magnetospheric sudden impulse (Simulations were done with SWMF, OpenGGCM and LFM.)&lt;br /&gt;
* Slava Merkin: Lessons from MHD-AMPERE comparisons        &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter: Magnetopause Challenge of 2010 and steps from there: Eents for future MP challenge&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Session 3: Validation of MHD models coupled with other modules such as the Ring Current and Polar Outflow====&lt;br /&gt;
Friday: 10:30 AM – 12:15 PM (Chair: Lutz Rastaetter)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we will investigate recent advances in the development of coupled models of the magnetosphere, inner magnetosphere, the plasmasphere/polar wind, and the ionosphere/thermosphere.  We solicit short presentations on methods to link models, validate the outputs and constrain coupled model systems using observations.  Emphasis should be placed on new physical processes that are described by the coupled models and on effects that remain out of scope and that limit the effectiveness and stability of the coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Raeder (co-authors Gilson &amp;amp; Toffoletto),  OpenGGCM - RCM validations&lt;br /&gt;
* Raluca Ilie: Coupling of SWMF magnetosphere and Heidi Ring Current&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Wiltberger: Validation of MFLFM Outflow Simulations &lt;br /&gt;
* All: Discussion on future Metrics and Validation Activities to Support GEM goals&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have topics for discussion, please consider communicating them to the conveners before the session.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Focus Group Proposal (December 2010) ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/Proposal_MV_12012010.pdf Metrics and Validation] by Masha Kuznetsova, Aaron Ridley, Tim Guild, Lutz Rastaetter, and Howard Singer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Metrics and Validation Focus Group''' &lt;br /&gt;
'''Status Report'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Current Co-Chairs (2005-2012): Masha Kuznetsova (CCMC), Aaron Ridley (Univ. of Michigan).&lt;br /&gt;
New Co-Chairs (2012-2015); Tim Guild (Aerospace Corp), Lutz Rastaetter (CCMC), Howard Singer (NOAA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summer 2008 the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group initiated the GGCM modeling Challenge. The goals of the Challenge:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Evaluate the current state of the space science models and track model improvements over time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate interaction between research and operation communities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate collaboration among modelers and data providers and research communities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Facilitate further model improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project focuses on various scientific and operational aspects of GGCM model performance and addresses challenges of model-data comparisons and metrics studies (e.g., model output and observational time series preparation for comparison, measurement uncertainty, metrics selection). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following model/data comparisons (Matrics Studies) are involved in the Modeling Challenge:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 1: Magnetic field at geosynchronous orbit (GOES)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 2: Magnetopause crossings by geosynchronous satellite (GOES and LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 3: Plasma density/temperature at geosynchronous orbit (LANL)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 4: Ground magnetic perturbations (ground based magnetometers)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 5: Dst index (added at  2009 summer workshop) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metric Study 6: Heat flux into ionosphere (added at 2010 summer workshop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics Study 7: Auroral oval position (study of interest to US Airforce, details to be discussed at fall 2010 mini-workshop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four events were selected at the GEM 2008 Workshop:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 1: Oct 29, 2003 06:00 UT - Oct  30,  06:00 UT (Kp = 9, Dst_min=-353nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 2: Dec 14, 2006 12:00 UT - Dec 16,  00:00 UT (Kp = 8, Dst_min=-139nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 3: Aug 31, 2001 00:00 UT - Sep  01, 00:00 UT (Kp = 4, Dst_min=-40nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 4: Aug 31, 2005 10:00 UT - Sep  01, 12:00 UT (Kp = 7, Dst_min=-131nT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two more events were added in summer 2010 for metrics study 6 on request of Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition focus group: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 5: May 15, 2005 00:00 UT - May 16, 2005, 00:00 UT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Event 6: July 9, 2005 00:00 UT - July 12, 2005, 00:00 UT &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/status.pdf Status of on-going metrics studies and future plans:]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Ground magnetic perturbations and magnetic field at geosynchronous orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
The first results of metrics studies 1 and 4 discussed at GEM 2009 and 2010 summer workshops are available at the CCMC website and at the GEM wiki. Two papers (with all Challenge participants as co-authors) are submitted to the Space Weather Journal.  &lt;br /&gt;
Pulkkinen, A., M. Kuznetsova, A. Ridley, J. Raeder, A. Vapirev, D. Weimer, R. Weigel, M. Wiltberger, G. Millward8, L. Rastaetter, M.Hesse, H. J. Singer and A. Chulaki, GEM 2008-2009 Challenge: ground magnetic field perturbations, submitted to Space Weather Journal, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
Rastatter,  L., M. M. Kuznetsova, A. Vapirev, A. Ridley, V. G. Merkin,&lt;br /&gt;
A. Pulkkinen M. Hesse, H. J. Singer, GEM 2008-2009 Challenge: magnetic fjelds at geosynchronous satellite positions, submitted to Space Weather Journal, 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
The principal conclusion of these studies is that ranking of the models is strongly dependent on the type of metric (the way how observational and modeled time series are compared) used to evaluate the model performance. Type of metrics to be used depends on the application and should be defined by model science and operational users. Metrics 4 is suggested for the Operational Metrics by NOAA SWPC. On NOAA SWPC request metrics format will be modified to focus on regional Kp  and dB/dt.  CCMC is working with the community to develop an automated system that will allow repeating the exercise on regular basis. We will continue dialog with the operations community to refine the metrics format. The second round of model-data comparison is planned for spring 2012 with the first report on model improvement over time to be presented at 2012 2ummer workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Plasma parameters at the geosynchronous orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To proceed with the study SOPA ion corrections for MPA are needed for pressure comparison. A group of LANL scientists are working on removal of electron contamination from the low- energy ion channels of SOPA. We exxpected completion of the first round of model-data comparison before the end of 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Magnetopause crossings by geosynchronous satellite.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary analysis of Challenge results demonstrated significant differences between observations and model predictions. The unexpected result is that magnetopause standoff distance varies significantly for different global MHD codes. To address the issue in more details we initiated baseline model comparison study, when researchers run different MHD codes with different settings for various solar wind and IMF conditions and compare the results.  &lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary analysis of the results at 2010 summer workshop excluded a number of possible sources for disagreement (e.g., such as grid resolution or value of anomalous resistivity). The latest idea is that the most likely source for the discrepancies are differences in inner boundary conditions. The decision was made to continue the study with the goal to resolve the issue within the next two years.  We plan to initiate collaborations on this topic with FGs in magnetopause research area and with FG  magnetic reconnection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) Dst index.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dst index Challenge originated in summer 2009 is a joint project with Inner Magnetisphere Focus group (liaison Dan Welling). The preliminary results were discussed at 2010 summer workshop. Report on the first round of study will be presented at the fall 2010 mini-workshop.  Different ways of Dst index calculations are currently being analyzed. We plan to finalize the paper to be submitted to the Space Weather Journal before the summer workshop 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5) Heat flux into ionosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat flux into ionosphere metrics study was initiated in summer 2010. This is a joint project with Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition focus group (liaison Stefan Eriksson). The study involves comparison with Poynting flux time series derived from DMSP observations. To facilitate the research two additional events were added to the original four GEM events.  This study is of potential interest to CEDAR community (as was agreed at the CEDAR 2010 summer workshop).  Simulations, data preparation, and tool development for model output postrocessing are currently on the way. We plan to present the first results for the discussion at summer workshop 2011. We expect this project to continue until the end of 2012 and beyond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6) Auroral oval position. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summer 2010 we agreed on the importance to include auroral oval position metrics study. This metrics study is of primary interest to a number of GGCM model operational users including US Air Force. This study is also of a potential interest to the CEDAR community.  The discussion on the details of this challenge is planned for the fall 2010 mini Workshop. We plan to continue this study beyond 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joint GEM-CEDAR Challenge'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To analyze the effects geospace environment on the ionosphere we are planning to involve CEDAR Community to the Modeling Challenge.  This activity is especially relevant due to upcoming joint GEM-CEDAR Workshop in 2011. Preliminary discussion with ionosphere modelers at CEDAR was held at CEDAR 2009 and 2010 Workshops.  GEM M&amp;amp;V FG co-chairs were involved in the organizing of the CEDAR Electrodynamics-Thermosphere-Ionosphere Challenge. CEDAR modelers included GEM challenge events for the series of planned comparative studies.  Further, many of the magnetospheric models are coupled to ionosphere-thermosphere models, therefore, the metrics can be conducted for both coupled and uncoupled simulations on both models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Baseline model comparison'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An aspect of validating models is to determine how well they solve the equation set that they are supposed to be solving.  This type of validation has to do with checking the numerics of the codes.  The method in which this validation will be conducted is to have researchers run different MHD codes for various solar wind and IMF conditions and compare the results.  For this, we have requested that modelers run a time period in which the solar wind stays constant at 5/cc and -400 km/s, while the IMF Bz drops every few hours from -5, -10, -20, -30, -35, to -40 nT.  The ionospheric conductance was held constant at 5 mhos. Another series of runs will change the  solar wind ram pressure, while keeping the IMF Bz equal to – 10 nt. Initial simulation results were presented at 2009 and 2010 summer workshops.  It was shown that many of the models had significant differences.  It was decided upon that the subsolar magnetopause location, the cusp location, and the current structures at the magnetopause will be investigated under the different IMF conditions.  Further investigations will include (1) examining the reconnection rate in the different codes to determine how each handles reconnection for the different IMF orientations; (2) examining the tail length, the amount of open flux in the polar caps and the plasma sheet density during the different intervals; &lt;br /&gt;
(3) the cross polar cap potential; and (4) the Dst as a function of time. With these types of comparisons, the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group can collaborate with other focus groups within the GEM community.  It is expected that  the FG will arrange a special issue of a journal to capture the results of these comparisons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2014_Summer_Workshop_Sessions&amp;diff=1970</id>
		<title>2014 Summer Workshop Sessions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2014_Summer_Workshop_Sessions&amp;diff=1970"/>
		<updated>2014-06-10T19:14:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* [GGCM] Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''June 15-20, 2014'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Renaissance Portsmouth Hotel &amp;amp; Conference Center, Portsmouth, Virginia'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General workshop information is available at the [[2014 Summer Workshop|2014 Summer Workshop Page]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below are ''tentative'' session agenda provided by Focus Groups. The information here serves as a rough guide for those who wish to know the most updated session plans. Due to the nature of the GEM Workshop, Focus Groups may continue to revise their agenda on this page or during sessions as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Monday, June 16, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMS tutorial''' by ''Drew Turner'' -- Probing the tempest: Current concepts and recent relevations concerning the nature of Earth's inner magnetosphere and geomagnetic storms&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MIC tutorial''' by ''Joe Huba'' -- Modeling the ionosphere/plasmasphere system: Quiet and stormtime conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS/MIC] Storm-time Inner Magneotsphere-Ionosphere Convection (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS/MIC] Storm-time Inner Magneotsphere-Ionosphere Convection (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] Strategic Priorities for Funding in the NSF Antarctic Program (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NSF has requested that the National Academy of Science develop a consensus recommendation on the most compelling research that can be supported in the coming decade and outline steps forward to implement this research. This meeting is to engage the space science community to participate in the development of this consensus recommendation. The Antarctic can be a platform for measurements and investigation of space weather phenomena and several measurement programs are presently active. How should funding priorities be set for this research during the coming decade? Please help to establish these priorities. Very broad key scientific questions have been identified in the 2011 NRC report “Future Science Opportunities in the Antarctic and Southern Ocean”. The relevant question for our community is “What can the Antarctic platform reveal about the interactions between the Earth and the space environment”. The results from the NAS committee established to develop funding priorities will have an important impact on funding decisions at NSF and our research community needs to be strongly represented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM/Tail] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere/Tail-inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS/MIC/GGCM] Storm-time Inner Magneotsphere-Ionosphere Convection/Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tuesday, June 17, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Tail tutorial''' by ''Jim Klimchuk'' -- Onset conditions for impulsive magnetic energy release&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GGCM tutorial''' by ''Jian Yang'' -- Effects of plasma-sheet bubble injections&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Schunk -- Overview of Ion Outflow (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling -- Merged Ionosphere/Magnetosphere Modeling of the GEM Idealized Storm Period Using GPW and BATSRUS&lt;br /&gt;
* Nick Perlongo -- PWOM Results as Input to MHD Models for the Idealized and First Real Storm Periods&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling and Nick Perlongo -- Merged Ionosphere/Magnetosphere Modeling of the GEM Idealized Storm Period Using PWOM and BATSRUS (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Varney and Mike Wiltberger -- Merged Modeling of the GEM Idealized Storm Period Using an Ionosphere/Polar Wind Model (IPWM) and the LFM-MIX/CMIT (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling/Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Tail] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[10 minutes/5 vugraph limit per presentation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Xiangning Chu, UCLA, “On the relation between the formation of SCW and the BBFs and the aurora”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Birn, SSI: “On relation of SCW to BBFs”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yan Song, Univ. Minn, “Theory of the Generation of Field-Aligned Current in Association with the Substorm Current Wedge Related to BBFs/Dipolarization Fronts”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Lysak, Univ. Minn, What is the physics of the oscillations in the field and plasma seen ahead of the front?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Toshi Nishimura, UCLA, “Tail-inner magnetosphere interaction seen by auroral streamers and proton aurora”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ying Zou, UCLA, “Polar cap flow-PBI-streamer connection”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Vince Eccles -- Ionospheric Dynamics During the 8-day GEM First Real Storm Study Period (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Abdallah Barakat -- Ion Outflow Predicted by the Generalized Polar Wind Model During the GEM First Real Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling and Abdallah Barakat -- Merged Ionosphere/Magnetosphere Modeling of the First Storm Period Using GPW and BATSRUS&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura -- FAST Ion Outflow Measurements—Flux, Velocity, Temperature, Current Density and Characteristics of Electron Precipitation During the GEM First Storm  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Tom Moore and Rick Chappell -- Polar Measurements of Low Energy Ion Outflow and Lobal Wind During the GEM First Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[Invited: 8 min/talk; Contributed: 5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
* Vania Jordanova -- Review of the convection-diffusion type radiation belt models (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer -- Recent RBE model results on radiation belt dynamics (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Shprits -- Review of the diffusion-type radiation belt models (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Thorne -- Recent diffusion model results on radiation belt dynamics (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Greg Cunningham -- Recent DREAM3D model results on radiation belt dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
* Anthony Chan -- Recent SDE model results on radiation belt dynamics (invited)  &lt;br /&gt;
* Scot Elkington -- MHD/SDE methods and results   &lt;br /&gt;
* Adam Kellerman -- MLT-dependent reanalysis of radiation belt electrons: Case studies using several satellites and different magnetic field models &lt;br /&gt;
* All: End-of-session discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Tail] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[10 minutes/5 vugraph limit per presentation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* W Douglas Cramer, UNH, “OpenGGCM to investigate steady and bursty tail flow into the ring current region during CME and CIR-driven storms”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Xiaojia Zhang, UCLA: &amp;quot;Evaluation of ECH Wave Contribution to Diffuse Aurora&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jian Yang, “RCM-E simulation of a thin arc preceded by a north-south-aligned streamer” &amp;amp; “RCM-E simulation of field-line slippage in the near-Earth plasma sheet: a test of substorm inside-out scenario (tentative)”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Shin Ohtani, APL, “Variations of High-energy Ions during Fast Plasma Flows and Dipolarization in the Plasma Sheet: Comparison among Different Ion Species”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Stein Haaland -- Cold Ion Outflow: Cluster Measurements During the GEM First Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn Kistler -- Cluster Measurements of O+ During the GEM First Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Elena Kronberg -- Cluster RAPID Energetic Ion and Electron Measurements During the GEM First Storm Period (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky -- LANL Plasma Measurements During the GEM First Storm Period (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura -- FAST Observations of the Solar Zenith Angle Dependence on Relations Between Energy Input and Outflowing H+ and O+ Ion Fluxes &amp;gt;3000 km&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[Invited: 8 min/talk; Contributed: 5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
* Louis Ozeke -- Specifying ULF wave properties and quantifying radial diffusion (invited) &lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi -- Occurrence of high-m ULF waves in the magnetosphere as observed by ST-5 satellites &lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Hartinger -- The effect of magnetopause motion on fast mode resonance &lt;br /&gt;
* Kyungguk Min -- Specifying EMIC wave properties based on statistical THEMIS data (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Denton -- Simulation of pitch angle scattering of relativistic electrons by EMIC waves &lt;br /&gt;
* Nigel Meredith (presented by Wen Li) -- Global model of lower band and upper band chorus from multiple satellite observations (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wen Li -- Construction of the dynamic global chorus wave distribution based on POES electron precipitation&lt;br /&gt;
* Maria de Soria-Santacruz Pich -- Global distribution of plasmaspheric hiss waves inferred from POES observations &lt;br /&gt;
* Ksenia Orlova -- Activity dependent global model of electron loss inside the plasmasphere &lt;br /&gt;
* Qianli Ma -- The distribution of magnetosonic waves in the Earth's inner magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* All: End-of-session discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Tail] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[10 minutes/5 vugraph limit per presentation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jacob Bortnik, UCLA, “TBA”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Christine Gabrielse, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Andrei Runov, Drew L. Turner, UCLA:” Magnetospheric Particle Injections and their Relation to Impulsive, Localized Electric Fields”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Christine Gabrielse, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Andrei Runov, Drew L. Turner, UCAL “Statistical characteristics of particle injections throughout the equatorial magnetotail”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* V. G. Merkin, M. Sitnov, J. Lyon: &amp;quot;Resistive MHD simulations of generalized 2D equilibria with LFMBOX”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger, NCAR: “LFM simulations of BBFs”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* J. C. Green, J.V. Rodriguez, J. Machol, R. Redmon: “Update on phase space density data from the POES and GOES satellites&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wednesday, June 18, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency Reports''' from ''NSF, NASA'' and ''NOAA''&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Dayside tutorial''' by ''Jim Burch'' -- The science of the MMS mission&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM CCGM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Krall -- SAMI 3 Modeling of Post-Storm Plasmasphere Filling and Comparisons With Measurements (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mick Denton -- Long-lived Drainage Plumes—Where Does the Plasma Come From? (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* George Khazanov -- What Is Missing in the Modern Plasmaspheric Studies?&lt;br /&gt;
* Ted Fritz -- The Energization of Ionospheric Plasma in the Cusp during the Solar Event of 23 May, 1998 Using Polar and ACE&lt;br /&gt;
* GENERAL DISCUSSION OF FUTURE COLLABORATIVE STUDIES&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[Invited: 8 min/talk; Contributed: 5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
* Natalia Ganjushkina -- Event-fitted magnetic field model (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Adam C. Kellerman -- On the influence of magnetic field model errors on data assimilation and radiation belt modeling &lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Birn -- Modeling the seed population of radiation belt electrons (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Natalia Ganjushkina -- 5-50 keV electrons in the inner magnetosphere: Observations and modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Drew Turner -- Energetic particle injections and their contributions to the outer belt seed population&lt;br /&gt;
* Alexander Boyd -- Using Phase Space Density to look at the Radiation Belt Seed Population&lt;br /&gt;
* Chia-Lin Huang -- Electron dropouts due to magnetopause shadowing: statistical study using GOES data and last closed drift shell calculation&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Denton -- Ion composition at geostationary orbit, and its effect on EMIC waves &lt;br /&gt;
* Justin H Lee -- THEMIS statistics on low-energy ion compositional properties and their application to observations and modeling of EMIC waves &lt;br /&gt;
* All: End-of-session discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Timescales, Time Lags, and Feedback Loops in the M-I System&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
This is an audience-participation discussion about the time lags in the solar-wind-driven magnetosphere-ionosphere system, about the characteristic timescales in the dynamics of the system, and about feedback loops affecting the system.The discussion will involve the solar wind, geomagnetic current systems, the plasmas of the magnetosphere, the radiation belt, substorms, the ionosphere, and the atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Empirical studies:&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Johnston -- AE9/AP9/SPM:  Update for the GEM Community&lt;br /&gt;
* Yi-Jiun Su -- Specification of &amp;gt; 2 MeV electron flux as a function of local time and geomagnetic activity at geosynchronous orbit  &lt;br /&gt;
* Larry Lyons -- Earthward penetrating meso-scale flow bursts leading to electron loss via EMIC waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Hong Zhao -- The 90 deg-minimum pitch angle distribution in the slot region and inner belt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All: Wrap-up discussions and planning for future FG activities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Potential challenge events:&lt;br /&gt;
* Wen Li -- Radiation Belt Electron Acceleration by Chorus Waves During the 17 March 2013 Storm&lt;br /&gt;
* Weichao Tu -- RB electron dropout and acceleration during the October 2012 event&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Part1 -- Long-Running Measurements of the State of the System: What Can Be Done?&amp;quot;. This is an audience-participation discussion about creating new geomagnetic indices from measurements besides magnetometers. The discussions will involve wave measurements, plasma measurements, composition measurements, radiation-belt measurements, substorm measurements, radar measurements, precipitation measurements, etc. A number of researchers have agreed to comment on ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM CCGM (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Informal Workshop Comparing Models and Measurements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Open discussion and data comparison&lt;br /&gt;
* Short papers by Jun Liang and Mike Liemohn&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Part2 -- Long-Running Measurements of the State of the System: What Can Be Done?&amp;quot;. This is an audience-participation discussion about creating new geomagnetic indices from measurements besides magnetometers. The discussions will involve wave measurements, plasma measurements, composition measurements, radiation-belt measurements, substorm measurements, radar measurements, precipitation measurements, etc. A number of researchers have agreed to comment on ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thursday, June 19, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Dayside tutorial''' by ''Antonius Otto'' -- Dayside solar wind-magnetosphere coupling&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GGCM tutorial''' by ''Jimmy Raeder'' -- Prospects for data assimilation in global magnetosphere models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [MIC] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Planning Session for the Geospace Systems Science Focus Group&amp;quot;. An open discussion to select the topics for the GSS sessions for the next few GEM Summer Workshop. We want to consider new systems-science questions to ask, future joint sessions with other focus groups, new problems and new techniques, and data analysis methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] THEMIS Training Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This session is intended for developers who are interested in contributing plugin modules to support new missions or data sets within the SPEDAS framework and analysis tools. SPEDAS (Space Physics Environment Data Analysis Software) has evolved from a THEMIS-specific set of tools, to a more general multi-mission framework. We&lt;br /&gt;
