Difference between revisions of "2010 Summer Workshop"

From gem
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(40 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Image:SilvertreeSView.jpg]]
 
[[Image:SilvertreeSView.jpg]]
  
GEM will be holding its annual summer workshop June 21-26, 2009 at the Snowmass Conference Center in Snowmass, Colorado.  Pre-registration can be made at the [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html GEM Workshop Web Site] by '''June 5, 2009''' (and online registration is open to June 14, 2009). The GEM Workshop Web Site also provides the workshop [http://www.ece.vt.edu/GEM-2009/ agenda]. 
+
GEM will be holding its annual summer workshop at the Snowmass Conference Center in Snowmass, Colorado during June 20-25, 2010A special student program will be held on Sunday, June 20.
  
The following GEM sessions are calling for presentationsPoster titles must be submitted to the workshop website no later than Friday, June 12.
+
Logistical information and workshop agenda can be found at the [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html GEM Workshop Web Site].   
  
(Note: In the e-mail addresses below the symbol @ is replaced by " [at] ".)
+
Listed below are the call for presentations by various GEM focus groups before the Workshop. (Note: In the e-mail addresses below the symbol @ is replaced by " [at] ".)
  
 
== GGCM Metrics and Validation ==
 
== GGCM Metrics and Validation ==
Line 11: Line 11:
 
''Conveners: Aaron Ridley <ridley [at] umich.edu> and Masha Kuznetsova <Maria.M.Kuznetsova [at] nasa.gov>''
 
''Conveners: Aaron Ridley <ridley [at] umich.edu> and Masha Kuznetsova <Maria.M.Kuznetsova [at] nasa.gov>''
  
The GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group would like to invite modelers to
+
A new Dst index metrics study is added to the GEM Modeling Challenge
participate in a model comparison.  The goal of this comparison is to
+
organized by the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group. Community
examine how the different models handle basic solar wind and interplanetary
+
Coordinating Modeling Center (CCMC) is supporting the Challenge.
magnetic field coupling with the magnetosphere. We invite modelers to bring
+
To participate in the Challenge please submit your model results using
simulation results in which the following conditions are simulated:
+
the web interface prior to June 1st, 2010.
  
0. Zero dipole tilt.
+
The results of the Challenge will be discussed at the GGCM Metrics and
 +
Validation Session at the GEM 2010 Summer Workshop. Joint publication
 +
by all participants is planned. For more details, go to the Challenge
 +
Web site: http://ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/support/GEM_metrics_08/
  
1. Constant Pedersen conductances in the ionosphere of 5 mho.  Zero Hall
+
Please send questions, comments and suggestions to: Masha Kuznetsova
conductance.  This condition is to simplify things, since everyone has a
+
(Maria.M.Kuznetsova[at]nasa.gov) and Aaron Ridley (ridley[at]umich.edu).
different implementation of the aurora.  We need to discuss how to do a more
 
realistic conductance, but have everyone do the same thing.  We will discuss
 
this at GEM.
 
 
 
2. Solar wind density is constant at 5/cc.  Temperature is constant at
 
100,000 K.  Vx is constant at -400 km/s, while Vy and Vz = 0.
 
 
 
3. The IMF starts at Bz=-5 nT, By=Bx=0.0.  And varies as the following:
 
 
 
yyyy  mm dd hh mm ss Bx By Bz
 
 
 
2000 03 21 00 00 00 0.0 0.0 -5.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 02 00 00 0.0 0.0 -5.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 02 10 00 0.0 0.0 -10.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 04 00 00 0.0 0.0 -10.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 04 10 00 0.0 0.0 -20.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 06 00 00 0.0 0.0 -20.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 06 10 00 0.0 0.0 -30.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 08 00 00 0.0 0.0 -30.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 08 10 00 0.0 0.0 -40.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 10 00 00 0.0 0.0 -40.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 10 10 00 0.0 0.0 -50.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 12 00 00 0.0 0.0 -50.0
 
 
 
We would like to examine:
 
 
 
1. The ionospheric potential patterns and the cross polar cap potential. 
 
Please bring plots of the CPCP versus time for the entire time period.
 
 
 
2. The mapping of currents from the ionosphere to the magnetosphere (and
 
beyond, as some see it.)
 
 
 
3. The development of the ring current. Please bring plots of Dst (if you
 
can calculate Dst).
 
 
 
4. The structure of the magnetosphere, including:
 
 
 
(a) the position of the
 
magnetopause and bow shock - please bring plots of the magnetopause location
 
and bowshock location versus time;
 
 
 
(b) the length of the tail - please bring
 
plots of the location of the last closed field-line (in the magnetosphere)
 
versus time; and
 
 
 
(c) the shape of the magnetosphere - please bring plots of
 
the magnetospheric current (Jy), plotting from X=~-100->~32; z=~-50->~50 at  
 
times just before the IMF Bz changes orientation (i.e., 1:45, 3:45, 5:45,
 
7:45, 9:45, 11:45).
 
 
 
We are more than willing to consider other models, rather than just global
 
MHD simulations. For example, empirical models could be utilized.  Ring
 
current models could also be utilized (one of the interesting issues that is
 
being discussed is whether there is saturation of the inner magnetosphere
 
when the outer magnetosphere is saturated).
 
 
 
We would also like to discuss varying different parameters, if other are
 
interested.  We will discuss this further at GEM.
 
 
 
''Aaron Ridley and Masha Kuznetsova''
 
  
 
== GGCM Modules and Methods ==
 
== GGCM Modules and Methods ==
  
''Conveners: John Dorelli <john.dorelli [at] nasa.gov>''
+
''Conveners: Brian Sullivan (bsullivan [at]artemis.sr.unh.edu); John Dorelli (john.dorelli [at] nasa.gov)and Michael Shay (shay [at] udel.edu) ''
  
The GGCM Methods and Modules Focus group would like to invite participants
+
The GGCM Methods and Modules Focus Group will hold 2 sessions at the
to two sessions to be held at the summer GEM workshop in Snowmass June 21-26.
+
upcoming GEM Summer Workshop in Snowmass (June 20-25, 2010). The
Both sessions will be held Wednesday, June 24:
+
sessions will be at 10:30 and 1:30 on Wednesday.
  
'''Session 1 (10:30 am):  What role does electron dissipation play in open
+
The overarching goal of this focus group is to understand the physics
boundary condition simulations of magnetic reconnection?'''
+
of collisionless magnetic reconnection on magnetospheric length scales
 +
(100-1000 ion inertial lengths). We invite potential contributors to
 +
participate with short presentations on the following topics:
  
In this session, we would like to continue where we left off last year,  
+
1. Scaling of reconnection with local and kinetic scale parameters in
addressing the following issues:
+
MHD, multifluid, and kinetic models.
  
1. What is the role of secondary magnetic islands?  Are they an irrelevant
+
2. Plasmoid instabilities in high Lundquist number current sheets
by-product, or do they play an essential role in determining the aspect
 
ratio of the dissipation region?
 
  
2. What limits the aspect ratio of the electron dissipation region?
+
3. Dependence (or independence) of the dayside reconnection rate on
 +
solar wind parameters.
  
3. How does the reconnection rate scale with dissipation scale parameters
+
or any other topics of interest to the focus group. This is the final
(e.g., resistivity or electron mass) in simulations (electron MHD, Hall MHD,
+
year of the GGCM Methods and Modules Focus Group. Looking forward, as
hybrid, fully kinetic)?
+
this focus group comes to an end, a major goal for this year's
 +
sessions will be to agree on a way to present the most significant
 +
results of geophysical magnetic reconnection research to the greater
 +
GEM community and to identify a few outstanding questions to address
 +
as we plan for future focus groups centered on the multi-scale physics
 +
of reconnection in the magnetosphere. A more detailed description of
 +
the objectives of this focus group can be found at
  
'''Session 2 (1:30 pm):  How do we accurately model magnetospheric reconnection
+
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG2._GGCM_Modules_and_Meth
on a global scale?'''
+
ods
  
Topics for this session include:
+
Potential Contributors are encouraged to contact Brian Sullivan
 +
(brian.sullivan [at] unh.edu) with the title of their presentation.
  
