Difference between revisions of "RG: Modeling Methods and Validation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Add Google Group links for resource group leads and community discussion) |
m (Add link to resource group proposal) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==Resource Group Formation== | ==Resource Group Formation== | ||
| − | Since 2005, the Metrics and Validation and Modeling Methods and Validation Focus Groups have supported modeling efforts at GEM. There was recently a grassroots movement to change the approach to have a standing committee – the Methods & Validation Resource Group | + | Since 2005, the Metrics and Validation and Modeling Methods and Validation Focus Groups have supported modeling efforts at GEM. There was recently a grassroots movement to change the approach to have a standing committee – the Methods & Validation Resource Group. A [https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1doEilkUw6KcVSVrzbK2aqafBscbdYjOb proposal] was approved by the GEM SC to play that role instead. The M&V Resource Group has four members on staggered terms of four years, with two new members selected every two years after an announcement in the GEM Messenger, usually prior to mini-GEM. |
Revision as of 12:26, 22 January 2021
Chairs
Mike Liemohn
Lutz Rastaetter
Alexa Halford
Josh Rigler
Contact:
Introduction
Resource Group Formation
Since 2005, the Metrics and Validation and Modeling Methods and Validation Focus Groups have supported modeling efforts at GEM. There was recently a grassroots movement to change the approach to have a standing committee – the Methods & Validation Resource Group. A proposal was approved by the GEM SC to play that role instead. The M&V Resource Group has four members on staggered terms of four years, with two new members selected every two years after an announcement in the GEM Messenger, usually prior to mini-GEM.