will present newly released features and capabilities of the framework, followed by an open discussion and Q&amp;amp;A regarding the road map for future development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside/GGCM] The Magnetosheath/Geospace System Science (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [MIC/GGCM] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques/Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] THEMIS Training Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This session is intended for users who are interested in using SPEDAS for loading, plotting, and analyzing data from THEMIS and other supported missions. We will present a variety of data analysis scenarios, focused mostly on THEMIS data, but touching on some of the other multi-mission capabilities. The formal presentation will be followed by an open Q&amp;amp;A, help session, and installation clinic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside/GGCM] The Magnetosheath/Geospace System Science (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Model Uncertainty: Dealing with uncertain physical processes and boundary conditions'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit contributions discussing how model uncertainties and uncertain boundary conditions affect model results and validation.  Specifically solicited are strategies to accommodate uncertainty in modeled physical processes (e.g. uncertain radiation belt diffusion coefficients), uncertainty in boundary conditions (e.g. upstream solar wind), or the validation of models at their boundaries (such as ground-based magnetometers). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will introduce a challenge based on previously run magnetopause standoff simulations that compared model results to magnetopause crossings of geo-synchronous satellites. The few crossings observed during strong events revealed significant discrepancies between the major magnetospheric MHD models. We plan to revisit the challenge on the basis of selected events with steady and changing solar wind conditions and observations near the nose of the magnetosphere. The role of boundary conditions applied at the inner boundary (e.g., ionospheric conductance and convection, plasma density and temperature, magnetic field) can be tested. Some of the questions that can be addressed are: &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* Which model is better suited to predict magnetopause position near the nose of the magnetosphere under typical conditions/storm time conditions?&lt;br /&gt;
* What model assumptions affect the model predictions significantly and lead to differences between models?&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the magnetopause change during extreme events&lt;br /&gt;
* How sensitive is model performance to changes of the boundary conditions?&lt;br /&gt;
* Can we define common settings for the inner boundary location, and the plasma density or temperature applied at this boundary?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We also anticipate presentations on topics such as the influence of the plasma sheet boundary conditions on ring current development and also welcome specifications of uncertainties derived from observations and lessons from data assimilation and ensemble modeling methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Draft Agenda:'''&lt;br /&gt;
(~12 min/ presentation, walk-ons welcome and we will adjust time appropriately)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Guild: Introduction to Session&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Weigel: Validation of MHD Magnetosphere Models - Long-term, point, and single model analysis with measured solar wind inputs.&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Weigel: Validation of MHD Magnetosphere Models - Short-term, global, and intermodel comparisons with artificial solar wind inputs.   &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter: Introduction to the Magnetopause Crossing Challenge.   &lt;br /&gt;
* Yari Collado-Vega:  Events and observations for the magnetopause challenge. &lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer: The effects of the inner near Earth boundary conditions on MHD models.   &lt;br /&gt;
* Darren DeZeeuw: Virtual Model Repository tools to calculate metrics derived from CCMC runs.  &lt;br /&gt;
* All:  Open Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friday, June 20, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Tail tutorial''' by ''Mike Wiltberger'' -- Determination of the global conductance pattern and its influence on the dynamics of the geospace&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Student-selected tutorial''' by ''Robyn Millan'' -- Radiation belts: Lost and found in Antarctica&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] The Magnetosheath (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Validating Models Under Extreme Geomagnetic Conditions.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Extreme events in the geospace environment are among the most interesting scientifically as well as important for their space weather consequences.  The goals for this session are: to show model results for extreme events in the magnetosphere, to share information about the range of conditions where models have been validated, to assess methods for validating model performance with limited observations (such as for early historical events), and to assess the reliability of a model outside the range in which it has been validated. These results will guide our understanding of the magnetosphere under extreme conditions, and provide insight into what physics needs to be incorporated into models so that they perform better during extreme events. Contributions to these and related issues are welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Draft Agenda:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(8-10 min/ presentation, walk-ons welcome and we will adjust time appropriately)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer – Chair and Introduction &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* Jimmy Raeder: Modeling Extreme Events with OPENGGCM  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger: Modleing Extreme Events with LFM/CMIT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling:  Modeling Extreme Events with the SWMF &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling and Vania Jordanova: Validating RAM-SCB under Extreme Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Robert Weigel (and Brian Curtis) Comparing Models under Extreme Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Shprits: Unusual Behavior of Radiation Belts During Extreme Events&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chigomezyo Ngwira: Modeling extreme `Carrington-type' space weather events using three-dimensional global MHD simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer and Mei-Ching  Fok: Testing Magnetosphere Radiation Belt and Ring Current models under Extreme Conditions &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Discussion, including suggestions for a Modeling Challenge for Extreme Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Plenary Wrap-up Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2014_Summer_Workshop_Sessions&amp;diff=1969</id>
		<title>2014 Summer Workshop Sessions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2014_Summer_Workshop_Sessions&amp;diff=1969"/>
		<updated>2014-06-10T18:01:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* [GGCM] Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''June 15-20, 2014'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Renaissance Portsmouth Hotel &amp;amp; Conference Center, Portsmouth, Virginia'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General workshop information is available at the [[2014 Summer Workshop|2014 Summer Workshop Page]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below are ''tentative'' session agenda provided by Focus Groups. The information here serves as a rough guide for those who wish to know the most updated session plans. Due to the nature of the GEM Workshop, Focus Groups may continue to revise their agenda on this page or during sessions as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Monday, June 16, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMS tutorial''' by ''Drew Turner'' -- Probing the tempest: Current concepts and recent relevations concerning the nature of Earth's inner magnetosphere and geomagnetic storms&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MIC tutorial''' by ''Joe Huba'' -- Modeling the ionosphere/plasmasphere system: Quiet and stormtime conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS/MIC] Storm-time Inner Magneotsphere-Ionosphere Convection (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS/MIC] Storm-time Inner Magneotsphere-Ionosphere Convection (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] Strategic Priorities for Funding in the NSF Antarctic Program (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NSF has requested that the National Academy of Science develop a consensus recommendation on the most compelling research that can be supported in the coming decade and outline steps forward to implement this research. This meeting is to engage the space science community to participate in the development of this consensus recommendation. The Antarctic can be a platform for measurements and investigation of space weather phenomena and several measurement programs are presently active. How should funding priorities be set for this research during the coming decade? Please help to establish these priorities. Very broad key scientific questions have been identified in the 2011 NRC report “Future Science Opportunities in the Antarctic and Southern Ocean”. The relevant question for our community is “What can the Antarctic platform reveal about the interactions between the Earth and the space environment”. The results from the NAS committee established to develop funding priorities will have an important impact on funding decisions at NSF and our research community needs to be strongly represented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM/Tail] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere/Tail-inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS/MIC/GGCM] Storm-time Inner Magneotsphere-Ionosphere Convection/Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tuesday, June 17, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Tail tutorial''' by ''Jim Klimchuk'' -- Onset conditions for impulsive magnetic energy release&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GGCM tutorial''' by ''Jian Yang'' -- Effects of plasma-sheet bubble injections&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Schunk -- Overview of Ion Outflow (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling -- Merged Ionosphere/Magnetosphere Modeling of the GEM Idealized Storm Period Using GPW and BATSRUS&lt;br /&gt;
* Nick Perlongo -- PWOM Results as Input to MHD Models for the Idealized and First Real Storm Periods&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling and Nick Perlongo -- Merged Ionosphere/Magnetosphere Modeling of the GEM Idealized Storm Period Using PWOM and BATSRUS (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Varney and Mike Wiltberger -- Merged Modeling of the GEM Idealized Storm Period Using an Ionosphere/Polar Wind Model (IPWM) and the LFM-MIX/CMIT (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling/Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Tail] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[10 minutes/5 vugraph limit per presentation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Xiangning Chu, UCLA, “On the relation between the formation of SCW and the BBFs and the aurora”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Birn, SSI: “On relation of SCW to BBFs”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yan Song, Univ. Minn, “Theory of the Generation of Field-Aligned Current in Association with the Substorm Current Wedge Related to BBFs/Dipolarization Fronts”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Lysak, Univ. Minn, What is the physics of the oscillations in the field and plasma seen ahead of the front?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Toshi Nishimura, UCLA, “Tail-inner magnetosphere interaction seen by auroral streamers and proton aurora”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ying Zou, UCLA, “Polar cap flow-PBI-streamer connection”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Vince Eccles -- Ionospheric Dynamics During the 8-day GEM First Real Storm Study Period (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Abdallah Barakat -- Ion Outflow Predicted by the Generalized Polar Wind Model During the GEM First Real Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling and Abdallah Barakat -- Merged Ionosphere/Magnetosphere Modeling of the First Storm Period Using GPW and BATSRUS&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura -- FAST Ion Outflow Measurements—Flux, Velocity, Temperature, Current Density and Characteristics of Electron Precipitation During the GEM First Storm  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Tom Moore and Rick Chappell -- Polar Measurements of Low Energy Ion Outflow and Lobal Wind During the GEM First Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[Invited: 8 min/talk; Contributed: 5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
* Vania Jordanova -- Review of the convection-diffusion type radiation belt models (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer -- Recent RBE model results on radiation belt dynamics (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Shprits -- Review of the diffusion-type radiation belt models (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Thorne -- Recent diffusion model results on radiation belt dynamics (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Greg Cunningham -- Recent DREAM3D model results on radiation belt dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
* Anthony Chan -- Recent SDE model results on radiation belt dynamics (invited)  &lt;br /&gt;
* Scot Elkington -- MHD/SDE methods and results   &lt;br /&gt;
* Adam Kellerman -- MLT-dependent reanalysis of radiation belt electrons: Case studies using several satellites and different magnetic field models &lt;br /&gt;
* All: End-of-session discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Tail] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[10 minutes/5 vugraph limit per presentation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* W Douglas Cramer, UNH, “OpenGGCM to investigate steady and bursty tail flow into the ring current region during CME and CIR-driven storms”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Xiaojia Zhang, UCLA: &amp;quot;Evaluation of ECH Wave Contribution to Diffuse Aurora&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jian Yang, “RCM-E simulation of a thin arc preceded by a north-south-aligned streamer” &amp;amp; “RCM-E simulation of field-line slippage in the near-Earth plasma sheet: a test of substorm inside-out scenario (tentative)”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Shin Ohtani, APL, “Variations of High-energy Ions during Fast Plasma Flows and Dipolarization in the Plasma Sheet: Comparison among Different Ion Species”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Stein Haaland -- Cold Ion Outflow: Cluster Measurements During the GEM First Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn Kistler -- Cluster Measurements of O+ During the GEM First Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Elena Kronberg -- Cluster RAPID Energetic Ion and Electron Measurements During the GEM First Storm Period (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky -- LANL Plasma Measurements During the GEM First Storm Period (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura -- FAST Observations of the Solar Zenith Angle Dependence on Relations Between Energy Input and Outflowing H+ and O+ Ion Fluxes &amp;gt;3000 km&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[Invited: 8 min/talk; Contributed: 5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
* Louis Ozeke -- Specifying ULF wave properties and quantifying radial diffusion (invited) &lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi -- Occurrence of high-m ULF waves in the magnetosphere as observed by ST-5 satellites &lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Hartinger -- The effect of magnetopause motion on fast mode resonance &lt;br /&gt;
* Kyungguk Min -- Specifying EMIC wave properties based on statistical THEMIS data (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Denton -- Simulation of pitch angle scattering of relativistic electrons by EMIC waves &lt;br /&gt;
* Nigel Meredith (presented by Wen Li) -- Global model of lower band and upper band chorus from multiple satellite observations (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wen Li -- Construction of the dynamic global chorus wave distribution based on POES electron precipitation&lt;br /&gt;
* Maria de Soria-Santacruz Pich -- Global distribution of plasmaspheric hiss waves inferred from POES observations &lt;br /&gt;
* Ksenia Orlova -- Activity dependent global model of electron loss inside the plasmasphere &lt;br /&gt;
* Qianli Ma -- The distribution of magnetosonic waves in the Earth's inner magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* All: End-of-session discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Tail] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[10 minutes/5 vugraph limit per presentation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jacob Bortnik, UCLA, “TBA”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Christine Gabrielse, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Andrei Runov, Drew L. Turner, UCLA:” Magnetospheric Particle Injections and their Relation to Impulsive, Localized Electric Fields”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Christine Gabrielse, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Andrei Runov, Drew L. Turner, UCAL “Statistical characteristics of particle injections throughout the equatorial magnetotail”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* V. G. Merkin, M. Sitnov, J. Lyon: &amp;quot;Resistive MHD simulations of generalized 2D equilibria with LFMBOX”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger, NCAR: “LFM simulations of BBFs”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* J. C. Green, J.V. Rodriguez, J. Machol, R. Redmon: “Update on phase space density data from the POES and GOES satellites&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wednesday, June 18, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency Reports''' from ''NSF, NASA'' and ''NOAA''&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Dayside tutorial''' by ''Jim Burch'' -- The science of the MMS mission&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM CCGM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Krall -- SAMI 3 Modeling of Post-Storm Plasmasphere Filling and Comparisons With Measurements (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mick Denton -- Long-lived Drainage Plumes—Where Does the Plasma Come From? (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* George Khazanov -- What Is Missing in the Modern Plasmaspheric Studies?&lt;br /&gt;
* Ted Fritz -- The Energization of Ionospheric Plasma in the Cusp during the Solar Event of 23 May, 1998 Using Polar and ACE&lt;br /&gt;
* GENERAL DISCUSSION OF FUTURE COLLABORATIVE STUDIES&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[Invited: 8 min/talk; Contributed: 5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
* Natalia Ganjushkina -- Event-fitted magnetic field model (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Adam C. Kellerman -- On the influence of magnetic field model errors on data assimilation and radiation belt modeling &lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Birn -- Modeling the seed population of radiation belt electrons (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Natalia Ganjushkina -- 5-50 keV electrons in the inner magnetosphere: Observations and modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Drew Turner -- Energetic particle injections and their contributions to the outer belt seed population&lt;br /&gt;
* Alexander Boyd -- Using Phase Space Density to look at the Radiation Belt Seed Population&lt;br /&gt;
* Chia-Lin Huang -- Electron dropouts due to magnetopause shadowing: statistical study using GOES data and last closed drift shell calculation&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Denton -- Ion composition at geostationary orbit, and its effect on EMIC waves &lt;br /&gt;
* Justin H Lee -- THEMIS statistics on low-energy ion compositional properties and their application to observations and modeling of EMIC waves &lt;br /&gt;
* All: End-of-session discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Timescales, Time Lags, and Feedback Loops in the M-I System&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
This is an audience-participation discussion about the time lags in the solar-wind-driven magnetosphere-ionosphere system, about the characteristic timescales in the dynamics of the system, and about feedback loops affecting the system.The discussion will involve the solar wind, geomagnetic current systems, the plasmas of the magnetosphere, the radiation belt, substorms, the ionosphere, and the atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Empirical studies:&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Johnston -- AE9/AP9/SPM:  Update for the GEM Community&lt;br /&gt;
* Yi-Jiun Su -- Specification of &amp;gt; 2 MeV electron flux as a function of local time and geomagnetic activity at geosynchronous orbit  &lt;br /&gt;
* Larry Lyons -- Earthward penetrating meso-scale flow bursts leading to electron loss via EMIC waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Hong Zhao -- The 90 deg-minimum pitch angle distribution in the slot region and inner belt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All: Wrap-up discussions and planning for future FG activities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Potential challenge events:&lt;br /&gt;
* Wen Li -- Radiation Belt Electron Acceleration by Chorus Waves During the 17 March 2013 Storm&lt;br /&gt;
* Weichao Tu -- RB electron dropout and acceleration during the October 2012 event&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Part1 -- Long-Running Measurements of the State of the System: What Can Be Done?&amp;quot;. This is an audience-participation discussion about creating new geomagnetic indices from measurements besides magnetometers. The discussions will involve wave measurements, plasma measurements, composition measurements, radiation-belt measurements, substorm measurements, radar measurements, precipitation measurements, etc. A number of researchers have agreed to comment on ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM CCGM (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Informal Workshop Comparing Models and Measurements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Open discussion and data comparison&lt;br /&gt;
* Short papers by Jun Liang and Mike Liemohn&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Part2 -- Long-Running Measurements of the State of the System: What Can Be Done?&amp;quot;. This is an audience-participation discussion about creating new geomagnetic indices from measurements besides magnetometers. The discussions will involve wave measurements, plasma measurements, composition measurements, radiation-belt measurements, substorm measurements, radar measurements, precipitation measurements, etc. A number of researchers have agreed to comment on ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thursday, June 19, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Dayside tutorial''' by ''Antonius Otto'' -- Dayside solar wind-magnetosphere coupling&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GGCM tutorial''' by ''Jimmy Raeder'' -- Prospects for data assimilation in global magnetosphere models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [MIC] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Planning Session for the Geospace Systems Science Focus Group&amp;quot;. An open discussion to select the topics for the GSS sessions for the next few GEM Summer Workshop. We want to consider new systems-science questions to ask, future joint sessions with other focus groups, new problems and new techniques, and data analysis methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] THEMIS Training Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This session is intended for developers who are interested in contributing plugin modules to support new missions or data sets within the SPEDAS framework and analysis tools. SPEDAS (Space Physics Environment Data Analysis Software) has evolved from a THEMIS-specific set of tools, to a more general multi-mission framework. We&lt;br /&gt;
will present newly released features and capabilities of the framework, followed by an open discussion and Q&amp;amp;A regarding the road map for future development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside/GGCM] The Magnetosheath/Geospace System Science (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [MIC/GGCM] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques/Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] THEMIS Training Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This session is intended for users who are interested in using SPEDAS for loading, plotting, and analyzing data from THEMIS and other supported missions. We will present a variety of data analysis scenarios, focused mostly on THEMIS data, but touching on some of the other multi-mission capabilities. The formal presentation will be followed by an open Q&amp;amp;A, help session, and installation clinic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside/GGCM] The Magnetosheath/Geospace System Science (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Model Uncertainty: Dealing with uncertain physical processes and boundary conditions'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit contributions discussing how model uncertainties and uncertain boundary conditions affect model results and validation.  Specifically solicited are strategies to accommodate uncertainty in modeled physical processes (e.g. uncertain radiation belt diffusion coefficients), uncertainty in boundary conditions (e.g. upstream solar wind), or the validation of models at their boundaries (such as ground-based magnetometers). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will introduce a challenge based on previously run magnetopause standoff simulations that compared model results to magnetopause crossings of geo-synchronous satellites. The few crossings observed during strong events revealed significant discrepancies between the major magnetospheric MHD models. We plan to revisit the challenge on the basis of selected events with steady and changing solar wind conditions and observations near the nose of the magnetosphere. The role of boundary conditions applied at the inner boundary (e.g., ionospheric conductance and convection, plasma density and temperature, magnetic field) can be tested. Some of the questions that can be addressed are: &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* Which model is better suited to predict magnetopause position near the nose of the magnetosphere under typical conditions/storm time conditions?&lt;br /&gt;
* What model assumptions affect the model predictions significantly and lead to differences between models?&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the magnetopause change during extreme events&lt;br /&gt;
* How sensitive is model performance to changes of the boundary conditions?&lt;br /&gt;
* Can we define common settings for the inner boundary location, and the plasma density or temperature applied at this boundary?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We also anticipate presentations on topics such as the influence of the plasma sheet boundary conditions on ring current development and also welcome specifications of uncertainties derived from observations and lessons from data assimilation and ensemble modeling methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Draft Agenda:'''&lt;br /&gt;
(~12 min/ presentation, walk-ons welcome and we will adjust time appropriately)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Guild: Introduction to Session&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Weigel: Validation of MHD Magnetosphere Models - Long-term, point, and single model analysis with measured solar wind inputs.&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Weigel: Validation of MHD Magnetosphere Models - Short-term, global, and intermodel comparisons with artificial solar wind inputs.   &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter: Introduction to the Magnetopause Crossing Challenge.   &lt;br /&gt;
* Yari Collado-Vega:  Events and observations for the magnetopause challenge. &lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer: The effects of the inner near Earth boundary conditions on MHD models.   &lt;br /&gt;