1.  How does the physics of reconnection depend on the ad hoc resistivity
+
== Plasma Entry and Transport into and within the Magnetotail (PET) ==
model used in global MHD codes?  In particular, how does reconnection scale
 
with resistivity in the high Lundquist number limit? What is the effect of
 
numerical resistivity? Can we reproduce Petschek reconnection by localizing
 
the plasma resistivity? What is the effect of current dependent resistivity?
 
  
2. How does dayside magnetopause reconnection work in global MHD codes?
+
''Conveners: Antonius Otto <ao [at] how.gi.alaska.edu>,Jay R. Johnson <jrj [at] pppl.gov>, and Simon Wing <Simon.Wing [at] jhuapl.edu>''
Is reconnection locally controlled or externally driven?  Does the Cassak-
 
Shay formula apply to the dayside magnetopause?
 
  
3.  What is the status of global Hall MHD modeling? What are the most
+
We would like to invite contributions to the PET focus group at the
robust numerical approaches? What are the new results coming from the  
+
upcoming GEM workshop in Snowmass on June 21-25, 2010.  The sessions
latest generation of global Hall MHD magnetosphere codes?
+
will be held in a workshop (NOT AGU) style in which each speaker will
 +
be allotted time for a 2-3 slides, in order to ensure enough time for
 +
discussionIn order to encourage this, at least one of the slides
 +
should deal with unresolved issues. Speakers are encouraged to end
 +
the presentation with outstanding questions rather than a summary of
 +
what has/have been accomplished. It is expected that there will be
 +
three sessions:
 +
(1) ion outflow effects on the plasma sheet;
 +
(2) Constraints on plasma sheet entry and transport; and
 +
(3) GEM challenge, northward and southward IMF.
  
4.  What is the status of other non-MHD approaches to global magnetosphere
+
All three sessions have been tentatively scheduled on Monday Jun 21
modeling (e.g., global hybrid codes)?  Are there any new ideas on the  
+
(See http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html for the definitive schedule).
horizon?
+
If you have not already done so, please send the title(s) and
 +
session(s) of your contribution(s) to us at your earliest convenience
 +
at the email addresses given above.
  
If you are interested in participating in either of these sessions, please
+
== Physical Processes in the Cusps: Plasma Transport and Energization ==
email one of the focus group co-chairs:
 
  
''john.dorelli [at] nasa.gov or brian.sullivan [at] unh.edu.''
+
''Conveners: K.J. Trattner(trattner [at] mail.spasci.com), N. Omidi (omidi [at] solanasci.com) and D. Sibeck (david.g.sibeck [at] nasa.gov)''
  
== Bow Shock Phenomena and their Magnetospheric Impacts ==
+
Presentations are solicited for the CUSP Focus Group to be held during
 +
the 2010 Summer GEM workshop in Snowmass Colorado. This is the last
 +
year of the Cusp Focus Group who's main objective is to utilize
 +
observations, modeling, and theory of the cusp and its role in
 +
particle acceleration and plasma transport. Based on the topics in
 +
earlier years and the discussions during the mini-workshop held during
 +
the 2009 Fall AGU, the Focus Group addresses the following topics:
  
''Conveners: N. Omidi <omidi [at] solanasci.com>, D. Sibeck <david.g.sibeck [at] nasa.gov>''
+
1. Plasma transport into the cusp.
  
During the 2009 GEM Summer workshop at Snowmass Colorado, a session on the
+
2. Energization of ions in diamagnetic cavities.
bow shock and its magnetospheric impacts will be held on Monday June 22nd.  
 
This marks the last year of the Bow Shock Focus Group and in addition to
 
discussion of recent observations, modeling, and theory of the bow shock and
 
related processes in the foreshock and the magnetosheath we will discuss
 
future plans. In particular, N. Omidi will provide a summary of
 
accomplishments and current status and D. Sibeck will discuss future
 
missions followed by solicitation and discussion of ideas about future
 
directions and plans.
 
  
Those who are interested and wish to show a few
+
3. Origin of waves observed in the cusp and their role in particle
relevant slides are invited to contact the conveners:
+
scattering and acceleration.
  
''omidi [at] solanasci.com, David.G.Sibeck [at] nasa.gov.''
+
4. Interaction of FTE's with the cusp.
  
For updated information please see http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html .
+
5. The source region of energetic ions and electrons observed in the
 +
cusp.
  
== Plasma Entry and Tranport into and within the Magnetotail (PET) ==
+
6. Ionospheric signatures of such processes such as Poleward Moving
 +
Auroral Forms
  
''Conveners: Antonius Otto <ao [at] how.gi.alaska.edu>, Jay R. Johnson <jrj [at] pppl.gov>, and Simon Wing <Simon.Wing [at] jhuapl.edu>''
+
It is the ultimate goal of the workshop to enhance our understanding
 +
of the cusp physics, its coupling to other parts of the system such as
 +
the bow shock, magnetopause and the ionosphere and the important role
 +
it plays in dayside transport and energization. Observational and
 +
theoretical contributions to this session are hereby solicited.
  
We would like to invite contributions to the PET focus group at the upcoming
+
Those interested in these topics are invited to attend and contribute
GEM workshop in Snowmass on June 21-26, 2009.  The sessions will be held in
+
through showing a few slides and/or participation in the discussions.
a workshop (NOT AGU) style in which each speaker will be allotted time for a
+
Information regarding hotel reservations and travel arrangements will
2-3 slides, in order to ensure enough time for discussion.  In order to
+
be posted on the GEM website (http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem) in the near
encourage this, at least one of the slides should deal with unresolved
+
future.   
issues.  Speakers are encouraged to end the presentation with outstanding
 
questions rather than a summary of what has/have been accomplished.  It is
 
expected that there will be three sessions: (1) Plasma entry into the
 
Magnetosphere; (2) Plasma transport in the plasma sheet; and (3) M-I
 
coupling and magnetotail transport.  Sessions 1 and 2 have been tentatively
 
scheduled on Jun 22 Tues afternoon while session 3 on Jun 23 Wed afternoon
 
(See http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html for the definitive schedule).  If
 
you have not already done so, please send the title(s) and session(s) of
 
your contribution(s) to us at your earliest convenience at the email
 
addresses listed below.   
 
  
'''The following lists a brief description of these three sessions.'''  
+
Those wishing to give a presentation or with questions
 +
regarding the workshop should contact the conveners:
 +
''trattner [at] mail.spasci.com, omidi [at] solanasci.com or
 +
david.g.sibeck [at] nasa.gov.''
  
''Plasma Entry into the Magnetosphere''
+
== Near Earth Magnetosphere: Plasma, Fields and Coupling ==
  
The session invites contributions on (a) morphology (plasma properties, time
+
''Conveners: Focus Group co-chairs: Sorin Zaharia <szaharia [at] lanl.gov>,''
scales, dawn dusk-asymmetry etc.) of plasma entry at the magnetospheric
+
''Stan Sazykin <sazykin [at] rice.edu> and Benoit Lavraud <Benoit.Lavraud [at] cesr.fr>''
boundaries, (b) mechanisms, models, and observation specific for northward
 
IMF, (c) mechanism and physics for southward IMF,  and (d) entry rates and
 
physics that processes the newly entering plasma (modification of
 
distribution functions, local entropy, fluxtube entropy,..)
 
  
''Plasma Transport in the Plasmasheet''
+
The Near Earth Magnetosphere: Plasma, Fields and Coupling Focus Group
 +
will hold 3 sessions at the upcoming GEM Summer Workshop in Snowmass
 +
(June 20-25, 2010).
  
