Difference between revisions of "Storm"
Vinceeccles (talk | contribs) |
Vinceeccles (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
- TEC | - TEC | ||
+ | |||
- Magnetometers | - Magnetometers | ||
+ | |||
- Incoherent Scatter Radar Ne, Te, Ti profiles | - Incoherent Scatter Radar Ne, Te, Ti profiles | ||
+ | |||
- SuperDARN line-of-sight | - SuperDARN line-of-sight | ||
+ | |||
Space-based: | Space-based: | ||
- AMPERE currents | - AMPERE currents | ||
+ | |||
- DMSP j/4 electron precipitation & cross-track drifts | - DMSP j/4 electron precipitation & cross-track drifts | ||
+ | |||
- MMS | - MMS | ||
+ | |||
- Van Allen Probes | - Van Allen Probes | ||
− | - Other satellites | + | |
+ | - Other satellites as available (Geotail, ...) | ||
+ | |||
Line 38: | Line 47: | ||
- Topside ion upflow | - Topside ion upflow | ||
+ | |||
- Ionospheric convection potential | - Ionospheric convection potential | ||
+ | |||
- Electron precipitation | - Electron precipitation | ||
− | - Vertical TEC | + | |
+ | - Vertical TEC Structuring | ||
+ | |||
- Temperature structure | - Temperature structure | ||
+ | |||
- Penetration electric fields | - Penetration electric fields | ||
+ | |||
N/S Polar Wind fields: | N/S Polar Wind fields: | ||
- 2D Ion outflow flux at 2.5 Re | - 2D Ion outflow flux at 2.5 Re | ||
+ | |||
- 2D Ion N, V, T at 2.5 Re | - 2D Ion N, V, T at 2.5 Re | ||
Line 52: | Line 68: | ||
- Calculated Dst and Ring Current | - Calculated Dst and Ring Current | ||
+ | |||
- 2D Ne, [O+], [H+], [He+] densities in equatorial plane | - 2D Ne, [O+], [H+], [He+] densities in equatorial plane | ||
+ | |||
- Van Allen Probe predictions of HOPE instrument | - Van Allen Probe predictions of HOPE instrument | ||
Revision as of 11:33, 24 February 2017
M3-I2 Community Storm Study #1
Storm #1: 2016 Mar 4-9 (64-68) KDst = -98, Kp=6.3, F10.7=96, F107A=90
We propose modeling and measuring the two quiet days prior to the storm (4,5), the day of the storm main phase (6), and two recovery days (7,8).
The choice of this storm is based on the excellent measurement support of ground-based instrumentation and the reasonable support of magnetospheric satellites (MMS, Van Allen Probes). I choosing these two recent storms to encourage other validation focus groups within NSF-GEM and NSF-CEDAR communities to join in these model-measurement studies. This invitation includes magnetosphere, inner magnetosphere, ring current, polar wind outflow, high-latitude ionosphere & electrodynamics, and the full coupled system.
The M3-I2 focus group leaders are committed to helping the GEM/CEDAR community in the collection of reduced data sets including ground-based and space-based data sets:
Ground-based:
- TEC
- Magnetometers
- Incoherent Scatter Radar Ne, Te, Ti profiles
- SuperDARN line-of-sight
Space-based:
- AMPERE currents
- DMSP j/4 electron precipitation & cross-track drifts
- MMS
- Van Allen Probes
- Other satellites as available (Geotail, ...)
The M3-I2 focus group leaders are also committed to helping the GEM/CEDAR community in the merging of models and sharing of results. We anticipate several nominal output fields but are open to new suggestions of important shared fields and benchmark results.
N/S high-latitude ionosphere fields (in order of importance to M3-I2):
- Topside ion upflow
- Ionospheric convection potential
- Electron precipitation
- Vertical TEC Structuring
- Temperature structure
- Penetration electric fields
N/S Polar Wind fields:
- 2D Ion outflow flux at 2.5 Re
- 2D Ion N, V, T at 2.5 Re
Inner Magnetosphere:
- Calculated Dst and Ring Current
- 2D Ne, [O+], [H+], [He+] densities in equatorial plane
- Van Allen Probe predictions of HOPE instrument
Magnetosphere:
- MMS predictions