* All:  Open Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friday, June 20, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Tail tutorial''' by ''Mike Wiltberger'' -- Determination of the global conductance pattern and its influence on the dynamics of the geospace&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Student-selected tutorial''' by ''Robyn Millan'' -- Radiation belts: Lost and found in Antarctica&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] The Magnetosheath (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Validating Models Under Extreme Geomagnetic Conditions.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Extreme events in the geospace environment are among the most interesting scientifically as well as important for their space weather consequences.  The goals for this session are: to show model results for extreme events in the magnetosphere, to share information about the range of conditions where models have been validated, to assess methods for validating model performance with limited observations (such as for early historical events), and to assess the reliability of a model outside the range in which it has been validated. These results will guide our understanding of the magnetosphere under extreme conditions, and provide insight into what physics needs to be incorporated into models so that they perform better during extreme events. Contributions to these and related issues are welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Draft Agenda:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(8-10 min/ presentation, walk-ons welcome and we will adjust time appropriately)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer – Chair and Introduction &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* Jimmy Raeder: Modeling Extreme Events with OPENGGCM  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger: Modleing Extreme Events with LFM/CMIT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling:  Modeling Extreme Events with the SWMF &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling and Vania Jordanova: Validating RAM-SCB under Extreme Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Robert Weigel (and Brian Curtis) Comparing Models under Extreme Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Shprits: Unusual Behavior of Radiation Belts During Extreme Events&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chigomezyo Ngwira: Modeling extreme `Carrington-type' space weather events using three-dimensional global MHD simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer and Mei-Ching  Fok: Testing Magnetosphere Radiation Belt and Ring Current models under Extreme Conditions &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Discussion, including suggestions for a Modeling Challenge for Extreme Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Plenary Wrap-up Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2014_Summer_Workshop_Sessions&amp;diff=1968</id>
		<title>2014 Summer Workshop Sessions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2014_Summer_Workshop_Sessions&amp;diff=1968"/>
		<updated>2014-06-10T17:58:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* [GGCM] Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''June 15-20, 2014'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Renaissance Portsmouth Hotel &amp;amp; Conference Center, Portsmouth, Virginia'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General workshop information is available at the [[2014 Summer Workshop|2014 Summer Workshop Page]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below are ''tentative'' session agenda provided by Focus Groups. The information here serves as a rough guide for those who wish to know the most updated session plans. Due to the nature of the GEM Workshop, Focus Groups may continue to revise their agenda on this page or during sessions as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Monday, June 16, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMS tutorial''' by ''Drew Turner'' -- Probing the tempest: Current concepts and recent relevations concerning the nature of Earth's inner magnetosphere and geomagnetic storms&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MIC tutorial''' by ''Joe Huba'' -- Modeling the ionosphere/plasmasphere system: Quiet and stormtime conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS/MIC] Storm-time Inner Magneotsphere-Ionosphere Convection (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS/MIC] Storm-time Inner Magneotsphere-Ionosphere Convection (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] Strategic Priorities for Funding in the NSF Antarctic Program (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NSF has requested that the National Academy of Science develop a consensus recommendation on the most compelling research that can be supported in the coming decade and outline steps forward to implement this research. This meeting is to engage the space science community to participate in the development of this consensus recommendation. The Antarctic can be a platform for measurements and investigation of space weather phenomena and several measurement programs are presently active. How should funding priorities be set for this research during the coming decade? Please help to establish these priorities. Very broad key scientific questions have been identified in the 2011 NRC report “Future Science Opportunities in the Antarctic and Southern Ocean”. The relevant question for our community is “What can the Antarctic platform reveal about the interactions between the Earth and the space environment”. The results from the NAS committee established to develop funding priorities will have an important impact on funding decisions at NSF and our research community needs to be strongly represented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM/Tail] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere/Tail-inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS/MIC/GGCM] Storm-time Inner Magneotsphere-Ionosphere Convection/Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tuesday, June 17, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Tail tutorial''' by ''Jim Klimchuk'' -- Onset conditions for impulsive magnetic energy release&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GGCM tutorial''' by ''Jian Yang'' -- Effects of plasma-sheet bubble injections&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Schunk -- Overview of Ion Outflow (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling -- Merged Ionosphere/Magnetosphere Modeling of the GEM Idealized Storm Period Using GPW and BATSRUS&lt;br /&gt;
* Nick Perlongo -- PWOM Results as Input to MHD Models for the Idealized and First Real Storm Periods&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling and Nick Perlongo -- Merged Ionosphere/Magnetosphere Modeling of the GEM Idealized Storm Period Using PWOM and BATSRUS (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Varney and Mike Wiltberger -- Merged Modeling of the GEM Idealized Storm Period Using an Ionosphere/Polar Wind Model (IPWM) and the LFM-MIX/CMIT (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling/Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Tail] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[10 minutes/5 vugraph limit per presentation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Xiangning Chu, UCLA, “On the relation between the formation of SCW and the BBFs and the aurora”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Birn, SSI: “On relation of SCW to BBFs”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yan Song, Univ. Minn, “Theory of the Generation of Field-Aligned Current in Association with the Substorm Current Wedge Related to BBFs/Dipolarization Fronts”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Lysak, Univ. Minn, What is the physics of the oscillations in the field and plasma seen ahead of the front?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Toshi Nishimura, UCLA, “Tail-inner magnetosphere interaction seen by auroral streamers and proton aurora”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ying Zou, UCLA, “Polar cap flow-PBI-streamer connection”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Vince Eccles -- Ionospheric Dynamics During the 8-day GEM First Real Storm Study Period (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Abdallah Barakat -- Ion Outflow Predicted by the Generalized Polar Wind Model During the GEM First Real Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling and Abdallah Barakat -- Merged Ionosphere/Magnetosphere Modeling of the First Storm Period Using GPW and BATSRUS&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura -- FAST Ion Outflow Measurements—Flux, Velocity, Temperature, Current Density and Characteristics of Electron Precipitation During the GEM First Storm  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Tom Moore and Rick Chappell -- Polar Measurements of Low Energy Ion Outflow and Lobal Wind During the GEM First Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[Invited: 8 min/talk; Contributed: 5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
* Vania Jordanova -- Review of the convection-diffusion type radiation belt models (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer -- Recent RBE model results on radiation belt dynamics (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Shprits -- Review of the diffusion-type radiation belt models (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Thorne -- Recent diffusion model results on radiation belt dynamics (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Greg Cunningham -- Recent DREAM3D model results on radiation belt dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
* Anthony Chan -- Recent SDE model results on radiation belt dynamics (invited)  &lt;br /&gt;
* Scot Elkington -- MHD/SDE methods and results   &lt;br /&gt;
* Adam Kellerman -- MLT-dependent reanalysis of radiation belt electrons: Case studies using several satellites and different magnetic field models &lt;br /&gt;
* All: End-of-session discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Tail] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[10 minutes/5 vugraph limit per presentation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* W Douglas Cramer, UNH, “OpenGGCM to investigate steady and bursty tail flow into the ring current region during CME and CIR-driven storms”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Xiaojia Zhang, UCLA: &amp;quot;Evaluation of ECH Wave Contribution to Diffuse Aurora&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jian Yang, “RCM-E simulation of a thin arc preceded by a north-south-aligned streamer” &amp;amp; “RCM-E simulation of field-line slippage in the near-Earth plasma sheet: a test of substorm inside-out scenario (tentative)”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Shin Ohtani, APL, “Variations of High-energy Ions during Fast Plasma Flows and Dipolarization in the Plasma Sheet: Comparison among Different Ion Species”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Stein Haaland -- Cold Ion Outflow: Cluster Measurements During the GEM First Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn Kistler -- Cluster Measurements of O+ During the GEM First Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Elena Kronberg -- Cluster RAPID Energetic Ion and Electron Measurements During the GEM First Storm Period (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky -- LANL Plasma Measurements During the GEM First Storm Period (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura -- FAST Observations of the Solar Zenith Angle Dependence on Relations Between Energy Input and Outflowing H+ and O+ Ion Fluxes &amp;gt;3000 km&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[Invited: 8 min/talk; Contributed: 5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
* Louis Ozeke -- Specifying ULF wave properties and quantifying radial diffusion (invited) &lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi -- Occurrence of high-m ULF waves in the magnetosphere as observed by ST-5 satellites &lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Hartinger -- The effect of magnetopause motion on fast mode resonance &lt;br /&gt;
* Kyungguk Min -- Specifying EMIC wave properties based on statistical THEMIS data (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Denton -- Simulation of pitch angle scattering of relativistic electrons by EMIC waves &lt;br /&gt;
* Nigel Meredith (presented by Wen Li) -- Global model of lower band and upper band chorus from multiple satellite observations (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wen Li -- Construction of the dynamic global chorus wave distribution based on POES electron precipitation&lt;br /&gt;
* Maria de Soria-Santacruz Pich -- Global distribution of plasmaspheric hiss waves inferred from POES observations &lt;br /&gt;
* Ksenia Orlova -- Activity dependent global model of electron loss inside the plasmasphere &lt;br /&gt;
* Qianli Ma -- The distribution of magnetosonic waves in the Earth's inner magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* All: End-of-session discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Tail] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[10 minutes/5 vugraph limit per presentation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jacob Bortnik, UCLA, “TBA”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Christine Gabrielse, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Andrei Runov, Drew L. Turner, UCLA:” Magnetospheric Particle Injections and their Relation to Impulsive, Localized Electric Fields”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Christine Gabrielse, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Andrei Runov, Drew L. Turner, UCAL “Statistical characteristics of particle injections throughout the equatorial magnetotail”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* V. G. Merkin, M. Sitnov, J. Lyon: &amp;quot;Resistive MHD simulations of generalized 2D equilibria with LFMBOX”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger, NCAR: “LFM simulations of BBFs”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* J. C. Green, J.V. Rodriguez, J. Machol, R. Redmon: “Update on phase space density data from the POES and GOES satellites&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wednesday, June 18, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency Reports''' from ''NSF, NASA'' and ''NOAA''&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Dayside tutorial''' by ''Jim Burch'' -- The science of the MMS mission&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM CCGM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Krall -- SAMI 3 Modeling of Post-Storm Plasmasphere Filling and Comparisons With Measurements (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mick Denton -- Long-lived Drainage Plumes—Where Does the Plasma Come From? (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* George Khazanov -- What Is Missing in the Modern Plasmaspheric Studies?&lt;br /&gt;
* Ted Fritz -- The Energization of Ionospheric Plasma in the Cusp during the Solar Event of 23 May, 1998 Using Polar and ACE&lt;br /&gt;
* GENERAL DISCUSSION OF FUTURE COLLABORATIVE STUDIES&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[Invited: 8 min/talk; Contributed: 5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
* Natalia Ganjushkina -- Event-fitted magnetic field model (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Adam C. Kellerman -- On the influence of magnetic field model errors on data assimilation and radiation belt modeling &lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Birn -- Modeling the seed population of radiation belt electrons (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Natalia Ganjushkina -- 5-50 keV electrons in the inner magnetosphere: Observations and modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Drew Turner -- Energetic particle injections and their contributions to the outer belt seed population&lt;br /&gt;
* Alexander Boyd -- Using Phase Space Density to look at the Radiation Belt Seed Population&lt;br /&gt;
* Chia-Lin Huang -- Electron dropouts due to magnetopause shadowing: statistical study using GOES data and last closed drift shell calculation&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Denton -- Ion composition at geostationary orbit, and its effect on EMIC waves &lt;br /&gt;
* Justin H Lee -- THEMIS statistics on low-energy ion compositional properties and their application to observations and modeling of EMIC waves &lt;br /&gt;
* All: End-of-session discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Timescales, Time Lags, and Feedback Loops in the M-I System&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
This is an audience-participation discussion about the time lags in the solar-wind-driven magnetosphere-ionosphere system, about the characteristic timescales in the dynamics of the system, and about feedback loops affecting the system.The discussion will involve the solar wind, geomagnetic current systems, the plasmas of the magnetosphere, the radiation belt, substorms, the ionosphere, and the atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Empirical studies:&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Johnston -- AE9/AP9/SPM:  Update for the GEM Community&lt;br /&gt;
* Yi-Jiun Su -- Specification of &amp;gt; 2 MeV electron flux as a function of local time and geomagnetic activity at geosynchronous orbit  &lt;br /&gt;
* Larry Lyons -- Earthward penetrating meso-scale flow bursts leading to electron loss via EMIC waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Hong Zhao -- The 90 deg-minimum pitch angle distribution in the slot region and inner belt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All: Wrap-up discussions and planning for future FG activities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Potential challenge events:&lt;br /&gt;
* Wen Li -- Radiation Belt Electron Acceleration by Chorus Waves During the 17 March 2013 Storm&lt;br /&gt;
* Weichao Tu -- RB electron dropout and acceleration during the October 2012 event&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Part1 -- Long-Running Measurements of the State of the System: What Can Be Done?&amp;quot;. This is an audience-participation discussion about creating new geomagnetic indices from measurements besides magnetometers. The discussions will involve wave measurements, plasma measurements, composition measurements, radiation-belt measurements, substorm measurements, radar measurements, precipitation measurements, etc. A number of researchers have agreed to comment on ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM CCGM (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Informal Workshop Comparing Models and Measurements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Open discussion and data comparison&lt;br /&gt;
* Short papers by Jun Liang and Mike Liemohn&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Part2 -- Long-Running Measurements of the State of the System: What Can Be Done?&amp;quot;. This is an audience-participation discussion about creating new geomagnetic indices from measurements besides magnetometers. The discussions will involve wave measurements, plasma measurements, composition measurements, radiation-belt measurements, substorm measurements, radar measurements, precipitation measurements, etc. A number of researchers have agreed to comment on ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thursday, June 19, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Dayside tutorial''' by ''Antonius Otto'' -- Dayside solar wind-magnetosphere coupling&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GGCM tutorial''' by ''Jimmy Raeder'' -- Prospects for data assimilation in global magnetosphere models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [MIC] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Planning Session for the Geospace Systems Science Focus Group&amp;quot;. An open discussion to select the topics for the GSS sessions for the next few GEM Summer Workshop. We want to consider new systems-science questions to ask, future joint sessions with other focus groups, new problems and new techniques, and data analysis methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] THEMIS Training Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This session is intended for developers who are interested in contributing plugin modules to support new missions or data sets within the SPEDAS framework and analysis tools. SPEDAS (Space Physics Environment Data Analysis Software) has evolved from a THEMIS-specific set of tools, to a more general multi-mission framework. We&lt;br /&gt;
will present newly released features and capabilities of the framework, followed by an open discussion and Q&amp;amp;A regarding the road map for future development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside/GGCM] The Magnetosheath/Geospace System Science (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [MIC/GGCM] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques/Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] THEMIS Training Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This session is intended for users who are interested in using SPEDAS for loading, plotting, and analyzing data from THEMIS and other supported missions. We will present a variety of data analysis scenarios, focused mostly on THEMIS data, but touching on some of the other multi-mission capabilities. The formal presentation will be followed by an open Q&amp;amp;A, help session, and installation clinic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside/GGCM] The Magnetosheath/Geospace System Science (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Model Uncertainty: Dealing with uncertain physical processes and boundary conditions'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit contributions discussing how model uncertainties and uncertain boundary conditions affect model results and validation.  Specifically solicited are strategies to accommodate uncertainty in modeled physical processes (e.g. uncertain radiation belt diffusion coefficients), uncertainty in boundary conditions (e.g. upstream solar wind), or the validation of models at their boundaries (such as ground-based magnetometers). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will introduce a challenge based on previously run magnetopause standoff simulations that compared model results to magnetopause crossings of geo-synchronous satellites. The few crossings observed during strong events revealed significant discrepancies between the major magnetospheric MHD models. We plan to revisit the challenge on the basis of selected events with steady and changing solar wind conditions and observations near the nose of the magnetosphere. The role of boundary conditions applied at the inner boundary (e.g., ionospheric conductance and convection, plasma density and temperature, magnetic field) can be tested. Some of the questions that can be addressed are: &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* Which model is better suited to predict magnetopause position near the nose of the magnetosphere under typical conditions/storm time conditions?&lt;br /&gt;
* What model assumptions affect the model predictions significantly and lead to differences between models?&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the magnetopause change during extreme events&lt;br /&gt;
* How sensitive is model performance to changes of the boundary conditions?&lt;br /&gt;
* Can we define common settings for the inner boundary location, and the plasma density or temperature applied at this boundary?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We also anticipate presentations on topics such as the influence of the plasma sheet boundary conditions on ring current development and also welcome specifications of uncertainties derived from observations and lessons from data assimilation and ensemble modeling methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Draft Agenda:'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Guild: Introduction to Session&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Weigel: Validation of MHD Magnetosphere Models - Long-term, point, and single model analysis with measured solar wind inputs.&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Weigel: Validation of MHD Magnetosphere Models - Short-term, global, and intermodel comparisons with artificial solar wind inputs.   &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter: Introduction to the Magnetopause Crossing Challenge.   &lt;br /&gt;
* Yari Collado-Vega:  Events and observations for the magnetopause challenge. &lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer: The effects of the inner near Earth boundary conditions on MHD models.   &lt;br /&gt;
* All:  Open Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friday, June 20, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Tail tutorial''' by ''Mike Wiltberger'' -- Determination of the global conductance pattern and its influence on the dynamics of the geospace&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Student-selected tutorial''' by ''Robyn Millan'' -- Radiation belts: Lost and found in Antarctica&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] The Magnetosheath (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Validating Models Under Extreme Geomagnetic Conditions.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Extreme events in the geospace environment are among the most interesting scientifically as well as important for their space weather consequences.  The goals for this session are: to show model results for extreme events in the magnetosphere, to share information about the range of conditions where models have been validated, to assess methods for validating model performance with limited observations (such as for early historical events), and to assess the reliability of a model outside the range in which it has been validated. These results will guide our understanding of the magnetosphere under extreme conditions, and provide insight into what physics needs to be incorporated into models so that they perform better during extreme events. Contributions to these and related issues are welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Draft Agenda:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(8-10 min/ presentation, walk-ons welcome and we will adjust time appropriately)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer – Chair and Introduction &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* Jimmy Raeder: Modeling Extreme Events with OPENGGCM  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger: Modleing Extreme Events with LFM/CMIT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling:  Modeling Extreme Events with the SWMF &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling and Vania Jordanova: Validating RAM-SCB under Extreme Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Robert Weigel (and Brian Curtis) Comparing Models under Extreme Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Shprits: Unusual Behavior of Radiation Belts During Extreme Events&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chigomezyo Ngwira: Modeling extreme `Carrington-type' space weather events using three-dimensional global MHD simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer and Mei-Ching  Fok: Testing Magnetosphere Radiation Belt and Ring Current models under Extreme Conditions &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Discussion, including suggestions for a Modeling Challenge for Extreme Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Plenary Wrap-up Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2014_Summer_Workshop_Sessions&amp;diff=1967</id>
		<title>2014 Summer Workshop Sessions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2014_Summer_Workshop_Sessions&amp;diff=1967"/>
		<updated>2014-06-10T17:55:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* [GGCM] Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''June 15-20, 2014'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Renaissance Portsmouth Hotel &amp;amp; Conference Center, Portsmouth, Virginia'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General workshop information is available at the [[2014 Summer Workshop|2014 Summer Workshop Page]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below are ''tentative'' session agenda provided by Focus Groups. The information here serves as a rough guide for those who wish to know the most updated session plans. Due to the nature of the GEM Workshop, Focus Groups may continue to revise their agenda on this page or during sessions as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Monday, June 16, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMS tutorial''' by ''Drew Turner'' -- Probing the tempest: Current concepts and recent relevations concerning the nature of Earth's inner magnetosphere and geomagnetic storms&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MIC tutorial''' by ''Joe Huba'' -- Modeling the ionosphere/plasmasphere system: Quiet and stormtime conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS/MIC] Storm-time Inner Magneotsphere-Ionosphere Convection (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS/MIC] Storm-time Inner Magneotsphere-Ionosphere Convection (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] Strategic Priorities for Funding in the NSF Antarctic Program (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NSF has requested that the National Academy of Science develop a consensus recommendation on the most compelling research that can be supported in the coming decade and outline steps forward to implement this research. This meeting is to engage the space science community to participate in the development of this consensus recommendation. The Antarctic can be a platform for measurements and investigation of space weather phenomena and several measurement programs are presently active. How should funding priorities be set for this research during the coming decade? Please help to establish these priorities. Very broad key scientific questions have been identified in the 2011 NRC report “Future Science Opportunities in the Antarctic and Southern Ocean”. The relevant question for our community is “What can the Antarctic platform reveal about the interactions between the Earth and the space environment”. The results from the NAS committee established to develop funding priorities will have an important impact on funding decisions at NSF and our research community needs to be strongly represented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM/Tail] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere/Tail-inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS/MIC/GGCM] Storm-time Inner Magneotsphere-Ionosphere Convection/Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tuesday, June 17, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Tail tutorial''' by ''Jim Klimchuk'' -- Onset conditions for impulsive magnetic energy release&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GGCM tutorial''' by ''Jian Yang'' -- Effects of plasma-sheet bubble injections&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Schunk -- Overview of Ion Outflow (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling -- Merged Ionosphere/Magnetosphere Modeling of the GEM Idealized Storm Period Using GPW and BATSRUS&lt;br /&gt;