This session focuses on the topics of (a) convective vs turbulent transport
+
We invite potential contributors to participate with short
for northward and southward IMF, (b) constraints to convection (entropy,
+
presentations on the following topics:
boundary conditions), (c) mapping of convection to the ionosphere,
 
observations, ionospheric influence on convection or turbulence, (d)
 
mechanisms and related observations for convection and turbulence in the  
 
plasma sheet (recovery phase, bursty bulk flows; steady magnetospheric
 
convection, etc.).
 
  
''M-I Coupling and Magnetotail Transport''
+
1). Effect of plasma on storm-time electric and magnetic fields
  
The session invites contributions on (a) the morphology of ion outflow
+
2). Plasma sheet effect on ring current dynamics
(Fluxes, outflow locations, concentrations and distribution in the plasma
 
sheet), (b) time scales of ion outflow, (c) solar wind dependence, (d)
 
heating of the cold ionospheric material, (e) ionospheric influence on  
 
transport in the magnetosphere.
 
  
== Dayside Magnetopause Reconnection ==
+
3). Electric fields in the near-Earth magnetosphere (potential and inductive)
  
''Conveners: Jean Berchem <jberchem [at] igpp.ucla.edu>, Nick Omidi <omidi [at] solanasci.com>''
+
4). Coupling of physics-based inner magnetosphere with global magnetosphere models
  
We are soliciting contributions to the Dayside Magnetopause Reconnection
+
or any other topics of interest to the focus group. It is the ultimate
session that will be held at the upcoming GEM workshop in Snowmass on June
+
goal of the focus group to improve physical knowledge and modeling of
21-26, 2009.
+
the near-Earth (closer than 10 RE) magnetosphere and its coupling with
 +
the outer magnetosphere; a more detailed description of the focus
 +
group objectives can be found at
  
The session will bring together people interested in the occurrence of
+
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG8._Near_Earth_Magnetosphere:_plasma%2C_fields%2C_and_coupling
magnetic reconnection at the dayside magnetopause. Given the wide range of
 
scales involved in reconnection processes, the discussion will address both
 
local and global aspects through a variety of modeling techniques including
 
full particle, hybrid, multi-fluid and MHD simulations, as well as in-situ
 
and ground-based observations. Our main goals this year will be to summarize
 
recent progress and to focus on outstanding questions. Since the session
 
will be held in a workshop style, each speaker is encouraged to present only
 
a few slides to ensure enough time for discussion.  
 
  
To facilitate scheduling, please send us a tentative title for your
+
Potential contributors are encouraged to contact Sorin Zaharia
contribution at your earliest convenience.
+
(szaharia at lanl.gov) with the title of their presentation.
  
''Jean Berchem and Nick Omidi''
+
== Space Radiation Climatology ==
 
 
== Physical Processes in the Cusps: Plasma Transport and Energization ==
 
  
''Conveners: K.J. Trattner, N. Omidi and D. Sibeck''
+
''Conveners: Paul O'Brien (paul.obrien [at] aero.org);Geoff Reeves (reeves [at] lanl.gov), Bob Weigel (rweigel-at-gmu.edu), and Reiner Friedel (friedel-at-lanl.gov)''
  
During the 2009 Summer GEM workshop in Snowmass Colorado, a number of
 
sessions on the physical processes in the cusp will be held. The main
 
objective of these sessions is to utilize observations, modeling, and theory
 
of the cusp and its role in particle acceleration and plasma transport to
 
assess the current status of the field and forge collaborative efforts
 
towards addressing outstanding issues in the future. Based on the topics in
 
earlier years and the discussions during the mini-workshop held during the
 
2008 Fall AGU, we plan to focus on the following topics:
 
  
1. Plasma transport into the cusp.
+
It's almost time for the GEM Summer Workshop, joint with CEDAR. The
 +
Space Radiation Climatology Focus Group (FG9) will meet for three
 +
breakout sessions: two on Thursday June 24th: 1:30-3:30 and 3:30-5,
 +
and one on Friday, the 25th, 10:30-12:15. We will be discussing the
 +
past year's results in reanalysis, data assimilation, climatology
 +
models, and long-term data/analysis. One of our sessions (the first
 +
one) will be joint with the new radiation belt focus group.
  
2. Energization of ions in diamagnetic cavities.
+
We already have a number of exciting talks lined up, but there's
 +
plenty of room for more. We encourage interested parties to send talk
 +
ideas to Paul O'Brien, Bob Weigel, and/or Reiner Friedel (Geoff will
 +
not be able to attend this year). If you are presenting an FG9-related
 +
poster, please sign up for the **Thursday** Poster Session and
 +
advertise on the Wiki. http://www.virbo.org/GEM_FG9_2010
  
3. Origin of waves observed in the cusp and their role in particle scattering and acceleration.
+
To view the FG9 email archive or to join the email group, go to
 +
http://groups.google.com/group/gem-2007-space-radiation-climatology-fg9
  
4. Interaction of FTE's with the cusp.
+
== Diffuse Auroral Precipitation ==
  
5. The source region of energetic ions and electrons observed in the cusp.
+
''Conveners: Richard Thorne <rmt [at] atmos.ucla.edu>''
  
6. Ionospheric signatures of such processes such as Poleward Moving Auroral Forms
+
The Diffuse Aurora Focus Group plans to hold 4 breakout sessions at
 +
the 2010 GEM meeting in Snowmass this summer. Potential contributors
 +
are invited to contact the session chairs listed below with a title of
 +
their talk, and prepare a brief presentation for the workshop.
  
It is the ultimate goal of the workshop to enhance our understanding of the
+
'''1. Relationship between auroral phenomenology and scattering mechanisms'''
cusp physics, its coupling to other parts of the system such as the bow
+
[Co-chairs, Binbin Ni (bbni[at}atmos.ucla.edu)
shock, magnetopause and the ionosphere and the important role it plays in
+
and Robert Michell (rmichell[at]swri.edu)]
dayside transport and energization. Observational and theoretical
 
contributions to this session are hereby solicited.
 
  
Those interested in these topics are invited to attend and contribute
+
*Monday June 21: 10:30-12:15:  
through showing a few slides and/or participation in the discussions. 
 
Information regarding hotel reservations and travel arrangements will be
 
posted on the GEM website (http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem) in the near future. 
 
Those wishing to give a presentation or with questions regarding the
 
workshop should contact the conveners:
 
  
''trattner [at] mail.spasci.com, omidi [at]solanasci.com or david.g.sibeck [at] nasa.gov.
+
'''2. Modulation of DA brightness by large-scale magnetospheric processes.'''
''
+
[Co-chairs, Marilia Samara
 +
(marilia.samara[at]swri.org) and Jacob Bortnik (jbortnik[at]gmail.com )]
  
== Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling, Electrodynamics and Transport (MICET) ==
+
*Monday June 21: 1:3-3:00:
  
== Near Earth Magnetosphere: Plasma, Fields and Coupling ==
+
'''3. Spatial and temporal extent and spatio-temporal occurrence of DA/scattering mechanisms'''
 +
[Co-chairs, Toshi Nishimura
 +
(toshi[at]atmos.ucla.edu) and Richard Thorne (rmt[at]atmos.ucla.edu)]
  
Conveners: Focus Group co-chairs: Sorin Zaharia <szaharia [at] lanl.gov>,
+
*Monday June 21: 3:30-5:00:  
Stan Sazykin <sazykin [at] rice.edu> and Benoit Lavraud <Benoit.Lavraud [at] cesr.fr>
 
 
We would like to invite potential contributors to the Near Earth
 
Magnetosphere: Plasma, Fields and Coupling Focus Group at the upcoming GEM
 
Summer Workshop in Snowmass (June 21-26, 2009) to participate with modeling,
 
theoretical and observational studies related to the topics below. Our focus
 
group will have 3 breakout sessions on June 24 (Wed.) (for the full schedule
 
of the workshop see http://www.ece.vt.edu/GEM-2009).
 
