Difference between revisions of "FG2. GGCM Modules and Methods"

From gem
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
The overarching goal of this focus group is to understand the physics of collisionless magnetic reconnection on magnetospheric length scales (hundreds of ion inertial lengths).  To this end, we have identified several broad questions:
 
The overarching goal of this focus group is to understand the physics of collisionless magnetic reconnection on magnetospheric length scales (hundreds of ion inertial lengths).  To this end, we have identified several broad questions:
  
* Can global resistive magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) codes accurately model magnetospheric reconnection?
+
* '''Q1''':Can global resistive magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) codes accurately model magnetospheric reconnection?
* How does the physics of collisionless reconnection observed in Particle-In-Cell (PIC) simulations scale up to reality?
+
* '''Q2''':How does the physics of collisionless reconnection observed in Particle-In-Cell (PIC) simulations scale up to reality?
* How do we extend resistive MHD models to model collisionless physics?
+
* '''Q3''':How do we extend resistive MHD models to model collisionless physics?

Revision as of 08:19, 31 July 2008

Contents

Co-chairs: John Dorelli (john<dot>dorelli<at>unh<dot>edu) or Michael Shay (shay<at>udel<dot>edu)

Goals

The overarching goal of this focus group is to understand the physics of collisionless magnetic reconnection on magnetospheric length scales (hundreds of ion inertial lengths). To this end, we have identified several broad questions:

  • Q1:Can global resistive magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) codes accurately model magnetospheric reconnection?
  • Q2:How does the physics of collisionless reconnection observed in Particle-In-Cell (PIC) simulations scale up to reality?
  • Q3:How do we extend resistive MHD models to model collisionless physics?