* Nick Perlongo -- PWOM Results as Input to MHD Models for the Idealized and First Real Storm Periods&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling and Nick Perlongo -- Merged Ionosphere/Magnetosphere Modeling of the GEM Idealized Storm Period Using PWOM and BATSRUS (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Varney and Mike Wiltberger -- Merged Modeling of the GEM Idealized Storm Period Using an Ionosphere/Polar Wind Model (IPWM) and the LFM-MIX/CMIT (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling/Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Tail] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[10 minutes/5 vugraph limit per presentation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Xiangning Chu, UCLA, “On the relation between the formation of SCW and the BBFs and the aurora”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Birn, SSI: “On relation of SCW to BBFs”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yan Song, Univ. Minn, “Theory of the Generation of Field-Aligned Current in Association with the Substorm Current Wedge Related to BBFs/Dipolarization Fronts”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Lysak, Univ. Minn, What is the physics of the oscillations in the field and plasma seen ahead of the front?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Toshi Nishimura, UCLA, “Tail-inner magnetosphere interaction seen by auroral streamers and proton aurora”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ying Zou, UCLA, “Polar cap flow-PBI-streamer connection”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Vince Eccles -- Ionospheric Dynamics During the 8-day GEM First Real Storm Study Period (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Abdallah Barakat -- Ion Outflow Predicted by the Generalized Polar Wind Model During the GEM First Real Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling and Abdallah Barakat -- Merged Ionosphere/Magnetosphere Modeling of the First Storm Period Using GPW and BATSRUS&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura -- FAST Ion Outflow Measurements—Flux, Velocity, Temperature, Current Density and Characteristics of Electron Precipitation During the GEM First Storm  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Tom Moore and Rick Chappell -- Polar Measurements of Low Energy Ion Outflow and Lobal Wind During the GEM First Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[Invited: 8 min/talk; Contributed: 5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
* Vania Jordanova -- Review of the convection-diffusion type radiation belt models (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer -- Recent RBE model results on radiation belt dynamics (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Shprits -- Review of the diffusion-type radiation belt models (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Thorne -- Recent diffusion model results on radiation belt dynamics (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Greg Cunningham -- Recent DREAM3D model results on radiation belt dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
* Anthony Chan -- Recent SDE model results on radiation belt dynamics (invited)  &lt;br /&gt;
* Scot Elkington -- MHD/SDE methods and results   &lt;br /&gt;
* Adam Kellerman -- MLT-dependent reanalysis of radiation belt electrons: Case studies using several satellites and different magnetic field models &lt;br /&gt;
* All: End-of-session discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Tail] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[10 minutes/5 vugraph limit per presentation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* W Douglas Cramer, UNH, “OpenGGCM to investigate steady and bursty tail flow into the ring current region during CME and CIR-driven storms”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Xiaojia Zhang, UCLA: &amp;quot;Evaluation of ECH Wave Contribution to Diffuse Aurora&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jian Yang, “RCM-E simulation of a thin arc preceded by a north-south-aligned streamer” &amp;amp; “RCM-E simulation of field-line slippage in the near-Earth plasma sheet: a test of substorm inside-out scenario (tentative)”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Shin Ohtani, APL, “Variations of High-energy Ions during Fast Plasma Flows and Dipolarization in the Plasma Sheet: Comparison among Different Ion Species”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Stein Haaland -- Cold Ion Outflow: Cluster Measurements During the GEM First Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn Kistler -- Cluster Measurements of O+ During the GEM First Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Elena Kronberg -- Cluster RAPID Energetic Ion and Electron Measurements During the GEM First Storm Period (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky -- LANL Plasma Measurements During the GEM First Storm Period (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura -- FAST Observations of the Solar Zenith Angle Dependence on Relations Between Energy Input and Outflowing H+ and O+ Ion Fluxes &amp;gt;3000 km&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[Invited: 8 min/talk; Contributed: 5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
* Louis Ozeke -- Specifying ULF wave properties and quantifying radial diffusion (invited) &lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi -- Occurrence of high-m ULF waves in the magnetosphere as observed by ST-5 satellites &lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Hartinger -- The effect of magnetopause motion on fast mode resonance &lt;br /&gt;
* Kyungguk Min -- Specifying EMIC wave properties based on statistical THEMIS data (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Denton -- Simulation of pitch angle scattering of relativistic electrons by EMIC waves &lt;br /&gt;
* Nigel Meredith (presented by Wen Li) -- Global model of lower band and upper band chorus from multiple satellite observations (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wen Li -- Construction of the dynamic global chorus wave distribution based on POES electron precipitation&lt;br /&gt;
* Maria de Soria-Santacruz Pich -- Global distribution of plasmaspheric hiss waves inferred from POES observations &lt;br /&gt;
* Ksenia Orlova -- Activity dependent global model of electron loss inside the plasmasphere &lt;br /&gt;
* Qianli Ma -- The distribution of magnetosonic waves in the Earth's inner magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* All: End-of-session discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Tail] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[10 minutes/5 vugraph limit per presentation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jacob Bortnik, UCLA, “TBA”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Christine Gabrielse, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Andrei Runov, Drew L. Turner, UCLA:” Magnetospheric Particle Injections and their Relation to Impulsive, Localized Electric Fields”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Christine Gabrielse, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Andrei Runov, Drew L. Turner, UCAL “Statistical characteristics of particle injections throughout the equatorial magnetotail”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* V. G. Merkin, M. Sitnov, J. Lyon: &amp;quot;Resistive MHD simulations of generalized 2D equilibria with LFMBOX”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger, NCAR: “LFM simulations of BBFs”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* J. C. Green, J.V. Rodriguez, J. Machol, R. Redmon: “Update on phase space density data from the POES and GOES satellites&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wednesday, June 18, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency Reports''' from ''NSF, NASA'' and ''NOAA''&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Dayside tutorial''' by ''Jim Burch'' -- The science of the MMS mission&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM CCGM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Krall -- SAMI 3 Modeling of Post-Storm Plasmasphere Filling and Comparisons With Measurements (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mick Denton -- Long-lived Drainage Plumes—Where Does the Plasma Come From? (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* George Khazanov -- What Is Missing in the Modern Plasmaspheric Studies?&lt;br /&gt;
* Ted Fritz -- The Energization of Ionospheric Plasma in the Cusp during the Solar Event of 23 May, 1998 Using Polar and ACE&lt;br /&gt;
* GENERAL DISCUSSION OF FUTURE COLLABORATIVE STUDIES&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[Invited: 8 min/talk; Contributed: 5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
* Natalia Ganjushkina -- Event-fitted magnetic field model (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Adam C. Kellerman -- On the influence of magnetic field model errors on data assimilation and radiation belt modeling &lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Birn -- Modeling the seed population of radiation belt electrons (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Natalia Ganjushkina -- 5-50 keV electrons in the inner magnetosphere: Observations and modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Drew Turner -- Energetic particle injections and their contributions to the outer belt seed population&lt;br /&gt;
* Alexander Boyd -- Using Phase Space Density to look at the Radiation Belt Seed Population&lt;br /&gt;
* Chia-Lin Huang -- Electron dropouts due to magnetopause shadowing: statistical study using GOES data and last closed drift shell calculation&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Denton -- Ion composition at geostationary orbit, and its effect on EMIC waves &lt;br /&gt;
* Justin H Lee -- THEMIS statistics on low-energy ion compositional properties and their application to observations and modeling of EMIC waves &lt;br /&gt;
* All: End-of-session discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Timescales, Time Lags, and Feedback Loops in the M-I System&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
This is an audience-participation discussion about the time lags in the solar-wind-driven magnetosphere-ionosphere system, about the characteristic timescales in the dynamics of the system, and about feedback loops affecting the system.The discussion will involve the solar wind, geomagnetic current systems, the plasmas of the magnetosphere, the radiation belt, substorms, the ionosphere, and the atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Empirical studies:&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Johnston -- AE9/AP9/SPM:  Update for the GEM Community&lt;br /&gt;
* Yi-Jiun Su -- Specification of &amp;gt; 2 MeV electron flux as a function of local time and geomagnetic activity at geosynchronous orbit  &lt;br /&gt;
* Larry Lyons -- Earthward penetrating meso-scale flow bursts leading to electron loss via EMIC waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Hong Zhao -- The 90 deg-minimum pitch angle distribution in the slot region and inner belt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All: Wrap-up discussions and planning for future FG activities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Potential challenge events:&lt;br /&gt;
* Wen Li -- Radiation Belt Electron Acceleration by Chorus Waves During the 17 March 2013 Storm&lt;br /&gt;
* Weichao Tu -- RB electron dropout and acceleration during the October 2012 event&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Part1 -- Long-Running Measurements of the State of the System: What Can Be Done?&amp;quot;. This is an audience-participation discussion about creating new geomagnetic indices from measurements besides magnetometers. The discussions will involve wave measurements, plasma measurements, composition measurements, radiation-belt measurements, substorm measurements, radar measurements, precipitation measurements, etc. A number of researchers have agreed to comment on ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM CCGM (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Informal Workshop Comparing Models and Measurements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Open discussion and data comparison&lt;br /&gt;
* Short papers by Jun Liang and Mike Liemohn&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Part2 -- Long-Running Measurements of the State of the System: What Can Be Done?&amp;quot;. This is an audience-participation discussion about creating new geomagnetic indices from measurements besides magnetometers. The discussions will involve wave measurements, plasma measurements, composition measurements, radiation-belt measurements, substorm measurements, radar measurements, precipitation measurements, etc. A number of researchers have agreed to comment on ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thursday, June 19, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Dayside tutorial''' by ''Antonius Otto'' -- Dayside solar wind-magnetosphere coupling&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GGCM tutorial''' by ''Jimmy Raeder'' -- Prospects for data assimilation in global magnetosphere models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [MIC] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Planning Session for the Geospace Systems Science Focus Group&amp;quot;. An open discussion to select the topics for the GSS sessions for the next few GEM Summer Workshop. We want to consider new systems-science questions to ask, future joint sessions with other focus groups, new problems and new techniques, and data analysis methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] THEMIS Training Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This session is intended for developers who are interested in contributing plugin modules to support new missions or data sets within the SPEDAS framework and analysis tools. SPEDAS (Space Physics Environment Data Analysis Software) has evolved from a THEMIS-specific set of tools, to a more general multi-mission framework. We&lt;br /&gt;
will present newly released features and capabilities of the framework, followed by an open discussion and Q&amp;amp;A regarding the road map for future development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside/GGCM] The Magnetosheath/Geospace System Science (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [MIC/GGCM] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques/Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] THEMIS Training Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This session is intended for users who are interested in using SPEDAS for loading, plotting, and analyzing data from THEMIS and other supported missions. We will present a variety of data analysis scenarios, focused mostly on THEMIS data, but touching on some of the other multi-mission capabilities. The formal presentation will be followed by an open Q&amp;amp;A, help session, and installation clinic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside/GGCM] The Magnetosheath/Geospace System Science (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Model Uncertainty: Dealing with uncertain physical processes and boundary conditions'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit contributions discussing how model uncertainties and uncertain boundary conditions affect model results and validation.  Specifically solicited are strategies to accommodate uncertainty in modeled physical processes (e.g. uncertain radiation belt diffusion coefficients), uncertainty in boundary conditions (e.g. upstream solar wind), or the validation of models at their boundaries (such as ground-based magnetometers). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will introduce a challenge based on previously run magnetopause standoff simulations that compared model results to magnetopause crossings of geo-synchronous satellites. The few crossings observed during strong events revealed significant discrepancies between the major magnetospheric MHD models. We plan to revisit the challenge on the basis of selected events with steady and changing solar wind conditions and observations near the nose of the magnetosphere. The role of boundary conditions applied at the inner boundary (e.g., ionospheric conductance and convection, plasma density and temperature, magnetic field) can be tested. Some of the questions that can be addressed are: &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* Which model is better suited to predict magnetopause position near the nose of the magnetosphere under typical conditions/storm time conditions?&lt;br /&gt;
* What model assumptions affect the model predictions significantly and lead to differences between models?&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the magnetopause change during extreme events&lt;br /&gt;
* How sensitive is model performance to changes of the boundary conditions?&lt;br /&gt;
* Can we define common settings for the inner boundary location, and the plasma density or temperature applied at this boundary?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We also anticipate presentations on topics such as the influence of the plasma sheet boundary conditions on ring current development and also welcome specifications of uncertainties derived from observations and lessons from data assimilation and ensemble modeling methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Draft Agenda:'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction to Session, Guild&lt;br /&gt;
* Validation of MHD Magnetosphere Models - Long-term, point, and single model analysis with measured solar wind inputs, Weigel.&lt;br /&gt;
* Validation of MHD Magnetosphere Models - Short-term, global, and intermodel comparisons with artificial solar wind inputs, Weigel.   &lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction to the Magnetopause Crossing Challenge, Rastaetter, Glocer, Collado-Vega.   &lt;br /&gt;
* Events and observations for the magnetopause challenge, Collado-Vega. &lt;br /&gt;
* The effects of the inner near Earth boundary conditions on MHD models, Glocer.   &lt;br /&gt;
* Open Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friday, June 20, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Tail tutorial''' by ''Mike Wiltberger'' -- Determination of the global conductance pattern and its influence on the dynamics of the geospace&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Student-selected tutorial''' by ''Robyn Millan'' -- Radiation belts: Lost and found in Antarctica&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] The Magnetosheath (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Validating Models Under Extreme Geomagnetic Conditions.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Extreme events in the geospace environment are among the most interesting scientifically as well as important for their space weather consequences.  The goals for this session are: to show model results for extreme events in the magnetosphere, to share information about the range of conditions where models have been validated, to assess methods for validating model performance with limited observations (such as for early historical events), and to assess the reliability of a model outside the range in which it has been validated. These results will guide our understanding of the magnetosphere under extreme conditions, and provide insight into what physics needs to be incorporated into models so that they perform better during extreme events. Contributions to these and related issues are welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Draft Agenda:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(8-10 min/ presentation, walk-ons welcome and we will adjust time appropriately)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer – Chair and Introduction &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* Jimmy Raeder: Modeling Extreme Events with OPENGGCM  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger: Modleing Extreme Events with LFM/CMIT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling:  Modeling Extreme Events with the SWMF &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling and Vania Jordanova: Validating RAM-SCB under Extreme Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Robert Weigel (and Brian Curtis) Comparing Models under Extreme Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Shprits: Unusual Behavior of Radiation Belts During Extreme Events&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chigomezyo Ngwira: Modeling extreme `Carrington-type' space weather events using three-dimensional global MHD simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer and Mei-Ching  Fok: Testing Magnetosphere Radiation Belt and Ring Current models under Extreme Conditions &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Discussion, including suggestions for a Modeling Challenge for Extreme Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Plenary Wrap-up Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2014_Summer_Workshop_Sessions&amp;diff=1966</id>
		<title>2014 Summer Workshop Sessions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2014_Summer_Workshop_Sessions&amp;diff=1966"/>
		<updated>2014-06-10T17:54:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* [GGCM] Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''June 15-20, 2014'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Renaissance Portsmouth Hotel &amp;amp; Conference Center, Portsmouth, Virginia'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
General workshop information is available at the [[2014 Summer Workshop|2014 Summer Workshop Page]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below are ''tentative'' session agenda provided by Focus Groups. The information here serves as a rough guide for those who wish to know the most updated session plans. Due to the nature of the GEM Workshop, Focus Groups may continue to revise their agenda on this page or during sessions as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Monday, June 16, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''IMS tutorial''' by ''Drew Turner'' -- Probing the tempest: Current concepts and recent relevations concerning the nature of Earth's inner magnetosphere and geomagnetic storms&lt;br /&gt;
* '''MIC tutorial''' by ''Joe Huba'' -- Modeling the ionosphere/plasmasphere system: Quiet and stormtime conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS/MIC] Storm-time Inner Magneotsphere-Ionosphere Convection (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS/MIC] Storm-time Inner Magneotsphere-Ionosphere Convection (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] Strategic Priorities for Funding in the NSF Antarctic Program (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NSF has requested that the National Academy of Science develop a consensus recommendation on the most compelling research that can be supported in the coming decade and outline steps forward to implement this research. This meeting is to engage the space science community to participate in the development of this consensus recommendation. The Antarctic can be a platform for measurements and investigation of space weather phenomena and several measurement programs are presently active. How should funding priorities be set for this research during the coming decade? Please help to establish these priorities. Very broad key scientific questions have been identified in the 2011 NRC report “Future Science Opportunities in the Antarctic and Southern Ocean”. The relevant question for our community is “What can the Antarctic platform reveal about the interactions between the Earth and the space environment”. The results from the NAS committee established to develop funding priorities will have an important impact on funding decisions at NSF and our research community needs to be strongly represented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM/Tail] Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere/Tail-inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS/MIC/GGCM] Storm-time Inner Magneotsphere-Ionosphere Convection/Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tuesday, June 17, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Tail tutorial''' by ''Jim Klimchuk'' -- Onset conditions for impulsive magnetic energy release&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GGCM tutorial''' by ''Jian Yang'' -- Effects of plasma-sheet bubble injections&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Schunk -- Overview of Ion Outflow (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling -- Merged Ionosphere/Magnetosphere Modeling of the GEM Idealized Storm Period Using GPW and BATSRUS&lt;br /&gt;
* Nick Perlongo -- PWOM Results as Input to MHD Models for the Idealized and First Real Storm Periods&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling and Nick Perlongo -- Merged Ionosphere/Magnetosphere Modeling of the GEM Idealized Storm Period Using PWOM and BATSRUS (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Varney and Mike Wiltberger -- Merged Modeling of the GEM Idealized Storm Period Using an Ionosphere/Polar Wind Model (IPWM) and the LFM-MIX/CMIT (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Radiation Belts &amp;amp; Wave Modeling/Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Tail] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[10 minutes/5 vugraph limit per presentation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Xiangning Chu, UCLA, “On the relation between the formation of SCW and the BBFs and the aurora”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Birn, SSI: “On relation of SCW to BBFs”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yan Song, Univ. Minn, “Theory of the Generation of Field-Aligned Current in Association with the Substorm Current Wedge Related to BBFs/Dipolarization Fronts”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Lysak, Univ. Minn, What is the physics of the oscillations in the field and plasma seen ahead of the front?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Toshi Nishimura, UCLA, “Tail-inner magnetosphere interaction seen by auroral streamers and proton aurora”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ying Zou, UCLA, “Polar cap flow-PBI-streamer connection”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Vince Eccles -- Ionospheric Dynamics During the 8-day GEM First Real Storm Study Period (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Abdallah Barakat -- Ion Outflow Predicted by the Generalized Polar Wind Model During the GEM First Real Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling and Abdallah Barakat -- Merged Ionosphere/Magnetosphere Modeling of the First Storm Period Using GPW and BATSRUS&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura -- FAST Ion Outflow Measurements—Flux, Velocity, Temperature, Current Density and Characteristics of Electron Precipitation During the GEM First Storm  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Tom Moore and Rick Chappell -- Polar Measurements of Low Energy Ion Outflow and Lobal Wind During the GEM First Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[Invited: 8 min/talk; Contributed: 5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
* Vania Jordanova -- Review of the convection-diffusion type radiation belt models (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer -- Recent RBE model results on radiation belt dynamics (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Shprits -- Review of the diffusion-type radiation belt models (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Thorne -- Recent diffusion model results on radiation belt dynamics (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Greg Cunningham -- Recent DREAM3D model results on radiation belt dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
* Anthony Chan -- Recent SDE model results on radiation belt dynamics (invited)  &lt;br /&gt;
* Scot Elkington -- MHD/SDE methods and results   &lt;br /&gt;
* Adam Kellerman -- MLT-dependent reanalysis of radiation belt electrons: Case studies using several satellites and different magnetic field models &lt;br /&gt;
* All: End-of-session discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Tail] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[10 minutes/5 vugraph limit per presentation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* W Douglas Cramer, UNH, “OpenGGCM to investigate steady and bursty tail flow into the ring current region during CME and CIR-driven storms”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Xiaojia Zhang, UCLA: &amp;quot;Evaluation of ECH Wave Contribution to Diffuse Aurora&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jian Yang, “RCM-E simulation of a thin arc preceded by a north-south-aligned streamer” &amp;amp; “RCM-E simulation of field-line slippage in the near-Earth plasma sheet: a test of substorm inside-out scenario (tentative)”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Shin Ohtani, APL, “Variations of High-energy Ions during Fast Plasma Flows and Dipolarization in the Plasma Sheet: Comparison among Different Ion Species”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Stein Haaland -- Cold Ion Outflow: Cluster Measurements During the GEM First Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn Kistler -- Cluster Measurements of O+ During the GEM First Storm Period  (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Elena Kronberg -- Cluster RAPID Energetic Ion and Electron Measurements During the GEM First Storm Period (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky -- LANL Plasma Measurements During the GEM First Storm Period (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura -- FAST Observations of the Solar Zenith Angle Dependence on Relations Between Energy Input and Outflowing H+ and O+ Ion Fluxes &amp;gt;3000 km&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[Invited: 8 min/talk; Contributed: 5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
* Louis Ozeke -- Specifying ULF wave properties and quantifying radial diffusion (invited) &lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Chi -- Occurrence of high-m ULF waves in the magnetosphere as observed by ST-5 satellites &lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Hartinger -- The effect of magnetopause motion on fast mode resonance &lt;br /&gt;
* Kyungguk Min -- Specifying EMIC wave properties based on statistical THEMIS data (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Denton -- Simulation of pitch angle scattering of relativistic electrons by EMIC waves &lt;br /&gt;
* Nigel Meredith (presented by Wen Li) -- Global model of lower band and upper band chorus from multiple satellite observations (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wen Li -- Construction of the dynamic global chorus wave distribution based on POES electron precipitation&lt;br /&gt;
* Maria de Soria-Santacruz Pich -- Global distribution of plasmaspheric hiss waves inferred from POES observations &lt;br /&gt;
* Ksenia Orlova -- Activity dependent global model of electron loss inside the plasmasphere &lt;br /&gt;