 
(1) Better observational knowledge/empirical models of fields and particles
 
relevant to the near-Earth magnetosphere (including plasma sheet models to
 
be used as input for near-Earth magnetosphere models); studies related to
 
better knowledge of the electric fields (convection and induced) are
 
particularly encouraged.
 
 
(2) Improvements in physics-based modeling, including coupling between
 
different elements in the models (plasma, electric and magnetic fields), as
 
well as inner-outer magnetosphere coupling; studies that address the effect
 
of the above coupling on the inner magnetosphere structure/dynamics,
 
including potential improvement of consistency with observations. A
 
significant part of this session will be devoted to presentations of results
 
related to the Near-Earth Magnetosphere Modeling Challenge. A description of
 
the Challenge can also be found at the Wiki address above.
 
 
Potential contributors are urged to contact the conveners indicating their
 
interest in participating. The sessions will be held workshop-style, with
 
contributers encouraged to limit their number of slides to maximum 5. Please
 
send the title of your contribution to us at the email addresses above.
 
 
Besides the 2 sessions dedicated to the topics above, a 3rd session will be
 
devoted to refining the direction of the focus group in the future;
 
community input is both welcome and appreciated. It is the ultimate goal of
 
the focus group to improve physical knowledge and modeling of the near-Earth
 
(< 10 RE) magnetosphere and its coupling with the outer magnetosphere. An
 
outline of the major topics of interest of the focus group can be found at:
 
 
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG8._Near_Earth_Magnetosphere:_plasma%2C_fields%2C_and_coupling
 
  
== Space Radiation Climatology ==
+
'''4. Importance of the DA for Geospace at the system level. Plans for next year.'''
 +
[Chair, Richard Thorne (rmt[at]atmos.ucla.edu)]
  
== Diffuse Auroral Precipitation ==
+
*Tuesday June 22: 10:30-12:15:
  
Conveners: Richard Thorne <rmt [at] atmos.ucla.edu>
+
== Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions (PMI) ==
 
There will be four separate breakout sessions devoted to the Diffuse Auroral
 
Precipitation Focus Group at the 2009 GEM workshop.
 
  
'''Session 1'''
+
''Conveners: From: Jerry Goldstein <jgoldstein [at] swri.edu> and Maria Spasojevic <mariaspasojevic [at] stanford.edu>''
  
Tu, 23 June, 1:30 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.
+
The Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions (PMI) focus group will
 +
hold several sessions at the 2010 GEM Workshop, during 20-25 June 2010.
  
DAP 1:   " Understanding Diffuse Auroral Structure "
+
We invite short presentations (several slides) related to any of the
 +
PMI's broad topics:
  
Co-chaired by Marilla Samara (msamara [at] swri.edu) and Robert Michell
+
+  Wave-Particle Interactions
(rmichell [at] swri.edu).
 
  
We invite contributions relating to the wide range of observable auroral
+
+  Plume Dynamics & Recirculation
structures and their classification. Diffuse aurora contains a wide range of
 
structures including the most fine scale features. However, the mechanisms
 
causing structure in aurora, whether discrete or diffuse, need to be defined
 
within a larger theoretical understanding, which requires consistency in
 
verification resulting from observations of all types of structures.
 
  
Therefore, we would like to broaden the discussion to include more than what
+
+  Plasma Density Structure & Evolution.
is often deemed to be diffuse auroral structure. A main re-occurring theme
 
is the confusion on what is actually termed diffuse aurora and most
 
importantly how to recognize it in optical data.
 
  
Topics for discussion will include:
+
Specific topics of interest:
 +
*  Dynamics of energetic particles
 +
*  Wave theory and observations
 +
*  Simulations or models of acceleration or loss
 +
*  Morphology and dynamics of cold plasma density
 +
*  Global circulation of plasmaspheric plumes
 +
*  Dayside distribution of cold plasma ions
 +
*  Fine scale plasma structure and flow turbulence.
 +
*  Plume plasma and magnetospheric reconnection.
  
1. Variety of auroral structure (and characteristics) observed to date with
+
or any other topic you feel would be of interest to the PMI focus
ground imagers, satellite-borne imagers and their counterparts in the in
+
group.
situ particle measurements.
 
  
2. Working definition of diffuse aurora: Historical context and observations.
+
If you would like to present, please e-mail your tentative title/topic
Is it ever really structureless?
+
to:
  
3. Current knowledge of what these diffuse auroral structures tell us about
+
JGoldstein [at] swri.edu.
in situ and wave scattering processes (connection to the other 2 sessions).  
 
What future measurements and models will add to the current understanding?
 
  
Input on how to further shape this session is welcome and encouraged.
+
== Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes ==
  
 +
''Conveners: Vassilis Angelopoulos  (Vassilis[at] ucla.edu); Kazuo Shiokawa (Shiokawa [at] stelab.nagoya-u.ac.jp) ; Andrei Runov (arunov [at] igpp.ucla.edu)  and Shin Ohtani  (Ohtani [at] jhuapl.edu)''
  
'''Session 2'''
+
Our focus group, "Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes",
 +
will have 4 sessions at the upcoming GEM Workshop in Snowmass (June
 +
20-25, 2010).  They are scheduled on June 24 (Thu) and 25 (Fri). 
  
Tu, 23 June, 3:30 - 5:00 p.m.
+
We have four topical areas identified, which are:
  
DAP 2: "The Relationship Between Diffuse Aurora and the Dynamics and Structure of the Magnetosphere"
+
1. Onset timing: observations/theory/simulations (Angelopoulos)
  
Co-chaired by Eric Donovan (edonovan [at] ucalgary.ca) Marilia Samara and Robert Mitchell
+
2. How do onset signatures propagate to near Earth and to the ground?
 +
(Runov)
  
A number of different types of aurora are classified as diffuse. These
+
3. Ground-space mapping of physical processes before/during/after
aurora are caused by a number of distinct precipitation mechanisms which
+
onset (Ohtani)
sometimes overlap in space. Unlike discrete aurora, in most instances
 
diffuse aurora is a more or less direct consequence of a process or
 
processes in the magnetosphere, and so temporal variations of and
 
spatial gradients in brightness are thought to convey significant
 
information about those magnetospheric processes. Further, diffuse
 
auroral precipitation plays some role in the loss of magnetospheric
 
particles and in carrying large- and possibly small-scale currents, and
 
so the diffuse aurora is important in the system-level behavior of
 
geospace.
 
  
In this session we will be exploring the use of diffuse aurora to remote
+
4. Substorm processes near transition between stretched and dipole
sense magnetospheric dynamics, and the role of diffuse aurora in those
+
field lines (Shiokawa)
dynamics. We encourage contributions about (1) the physical meaning (in
 
terms of magnetospheric dynamics and topology) of diffuse auroral
 
boundaries and their temporal evolution, variations in brightness, as
 
well as (2) the importance of diffuse aurora in carrying large-scale
 
currents and magnetospheric particle loss. We encourage presentations
 
based on observational and theoretical/modelling work. We are hoping for
 
presentations describing work that utilizes coordinated ground-based
 
(ASIs, induction coil & fluxgate magnetometers, riometers, ISRs, etc)
 
and in situ (THEMIS, FAST, Polar, Geotail, LANL, etc) observations.
 
  
Topics for discussion will include
+
We would like to invite you to participate, and if you have any
 +
request or question, please contact the person of the topical area of
 +
your interest, whose name is in the parentheses for each topic.
  
1. How is the motion of diffuse auroral structures related to
+
The description of our focus group is posted at:
magnetospheric convection?
+
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG12._Substorm_Expansion_Onset:_The_First_10_Minutes
  
2. The poleward boundary of the diffuse “redline” aurora has been widely
+
== Modes of Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Energy Transfer ==
used as a proxy for the open-closed field line boundary. In terms of the
 
magnetosphere, what does the equatorward boundary of the redline aurora
 
correspond to?
 
  
3. What is the "state of the art" in terms of using intensity ratios to
+
''Convener: Larry Kepko (larry.kepko [at] unh.edu) and Bob McPherron (rmcpherron [at] igpp.ucla.edu)''
infer characteristics of precipitating particles?
 
  
4. What is the instantaneous spatial extent of different types of
 
diffuse aurora?
 
  
5. How do large-scale processes (eg., solar wind pressure pulses, ULF
+
The Modes of Magnetospheric Response focus group will hold three
waves including Pi2s, etc) modulate diffuse auroral brightness?
+
sessions at the upcoming GEM Workshop (June 20-25) in Snowmass, CO,
 +
covering the following topics:
  
6. How do diffuse aurora of different types relate to currents?
+
1. Dayside observations during sawtooth events, the role of polar cap
 +
saturation, and implications for the magnetospheric response.
 +
Specifically, are particle injections on the dayside dispersionless or
 +
dispersive? Can sawtooth observations be understood as substorms that
 +
penetrate deep into the inner magnetosphere, or do sawtooth represent
 +
a fundamentally different state of the magnetosphere? We particularly
 +
encourage participants to bring data that addresses the issue of
 +
dayside injection and/or dipolarization.
  
7. How do diffuse aurora of different relate to magnetospheric particle
+
2. Non-linear coupling and the role of pre-conditioning in determining
loss?
+
the response mode. Example topics and questions include: Systematic
 +
errors in activity indices; Seasonal effects on coupling functions;
 +
mass-loading effects on convection; The storm/substorm/SMC
 +
relationship.
  
 +
3. Magnetospheric response and solar wind energy transfer during the
 +
extreme solar minimum.
  
 +
This focus group has as its aim the improvement of knowledge of the
 +
physical mechanisms that provide different dynamical modes of response
 +
of the magnetotail to the solar wind. These include substorms, steady
 +
magnetospheric convection, sawtooth injection events, pseudo breakups,
 +
and poleward boundary intensifications. A complete description of the
 +
FG and its goals can be found at http://bit.ly/beGmTF
  
'''Session 3'''
+
'''Schedule Change'''
  
Wed, 24 June, 10:30 a.m. - 12:15 p.m.
+
To minimize overlap with the "First 10 Minutes" focus group the "Modes of Magnetospheric Response" has been moved to the following dates and times:
  
DAP 3 "Modeling Electron Scattering Rates by ECH waves and Chorus"
+
Wednesday 6/23, 10:30 am - 12:15 pm, and 3:30-5:00 pm
 +
Thursday 6/24, 10:30 am - 12:15 pm
  
Co-chaired by Richard Thorne  (rmt [at] atmos.ucla.edu) and Binbin Ni
+
Please contact us if you are interested in presenting in one of the sessions [''Larry Kepko (larry.kepko [at] unh.edu) and Bob McPherron (rmcpherron [at] igpp.ucla.edu)'']:
(bbni [at] atmos.ucla.edu).
 
  
This session will examine the global morphology, spectral properties, and  
+
1. Dayside observations during sawtooth events, the role of polar cap saturation, and implications for the magnetospheric response. Specifically, are particle injections on the dayside dispersionless or dispersive? Can sawtooth observations be understood as substorms that penetrate deep into the inner magnetosphere, or do sawtooth represent a fundamentally different state of the magnetosphere? We particularly encourage participants to bring data that addresses the issue of dayside injection and/or dipolarization.
variability of two classes of magnetospheric plasma waves, electrostatic
 
electron cyclotron harmonic (ECH) and electromagnetic whistler mode chorus
 
plasma waves, which are capable of scattering plasma sheet electrons,  
 
leading to diffuse auroral precipitation. Theoretical calculations of pitch-
 
angle scattering rates from each class of wave will be presented to assess
 
their potential contribution to the global pattern of diffuse auroral
 
precipitation.  
 
  
 +
2. Non-linear coupling and the role of pre-conditioning in determining the response mode. Example topics and questions include: Systematic errors in activity indices; Seasonal effects on coupling functions; mass-loading effects on convection; The storm/substorm/SMC relationship.
  
'''Session 4'''
+
3. Magnetospheric response, state of the magnetosphere, and solar wind energy transfer during the extreme solar minimum.
  
Wed, 24 June, 1:30 – 5:00 p.m.
+
== Magnetosheath Studies ==
  
DAP 4: "Required Inputs for Global Modeling: Plans for 2009-2010
+
''Convener: Steven Petrinec (steve.petrinec [at] gmail.com) and Katariina Nykyri (nykyrik [at] erau.edu)''
Activities"
 
  
Co-chaired by Margaret Chen (Margaret.W.Chen [at] aero.org) and Richard Thorne
+
Magnetosheath focus group will hold sessions at the next GEM workshop
(rmt [at] atmos.ucla.edu)
+
on 21-25th of June, 2010 in Snowmass Village Colorado. We invite short
 +
presentations related to any of the focus group topics.
  
In this session we will discuss how data and theoretical scattering rates
+
The Primary Objectives and Expected Activities of the FG:
can best be implemented in future models of the global distribution of
 
diffuse auroral precipitation. We will also outline plans and objectives for
 
the next year of the campaign.
 
  
 +
1. To produce more comprehensive models of large scale magnetosheath
 +
flow and field patterns, and geometry of the magnetosheath region
  
Anyone interested in contributing to any of these sessions is encouraged to
+
2. To improve understanding of magnetosheath plasma instabilities and
contact the relevant session chairs.
+
wave particle interactions: Spatial distribution and characteristics
  
== Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions ==
+
3. To develop a better understanding of the effects on magnetospheric
 +
dynamics due to processes occurring in the magnetosheath and due to
 +
characteristic magnetosheath properties.
  
Conveners: From: Jerry Goldstein <jgoldstein [at] swri.edu> and Maria Spasojevic <mariaspasojevic [at] stanford.edu>
+
The focus group proposal with specific science questions can be found
 +
at
 +
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/GEM_FG_MSheath_proposal.pdf.
  
The 2009 GEM workshop will feature FIVE sessions for the Focus Group
+
We especially encourage data-analysts utilizing in-situ spacecraft
"Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions" (PMI). This focus group seeks to  
+
measurements from Themis and Cluster missions, theoretical modelers,
improve our understanding of the two-way coupling between the plasmasphere
+
global and local modelers to participate in this workshop and present
and magnetosphere.  The PMI Focus Group website can be reached here:
+
your findings. We also encourage presentations of studies of
http://tinyurl.com/pmiFGwiki
+
magnetosheaths around other solar system bodies, as they relate to the
 +
terrestrial magnetosheath.
  
Anyone interested in participating or contributing is encouraged to email
+
See GEM website for further details: http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/
Jerry Goldstein (jgoldstein [at] swri.edu) or Maria Spasojevic
 
(mariaspasojevic [at] stanford.edu).
 
  
'''The five (5) PMI sessions to be held at the upcoming 2009 GEM:'''
+
== Radiation-Belt and Waves Modeling (RBWM) ==
  
''MON 22 JUN: 10:30am - 12:15pm PMI Breakout 1A:''
+
''Conveners: Yuri Shprits, UCLA (yshprits [at] atmos.ucla.edu); Scot Elkington, LASP (Scot.Elkington [at] lasp.colorado.edu); Jacob Bortnik, UCLA (jbortnik [at] atmos.ucla.edu);Craig Kletzing, U. Iowa (craig-kletzing [at] uiowa.edu)''
  
"Wave Growth and Propagation"
+
The Radiation-Belt and Waves Modeling (RBWM) focus group will
 +
hold several sessions at the 2010 GEM Workshop, during 20-25 June 2010.
  
''MON 22 JUN: 1:30 - 3:00pm PMI Breakout 1B:''
+
We invite short presentations (several slides) related to any of
 +
RBWM's broad topics:
  
"Plasma Influence on Wave Particle Interactions"
+
- Wave excitation, propagation and distribution (ULF, VLF, etc.)
  
''MON 22 JUN: 3:30 - 5:00pm PMI Breakout 2:''
+
- Dynamical modeling of the radiation belts (acceleration, loss, etc.)
  