* Qianli Ma -- The distribution of magnetosonic waves in the Earth's inner magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* All: End-of-session discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Tail] Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[10 minutes/5 vugraph limit per presentation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jacob Bortnik, UCLA, “TBA”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Christine Gabrielse, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Andrei Runov, Drew L. Turner, UCLA:” Magnetospheric Particle Injections and their Relation to Impulsive, Localized Electric Fields”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Christine Gabrielse, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Andrei Runov, Drew L. Turner, UCAL “Statistical characteristics of particle injections throughout the equatorial magnetotail”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* V. G. Merkin, M. Sitnov, J. Lyon: &amp;quot;Resistive MHD simulations of generalized 2D equilibria with LFMBOX”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger, NCAR: “LFM simulations of BBFs”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* J. C. Green, J.V. Rodriguez, J. Machol, R. Redmon: “Update on phase space density data from the POES and GOES satellites&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wednesday, June 18, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency Reports''' from ''NSF, NASA'' and ''NOAA''&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Dayside tutorial''' by ''Jim Burch'' -- The science of the MMS mission&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM CCGM (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Krall -- SAMI 3 Modeling of Post-Storm Plasmasphere Filling and Comparisons With Measurements (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mick Denton -- Long-lived Drainage Plumes—Where Does the Plasma Come From? (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* George Khazanov -- What Is Missing in the Modern Plasmaspheric Studies?&lt;br /&gt;
* Ted Fritz -- The Energization of Ionospheric Plasma in the Cusp during the Solar Event of 23 May, 1998 Using Polar and ACE&lt;br /&gt;
* GENERAL DISCUSSION OF FUTURE COLLABORATIVE STUDIES&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[Invited: 8 min/talk; Contributed: 5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
* Natalia Ganjushkina -- Event-fitted magnetic field model (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Adam C. Kellerman -- On the influence of magnetic field model errors on data assimilation and radiation belt modeling &lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Birn -- Modeling the seed population of radiation belt electrons (invited)&lt;br /&gt;
* Natalia Ganjushkina -- 5-50 keV electrons in the inner magnetosphere: Observations and modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Drew Turner -- Energetic particle injections and their contributions to the outer belt seed population&lt;br /&gt;
* Alexander Boyd -- Using Phase Space Density to look at the Radiation Belt Seed Population&lt;br /&gt;
* Chia-Lin Huang -- Electron dropouts due to magnetopause shadowing: statistical study using GOES data and last closed drift shell calculation&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Denton -- Ion composition at geostationary orbit, and its effect on EMIC waves &lt;br /&gt;
* Justin H Lee -- THEMIS statistics on low-energy ion compositional properties and their application to observations and modeling of EMIC waves &lt;br /&gt;
* All: End-of-session discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Timescales, Time Lags, and Feedback Loops in the M-I System&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
This is an audience-participation discussion about the time lags in the solar-wind-driven magnetosphere-ionosphere system, about the characteristic timescales in the dynamics of the system, and about feedback loops affecting the system.The discussion will involve the solar wind, geomagnetic current systems, the plasmas of the magnetosphere, the radiation belt, substorms, the ionosphere, and the atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Quantitative Assessment of Radiation Belt Modeling (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
[5 min/talk]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Empirical studies:&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Johnston -- AE9/AP9/SPM:  Update for the GEM Community&lt;br /&gt;
* Yi-Jiun Su -- Specification of &amp;gt; 2 MeV electron flux as a function of local time and geomagnetic activity at geosynchronous orbit  &lt;br /&gt;
* Larry Lyons -- Earthward penetrating meso-scale flow bursts leading to electron loss via EMIC waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Hong Zhao -- The 90 deg-minimum pitch angle distribution in the slot region and inner belt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All: Wrap-up discussions and planning for future FG activities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Potential challenge events:&lt;br /&gt;
* Wen Li -- Radiation Belt Electron Acceleration by Chorus Waves During the 17 March 2013 Storm&lt;br /&gt;
* Weichao Tu -- RB electron dropout and acceleration during the October 2012 event&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Part1 -- Long-Running Measurements of the State of the System: What Can Be Done?&amp;quot;. This is an audience-participation discussion about creating new geomagnetic indices from measurements besides magnetometers. The discussions will involve wave measurements, plasma measurements, composition measurements, radiation-belt measurements, substorm measurements, radar measurements, precipitation measurements, etc. A number of researchers have agreed to comment on ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma-Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM CCGM (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Informal Workshop Comparing Models and Measurements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Open discussion and data comparison&lt;br /&gt;
* Short papers by Jun Liang and Mike Liemohn&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Part2 -- Long-Running Measurements of the State of the System: What Can Be Done?&amp;quot;. This is an audience-participation discussion about creating new geomagnetic indices from measurements besides magnetometers. The discussions will involve wave measurements, plasma measurements, composition measurements, radiation-belt measurements, substorm measurements, radar measurements, precipitation measurements, etc. A number of researchers have agreed to comment on ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thursday, June 19, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Dayside tutorial''' by ''Antonius Otto'' -- Dayside solar wind-magnetosphere coupling&lt;br /&gt;
* '''GGCM tutorial''' by ''Jimmy Raeder'' -- Prospects for data assimilation in global magnetosphere models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [MIC] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Geospace System Science (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Planning Session for the Geospace Systems Science Focus Group&amp;quot;. An open discussion to select the topics for the GSS sessions for the next few GEM Summer Workshop. We want to consider new systems-science questions to ask, future joint sessions with other focus groups, new problems and new techniques, and data analysis methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] THEMIS Training Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This session is intended for developers who are interested in contributing plugin modules to support new missions or data sets within the SPEDAS framework and analysis tools. SPEDAS (Space Physics Environment Data Analysis Software) has evolved from a THEMIS-specific set of tools, to a more general multi-mission framework. We&lt;br /&gt;
will present newly released features and capabilities of the framework, followed by an open discussion and Q&amp;amp;A regarding the road map for future development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside/GGCM] The Magnetosheath/Geospace System Science (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [MIC/GGCM] Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques/Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1530-1700 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Special] THEMIS Training Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This session is intended for users who are interested in using SPEDAS for loading, plotting, and analyzing data from THEMIS and other supported missions. We will present a variety of data analysis scenarios, focused mostly on THEMIS data, but touching on some of the other multi-mission capabilities. The formal presentation will be followed by an open Q&amp;amp;A, help session, and installation clinic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside/GGCM] The Magnetosheath/Geospace System Science (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Model Uncertainty: Dealing with uncertain physical processes and boundary conditions'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit contributions discussing how model uncertainties and uncertain boundary conditions affect model results and validation.  Specifically solicited are strategies to accommodate uncertainty in modeled physical processes (e.g. uncertain radiation belt diffusion coefficients), uncertainty in boundary conditions (e.g. upstream solar wind), or the validation of models at their boundaries (such as ground-based magnetometers). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will introduce a challenge based on previously run magnetopause standoff simulations that compared model results to magnetopause crossings of geo-synchronous satellites. The few crossings observed during strong events revealed significant discrepancies between the major magnetospheric MHD models. We plan to revisit the challenge on the basis of selected events with steady and changing solar wind conditions and observations near the nose of the magnetosphere. The role of boundary conditions applied at the inner boundary (e.g., ionospheric conductance and convection, plasma density and temperature, magnetic field) can be tested. Some of the questions that can be addressed are: &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* Which model is better suited to predict magnetopause position near the nose of the magnetosphere under typical conditions/storm time conditions?&lt;br /&gt;
* What model assumptions affect the model predictions significantly and lead to differences between models?&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the magnetopause change during extreme events&lt;br /&gt;
* How sensitive is model performance to changes of the boundary conditions?&lt;br /&gt;
* Can we define common settings for the inner boundary location, and the plasma density or temperature applied at this boundary?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We also anticipate presentations on topics such as the influence of the plasma sheet boundary conditions on ring current development and also welcome specifications of uncertainties derived from observations and lessons from data assimilation and ensemble modeling methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Draft Agenda:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Validation of MHD Magnetosphere Models - Long-term, point, and single model analysis with measured solar wind inputs, Weigel.&lt;br /&gt;
* Validation of MHD Magnetosphere Models - Short-term, global, and intermodel comparisons with artificial solar wind inputs, Weigel.   &lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction to the Magnetopause Crossing Challenge, Rastaetter, Glocer, Collado-Vega.   &lt;br /&gt;
* Events and observations for the magnetopause challenge, Collado-Vega. &lt;br /&gt;
* The effects of the inner near Earth boundary conditions on MHD models, Glocer.   &lt;br /&gt;
* Open Discussion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friday, June 20, 2014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 0815-1000 AM: Planery Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Tail tutorial''' by ''Mike Wiltberger'' -- Determination of the global conductance pattern and its influence on the dynamics of the geospace&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Student-selected tutorial''' by ''Robyn Millan'' -- Radiation belts: Lost and found in Antarctica&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1030 AM-1215 PM: Splinter Sessions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [Dayside] The Magnetosheath (Ports Ballroom I-III) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [GGCM] Metrics and Validation (Ports Ballroom VI-VIII) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Validating Models Under Extreme Geomagnetic Conditions.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Extreme events in the geospace environment are among the most interesting scientifically as well as important for their space weather consequences.  The goals for this session are: to show model results for extreme events in the magnetosphere, to share information about the range of conditions where models have been validated, to assess methods for validating model performance with limited observations (such as for early historical events), and to assess the reliability of a model outside the range in which it has been validated. These results will guide our understanding of the magnetosphere under extreme conditions, and provide insight into what physics needs to be incorporated into models so that they perform better during extreme events. Contributions to these and related issues are welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Draft Agenda:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(8-10 min/ presentation, walk-ons welcome and we will adjust time appropriately)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer – Chair and Introduction &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* Jimmy Raeder: Modeling Extreme Events with OPENGGCM  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Wiltberger: Modleing Extreme Events with LFM/CMIT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling:  Modeling Extreme Events with the SWMF &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling and Vania Jordanova: Validating RAM-SCB under Extreme Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Robert Weigel (and Brian Curtis) Comparing Models under Extreme Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yuri Shprits: Unusual Behavior of Radiation Belts During Extreme Events&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chigomezyo Ngwira: Modeling extreme `Carrington-type' space weather events using three-dimensional global MHD simulations”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer and Mei-Ching  Fok: Testing Magnetosphere Radiation Belt and Ring Current models under Extreme Conditions &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Discussion, including suggestions for a Modeling Challenge for Extreme Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [IMS] Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions (Amphitheater) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1330-1500 PM: Plenary Wrap-up Session (Ports Ballroom IV-V) ===&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2013_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=1735</id>
		<title>2013 Summer Workshop</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2013_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=1735"/>
		<updated>2013-06-20T17:54:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* Scheduled Presentations */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''June 16-21, 2013'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Snowmass Conference Center, Snowmass, Colorado'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Snowmass2013_small.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(''The Westin Snowmass Resort'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Web links to more Workshop information:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html GEM Workshop Website]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/schedule.html Workshop Schedule]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/poster.html Poster Information]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/travel.html Travel and Accommodations]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[GEM Student Forum|GEM Student Forum on Sunday, June 16, 2013]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:magenta;font-weight:bold;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;1st GEM Student Poster Competition:&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Students:  Please register yourself for the competition at http://goo.gl/NbvrE.&lt;br /&gt;
* Volunteer for judging: Please sign up to volunteer at  http://goo.gl/blCbF.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below are '''session announcements''' and '''scheduled presentations (if available)''' for active GEM Focus Groups. Updates on scheduled presentations may be posted at individual Focus Group pages (see links from [[GEM Focus Groups|Focus Group pages]]). The symbol @ in all e-mail addresses below is replaced by &amp;quot; [at] &amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(''Last update of this page: 6/20/2013 9:45 Pacific Time'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions|Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Frank Toffoletto, John Lyon, Pontus Brandt, and Vassilis Angelopoulos''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GEM focus group on Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions will hold &lt;br /&gt;
its breakout sessions on Monday - Tuesday, June 17-18, 2013. We invite &lt;br /&gt;
presentations that specifically address one of the following topics:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Origin and evolution of BBFs and related phenomena (bubbles, dipolarization fronts, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
* The impact of BBFs et al on transport during different levels of activity (e.g., quiet times, SMCs, substorms, storm main phases).&lt;br /&gt;
* The impact of BBFs et al on the inner magnetosphere, including ring current and radiation belts; braking oscillations and micropulsations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Auroral streamers and other ionospheric signatures of BBFs et al.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More information on the focus group can be found at: &lt;br /&gt;
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/GEM_Focus_Groups&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We kindly ask presentations to be limited to 2-3 slides/5 minutes. If &lt;br /&gt;
you would like to be put on the schedule, please contact Frank &lt;br /&gt;
Toffoletto (toffo [at] rice.edu). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We look forward to seeing everyone at GEM and to your contributions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Scheduled Presentations====&lt;br /&gt;
GEM Tail Inner Magnetosphere Focus Group Breakouts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Monday June 17, 10:30 – 12:00 – Cathedral Peak&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A. Origin and evolution of BBFs and related phenomena (bubbles, dipolarization fronts, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Misha Sitnov, APL: Spontaneous formation of dipolarization fronts in the magnetotail&lt;br /&gt;
# Joachim Birn, SSL:&lt;br /&gt;
# John Lyon, Dartmouth:&lt;br /&gt;
# Jimmy Reader, UNH: Morphology and topology of BBFs and dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
# Chih-Ping Wang, UCLA: Evolution of low entropy region and its effect on transport from some RCM runs&lt;br /&gt;
# Mostafa El Alaoui, UCLA: Flow channels, dipolarization and turbulence&lt;br /&gt;
# Xiaoyan Zhou, Xu-Zhi Zhou, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Chih-Ping Wang, Shiquan Qi, UCLA/IGPP: Current Sheet Thinning and Disturbances Caused by Interplanetary Shock Compression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
B. The impact of BBFs et al on transport during different levels of activity (e.g., quiet times, SMCs, substorms, storm main phases).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Matina Gkioulidou, APL: RBSPICE observations from the March 17th storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Jian Yang, Rice: Effects of intermittent bubble injections on the storm recovery phase&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani, APL: Solar cycle dependence of magnetotail stretching&lt;br /&gt;
# Jennifer Kissinger, GSFC: How SMC quasi-steady convection affects inner magnetosphere transport and energization of the radiation belts&lt;br /&gt;
# Grant Stephens and Misha Sitnov, APL: Empirical reconstructions of storm-time SMC events&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Monday June 17, 1:30 – 3:00 – Cathedral Peak&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
C. The impact of BBFs et al on the inner magnetosphere, including ring current and radiation belts; braking oscillations and micropulsations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Andrei Runov, UCLA: Dipolarization front/fast flow braking&lt;br /&gt;
# Sasha Ukhorskiy, APL: Nonadiabatic Ion Acceleration at Injection Fronts&lt;br /&gt;
# Christine Gabrielse, UCLA: The effects of transient, localized electric fields on equatorial electron acceleration and transport towards the inner magnetosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
# Seth Claudepierre, Aerospace; Michael Wiltberger, NCAR; Scot Elkington, CU; Mary Hudson, Dartmouth: Initial Results from Lyon-Fedder-Mobarry Simulations Driven by Upstream Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) Fluctuations &lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang, UNH: Van Allen Probes/ECT-HOPE data about ion access to the inner edge of the plasma sheet&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
D. Auroral streamers and other ionospheric signatures of BBFs et al.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Toshi Nishimura, UCLA: Precursors of auroral streamers and BBFs seen in polar cap structures &lt;br /&gt;
# Ying Zou, UCLA: Structure of meso-scale polar cap flows and their influence on PBIs&lt;br /&gt;
# Bill Lotko, Dartmouth: What are the magnetospheric implications when more flux circulates in the dusk convection cell (in the ionosphere) than in the dawn cell?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Monday June 17, 1:30 – 3:00, 3:30 – 5:00 or Tuesday June 17, 10:30 – 12:00 – Cathedral Peak &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Planning session on a TIMI Challenge?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: The Magnetosheath|The Magnetosheath]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Steve Petrinec &amp;lt;steven.m.petrinec [at] lmco.com&amp;gt;, Katariina Nykyri &amp;lt;nykyrik [at] erau.edu&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date/Room: Monday, 17 June (Salon C)&lt;br /&gt;
* Morning Session: 10:30 am - 12:15 pm&lt;br /&gt;
* Afternoon Session: 1:30 - 3:00 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Scheduled Presentations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Katariina Nykyri: Statistical study of magnetosheath properties using 6+ years of THEMIS data&lt;br /&gt;
* Brian Walsh: X-ray emissions from the Earth's magnetosheath&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrey Samsonov: Influence of IMF cone angle on magnetosheath parameters: isotropic and anisotropic MHD results&lt;br /&gt;
* David Sibeck: The magnetosheath at lunar distances&lt;br /&gt;
* Nick Omidi: Generation of large scale density and temperature structures in the magnetosheath&lt;br /&gt;
* Jean Berchem: 3D Global Hybrid – Global MHD Comparisons&lt;br /&gt;
* Viacheslav Merkin: Kelvin-Helmholtz instability of the magnetospheric boundaryin a 3-dimensional global MHD simulation during northward IMF conditions&lt;br /&gt;
* Ted Fritz: TBD&lt;br /&gt;
* Chih-Ping Wang: Unusual encounters with the magnetosheath within the nominal magnetotail&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques|Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Elizabeth MacDonald &amp;lt;macdonald [at] lanl.gov&amp;gt;, Robyn Millan &amp;lt;robyn.millan [at] dartmouth.edu&amp;gt;, and Eric Donovan &amp;lt;edonovan [at] ucalgary.ca)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GEM Magnetic Mapping Focus group (bit.ly/gem_mapping) is pleased to announce our sessions for Snowmass 2013:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Monday at 10:30 in Salon D &lt;br /&gt;
# Monday at 1:30 in Salon D &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will focus the first two sessions on mapping challenges around a number of new exciting events in the RBSP era including:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nov 14 (lobe crossings)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jan 17, Jan 26, Feb 2 (BARREL and RBSP wave conjunctions)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mar 17 (geomagnetic storm)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coordinated study from multiple observation types and vantage points is encouraged and those who wish to present on other dates of interest are also welcome. Invited and confirmed speakers include Toshi Nishimura, Lutz Rastaetter, Alexa Halford, Phil Erickson, and Mei-ching Fok. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, Tuesday at 10:30 in Salon D we will continue our successful collaboration with the Substorm Expansion Onset focus group. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those interested in volunteering for any of these exciting, challenging topics, please contact Liz MacDonald, Robyn Millan, and/or Eric Donovan at your earliest convenience. We look forward to seeing you in Snowmass and thank you in advance for your participation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Scheduled Presentations====&lt;br /&gt;
(Tentative Agenda. Lots of discussion is highly encouraged! If you want to speak please get in touch with Liz, Robyn, or Eric.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Session 1: '''RBSP Mapping Challenges, Monday 10:30, Salon D'''&lt;br /&gt;
**Focus on events: Nov 14 (lobe crossings), Jan 17, Jan 26, Feb 2 (BARREL and RBSP wave conjunctions), Mar 17 (geomagnetic storm)&lt;br /&gt;
**Alexa Halford, BARREL&lt;br /&gt;
**Toshi Nishimura, RBSP pulsating aurora mapping&lt;br /&gt;
**Liz MacDonald, HOPE Nov 14 lobes&lt;br /&gt;
**Mei-Ching Fok, modeling of Nov 14 lobe event&lt;br /&gt;
**Manuel Grande, Nov 14 lobe event&lt;br /&gt;
*Session 2: '''Mapping Challenge Potpourri, Monday 1:30, Salon D'''&lt;br /&gt;
**Lutz Rastaetter, CCMC FAST boundary crossings&lt;br /&gt;
**Mike Henderson, PSD matching to test B-field models&lt;br /&gt;
**Yue Chao,  3D force balance magnetic field mode&lt;br /&gt;
**Mike Schultz, Source-Surface Modeling of Planetary Magnetospheres&lt;br /&gt;
**Jone Peter Reistad, auroral non-conjugacy&lt;br /&gt;
*Session 3: '''Joint with Substorm Expansion Onset FG, Tuesday 10:30, Salon D'''&lt;br /&gt;
**Matina Gkioulidou, RBSP observations of injections&lt;br /&gt;
**Phil Erickson (given by Robyn Millan), Ground-based measurements during BARREL substorms and connection to in situ electric fields&lt;br /&gt;
**Tetsuo Motoba, Conjugate observations of onset auroral dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
**Eric Donovan, Identifying magnetic conjugacy between satellites and the ground during onset&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures|Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Hui Zhang &amp;lt;hzhang [at] gi.alaska.edu&amp;gt;, Q.-G. Zong &amp;lt;qgzong [at] gmail.com&amp;gt;, Michael Ruohoniemi &amp;lt;mikeruo [at] vt.edu&amp;gt;, David Murr &amp;lt;murrdl [at] augsburg.edu&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures'' focus group will hold four sessions at the upcoming GEM Workshop in Snowmass, CO, June 16-21, 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Session 1: 03:30 pm - 05:00 pm on Monday (June 17) Foreshock Phenomena &lt;br /&gt;
* Session 2: 10:30 am - 12:15 pm on Tuesday (June 18) Ground Signatures &lt;br /&gt;
* Session 3: 01:30 pm - 03:00 pm on Tuesday (June 18) Magnetopause Phenomena (joint with Reconnection FG) &lt;br /&gt;