"Plume Transport, Evolution, and Influence"
+
- Wave-particle interactions (linear, nonlinear, non-resonant)
  
''TUE 23 JUN: 10:30am - 12:15pm PMI Breakout 3:''
+
The RBWM focus group kicks off this year, and aims to achieve a first-
 +
principles understanding of the coupled dynamic variability of the
 +
radiation-belts, and the wave environment that controls it. A few
 +
sample questions that are of particular interest to this focus group
 +
are:
  
"Plasma Density Structure and Evolution"
+
- what are the physical processes responsible for wave excitation?
  
''THU 25 JUN: 3:30 - 5:00pm Joint PMI-CEDAR session:''
+
- what are the spatiotemporal distributions of various plasma waves
 +
and what are their relative roles in producing acceleration/loss?
  
"Plasmasphere, Magnetosphere, Ionosphere:  Overall System Response"
+
- what are the roles of linear, nonlinear, and non-diffusive wave-
 +
particle interactions in RB dynamics?
  
More complete descriptions of these sessions are listed below under "SESSION
+
- what are the quantitative effects of transport via interactions with
DESCRIPTIONS".
+
ULF waves?
  
Interested in participating or contributing? Contact:
+
- what is the role of the seed population in radiation belt dynamics?
  
Jerry Goldstein (jgoldstein [at] swri.edu)
+
- why do some storms produce flux increases, decreases, or no
Maria Spasojevic (mariaspasojevic [at] stanford.edu).
+
variation?
  
'''SESSION DESCRIPTIONS'''
+
If you would like to learn more about this focus group, or submit a
 +
presentation, please use the following resources:
  
MON 22 JUN: 10:30am - 12:15pm PMI Breakout 1A: "Wave Growth and
+
Wiki page
Propagation"
+
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG:_Radiation_Belts_and_Wave_Modeling
  
''How does the evolving global distribution of cold plasma govern the growth
+
We look forward to your participation
and propagation of waves that control energetic particle distributions &
 
dynamics?''
 
  
This session focuses on the influence of ambient plasma upon how waves are
+
'''Radiation Belts and Wave Modeling (RBWM) session description:'''
produced, and how they propagateTo be examined are the conditions for
+
growth and propagation of various waves including EMIC, whistlers (hiss,
+
We will have 6 sessions this year: You can submit the title of your presentation online by following the link below to reserve a time slot during each individual session. We invite potential contributions and encourage to limit presentations to approximately 5 min.  
chorus), ULF, especially the influence of ambient plasma properties (such
+
   
as density, composition, and spatial  structure on various scale sizes).
+
http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?hl=en&formkey=dEhELVhvSXg5VS1HQmd3dzhCY3BaMGc6MQ
 +
 +
   
 +
''Tues PM 1: RBWM 1 -- Dynamical modeling of the radiation belts (Model development, verification, validation) (Scot Elkington and Yuri Shprits)''
  
 +
During this session we will discuss the development of new and improvement of existing models of particle transport, scattering, and acceleration in the radiation belts.  We will discuss future plans for model inter-comparison and for comparison of models with observations.
  
MON 22 JUN: 1:30 - 3:00pm PMI Breakout 1B: "Plasma Influence on Wave
+
Particle Interactions"
+
''Tues PM 2: RBWM 2 -- Dynamical modeling of the radiation belts (Preparing Radiation Belt models for RBSP data) (Scot Elkington and Yuri Shprits)''
 
+
''How do ambient plasma properties such as temperature, density, and  
+
During this session we will concentrate on comparing model results with observations from RBSP and other missions such as ORBITALS, ERG, and BARREL.  
composition influence wave particle interactions?''
 
 
 
This session focuses on how ambient plasma influences the waves-particle
 
interactions themselves, examining how various plasma properties (such as  
 
density, composition, and spatial structure on various scale sizes) help
 
govern the effectiveness of various waves in changing the energy or pitch
 
angle of energetic particles.
 
  
 +
 +
''Wed AM 2: RBWM 3 -- Wave-particle interactions (Particle scattering and transport) (Scot Elkington and Yuri Shprits)''
 +
         
 +
We will discuss quasi-liner and non-liner pitch-angle, energy, and radial scattering and will discuss other potentially important acceleration and loss mechanisms operating in the radiation belts.
  
MON 22 JUN: 3:30 - 5:00pm PMI Breakout 2:
 
"Plume Transport, Evolution, and Influence"
 
  
''How is eroded plasmaspheric material transported, how does it evolve and  
+
''Wed PM 1: RBWM 4 -- Wave excitation, propagation, and distribution (ULF) (Jacob Bortnik and Craig Kletzing)''
influence reconnection?''
+
         
 +
We will discuss excitation, propagation and distribution of ULF waves. We would like to invite contributions concerning modeling and observations.
  
This session will examine the formation, dynamics, and fate of
+
 
plasmaspheric  plume plasma.  Specific topics to be addressed include (but
+
''Wed PM 2: RBWM 5 -- Wave excitation, propagation and distribution (VLF) (Jacob Bortnik and Craig Kletzing)''
are not limited to):  observation or modeling of cold, dense plasma mixed
 
with magnetospheric plasma, plume plasma at reconnection sites or on open
 
field lines, recirculation or redistribution of cold, dense plasma into the
 
cusp and plasmasheet.
 
  
 +
We will discuss excitation, propagation and distribution of VLF waves. We would like to invite contributions concerning modeling and observations.
  
TUE 23 JUN: 10:30am - 12:15pm PMI Breakout 3:
+
 
"Plasma Density Structure and Evolution"
+
''Thur AM 2: RBWM 6 -- Planning session (Jacob Bortnik, Scot Elkington, Craig Kletzing, and Yuri Shprits)''
  
''How do various plasma density structures originate and evolve during various
+
We will discuss future plans of model development, validation, and verification. We will discuss potential future GEM challenges and will outline a plan for future GEM meetings.
phases of geomagnetic activity?''
 
  
This session will focus upon outstanding questions about the dynamics of
+
== Dayside FACs and Energy Deposition--Dayside FED ==
density structures in the plasmaspheric.  Potential topics to be covered
 
include, plume, fine structure & turbulence, plasma instabilities, refilling,
 
ionosphere-thermosphere-plasmasphere interactions, and subcorotation.
 
  
 +
''Delores Knipp (delores.knipp [at] gmail.com); Stefan Eriksson (eriksson [a]t lasp.colorado.edu), Geoff Crowley (gcrowley [at] astraspace.net), Ramon Lopez (rlopez [at] uta.edu)''
  
THU 25 JUN: 3:30 - 5:00pm; Joint PMI-CEDAR session:
+
We would like to invite contributions to the Dayside FAC and Energy
 +
Deposition (FED) focus group at the upcoming GEM workshop in Snowmass
 +
on June 21-25, 2010.  This new focus group is organizing to explain
 +
the relation between enhanced dayside Poynting flux and field-aligned
 +
currents, sources of field-aligned currents in the solar wind and
 +
magnetosphere and their impacts in the ionosphere-thermosphere system.
 +
The GF goals and other information are at:
  
"Plasmasphere, Magnetosphere, Ionosphere: Overall System Response"
+
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG:_Dayside_FACs_and_Energy_Deposition
  
''How do PMI processes influence the overall system response to storms?''
+
The FED focus group will hold two sessions at the upcoming GEM
 +
Workshop (June 20-25) in Snowmass, covering data, theory, modeling
 +
aspects of the following topics:
  
This session will investigate the effects of redistribution of thermal ions
+
- Dayside Poynting Flux, Joule Heating and Their Relation to Field Aligned Currents
(ionospheric and plasmaspheric) on the stormtime response of the overall
 
magnetospheric system.  The goal is to develop our understanding of the
 
interaction among components of the larger system.
 