* Session 4: 03:30 pm - 05:00 pm on Tuesday (June 18) Planning Session&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you would like to present in this focus group sessions, please send a tentative title of your presentation to hzhang [at] gi.alaska.edu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Focus Group description is available at http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG:_Transient_Phenomena_at_the_Magnetopause_and_Bow_Shock_and_Their_Ground_Signatures&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also find a table and a short description of some transient foreshock phenomena, together with a list of Hot Flow Anomaly and Foreshock Bubble event at this webpage. You are more than welcome to investigate these events and their ionospheric response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We hope to see you soon at GEM!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Scheduled Presentations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 1: 03:30 pm - 05:00 pm on Monday (June 17) Foreshock Phenomena&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Drew Turner'''-Foreshock bubbles and their effects on particle acceleration and the magnetosphere-ionosphere system&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Nick Omidi'''- Mach number and cone angle dependence of SHFA formation.&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Christina Chu'''-Statistical study of HFAs-THEMIS observations&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Gabor Facsko'''-Turbulence in HFA cavities &lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Hui Zhang'''-Recent advances in HFA studies &lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Nick Omidi'''- Hybrid simulation of enhanced ion precipitation caused by an interplanetary shock&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 2: 10:30 am - 12:15 pm on Tuesday (June 18) Ground Signatures&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''David Murr''' - Overview of ground mag signatures for HFA events list on FG wiki&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Michael Hartinger''' -Magnetospheric ULF waves driven by the ion foreshock&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Evan Thomas''' -Mapping Ionospheric TOI to the Magnetopause&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Harald Frey''' (presented by Murr) - Dayside transients in the aurora as seen from the ground&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Mark Engebretson''' - EMIC waves stimulated by dayside transients&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Hyomin Kim'''-Conjugate observations of traveling convection vortices and electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves associated with transient events at the magnetopause: Initial Results from the 40-Degree Magnetic Meridian Conjugate Magnetometer Network&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Gar Bering''' - &amp;quot;Further Studies of the Relationship between Pc3 Emissions and TCV's&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Mark Engebretson''' -TCVs observed by MACCS array&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 3: 01:30 pm - 03:00 pm on Tuesday (June 18) Magnetopause Phenomena (joint with Reconnection FG)&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Brian Walsh'''-Plasmaspheric drainage plumes and reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Sunhee Lee'''-Cold ion behavior during magnetic reconnection at the magnetopause&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Rick Wilder'''-Cluster Observations of Reconnection Exhausts at the High-Latitude Magnetopause Under Extreme Density Asymmetry Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Binzheng Zhang'''- Bifurcation of soft electron precipitation under IMF By driving conditions&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Karlheinz J Trattner''' -Tracing multiple X-lines at the magnetopause&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Yaireska M. Colladovega'''- Determining the motion of FTEs on the dayside magnetopause&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Takuma Nakamura'''-Vortex induced reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Xuanye Ma'''-On the Interaction of Kelvin-Helmholtz Modes and Magnetic Reconnection for Large Magnetic Shear&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Shiva Kavosi'''- OpenGGCM Simulation of Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability observed by THEMIS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 4: 03:30 pm - 05:00 pm on Tuesday (June 18) Planning Session&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Joe Borovsky'''-The Effect of Sudden Wind Shears on the Earth’s Magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Andrey Samsonov'''-THEMIS observations of sudden impulses in the magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG11. Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions|Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Joe Borovsky &amp;lt;jborovsky [at] spacescience.org&amp;gt;, Jerry Goldstein, and Maria Spasojevic''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interaction'' focus group will have its final sessions at the 2013 GEM Summer Workshop in Snowmass June 16-21. Two sessions will be held on Tuesday Afternoon: one session in which plasmaspheric research findings from this last year will be reported, and one session that is a wrap-up/summary of progress made with the 5-year Focus Group. To make short contributions to either session, please contact Joe Borovsky (jborovsky [at] spacescience.org).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Scheduled Presentations====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Time: Tuesday 1:30-3:00 PM and 3:00-5:00 PM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Location: Cathedral Peak&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Wen Li -- An unusual enhancement of low-frequency plasmaspheric hiss associated with substorm injected electrons&lt;br /&gt;
# Brian Walsh -- plumes at the magnetopause&lt;br /&gt;
# Joe Borovsky -- estimates of plumes and dayside reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
# Dan Welling -- long lived plumes&lt;br /&gt;
# Vania Jordanova -- simulation results&lt;br /&gt;
# Richard Denton -- simulation of EMIC waves for the June 9-10 2001 event&lt;br /&gt;
# Konstantin Gamayunov -- model results for EMIC waves&lt;br /&gt;
# Kyungguk Min -- quiet time equatorial mass distribution&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang -- on the &amp;quot;trunk-like&amp;quot; ion spectral feature at the inner edge of the plasma sheet&lt;br /&gt;
# Final Discussion -- Does the plasmasphere have a future?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere|Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Paul Cassak, West Virginia University &amp;lt;Paul.Cassak [at] mail.wvu.edu&amp;gt;, Homa Karimabadi, University of California, San Diego, &amp;lt;homakar [at] gmail.com&amp;gt;, Andrei Runov, University of California, Los Angeles, &amp;lt;arunov [at] igpp.ucla.edu&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would like to solicit contributions to the &amp;quot;Magnetic Reconnection &lt;br /&gt;
in the Magnetosphere&amp;quot; Focus Group sessions at the upcoming GEM meeting &lt;br /&gt;
in Snowmass, Colorado on June 16 - 21, 2013. The Focus Group goals &lt;br /&gt;
description and other information is available at&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG:_Magnetic_Reconnection_in_the_Magnetosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus summer we plan four 1.5 hr-long sessions to discuss&lt;br /&gt;
# Dayside reconnection and its relation to transient phenomena at the magnetopause and bow shock (joint with Dayside Transient FG);&lt;br /&gt;
# Magnetotail reconnection and its role in substorms, pseudo breakups, PBIs and other substorm-related phenomena (joint with Substorm Onset FG);&lt;br /&gt;
# General problems of magnetospheric reconnection. Nominally, the session activities will address Signatures of Kinetic Scale Reconnection Physics (a prelude to the launch of MMS), but contributions on any topic including onset, evolution, and consequences are welcomed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We welcome contributions based upon data analysis, simulations, and theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tentative agenda of the workshop is available at &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/2013GEM_agenda.pdf.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To follow the GEM philosophy and the informal workshop format, your &lt;br /&gt;
presentations need to be short and concise (without AGU-style &lt;br /&gt;
introductions and conclusions) in order to engender discussions. We &lt;br /&gt;
strongly suggest preparing 5 slides or less and 5 min-long &lt;br /&gt;
presentations focused strictly on the topic.  We encourage &lt;br /&gt;
presentations by graduate students and postdoctoral researchers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please submit a tentative topic of your presentation (to help us plan &lt;br /&gt;
the session) and address your questions, if any, to&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paul Cassak, West Virginia University, Paul.Cassak [at] mail.wvu.edu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Scheduled Presentations ====&lt;br /&gt;
(in alphabetical order)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm on Tuesday (June 18), joint with Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures focus group&lt;br /&gt;
# Yaireska Colladovega, determining motion of FTEs on the dayside magnetopause&lt;br /&gt;
# Shiva Kavosi, simulations of Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability observed by THEMIS&lt;br /&gt;
# Sunhee Lee, cold ion behavior during magnetic reconnection at the magnetopause&lt;br /&gt;
# Xuanye Ma, interaction of Kelvin-helmholtz and reconnection for large magnetic shear&lt;br /&gt;
# Takuma Nakamura, vortex induced reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
# Karlheinz Trattner, Tracing multiple X-lines at the magnetopause&lt;br /&gt;
# Rick Wilder, reconnection at high-latitude magnetopause with extreme density asymmetry&lt;br /&gt;
# Binzheng Zhang, soft electron precipitation bifurcations during large By driving&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10:30 am - 12:15 pm on Wednesday (June 19), joint with Substorm Expansion Onset focus group=====&lt;br /&gt;
Expected speakers&lt;br /&gt;
# Joachim Birn (w/M. Hesse), near tail reconnection: onset&lt;br /&gt;
# Joachim Birn (w/M. Hesse), near tail reconnection: energy conversion&lt;br /&gt;
# Jim Drake, structure of reconnection exhausts and dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
# Stefan Kiehas, reconnection observations with THEMIS/ARTEMIS&lt;br /&gt;
# Andrei Runov, Update on Cluster and THEMIS/ARTEMIS observations&lt;br /&gt;
# Mikhail Sitnov, magnetotail reconnection onset and dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
# Mikhail Sitnov (w/S. Merkin), magnetotail reconnection onset: kinetic vs. MHD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm and 3:30 - 5:00pm on Wednesday (June 19)&lt;br /&gt;
Expected speakers&lt;br /&gt;
# Amitava Bhattacharjee, plasmoids&lt;br /&gt;
# Joachim Birn, energetic particle fluxes &amp;amp; anisotropies at dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
# Joe Borovsky, solar wind coupling&lt;br /&gt;
# Paul Cassak, shear flow&lt;br /&gt;
# Lars Daldorff, PIC/BATS-R-US coupling&lt;br /&gt;
# John Dorelli, global Hall-MHD effects on magnetospheric convection&lt;br /&gt;
# John Dorelli, sw/ms coupling&lt;br /&gt;
# Jan Egedal, role of pressure anisotropy&lt;br /&gt;
# Stefan Eriksson, solar wind reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
# Gabor Facsko, solar wind disturbances forcing magnetotail reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
# Michael Hesse, asymmetric reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
# Colin Komar, dayside separators&lt;br /&gt;
# Yanhua Liu, counter streaming heavy ions in reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
# Kittipat Malakit, asymmetric reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
# Tai Phan, electron heating&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Shay, electron heating&lt;br /&gt;
# Brian Walsh, plasmaspheric drainage plumes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: Radiation Belts and Wave Modeling|Radiation Belts and Wave Modeling]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Yuri Shprits &amp;lt;yshprits [at] atmos.ucla.edu&amp;gt;, Scot Elkington, Jacob Bortnik, Craig Kletzing''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The RBW focus group will have 6 sessions this year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
# Wed, Jun 19, (10:30am-12:15pm) RBW 1 -- GEM particle transport challenge&lt;br /&gt;
# Wed, Jun 19, (1:30pm-3:00pm) RBW 2 -- Dynamical modeling of the radiation belts (Preparing radiation belt models for Van Allen Probes data)&lt;br /&gt;
# Wed, Jun 19, (3:30pm-5:00pm) RBW 3 -- Wave-particle interactions (Particle scattering and transport)&lt;br /&gt;
# Thu, Jun 20, (10:30am-12:15pm) RBW 4 -- Wave excitation, propagation, and distribution (ULF)&lt;br /&gt;
# Thu, Jun 20, (1:30pm-3:00pm) RBW 5 -- Wave excitation, propagation, and distribution (VLF/ELF)&lt;br /&gt;
# Thu, Jun 20, (3:30pm-5:00pm) RBW 6 -- GEM wave challenge, overflow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can submit the title of your presentation online by following the &lt;br /&gt;
link below to reserve a time slot during each individual session. We &lt;br /&gt;
invite potential contributions and encourage to participants to limit &lt;br /&gt;
presentations to approximately 5 min.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please submit the title of your presentations by June 5th at&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://goo.gl/B7BY9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In particular, we would like to encourage modelers to participate in &lt;br /&gt;
the GEM particle modeling challenge as well as the wave modeling &lt;br /&gt;
challenge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Data and rules for the GEM challenge are given on the ViRBO web site &lt;br /&gt;
at&lt;br /&gt;
http://virbo.org/RBW#2010_RBW_Challenge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See you at GEM.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Scheduled Presentations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/images/4/43/RBWM-GEM2013.pdf Preliminary Schedule] (PDF file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5-minute presentation limits:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the large number of abstracts submitted to the Radiation Belts and Waves Focus Group, we would like to remind presenters to adhere to the 3-slide, 5-minute limit as much as possible.  We have a limited amount of time and would like to accommodate as many speakers as we can, so we are asking presenters to please be succinct (yet convey the main point of the science clearly).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma|The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Rick Chappell &amp;lt;rick.chappell [at] vanderbilt.edu&amp;gt;, Bob Schunk and Dan Welling''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would like to invite your participation in an area of research that is directed toward creating a unified model that incorporates the outflow of plasma from the ionosphere into the creation and dynamics of the important plasma regions of the magnetosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This GEM focus group has as its goal to improve the understanding of the role of the ionospheric outflow source by (1) refining outflow modeling through comparison with measurements, (2) adjusting the outflow modeling to become a compatible input to magnetospheric Geospace Global Circulation Models (GGCM), (3) comparing magnetospheric modeling results with satellite measurements and (4) examining ways in which the dynamic magnetosphere can couple back to influence the original ionospheric outflow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have planned the following four sessions for the upcoming GEM Snowmass meeting and would like for you to suggest topics that you would like to present in the sessions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 1—Observational and Modeling Mysteries—June 19, 10:30am:'''&lt;br /&gt;
	This session will be an opportunity for both modelers and experimentalists to present areas of unanswered questions in their work concerning outflow and its effects.  The goal will be to solicit discussion from the GEM Ion Outflow-MMM community regarding approaches to solving the outstanding mysteries and to initiate new collaborative research in these areas. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 2—The Magnetosphere-Ionosphere System With and Without Outflow-June 19, 1:30pm:'''&lt;br /&gt;
	This session will compare and contrast the characteristics of periods of strong outflow with periods of weak outflow in both the observational and modeling results.  A focal point of this session will be to work toward a self-consistent coupling in the merging of the ionosphere and magnetosphere models considering effects such as precipitation, currents and electric fields.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 3—General Contributions in Measurements, Modeling and Merging—June 19, 3:30pm:'''&lt;br /&gt;
	This session will cover a variety of topics related to measuring and modeling the ionospheric outflow and its effects on the magnetosphere as well as merging the ionospheric and magnetospheric models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 4—Planning Session—June 20, 10:30am:'''&lt;br /&gt;
	This will be an open discussion on the status of the focus group accomplishments in order to identify areas of research that are needed and approaches that can be initiated to drive new modeling, measurements and GGCM results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please send your topics and suggestions to Rick Chappell at rick.chappell [at] vanderbilt.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We look forward to seeing you at the GEM meeting in June.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Scheduled Presentations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(''Presentations should be planned for 10 minutes with 5 minutes of discussion'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 4-1: Observational and Modeling Mysteries—June 19, 10:30am, Salon D&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Schunk: Neutral Polar Wind Mysteries&lt;br /&gt;
* Rick Chappell: The Low Energy Invisible Plasma Mystery&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Lotko: Issues, Challenges and Advances Required for Outflow and Magnetospheric Modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: The Plasma Cloak:Where It Comes From, How Often It Occurs, and Its Impact On Dayside Reconnection.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Outflow Effects on CPCP&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura: The Effect of Photoelectrons on the Polar Wind&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 4-2: The Magnetosphere-Ionosphere System With and Without Outflow—June 19, 1:30pm, Salon D&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Outflow versus No Outflow: Difficulties of Excluding Outflow&lt;br /&gt;
* Schunk/Abdallah: Escape of Plasma and Neutral Gas from the Earth's Upper Atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn Kistler: Relationship Between Sawtooth Events and O+ in the Plasma Sheet&lt;br /&gt;
* Yanhua Liu: The Thickness of O+ Mediated Reconnecting Current Sheet&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer: Superthermal Electrons and MI Coupling in Modeling Ionospheric Outflow&lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Varney: The Nature of Heat Flows Into the Daylit Polar Cap Ionosphere&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 4-3: General Contributions in Measurements, Modeling and Merging—June 19, 3:30pm, Salon D&lt;br /&gt;
* Dennis Gallagher: Dynamics Explorer-1 Ion Densities and Temperatures&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Denton, Jonathan Krall, Joe Huba: SAMI3 Plasmasphere Simulations&lt;br /&gt;
* Eric Donovan: Mechanisms of Energetic Mass Ejection Xplorer (MEMEX) Mission&lt;br /&gt;
* Karimabadi Homayoun: What Can We Gain By Coupling the Ionospheric Models To 3D Global Hybrid Simulations? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 4-4: Focus Group Planning Session—June 20, 10:30am, Salon D&lt;br /&gt;
* Suggestions, mini-presentations and discussion are encouraged to guide future focus group activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG13. Modes of Solar WInd-Magnetosphere Energy Transfer|Modes of Solar WInd-Magnetosphere Energy Transfer]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: R. McPherron &amp;lt;rmcpherron [at] igpp.ucla.edu&amp;gt;, J. Kissinger &amp;lt;jenni.kissinger [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;, L. Kepko &amp;lt;larry.kepko [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Focus Group on ''Modes of Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Energy Transfer'' will hold two sessions at the 2013 workshop. These sessions are scheduled at 10:30 AM to 12:15 PM and 1:30 to 3:00 PM on Thursday June 20. The Focus Group has examined the solar wind and magnetospheric conditions leading to different types of geomagnetic activity. This will be the last meeting of this Focus Group as GEM moves to other topics. We will begin with a review of our past activities and suggestions for future work. We are soliciting presentations related to the following topics:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The occurrence of substorms as function of universal time, season, and solar cycle&lt;br /&gt;
# The properties of steady magnetospheric convection (SMC) and its relation to solar wind and prior substorm activity&lt;br /&gt;
# The occurrence and properties of sawtooth events&lt;br /&gt;
# The occurrence statistics of poleward boundary intensifications (PBI) during substorm phases and SMC&lt;br /&gt;
# A comparison of PBI and pseudo breakups&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please contact one of the organizers if you have material you wish to present. Plan for short informal presentations designed to stimulate discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Scheduled Presentations====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Location: Salon C&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 1: 10:30 am - 12:15 pm on Thursday (June 20)&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Bob McPherron''' (UCLA): Focus group objectives and accomplishments&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Suzie Imber''' (U. Leicester): The role of magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling in producing different convection modes&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Bill Lotko''' (Dartmouth): What are the implications for convection and reconnection in the magnetosphere when more flux circulates in the dusk convection cell (in the ionosphere) than the dawn cell?&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Binzheng Zhang''' (Dartmouth): How do some SMC states emerge without an initiating substorm?&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Jenni Kissinger''' (NASA Goddard): How do SMC events end?&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Xia Cai''' (Virginia Tech): Auto detection of sawtooth events&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Xiangning Chu''' (UCLA): Solar cycle variations in substorm occurrence and strength&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 1: 01:30 pm - 03:00 pm on Thursday (June 20)&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Joe Borovsky''' (SSI): Derived solar wind coupling functions: What they say about changes in solar wind parameters and changes in driving&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Bill Lotko''' (Dartmouth): Are ionospheric outflows required to induce sawtooth oscillations (or, what exactly is a sawtooth mode)?&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Lynn Kistler''' (UNH): O+ ion the plasma sheet during sawtooth events, isolated substorms, and storm time substorms&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Grant Stephens''' (APL): Empiricial reconstruction of storm-time steady magnetospheric convection events&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Gina DiBraccio''' (U. Michigan): Substorms seen by MESSENGER at Mercury&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Ryan McGranaghan''' (U. Colorado): Signature of the Russell-McPherron effect on thermospheric density&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Anna DeJong''' (CNU): Comparing the first tooth in an oscillation to initiating substorms of an SMC&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Bob McPherron and Jenni Kissinger''': Future directions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: Metrics and Validation|Metrics and Validation]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group solicits short &lt;br /&gt;
contributions to three planned sessions at the upcoming GEM meeting in &lt;br /&gt;
Snowmass, Colorado, on Thursday and Friday, June 20-21.  The session &lt;br /&gt;
descriptions are below.  If you have a topic to discuss, please send &lt;br /&gt;
us a draft title so that we can begin to put together a program; &lt;br /&gt;
however, in the spirit of GEM, participation and brief, last-minute &lt;br /&gt;
informal presentations are always welcome. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 1:'''  New Validation Results and Methods &lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit short presentations focusing on all aspects &lt;br /&gt;
of data-model comparisons.  Welcomed themes could include geospace &lt;br /&gt;
model validation using regional ground magnetometer indices, model &lt;br /&gt;
responses to dynamic magnetopause boundaries, long-term &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;climatological&amp;quot; model validation, using multi-variate metrics to &lt;br /&gt;
assess model performance, or any related contribution.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 2:''' How Validation Studies Guide Model Improvements: &lt;br /&gt;
In this session, we solicit short presentations on specific examples &lt;br /&gt;
of how discrepancies between models and observations have led to a &lt;br /&gt;
better understanding of the physics that needs to be incorporated into &lt;br /&gt;
models. Studies, or ideas, on studies involving model sensitivity to &lt;br /&gt;
inputs and various model parameters are welcome. The session will &lt;br /&gt;
include a discussion on better ways to design metrics and validation &lt;br /&gt;
studies to uncover missing physics in models. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 3:'''  Validation of MHD models Coupled with other modules such &lt;br /&gt;
as the Ring Current and Polar Outflow &lt;br /&gt;
In this session we will investigate recent advances in the development &lt;br /&gt;
of coupled models of the magnetosphere, inner magnetosphere, the &lt;br /&gt;
plasmasphere/polar wind, and the ionosphere/thermosphere.  We solicit &lt;br /&gt;
short presentations on methods to link models, validate the outputs &lt;br /&gt;
and constrain coupled model systems using observations.  Emphasis &lt;br /&gt;
should be placed on new physical processes that are described by the &lt;br /&gt;
coupled models and on effects that remain out of scope and that limit &lt;br /&gt;
the effectiveness and stability of the coupling. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for your contributions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Scheduled Presentations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(''We welcome additional contributions.'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 1''': New Validation Results and Methods&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 1:30 PM – 3:00 PM (''Chair: Tim Guild'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit short presentations focusing on all aspects of data-model comparisons.  Welcomed themes could include geospace model validation using regional ground magnetometer indices, model responses to dynamic magnetopause boundaries, long-term &amp;quot;climatological&amp;quot; model validation, using multi-variate metrics to assess model performance, or any related contribution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank Toffoletto:  Initial result from LFM RCM for Oct 2012 Storm &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter and Howard Singer: dB/dt study (MHD and empirical) results / discussion&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer: Calculation of K index values from model magnetic perturbations&lt;br /&gt;
* Victoir Veibell and Bob Weigel (presented by Tim Guild): Climatological analysis of 12 months of MHD simulated ground magnetometer measurements&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabor Facsko:  GUMICS-4 verification and footprint determination using static and dynamic global MHD simulations of the ECLAT project&lt;br /&gt;
* Roxanne Katus and Michael Liemohn: Climatological Validation of the HEIDI Ring Current Model&lt;br /&gt;
* Haje Korth:  Statistical maps of TIMED/GUVI auroral emissions as a new global MHD validation data source&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These next two talks may move to the beginning of the next session (Thursday 3:30-5:00).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Josh Rigler:  Metrics derived from multi-variate statistical distributions   &lt;br /&gt;
* Asher Pembroke:  Interpolating into &amp;quot;Hard to reach places&amp;quot; of MHD volumes for more accurate DST&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 2''': How Validation Studies Guide Model Improvements&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 03:30 PM – 5:00 PM (''Chair: Howard Singer'') &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
In this session, we solicit short presentations on specific examples of how discrepancies between models and observations have led to a better understanding of the physics that needs to be incorporated into models. Studies, or ideas, on studies involving model sensitivity to inputs and various model parameters are welcome. The session will include a discussion on better ways to design metrics and validation studies to uncover missing physics in models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer: Session Intro and Comments on Ensemble Modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling : Multi-Model Validation with the Space Weather Modeling Framework&lt;br /&gt;
* Margaret Chen: The effect of uncertain boundary conditions on ring current model validation  &lt;br /&gt;
* Andrey Samsonov: Large-scale flow vortices following a magnetospheric sudden impulse (Simulations were done with SWMF, OpenGGCM and LFM.)&lt;br /&gt;
* Slava Merkin: Lessons from MHD-AMPERE comparisons        &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter: Magnetopause Challenge of 2010 and steps from there: Eents for future MP challenge&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 3''': Validation of MHD models coupled with other modules such as the Ring Current and Polar Outflow&lt;br /&gt;
Friday: 10:30 AM – 12:15 PM (''Chair: Lutz Rastaetter'')  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we will investigate recent advances in the development of coupled models of the magnetosphere, inner magnetosphere, the plasmasphere/polar wind, and the ionosphere/thermosphere.  We solicit short presentations on methods to link models, validate the outputs and constrain coupled model systems using observations.  Emphasis should be placed on new physical processes that are described by the coupled models and on effects that remain out of scope and that limit the effectiveness and stability of the coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Raeder (co-authors Gilson &amp;amp; Toffoletto),  OpenGGCM - RCM validations&lt;br /&gt;
* Raluca Ilie: Coupling of SWMF magnetosphere and Heidi Ring Current&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Wiltberger: Validation of MFLFM Outflow Simulations &lt;br /&gt;
* Binzheng Zhang - Validation of the Polar Cusp position in the LFM simulation&lt;br /&gt;
* All: Discussion on future Metrics and Validation Activities to Support GEM goals&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have topics for discussion, please consider communicating them to the conveners before the session.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: Storm-Time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection|Storm-Time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Joseph Baker, Stan Sazykin, Mike Ruohoniemi, Peter Chi, Mark Engebretson''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Colleagues,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This year's GEM Summer Workshop marks the initiation of a new Focus &lt;br /&gt;
Group to examine &amp;quot;Storm-Time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection &lt;br /&gt;
(SIMIC)&amp;quot;. The SIMIC Focus Group will bring together observations and &lt;br /&gt;
modeling to examine the coupled dynamics of the inner magnetosphere &lt;br /&gt;
and ionosphere during geomagnetic storms. Recent improvements in &lt;br /&gt;
modeling and ground- and space-based instrumentation allow this topic &lt;br /&gt;
to be examined with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution and &lt;br /&gt;
coverage. Some examples of relevant parameters of interest include: &lt;br /&gt;
plasma distributions, magnetic topology, convection electric fields, &lt;br /&gt;
and current systems. More details about the SIMIC Focus Group can be &lt;br /&gt;
found at:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG:_Storm-Time_Inner_Magnetosphere-Ionosphere_Convection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We invite short presentations that highlight one or more of the &lt;br /&gt;
following themes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Improvements in self-consistent physics-based simulations of the coupled inner magnetosphere-ionosphere system during geomagnetic storms.&lt;br /&gt;
# Instrumentation which can be used to examine storm-time magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling over large spatial scales and validate the simulations (e.g. magnetometers, radars, imaging, GPS receivers, etc.)  &lt;br /&gt;
# Any other discussion topics relevant to articulating an appropriate scope and emphasis for this Focus Group. (Since this is the first year, we are open to any comments or suggestions about how to move forward most effectively.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SIMIC Focus Group will hold two sessions on Thursday afternoon and &lt;br /&gt;
Friday morning. We have deliberately scheduled the sessions for late &lt;br /&gt;
in the week to benefit those people who aim to attend both GEM and &lt;br /&gt;
CEDAR.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
If you would like to give a SIMIC presentation, please email Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
Baker (jo.baker [at] vt.edu) and Stan Sazykin (sazykin [at] rice.edu) with &lt;br /&gt;
a working title and short description of your talk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's to a great SIMIC kick-off!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Scheduled Presentations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Time:&lt;br /&gt;
# Thursday, June 20, 03:30 - 05:00 PM&lt;br /&gt;
# Friday, June 21, 10:30 AM - 12:15 PM &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Location: Salon C&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday afternoon session (3:30--5:00 pm):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Jo Baker'' (Virginia Tech): Characteristics of SAPS seen with SuperDARN and results from conjunctions with the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Stan Sazykin'' (Rice U.): SAPS modeling and comparison with observations&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Josh Rigler'' (USGS): ground-based magnetometer data overview&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Peter Chi'' (UCLA): update on ground-based magnetometer observations on field line resonance sounding&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Jichun Zhang'' (UNH): Observationsof ion &amp;quot;trunk structures&amp;quot; by the Van Allen probes and their modeling (needs to give it on Thursday)&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Raluca Ilie'' (U.Mich.): How do the changes in the inner magnetospheric ion composition affect the dynamics of a magnetic storm?&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Vania Jordanova'' (LANL): improvements of physics based modeling of ring current&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Gang Lu'' (HAO/NCAR): Mid- and low-latitude ionospheric plasma drift associated with  prompt penetration electric fields&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Jimmy Raeder'' (UNH): Convection, shielding, and magnetosphere inflation during storms with the coupled OpenGGCM-RCM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Friday morning session (10:30 am--12:15 pm):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Matina Gkioulidou'' (JHU/APL): RBSPICE data from recent storms&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Colby Lemon'' (Aerospace):  RCM-E simulations of ring current electrons&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Mei-Ching Fok'' (NASA Goddard): A Comprehensive Inner Magnetosphere Ionosphere (CIMI) Model&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Jian Yang'' (Rice U.): On the rate of ring current injection&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Mike Liemohn'' (U. Mich): What can current system analysis tell us about inner magnetosphere MI coupling?&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Guan Le'' (NASA Goddard): Results from C/NOFS data on ring current evolution and  asymmetry&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Shin-ichi Ohtani'' (JHU/APL): inductive electric fields in the storm-time inner magnetosphere from Cluster observations&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Naomi Maruyama'' (NOAA): Validating/improving self-consistent physics-based simulations of the coupled inner magnetosphere-ionosphere-thermosphere system during storms&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Sasha Zou'' (U. Michigan): Multi-instrument observation of the Storm Enhanced Density (SED) during Oct. 24-25, 2011 storm: implications for SED formation processes&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Jacob Bortnik'' (UCLA): SPeCIMEN program (Specification and Prediction of the Coupled Inner-Magnetospheric Environment)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG12. Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes|Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Vassilis Angelopoulos &amp;lt;vassilis [at] ucla.edu&amp;gt;, Shin Ohtani &amp;lt;Shin.Ohtani [at] jhuapl.edu&amp;gt;, Kazuo Shiokawa &amp;lt;shiokawa [at] stelab.nagoya-u.ac.jp&amp;gt;, Andrei Runov &amp;lt;arunov [at] igpp.ucla.edu&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would like to invite contributions to the Substorm Expansion Onset: &lt;br /&gt;
The First 10 Minutes Focus Group at the upcoming GEM meeting in &lt;br /&gt;
Snowmass on June 16-21, 2013. The Focus Group goals and other &lt;br /&gt;
information are available at:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG12._Substorm_Expansion_Onset:_The_First_10_Minutes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For this summer we plan four 1.5 hr-long sessions to discuss&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Relative timing between onset signatures in space and on the ground&lt;br /&gt;
* The role of magnetotail reconnection (distant and near-Earth) in substorms and substorm-related processes, such as pseudo-breakups, PBIs, streamers, and other substorm-related phenomena (joint with the RX Focus Group)&lt;br /&gt;
* Substorm-related processes in the tail-dipole transition region&lt;br /&gt;
* Substorm onset mapping (joint with the Magnetic Mapping and Techniques Focus Group).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since it is the Substorm Expansion Onset Focus Group final year, we &lt;br /&gt;
plan to allocate 10 minutes of each session for the final report &lt;br /&gt;
discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The workshop agenda is available at &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/schedule.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each speaker will be allotted time for 5 minutes (3 slides) &lt;br /&gt;
presentation, in order to ensure enough time for discussion. Please &lt;br /&gt;
submit tentative titles of your presentation and/or address your &lt;br /&gt;
questions to the FG coordinators.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2013_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=1734</id>
		<title>2013 Summer Workshop</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2013_Summer_Workshop&amp;diff=1734"/>
		<updated>2013-06-20T17:52:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tguild: /* Scheduled Presentations */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''June 16-21, 2013'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Snowmass Conference Center, Snowmass, Colorado'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Snowmass2013_small.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(''The Westin Snowmass Resort'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Web links to more Workshop information:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html GEM Workshop Website]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/schedule.html Workshop Schedule]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/poster.html Poster Information]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/travel.html Travel and Accommodations]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[GEM Student Forum|GEM Student Forum on Sunday, June 16, 2013]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:magenta;font-weight:bold;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;1st GEM Student Poster Competition:&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Students:  Please register yourself for the competition at http://goo.gl/NbvrE.&lt;br /&gt;
* Volunteer for judging: Please sign up to volunteer at  http://goo.gl/blCbF.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below are '''session announcements''' and '''scheduled presentations (if available)''' for active GEM Focus Groups. Updates on scheduled presentations may be posted at individual Focus Group pages (see links from [[GEM Focus Groups|Focus Group pages]]). The symbol @ in all e-mail addresses below is replaced by &amp;quot; [at] &amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(''Last update of this page: 6/20/2013 9:45 Pacific Time'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions|Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Frank Toffoletto, John Lyon, Pontus Brandt, and Vassilis Angelopoulos''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GEM focus group on Tail-Inner Magnetosphere Interactions will hold &lt;br /&gt;
its breakout sessions on Monday - Tuesday, June 17-18, 2013. We invite &lt;br /&gt;
presentations that specifically address one of the following topics:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Origin and evolution of BBFs and related phenomena (bubbles, dipolarization fronts, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
* The impact of BBFs et al on transport during different levels of activity (e.g., quiet times, SMCs, substorms, storm main phases).&lt;br /&gt;
* The impact of BBFs et al on the inner magnetosphere, including ring current and radiation belts; braking oscillations and micropulsations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Auroral streamers and other ionospheric signatures of BBFs et al.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More information on the focus group can be found at: &lt;br /&gt;
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/GEM_Focus_Groups&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We kindly ask presentations to be limited to 2-3 slides/5 minutes. If &lt;br /&gt;
you would like to be put on the schedule, please contact Frank &lt;br /&gt;
Toffoletto (toffo [at] rice.edu). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We look forward to seeing everyone at GEM and to your contributions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Scheduled Presentations====&lt;br /&gt;
GEM Tail Inner Magnetosphere Focus Group Breakouts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Monday June 17, 10:30 – 12:00 – Cathedral Peak&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A. Origin and evolution of BBFs and related phenomena (bubbles, dipolarization fronts, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Misha Sitnov, APL: Spontaneous formation of dipolarization fronts in the magnetotail&lt;br /&gt;
# Joachim Birn, SSL:&lt;br /&gt;
# John Lyon, Dartmouth:&lt;br /&gt;
# Jimmy Reader, UNH: Morphology and topology of BBFs and dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
# Chih-Ping Wang, UCLA: Evolution of low entropy region and its effect on transport from some RCM runs&lt;br /&gt;
# Mostafa El Alaoui, UCLA: Flow channels, dipolarization and turbulence&lt;br /&gt;
# Xiaoyan Zhou, Xu-Zhi Zhou, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Chih-Ping Wang, Shiquan Qi, UCLA/IGPP: Current Sheet Thinning and Disturbances Caused by Interplanetary Shock Compression&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
B. The impact of BBFs et al on transport during different levels of activity (e.g., quiet times, SMCs, substorms, storm main phases).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Matina Gkioulidou, APL: RBSPICE observations from the March 17th storm&lt;br /&gt;
# Jian Yang, Rice: Effects of intermittent bubble injections on the storm recovery phase&lt;br /&gt;
# Shin Ohtani, APL: Solar cycle dependence of magnetotail stretching&lt;br /&gt;
# Jennifer Kissinger, GSFC: How SMC quasi-steady convection affects inner magnetosphere transport and energization of the radiation belts&lt;br /&gt;
# Grant Stephens and Misha Sitnov, APL: Empirical reconstructions of storm-time SMC events&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Monday June 17, 1:30 – 3:00 – Cathedral Peak&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
C. The impact of BBFs et al on the inner magnetosphere, including ring current and radiation belts; braking oscillations and micropulsations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Andrei Runov, UCLA: Dipolarization front/fast flow braking&lt;br /&gt;
# Sasha Ukhorskiy, APL: Nonadiabatic Ion Acceleration at Injection Fronts&lt;br /&gt;
# Christine Gabrielse, UCLA: The effects of transient, localized electric fields on equatorial electron acceleration and transport towards the inner magnetosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
# Seth Claudepierre, Aerospace; Michael Wiltberger, NCAR; Scot Elkington, CU; Mary Hudson, Dartmouth: Initial Results from Lyon-Fedder-Mobarry Simulations Driven by Upstream Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) Fluctuations &lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang, UNH: Van Allen Probes/ECT-HOPE data about ion access to the inner edge of the plasma sheet&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
D. Auroral streamers and other ionospheric signatures of BBFs et al.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Toshi Nishimura, UCLA: Precursors of auroral streamers and BBFs seen in polar cap structures &lt;br /&gt;
# Ying Zou, UCLA: Structure of meso-scale polar cap flows and their influence on PBIs&lt;br /&gt;
# Bill Lotko, Dartmouth: What are the magnetospheric implications when more flux circulates in the dusk convection cell (in the ionosphere) than in the dawn cell?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Monday June 17, 1:30 – 3:00, 3:30 – 5:00 or Tuesday June 17, 10:30 – 12:00 – Cathedral Peak &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Planning session on a TIMI Challenge?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: The Magnetosheath|The Magnetosheath]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Steve Petrinec &amp;lt;steven.m.petrinec [at] lmco.com&amp;gt;, Katariina Nykyri &amp;lt;nykyrik [at] erau.edu&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date/Room: Monday, 17 June (Salon C)&lt;br /&gt;
* Morning Session: 10:30 am - 12:15 pm&lt;br /&gt;
* Afternoon Session: 1:30 - 3:00 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Scheduled Presentations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Katariina Nykyri: Statistical study of magnetosheath properties using 6+ years of THEMIS data&lt;br /&gt;
* Brian Walsh: X-ray emissions from the Earth's magnetosheath&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrey Samsonov: Influence of IMF cone angle on magnetosheath parameters: isotropic and anisotropic MHD results&lt;br /&gt;
* David Sibeck: The magnetosheath at lunar distances&lt;br /&gt;
* Nick Omidi: Generation of large scale density and temperature structures in the magnetosheath&lt;br /&gt;
* Jean Berchem: 3D Global Hybrid – Global MHD Comparisons&lt;br /&gt;
* Viacheslav Merkin: Kelvin-Helmholtz instability of the magnetospheric boundaryin a 3-dimensional global MHD simulation during northward IMF conditions&lt;br /&gt;
* Ted Fritz: TBD&lt;br /&gt;
* Chih-Ping Wang: Unusual encounters with the magnetosheath within the nominal magnetotail&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques|Scientific Magnetic Mapping &amp;amp; Techniques]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Elizabeth MacDonald &amp;lt;macdonald [at] lanl.gov&amp;gt;, Robyn Millan &amp;lt;robyn.millan [at] dartmouth.edu&amp;gt;, and Eric Donovan &amp;lt;edonovan [at] ucalgary.ca)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GEM Magnetic Mapping Focus group (bit.ly/gem_mapping) is pleased to announce our sessions for Snowmass 2013:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Monday at 10:30 in Salon D &lt;br /&gt;
# Monday at 1:30 in Salon D &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will focus the first two sessions on mapping challenges around a number of new exciting events in the RBSP era including:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nov 14 (lobe crossings)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jan 17, Jan 26, Feb 2 (BARREL and RBSP wave conjunctions)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mar 17 (geomagnetic storm)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coordinated study from multiple observation types and vantage points is encouraged and those who wish to present on other dates of interest are also welcome. Invited and confirmed speakers include Toshi Nishimura, Lutz Rastaetter, Alexa Halford, Phil Erickson, and Mei-ching Fok. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, Tuesday at 10:30 in Salon D we will continue our successful collaboration with the Substorm Expansion Onset focus group. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those interested in volunteering for any of these exciting, challenging topics, please contact Liz MacDonald, Robyn Millan, and/or Eric Donovan at your earliest convenience. We look forward to seeing you in Snowmass and thank you in advance for your participation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Scheduled Presentations====&lt;br /&gt;
(Tentative Agenda. Lots of discussion is highly encouraged! If you want to speak please get in touch with Liz, Robyn, or Eric.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Session 1: '''RBSP Mapping Challenges, Monday 10:30, Salon D'''&lt;br /&gt;
**Focus on events: Nov 14 (lobe crossings), Jan 17, Jan 26, Feb 2 (BARREL and RBSP wave conjunctions), Mar 17 (geomagnetic storm)&lt;br /&gt;
**Alexa Halford, BARREL&lt;br /&gt;
**Toshi Nishimura, RBSP pulsating aurora mapping&lt;br /&gt;
**Liz MacDonald, HOPE Nov 14 lobes&lt;br /&gt;
**Mei-Ching Fok, modeling of Nov 14 lobe event&lt;br /&gt;
**Manuel Grande, Nov 14 lobe event&lt;br /&gt;
*Session 2: '''Mapping Challenge Potpourri, Monday 1:30, Salon D'''&lt;br /&gt;
**Lutz Rastaetter, CCMC FAST boundary crossings&lt;br /&gt;
**Mike Henderson, PSD matching to test B-field models&lt;br /&gt;
**Yue Chao,  3D force balance magnetic field mode&lt;br /&gt;
**Mike Schultz, Source-Surface Modeling of Planetary Magnetospheres&lt;br /&gt;
**Jone Peter Reistad, auroral non-conjugacy&lt;br /&gt;
*Session 3: '''Joint with Substorm Expansion Onset FG, Tuesday 10:30, Salon D'''&lt;br /&gt;
**Matina Gkioulidou, RBSP observations of injections&lt;br /&gt;
**Phil Erickson (given by Robyn Millan), Ground-based measurements during BARREL substorms and connection to in situ electric fields&lt;br /&gt;
**Tetsuo Motoba, Conjugate observations of onset auroral dynamics&lt;br /&gt;
**Eric Donovan, Identifying magnetic conjugacy between satellites and the ground during onset&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures|Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Hui Zhang &amp;lt;hzhang [at] gi.alaska.edu&amp;gt;, Q.-G. Zong &amp;lt;qgzong [at] gmail.com&amp;gt;, Michael Ruohoniemi &amp;lt;mikeruo [at] vt.edu&amp;gt;, David Murr &amp;lt;murrdl [at] augsburg.edu&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures'' focus group will hold four sessions at the upcoming GEM Workshop in Snowmass, CO, June 16-21, 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Session 1: 03:30 pm - 05:00 pm on Monday (June 17) Foreshock Phenomena &lt;br /&gt;
* Session 2: 10:30 am - 12:15 pm on Tuesday (June 18) Ground Signatures &lt;br /&gt;
* Session 3: 01:30 pm - 03:00 pm on Tuesday (June 18) Magnetopause Phenomena (joint with Reconnection FG) &lt;br /&gt;
* Session 4: 03:30 pm - 05:00 pm on Tuesday (June 18) Planning Session&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you would like to present in this focus group sessions, please send a tentative title of your presentation to hzhang [at] gi.alaska.edu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Focus Group description is available at http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG:_Transient_Phenomena_at_the_Magnetopause_and_Bow_Shock_and_Their_Ground_Signatures&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also find a table and a short description of some transient foreshock phenomena, together with a list of Hot Flow Anomaly and Foreshock Bubble event at this webpage. You are more than welcome to investigate these events and their ionospheric response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We hope to see you soon at GEM!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Scheduled Presentations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 1: 03:30 pm - 05:00 pm on Monday (June 17) Foreshock Phenomena&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Drew Turner'''-Foreshock bubbles and their effects on particle acceleration and the magnetosphere-ionosphere system&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Nick Omidi'''- Mach number and cone angle dependence of SHFA formation.&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Christina Chu'''-Statistical study of HFAs-THEMIS observations&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Gabor Facsko'''-Turbulence in HFA cavities &lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Hui Zhang'''-Recent advances in HFA studies &lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Nick Omidi'''- Hybrid simulation of enhanced ion precipitation caused by an interplanetary shock&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 2: 10:30 am - 12:15 pm on Tuesday (June 18) Ground Signatures&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''David Murr''' - Overview of ground mag signatures for HFA events list on FG wiki&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Michael Hartinger''' -Magnetospheric ULF waves driven by the ion foreshock&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Evan Thomas''' -Mapping Ionospheric TOI to the Magnetopause&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Harald Frey''' (presented by Murr) - Dayside transients in the aurora as seen from the ground&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Mark Engebretson''' - EMIC waves stimulated by dayside transients&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Hyomin Kim'''-Conjugate observations of traveling convection vortices and electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves associated with transient events at the magnetopause: Initial Results from the 40-Degree Magnetic Meridian Conjugate Magnetometer Network&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Gar Bering''' - &amp;quot;Further Studies of the Relationship between Pc3 Emissions and TCV's&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Mark Engebretson''' -TCVs observed by MACCS array&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 3: 01:30 pm - 03:00 pm on Tuesday (June 18) Magnetopause Phenomena (joint with Reconnection FG)&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Brian Walsh'''-Plasmaspheric drainage plumes and reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Sunhee Lee'''-Cold ion behavior during magnetic reconnection at the magnetopause&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Rick Wilder'''-Cluster Observations of Reconnection Exhausts at the High-Latitude Magnetopause Under Extreme Density Asymmetry Conditions&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Binzheng Zhang'''- Bifurcation of soft electron precipitation under IMF By driving conditions&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Karlheinz J Trattner''' -Tracing multiple X-lines at the magnetopause&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Yaireska M. Colladovega'''- Determining the motion of FTEs on the dayside magnetopause&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Takuma Nakamura'''-Vortex induced reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Xuanye Ma'''-On the Interaction of Kelvin-Helmholtz Modes and Magnetic Reconnection for Large Magnetic Shear&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Shiva Kavosi'''- OpenGGCM Simulation of Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability observed by THEMIS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 4: 03:30 pm - 05:00 pm on Tuesday (June 18) Planning Session&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Joe Borovsky'''-The Effect of Sudden Wind Shears on the Earth’s Magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Andrey Samsonov'''-THEMIS observations of sudden impulses in the magnetosphere&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG11. Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions|Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Joe Borovsky &amp;lt;jborovsky [at] spacescience.org&amp;gt;, Jerry Goldstein, and Maria Spasojevic''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interaction'' focus group will have its final sessions at the 2013 GEM Summer Workshop in Snowmass June 16-21. Two sessions will be held on Tuesday Afternoon: one session in which plasmaspheric research findings from this last year will be reported, and one session that is a wrap-up/summary of progress made with the 5-year Focus Group. To make short contributions to either session, please contact Joe Borovsky (jborovsky [at] spacescience.org).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Scheduled Presentations====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Time: Tuesday 1:30-3:00 PM and 3:00-5:00 PM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Location: Cathedral Peak&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Wen Li -- An unusual enhancement of low-frequency plasmaspheric hiss associated with substorm injected electrons&lt;br /&gt;
# Brian Walsh -- plumes at the magnetopause&lt;br /&gt;
# Joe Borovsky -- estimates of plumes and dayside reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
# Dan Welling -- long lived plumes&lt;br /&gt;
# Vania Jordanova -- simulation results&lt;br /&gt;
# Richard Denton -- simulation of EMIC waves for the June 9-10 2001 event&lt;br /&gt;
# Konstantin Gamayunov -- model results for EMIC waves&lt;br /&gt;
# Kyungguk Min -- quiet time equatorial mass distribution&lt;br /&gt;
# Jichun Zhang -- on the &amp;quot;trunk-like&amp;quot; ion spectral feature at the inner edge of the plasma sheet&lt;br /&gt;
# Final Discussion -- Does the plasmasphere have a future?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere|Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Paul Cassak, West Virginia University &amp;lt;Paul.Cassak [at] mail.wvu.edu&amp;gt;, Homa Karimabadi, University of California, San Diego, &amp;lt;homakar [at] gmail.com&amp;gt;, Andrei Runov, University of California, Los Angeles, &amp;lt;arunov [at] igpp.ucla.edu&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would like to solicit contributions to the &amp;quot;Magnetic Reconnection &lt;br /&gt;
in the Magnetosphere&amp;quot; Focus Group sessions at the upcoming GEM meeting &lt;br /&gt;
in Snowmass, Colorado on June 16 - 21, 2013. The Focus Group goals &lt;br /&gt;
description and other information is available at&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG:_Magnetic_Reconnection_in_the_Magnetosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus summer we plan four 1.5 hr-long sessions to discuss&lt;br /&gt;
# Dayside reconnection and its relation to transient phenomena at the magnetopause and bow shock (joint with Dayside Transient FG);&lt;br /&gt;
# Magnetotail reconnection and its role in substorms, pseudo breakups, PBIs and other substorm-related phenomena (joint with Substorm Onset FG);&lt;br /&gt;
# General problems of magnetospheric reconnection. Nominally, the session activities will address Signatures of Kinetic Scale Reconnection Physics (a prelude to the launch of MMS), but contributions on any topic including onset, evolution, and consequences are welcomed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We welcome contributions based upon data analysis, simulations, and theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tentative agenda of the workshop is available at &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/2013GEM_agenda.pdf.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To follow the GEM philosophy and the informal workshop format, your &lt;br /&gt;
presentations need to be short and concise (without AGU-style &lt;br /&gt;
introductions and conclusions) in order to engender discussions. We &lt;br /&gt;
strongly suggest preparing 5 slides or less and 5 min-long &lt;br /&gt;
presentations focused strictly on the topic.  We encourage &lt;br /&gt;
presentations by graduate students and postdoctoral researchers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please submit a tentative topic of your presentation (to help us plan &lt;br /&gt;
the session) and address your questions, if any, to&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paul Cassak, West Virginia University, Paul.Cassak [at] mail.wvu.edu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Scheduled Presentations ====&lt;br /&gt;
(in alphabetical order)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm on Tuesday (June 18), joint with Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures focus group&lt;br /&gt;
# Yaireska Colladovega, determining motion of FTEs on the dayside magnetopause&lt;br /&gt;
# Shiva Kavosi, simulations of Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability observed by THEMIS&lt;br /&gt;
# Sunhee Lee, cold ion behavior during magnetic reconnection at the magnetopause&lt;br /&gt;
# Xuanye Ma, interaction of Kelvin-helmholtz and reconnection for large magnetic shear&lt;br /&gt;
# Takuma Nakamura, vortex induced reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
# Karlheinz Trattner, Tracing multiple X-lines at the magnetopause&lt;br /&gt;
# Rick Wilder, reconnection at high-latitude magnetopause with extreme density asymmetry&lt;br /&gt;
# Binzheng Zhang, soft electron precipitation bifurcations during large By driving&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10:30 am - 12:15 pm on Wednesday (June 19), joint with Substorm Expansion Onset focus group=====&lt;br /&gt;
Expected speakers&lt;br /&gt;