  
Contact:
+
- Particle Energy Deposition on the Dayside
Jerry Goldstein (jgoldstein [at] swri.edu), Maria Spasojevic
 
(mariaspasojevic [at] stanford.edu).
 
  
== Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes ==
+
- Dissipation of Magnetospheric Energy in the Dayside Thermosphere
  
This is the 1st announcement of the focus group "Expansion Onset: The First
+
- Thermospheric Density Enhancements and Traveling Atmo/Iono- spheric Disturbances
10 Minutes" for the upcoming GEM workshop in Snowmass (June 21-26, 2009;
 
http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html).
 
  
We will have 4 breakout sessions on
+
- Solar Wind Drivers for Extreme Dayside Poynting Flux Events
June 25 (Thu) and 26(Fri) (for the current schedule of the overall workshop
 
see http://www.ece.vt.edu/GEM-2009).
 
  
Following are four topics and primary questions we will discuss this year.
+
We will discuss the types of NSF GEM investigations to bring this
 +
forward toward a conclusion by 2012.
  
1) Onset Timing
+
The sessions will be held in a workshop (NOT AGU) style in which each
What is the time sequence of onset-related phenomena observed in space and
+
speaker will be allotted time for a 3-4 slides, in order to ensure
on the ground, and what are the implications for substorm initiation?
+
enough time for discussion.  At least one of the slides should deal
 +
with unresolved issues.  Speakers are encouraged to end their
 +
presentation with outstanding questions that could provide a basis for
 +
a session at next year's joint GEM-CEDAR meeting.
  
2) M-I Coupling
+
Both sessions have been tentatively scheduled on Monday Jun 21
How does aurora evolve around substorm onsets?  How are magnetospheric and  
+
(See http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html for the definitive schedule).
ionospheric onset signatures connected in terms of auroral precipitation and
+
If you have not already done so, please send the title(s) and
currents, and what can we learn about substorm initiation from simultaneous
+
session(s) of your contribution(s) to us at your earliest convenience
ground-satellite observations?
+
at the email addresses listed below.
  
3) Onset Signature Propagation
+
Delores Knipp (delores.knipp [at] gmail.com)
How do onset-related signatures propagate in the magnetosphere?  How does
 
the uncertainty of propagation time affect our understanding of substorm
 
initiation?
 
  
4) Mapping
+
Stefan Eriksson (eriksson [a]t lasp.colorado.edu)
How does the presence and evolution of pre-onset and expansion-phase current
 
systems affect the link between auroral and plasma sheet locations and
 
processes?
 
 
 
Sessions will be scheduled based on responses to this announcement.  Those
 
who are interested in participating in the discussion are encouraged to
 
email to Andrei Runov (arunov at igpp.ucla.edu), the session coordinator,
 
with c.c. to other conveners.
 
 
 
We look forward to seeing you there.
 
 
 
Vassilis Angelopoulos (vassilis [at] ucla.edu)
 
 
 
Kazuo Shiokawa (Shiokawa [at] stelab.nagoya-u.ac.jp)
 
 
 
Andrei Runov (arunov [at] igpp.ucla.edu)
 
 
 
Shin Ohtani (ohtani [at] jhuapl.edu)
 
 
 
== Modes of Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Energy Transfer ==
 
  
== Geospace System ==
+
Geoff Crowley (gcrowley [at] astraspace.net)
  
'''Prospectus for a "Geospace System" Focus Group: Call for Participation'''
+
Ray Lopez (rlopez [at] uta.edu)
  
Friday, June 26, 10:30-12:15
+
== [Special breakout session] Comparative Planetary Magnetospheric Physics ==
  
From: Bill Lotko <wlotko [at] dartmouth.edu> and George Siscoe <siscoe [at] skynet.bu.edu>
+
Conveners: ''Larry Kepko (larry dot kepko at nasa dot gov) and Mike Liemohn (liemohn at umich dot edu)''
  
We would like to initiate a discussion among the magnetospheric and aeronomy communities (portions, at least) on the prospect of undertaking a global, system-dynamics study of the coupled solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere-thermosphere system, which we identify simply as the geospace system. The suggestion responds to two circumstances: first, 50 years of magnetospheric research have shown the geospace system to be interactively coupled in multiple ways from the solar wind to the thermosphere, and second, as GEM moves in its long-range program from the 'divide-and-conquer' stage to the more challenging synthesis stage, a focus group devoted to problems of the coupled system will leverage scientific progress in each GEM research area. The magnitude of the task to comprehend the global system in its coupled complexity is almost certainly too great for a single, scientist-centered research team and probably too great for the multiple teams of a single institution. Instead it would seem to require a sustained collaborative effort by experts of manifold specialties distributed among many institutions. It might even take the combined collaboration of the GEM community and a sizable portion of the CEDAR community.
+
We invite all interested GEM attendees to participate in a special "comparative planetary magnetospheric physics" breakout session at the upcoming GEM workshop on Tuesday from 3:30-5:00 pm. The focus will be on how to utilize the knowledge gained from examining similar physical processes in the different systems to further the goals of GEM. These processes include MI coupling, dayside interactions, solar wind energy coupling, etc., and span the entirety of the GEM focus areas. We do not anticipate formal presentations. Rather, this is an open forum for discussion. Please bring your thinking caps!
  
The priorities of such a focus group must be enlightened by community interest. To begin the conversation we can suggest among many possible directions several problems, each global in scope and of considerable current interest. We have asked some GEM participants to help initiate the discussion with a few slides on each problem. They include: 1) the dayside reconnection potential, its relationship to the polar cap potential, and the saturation of both at large IMF; 2) global resonance, periodicity of the magnetospheric response, and sawtooth phenomena; 3) ionospheric-magnetospheric plasma circulation, including ionospheric outflows, and its effects on plasmasheet and inner magnetospheric dynamics; and 4) prompt penetration electric fields and their relationship to the dayside ionospheric superfountain, storm enhanced density, and plasmaspheric plumes. While some aspects of these global problems can be treated as regional phenomena, differentiated by distinct physical processes, their dynamics seem to evolve as an integrated whole during extreme solar wind conditions. The geospace system thus behaves coherently across a broad spatiotemporal range, making it difficult to unravel its causal behavior by considering the response in terms of isolated elements or processes. Integration of global problems of this type into a system-dynamics picture spans the expertise of all five GEM research areas and several CEDAR working groups. We invite participation from the GEM community in deciding whether the time is right for this focus group, and, if so, how best to structure its direction.
+
GEM will also have two related plenary session tutorials, one by Margaret Kivelson, "Learning about Earth's plasma processes from studies of other magnetospheres," on Tuesday morning and a second by Jim Slavin, "Reconnection in planetary magnetic tails," on Thursday morning.

Latest revision as of 08:27, 4 June 2010

SilvertreeSView.jpg

GEM will be holding its annual summer workshop at the Snowmass Conference Center in Snowmass, Colorado during June 20-25, 2010. A special student program will be held on Sunday, June 20.

Logistical information and workshop agenda can be found at the GEM Workshop Web Site.

Listed below are the call for presentations by various GEM focus groups before the Workshop. (Note: In the e-mail addresses below the symbol @ is replaced by " [at] ".)

GGCM Metrics and Validation

Conveners: Aaron Ridley <ridley [at] umich.edu> and Masha Kuznetsova <Maria.M.Kuznetsova [at] nasa.gov>

A new Dst index metrics study is added to the GEM Modeling Challenge organized by the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group. Community Coordinating Modeling Center (CCMC) is supporting the Challenge. To participate in the Challenge please submit your model results using the web interface prior to June 1st, 2010.

The results of the Challenge will be discussed at the GGCM Metrics and Validation Session at the GEM 2010 Summer Workshop. Joint publication by all participants is planned. For more details, go to the Challenge Web site: http://ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/support/GEM_metrics_08/

Please send questions, comments and suggestions to: Masha Kuznetsova (Maria.M.Kuznetsova[at]nasa.gov) and Aaron Ridley (ridley[at]umich.edu).