# Joachim Birn (w/M. Hesse), near tail reconnection: onset&lt;br /&gt;
# Joachim Birn (w/M. Hesse), near tail reconnection: energy conversion&lt;br /&gt;
# Jim Drake, structure of reconnection exhausts and dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
# Stefan Kiehas, reconnection observations with THEMIS/ARTEMIS&lt;br /&gt;
# Andrei Runov, Update on Cluster and THEMIS/ARTEMIS observations&lt;br /&gt;
# Mikhail Sitnov, magnetotail reconnection onset and dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
# Mikhail Sitnov (w/S. Merkin), magnetotail reconnection onset: kinetic vs. MHD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm and 3:30 - 5:00pm on Wednesday (June 19)&lt;br /&gt;
Expected speakers&lt;br /&gt;
# Amitava Bhattacharjee, plasmoids&lt;br /&gt;
# Joachim Birn, energetic particle fluxes &amp;amp; anisotropies at dipolarization fronts&lt;br /&gt;
# Joe Borovsky, solar wind coupling&lt;br /&gt;
# Paul Cassak, shear flow&lt;br /&gt;
# Lars Daldorff, PIC/BATS-R-US coupling&lt;br /&gt;
# John Dorelli, global Hall-MHD effects on magnetospheric convection&lt;br /&gt;
# John Dorelli, sw/ms coupling&lt;br /&gt;
# Jan Egedal, role of pressure anisotropy&lt;br /&gt;
# Stefan Eriksson, solar wind reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
# Gabor Facsko, solar wind disturbances forcing magnetotail reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
# Michael Hesse, asymmetric reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
# Colin Komar, dayside separators&lt;br /&gt;
# Yanhua Liu, counter streaming heavy ions in reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
# Kittipat Malakit, asymmetric reconnection&lt;br /&gt;
# Tai Phan, electron heating&lt;br /&gt;
# Mike Shay, electron heating&lt;br /&gt;
# Brian Walsh, plasmaspheric drainage plumes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: Radiation Belts and Wave Modeling|Radiation Belts and Wave Modeling]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Yuri Shprits &amp;lt;yshprits [at] atmos.ucla.edu&amp;gt;, Scot Elkington, Jacob Bortnik, Craig Kletzing''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The RBW focus group will have 6 sessions this year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
# Wed, Jun 19, (10:30am-12:15pm) RBW 1 -- GEM particle transport challenge&lt;br /&gt;
# Wed, Jun 19, (1:30pm-3:00pm) RBW 2 -- Dynamical modeling of the radiation belts (Preparing radiation belt models for Van Allen Probes data)&lt;br /&gt;
# Wed, Jun 19, (3:30pm-5:00pm) RBW 3 -- Wave-particle interactions (Particle scattering and transport)&lt;br /&gt;
# Thu, Jun 20, (10:30am-12:15pm) RBW 4 -- Wave excitation, propagation, and distribution (ULF)&lt;br /&gt;
# Thu, Jun 20, (1:30pm-3:00pm) RBW 5 -- Wave excitation, propagation, and distribution (VLF/ELF)&lt;br /&gt;
# Thu, Jun 20, (3:30pm-5:00pm) RBW 6 -- GEM wave challenge, overflow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can submit the title of your presentation online by following the &lt;br /&gt;
link below to reserve a time slot during each individual session. We &lt;br /&gt;
invite potential contributions and encourage to participants to limit &lt;br /&gt;
presentations to approximately 5 min.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please submit the title of your presentations by June 5th at&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://goo.gl/B7BY9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In particular, we would like to encourage modelers to participate in &lt;br /&gt;
the GEM particle modeling challenge as well as the wave modeling &lt;br /&gt;
challenge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Data and rules for the GEM challenge are given on the ViRBO web site &lt;br /&gt;
at&lt;br /&gt;
http://virbo.org/RBW#2010_RBW_Challenge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See you at GEM.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Scheduled Presentations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/images/4/43/RBWM-GEM2013.pdf Preliminary Schedule] (PDF file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5-minute presentation limits:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the large number of abstracts submitted to the Radiation Belts and Waves Focus Group, we would like to remind presenters to adhere to the 3-slide, 5-minute limit as much as possible.  We have a limited amount of time and would like to accommodate as many speakers as we can, so we are asking presenters to please be succinct (yet convey the main point of the science clearly).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma|The Ionospheric Source of Magnetospheric Plasma--Measuring, Modeling and Merging into the GEM GGCM]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Rick Chappell &amp;lt;rick.chappell [at] vanderbilt.edu&amp;gt;, Bob Schunk and Dan Welling''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would like to invite your participation in an area of research that is directed toward creating a unified model that incorporates the outflow of plasma from the ionosphere into the creation and dynamics of the important plasma regions of the magnetosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This GEM focus group has as its goal to improve the understanding of the role of the ionospheric outflow source by (1) refining outflow modeling through comparison with measurements, (2) adjusting the outflow modeling to become a compatible input to magnetospheric Geospace Global Circulation Models (GGCM), (3) comparing magnetospheric modeling results with satellite measurements and (4) examining ways in which the dynamic magnetosphere can couple back to influence the original ionospheric outflow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have planned the following four sessions for the upcoming GEM Snowmass meeting and would like for you to suggest topics that you would like to present in the sessions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 1—Observational and Modeling Mysteries—June 19, 10:30am:'''&lt;br /&gt;
	This session will be an opportunity for both modelers and experimentalists to present areas of unanswered questions in their work concerning outflow and its effects.  The goal will be to solicit discussion from the GEM Ion Outflow-MMM community regarding approaches to solving the outstanding mysteries and to initiate new collaborative research in these areas. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 2—The Magnetosphere-Ionosphere System With and Without Outflow-June 19, 1:30pm:'''&lt;br /&gt;
	This session will compare and contrast the characteristics of periods of strong outflow with periods of weak outflow in both the observational and modeling results.  A focal point of this session will be to work toward a self-consistent coupling in the merging of the ionosphere and magnetosphere models considering effects such as precipitation, currents and electric fields.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 3—General Contributions in Measurements, Modeling and Merging—June 19, 3:30pm:'''&lt;br /&gt;
	This session will cover a variety of topics related to measuring and modeling the ionospheric outflow and its effects on the magnetosphere as well as merging the ionospheric and magnetospheric models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 4—Planning Session—June 20, 10:30am:'''&lt;br /&gt;
	This will be an open discussion on the status of the focus group accomplishments in order to identify areas of research that are needed and approaches that can be initiated to drive new modeling, measurements and GGCM results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please send your topics and suggestions to Rick Chappell at rick.chappell [at] vanderbilt.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We look forward to seeing you at the GEM meeting in June.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Scheduled Presentations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(''Presentations should be planned for 10 minutes with 5 minutes of discussion'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 4-1: Observational and Modeling Mysteries—June 19, 10:30am, Salon D&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob Schunk: Neutral Polar Wind Mysteries&lt;br /&gt;
* Rick Chappell: The Low Energy Invisible Plasma Mystery&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Lotko: Issues, Challenges and Advances Required for Outflow and Magnetospheric Modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe Borovsky: The Plasma Cloak:Where It Comes From, How Often It Occurs, and Its Impact On Dayside Reconnection.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Outflow Effects on CPCP&lt;br /&gt;
* Naritoshi Kitamura: The Effect of Photoelectrons on the Polar Wind&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 4-2: The Magnetosphere-Ionosphere System With and Without Outflow—June 19, 1:30pm, Salon D&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling: Outflow versus No Outflow: Difficulties of Excluding Outflow&lt;br /&gt;
* Schunk/Abdallah: Escape of Plasma and Neutral Gas from the Earth's Upper Atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynn Kistler: Relationship Between Sawtooth Events and O+ in the Plasma Sheet&lt;br /&gt;
* Yanhua Liu: The Thickness of O+ Mediated Reconnecting Current Sheet&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer: Superthermal Electrons and MI Coupling in Modeling Ionospheric Outflow&lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Varney: The Nature of Heat Flows Into the Daylit Polar Cap Ionosphere&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 4-3: General Contributions in Measurements, Modeling and Merging—June 19, 3:30pm, Salon D&lt;br /&gt;
* Dennis Gallagher: Dynamics Explorer-1 Ion Densities and Temperatures&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Denton, Jonathan Krall, Joe Huba: SAMI3 Plasmasphere Simulations&lt;br /&gt;
* Eric Donovan: Mechanisms of Energetic Mass Ejection Xplorer (MEMEX) Mission&lt;br /&gt;
* Karimabadi Homayoun: What Can We Gain By Coupling the Ionospheric Models To 3D Global Hybrid Simulations? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 4-4: Focus Group Planning Session—June 20, 10:30am, Salon D&lt;br /&gt;
* Suggestions, mini-presentations and discussion are encouraged to guide future focus group activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG13. Modes of Solar WInd-Magnetosphere Energy Transfer|Modes of Solar WInd-Magnetosphere Energy Transfer]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: R. McPherron &amp;lt;rmcpherron [at] igpp.ucla.edu&amp;gt;, J. Kissinger &amp;lt;jenni.kissinger [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;, L. Kepko &amp;lt;larry.kepko [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Focus Group on ''Modes of Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Energy Transfer'' will hold two sessions at the 2013 workshop. These sessions are scheduled at 10:30 AM to 12:15 PM and 1:30 to 3:00 PM on Thursday June 20. The Focus Group has examined the solar wind and magnetospheric conditions leading to different types of geomagnetic activity. This will be the last meeting of this Focus Group as GEM moves to other topics. We will begin with a review of our past activities and suggestions for future work. We are soliciting presentations related to the following topics:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The occurrence of substorms as function of universal time, season, and solar cycle&lt;br /&gt;
# The properties of steady magnetospheric convection (SMC) and its relation to solar wind and prior substorm activity&lt;br /&gt;
# The occurrence and properties of sawtooth events&lt;br /&gt;
# The occurrence statistics of poleward boundary intensifications (PBI) during substorm phases and SMC&lt;br /&gt;
# A comparison of PBI and pseudo breakups&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please contact one of the organizers if you have material you wish to present. Plan for short informal presentations designed to stimulate discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Scheduled Presentations====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Location: Salon C&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 1: 10:30 am - 12:15 pm on Thursday (June 20)&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Bob McPherron''' (UCLA): Focus group objectives and accomplishments&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Suzie Imber''' (U. Leicester): The role of magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling in producing different convection modes&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Bill Lotko''' (Dartmouth): What are the implications for convection and reconnection in the magnetosphere when more flux circulates in the dusk convection cell (in the ionosphere) than the dawn cell?&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Binzheng Zhang''' (Dartmouth): How do some SMC states emerge without an initiating substorm?&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Jenni Kissinger''' (NASA Goddard): How do SMC events end?&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Xia Cai''' (Virginia Tech): Auto detection of sawtooth events&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Xiangning Chu''' (UCLA): Solar cycle variations in substorm occurrence and strength&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Session 1: 01:30 pm - 03:00 pm on Thursday (June 20)&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Joe Borovsky''' (SSI): Derived solar wind coupling functions: What they say about changes in solar wind parameters and changes in driving&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Bill Lotko''' (Dartmouth): Are ionospheric outflows required to induce sawtooth oscillations (or, what exactly is a sawtooth mode)?&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Lynn Kistler''' (UNH): O+ ion the plasma sheet during sawtooth events, isolated substorms, and storm time substorms&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Grant Stephens''' (APL): Empiricial reconstruction of storm-time steady magnetospheric convection events&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Gina DiBraccio''' (U. Michigan): Substorms seen by MESSENGER at Mercury&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Ryan McGranaghan''' (U. Colorado): Signature of the Russell-McPherron effect on thermospheric density&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Anna DeJong''' (CNU): Comparing the first tooth in an oscillation to initiating substorms of an SMC&lt;br /&gt;
*	'''Bob McPherron and Jenni Kissinger''': Future directions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: Metrics and Validation|Metrics and Validation]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Tim Guild &amp;lt;timothy.b.guild [at] aero.org&amp;gt;, Howard Singer &amp;lt;howard.singer [at] noaa.gov&amp;gt;, and Lutz Rastaetter &amp;lt;lutz.rastaetter [at] nasa.gov&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group solicits short &lt;br /&gt;
contributions to three planned sessions at the upcoming GEM meeting in &lt;br /&gt;
Snowmass, Colorado, on Thursday and Friday, June 20-21.  The session &lt;br /&gt;
descriptions are below.  If you have a topic to discuss, please send &lt;br /&gt;
us a draft title so that we can begin to put together a program; &lt;br /&gt;
however, in the spirit of GEM, participation and brief, last-minute &lt;br /&gt;
informal presentations are always welcome. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 1:'''  New Validation Results and Methods &lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit short presentations focusing on all aspects &lt;br /&gt;
of data-model comparisons.  Welcomed themes could include geospace &lt;br /&gt;
model validation using regional ground magnetometer indices, model &lt;br /&gt;
responses to dynamic magnetopause boundaries, long-term &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;climatological&amp;quot; model validation, using multi-variate metrics to &lt;br /&gt;
assess model performance, or any related contribution.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 2:''' How Validation Studies Guide Model Improvements: &lt;br /&gt;
In this session, we solicit short presentations on specific examples &lt;br /&gt;
of how discrepancies between models and observations have led to a &lt;br /&gt;
better understanding of the physics that needs to be incorporated into &lt;br /&gt;
models. Studies, or ideas, on studies involving model sensitivity to &lt;br /&gt;
inputs and various model parameters are welcome. The session will &lt;br /&gt;
include a discussion on better ways to design metrics and validation &lt;br /&gt;
studies to uncover missing physics in models. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 3:'''  Validation of MHD models Coupled with other modules such &lt;br /&gt;
as the Ring Current and Polar Outflow &lt;br /&gt;
In this session we will investigate recent advances in the development &lt;br /&gt;
of coupled models of the magnetosphere, inner magnetosphere, the &lt;br /&gt;
plasmasphere/polar wind, and the ionosphere/thermosphere.  We solicit &lt;br /&gt;
short presentations on methods to link models, validate the outputs &lt;br /&gt;
and constrain coupled model systems using observations.  Emphasis &lt;br /&gt;
should be placed on new physical processes that are described by the &lt;br /&gt;
coupled models and on effects that remain out of scope and that limit &lt;br /&gt;
the effectiveness and stability of the coupling. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for your contributions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Scheduled Presentations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(''We welcome additional contributions.'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 1''': New Validation Results and Methods&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 1:30 PM – 3:00 PM (''Chair: Tim Guild'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we solicit short presentations focusing on all aspects of data-model comparisons.  Welcomed themes could include geospace model validation using regional ground magnetometer indices, model responses to dynamic magnetopause boundaries, long-term &amp;quot;climatological&amp;quot; model validation, using multi-variate metrics to assess model performance, or any related contribution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank Toffoletto:  Initial result from LFM RCM for Oct 2012 Storm &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter and Howard Singer: dB/dt study (MHD and empirical) results / discussion&lt;br /&gt;
* Alex Glocer: Calculation of K index values from model magnetic perturbations&lt;br /&gt;
* Victoir Veibell and Bob Weigel (presented by Tim Guild): Climatological analysis of 12 months of MHD simulated ground magnetometer measurements&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabor Facsko:  GUMICS-4 verification and footprint determination using static and dynamic global MHD simulations of the ECLAT project&lt;br /&gt;
* Roxanne Katus and Michael Liemohn: Climatological Validation of the HEIDI Ring Current Model&lt;br /&gt;
* Haje Korth:  Statistical maps of TIMED/GUVI auroral emissions as a new global MHD validation data source&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These next two talks may move to the beginning of the next session (Thursday 3:30-5:00).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Josh Rigler:  Metrics derived from multi-variate statistical distributions   &lt;br /&gt;
* Asher Pembroke:  Interpolating into &amp;quot;Hard to reach places&amp;quot; of MHD volumes for more accurate DST&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 2''': How Validation Studies Guide Model Improvements&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday, 03:30 PM – 5:00 PM (''Chair: Howard Singer'') &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
In this session, we solicit short presentations on specific examples of how discrepancies between models and observations have led to a better understanding of the physics that needs to be incorporated into models. Studies, or ideas, on studies involving model sensitivity to inputs and various model parameters are welcome. The session will include a discussion on better ways to design metrics and validation studies to uncover missing physics in models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Singer: Session Intro and Comments on Ensemble Modeling&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Welling : Multi-Model Validation with the Space Weather Modeling Framework&lt;br /&gt;
* Margaret Chen: The effect of uncertain boundary conditions on ring current model validation  &lt;br /&gt;
* Andrey Samsonov: Large-scale flow vortices following a magnetospheric sudden impulse (Simulations were done with SWMF, OpenGGCM and LFM.)&lt;br /&gt;
* Slava Merkin: Lessons from MHD-AMPERE comparisons        &lt;br /&gt;
* Lutz Rastaetter: Magnetopause Challenge of 2010 and steps from there: Eents for future MP challenge&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Session 3''': Validation of MHD models coupled with other modules such as the Ring Current and Polar Outflow&lt;br /&gt;
Friday: 10:30 AM – 12:15 PM (''Chair: Lutz Rastaetter'')  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session we will investigate recent advances in the development of coupled models of the magnetosphere, inner magnetosphere, the plasmasphere/polar wind, and the ionosphere/thermosphere.  We solicit short presentations on methods to link models, validate the outputs and constrain coupled model systems using observations.  Emphasis should be placed on new physical processes that are described by the coupled models and on effects that remain out of scope and that limit the effectiveness and stability of the coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joachim Raeder (co-authors Gilson &amp;amp; Toffoletto),  OpenGGCM - RCM validations&lt;br /&gt;
* Raluca Ilie: Coupling of SWMF magnetosphere and Heidi Ring Current&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Wiltberger: Validation of MFLFM Outflow Simulations &lt;br /&gt;
* Binzheng Zhang - Validation of the Polar Cups position in the LFM simulation&lt;br /&gt;
* All: Discussion on future Metrics and Validation Activities to Support GEM goals&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have topics for discussion, please consider communicating them to the conveners before the session.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG: Storm-Time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection|Storm-Time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Joseph Baker, Stan Sazykin, Mike Ruohoniemi, Peter Chi, Mark Engebretson''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Colleagues,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This year's GEM Summer Workshop marks the initiation of a new Focus &lt;br /&gt;
Group to examine &amp;quot;Storm-Time Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection &lt;br /&gt;
(SIMIC)&amp;quot;. The SIMIC Focus Group will bring together observations and &lt;br /&gt;
modeling to examine the coupled dynamics of the inner magnetosphere &lt;br /&gt;
and ionosphere during geomagnetic storms. Recent improvements in &lt;br /&gt;
modeling and ground- and space-based instrumentation allow this topic &lt;br /&gt;
to be examined with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution and &lt;br /&gt;
coverage. Some examples of relevant parameters of interest include: &lt;br /&gt;
plasma distributions, magnetic topology, convection electric fields, &lt;br /&gt;
and current systems. More details about the SIMIC Focus Group can be &lt;br /&gt;
found at:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG:_Storm-Time_Inner_Magnetosphere-Ionosphere_Convection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We invite short presentations that highlight one or more of the &lt;br /&gt;
following themes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Improvements in self-consistent physics-based simulations of the coupled inner magnetosphere-ionosphere system during geomagnetic storms.&lt;br /&gt;
# Instrumentation which can be used to examine storm-time magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling over large spatial scales and validate the simulations (e.g. magnetometers, radars, imaging, GPS receivers, etc.)  &lt;br /&gt;
# Any other discussion topics relevant to articulating an appropriate scope and emphasis for this Focus Group. (Since this is the first year, we are open to any comments or suggestions about how to move forward most effectively.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SIMIC Focus Group will hold two sessions on Thursday afternoon and &lt;br /&gt;
Friday morning. We have deliberately scheduled the sessions for late &lt;br /&gt;
in the week to benefit those people who aim to attend both GEM and &lt;br /&gt;
CEDAR.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
If you would like to give a SIMIC presentation, please email Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
Baker (jo.baker [at] vt.edu) and Stan Sazykin (sazykin [at] rice.edu) with &lt;br /&gt;
a working title and short description of your talk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's to a great SIMIC kick-off!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Scheduled Presentations ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Time:&lt;br /&gt;
# Thursday, June 20, 03:30 - 05:00 PM&lt;br /&gt;
# Friday, June 21, 10:30 AM - 12:15 PM &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Location: Salon C&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday afternoon session (3:30--5:00 pm):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Jo Baker'' (Virginia Tech): Characteristics of SAPS seen with SuperDARN and results from conjunctions with the Van Allen Probes&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Stan Sazykin'' (Rice U.): SAPS modeling and comparison with observations&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Josh Rigler'' (USGS): ground-based magnetometer data overview&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Peter Chi'' (UCLA): update on ground-based magnetometer observations on field line resonance sounding&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Jichun Zhang'' (UNH): Observationsof ion &amp;quot;trunk structures&amp;quot; by the Van Allen probes and their modeling (needs to give it on Thursday)&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Raluca Ilie'' (U.Mich.): How do the changes in the inner magnetospheric ion composition affect the dynamics of a magnetic storm?&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Vania Jordanova'' (LANL): improvements of physics based modeling of ring current&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Gang Lu'' (HAO/NCAR): Mid- and low-latitude ionospheric plasma drift associated with  prompt penetration electric fields&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Jimmy Raeder'' (UNH): Convection, shielding, and magnetosphere inflation during storms with the coupled OpenGGCM-RCM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Friday morning session (10:30 am--12:15 pm):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Matina Gkioulidou'' (JHU/APL): RBSPICE data from recent storms&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Colby Lemon'' (Aerospace):  RCM-E simulations of ring current electrons&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Mei-Ching Fok'' (NASA Goddard): A Comprehensive Inner Magnetosphere Ionosphere (CIMI) Model&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Jian Yang'' (Rice U.): On the rate of ring current injection&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Mike Liemohn'' (U. Mich): What can current system analysis tell us about inner magnetosphere MI coupling?&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Guan Le'' (NASA Goddard): Results from C/NOFS data on ring current evolution and  asymmetry&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Shin-ichi Ohtani'' (JHU/APL): inductive electric fields in the storm-time inner magnetosphere from Cluster observations&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Naomi Maruyama'' (NOAA): Validating/improving self-consistent physics-based simulations of the coupled inner magnetosphere-ionosphere-thermosphere system during storms&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Sasha Zou'' (U. Michigan): Multi-instrument observation of the Storm Enhanced Density (SED) during Oct. 24-25, 2011 storm: implications for SED formation processes&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Jacob Bortnik'' (UCLA): SPeCIMEN program (Specification and Prediction of the Coupled Inner-Magnetospheric Environment)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[FG12. Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes|Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Conveners: Vassilis Angelopoulos &amp;lt;vassilis [at] ucla.edu&amp;gt;, Shin Ohtani &amp;lt;Shin.Ohtani [at] jhuapl.edu&amp;gt;, Kazuo Shiokawa &amp;lt;shiokawa [at] stelab.nagoya-u.ac.jp&amp;gt;, Andrei Runov &amp;lt;arunov [at] igpp.ucla.edu&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would like to invite contributions to the Substorm Expansion Onset: &lt;br /&gt;
The First 10 Minutes Focus Group at the upcoming GEM meeting in &lt;br /&gt;
Snowmass on June 16-21, 2013. The Focus Group goals and other &lt;br /&gt;
information are available at:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG12._Substorm_Expansion_Onset:_The_First_10_Minutes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For this summer we plan four 1.5 hr-long sessions to discuss&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Relative timing between onset signatures in space and on the ground&lt;br /&gt;
* The role of magnetotail reconnection (distant and near-Earth) in substorms and substorm-related processes, such as pseudo-breakups, PBIs, streamers, and other substorm-related phenomena (joint with the RX Focus Group)&lt;br /&gt;
* Substorm-related processes in the tail-dipole transition region&lt;br /&gt;
* Substorm onset mapping (joint with the Magnetic Mapping and Techniques Focus Group).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since it is the Substorm Expansion Onset Focus Group final year, we &lt;br /&gt;
plan to allocate 10 minutes of each session for the final report &lt;br /&gt;
discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The workshop agenda is available at &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/schedule.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each speaker will be allotted time for 5 minutes (3 slides) &lt;br /&gt;
presentation, in order to ensure enough time for discussion. Please &lt;br /&gt;
submit tentative titles of your presentation and/or address your &lt;br /&gt;
questions to the FG coordinators.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tguild</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>