GGCM Modules and Methods

Conveners: Brian Sullivan (bsullivan [at]artemis.sr.unh.edu); John Dorelli (john.dorelli [at] nasa.gov)and Michael Shay (shay [at] udel.edu)

The GGCM Methods and Modules Focus Group will hold 2 sessions at the upcoming GEM Summer Workshop in Snowmass (June 20-25, 2010). The sessions will be at 10:30 and 1:30 on Wednesday.

The overarching goal of this focus group is to understand the physics of collisionless magnetic reconnection on magnetospheric length scales (100-1000 ion inertial lengths). We invite potential contributors to participate with short presentations on the following topics:

1. Scaling of reconnection with local and kinetic scale parameters in MHD, multifluid, and kinetic models.

2. Plasmoid instabilities in high Lundquist number current sheets

3. Dependence (or independence) of the dayside reconnection rate on solar wind parameters.

or any other topics of interest to the focus group. This is the final year of the GGCM Methods and Modules Focus Group. Looking forward, as this focus group comes to an end, a major goal for this year's sessions will be to agree on a way to present the most significant results of geophysical magnetic reconnection research to the greater GEM community and to identify a few outstanding questions to address as we plan for future focus groups centered on the multi-scale physics of reconnection in the magnetosphere. A more detailed description of the objectives of this focus group can be found at

http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG2._GGCM_Modules_and_Meth ods

Potential Contributors are encouraged to contact Brian Sullivan (brian.sullivan [at] unh.edu) with the title of their presentation.

Plasma Entry and Transport into and within the Magnetotail (PET)

Conveners: Antonius Otto <ao [at] how.gi.alaska.edu>,Jay R. Johnson <jrj [at] pppl.gov>, and Simon Wing <Simon.Wing [at] jhuapl.edu>

We would like to invite contributions to the PET focus group at the upcoming GEM workshop in Snowmass on June 21-25, 2010. The sessions will be held in a workshop (NOT AGU) style in which each speaker will be allotted time for a 2-3 slides, in order to ensure enough time for discussion. In order to encourage this, at least one of the slides should deal with unresolved issues. Speakers are encouraged to end the presentation with outstanding questions rather than a summary of what has/have been accomplished. It is expected that there will be three sessions: (1) ion outflow effects on the plasma sheet; (2) Constraints on plasma sheet entry and transport; and (3) GEM challenge, northward and southward IMF.

All three sessions have been tentatively scheduled on Monday Jun 21 (See http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html for the definitive schedule). If you have not already done so, please send the title(s) and session(s) of your contribution(s) to us at your earliest convenience at the email addresses given above.

Physical Processes in the Cusps: Plasma Transport and Energization

Conveners: K.J. Trattner(trattner [at] mail.spasci.com), N. Omidi (omidi [at] solanasci.com) and D. Sibeck (david.g.sibeck [at] nasa.gov)

Presentations are solicited for the CUSP Focus Group to be held during the 2010 Summer GEM workshop in Snowmass Colorado. This is the last year of the Cusp Focus Group who's main objective is to utilize observations, modeling, and theory of the cusp and its role in particle acceleration and plasma transport. Based on the topics in earlier years and the discussions during the mini-workshop held during the 2009 Fall AGU, the Focus Group addresses the following topics:

1. Plasma transport into the cusp.

2. Energization of ions in diamagnetic cavities.

3. Origin of waves observed in the cusp and their role in particle scattering and acceleration.

4. Interaction of FTE's with the cusp.

5. The source region of energetic ions and electrons observed in the cusp.

6. Ionospheric signatures of such processes such as Poleward Moving Auroral Forms

It is the ultimate goal of the workshop to enhance our understanding of the cusp physics, its coupling to other parts of the system such as the bow shock, magnetopause and the ionosphere and the important role it plays in dayside transport and energization. Observational and theoretical contributions to this session are hereby solicited.

Those interested in these topics are invited to attend and contribute through showing a few slides and/or participation in the discussions. Information regarding hotel reservations and travel arrangements will be posted on the GEM website (http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem) in the near future.

Those wishing to give a presentation or with questions regarding the workshop should contact the conveners: trattner [at] mail.spasci.com, omidi [at] solanasci.com or david.g.sibeck [at] nasa.gov.

Near Earth Magnetosphere: Plasma, Fields and Coupling

Conveners: Focus Group co-chairs: Sorin Zaharia <szaharia [at] lanl.gov>, Stan Sazykin <sazykin [at] rice.edu> and Benoit Lavraud <Benoit.Lavraud [at] cesr.fr>

The Near Earth Magnetosphere: Plasma, Fields and Coupling Focus Group will hold 3 sessions at the upcoming GEM Summer Workshop in Snowmass (June 20-25, 2010).

We invite potential contributors to participate with short presentations on the following topics:

1). Effect of plasma on storm-time electric and magnetic fields

2). Plasma sheet effect on ring current dynamics

3). Electric fields in the near-Earth magnetosphere (potential and inductive)

4). Coupling of physics-based inner magnetosphere with global magnetosphere models

or any other topics of interest to the focus group. It is the ultimate goal of the focus group to improve physical knowledge and modeling of the near-Earth (closer than 10 RE) magnetosphere and its coupling with the outer magnetosphere; a more detailed description of the focus group objectives can be found at

http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG8._Near_Earth_Magnetosphere:_plasma%2C_fields%2C_and_coupling

Potential contributors are encouraged to contact Sorin Zaharia (szaharia at lanl.gov) with the title of their presentation.

Space Radiation Climatology

Conveners: Paul O'Brien (paul.obrien [at] aero.org);Geoff Reeves (reeves [at] lanl.gov), Bob Weigel (rweigel-at-gmu.edu), and Reiner Friedel (friedel-at-lanl.gov)


It's almost time for the GEM Summer Workshop, joint with CEDAR. The Space Radiation Climatology Focus Group (FG9) will meet for three breakout sessions: two on Thursday June 24th: 1:30-3:30 and 3:30-5, and one on Friday, the 25th, 10:30-12:15. We will be discussing the past year's results in reanalysis, data assimilation, climatology models, and long-term data/analysis. One of our sessions (the first one) will be joint with the new radiation belt focus group.

We already have a number of exciting talks lined up, but there's plenty of room for more. We encourage interested parties to send talk ideas to Paul O'Brien, Bob Weigel, and/or Reiner Friedel (Geoff will not be able to attend this year). If you are presenting an FG9-related poster, please sign up for the **Thursday** Poster Session and advertise on the Wiki. http://www.virbo.org/GEM_FG9_2010

To view the FG9 email archive or to join the email group, go to http://groups.google.com/group/gem-2007-space-radiation-climatology-fg9

Diffuse Auroral Precipitation

Conveners: Richard Thorne <rmt [at] atmos.ucla.edu>

The Diffuse Aurora Focus Group plans to hold 4 breakout sessions at the 2010 GEM meeting in Snowmass this summer. Potential contributors are invited to contact the session chairs listed below with a title of their talk, and prepare a brief presentation for the workshop.

1. Relationship between auroral phenomenology and scattering mechanisms [Co-chairs, Binbin Ni (bbni[at}atmos.ucla.edu) and Robert Michell (rmichell[at]swri.edu)]

  • Monday June 21: 10:30-12:15:

2. Modulation of DA brightness by large-scale magnetospheric processes. [Co-chairs, Marilia Samara (marilia.samara[at]swri.org) and Jacob Bortnik (jbortnik[at]gmail.com )]

  • Monday June 21: 1:3-3:00:

3. Spatial and temporal extent and spatio-temporal occurrence of DA/scattering mechanisms [Co-chairs, Toshi Nishimura (toshi[at]atmos.ucla.edu) and Richard Thorne (rmt[at]atmos.ucla.edu)]

  • Monday June 21: 3:30-5:00:

4. Importance of the DA for Geospace at the system level. Plans for next year. [Chair, Richard Thorne (rmt[at]atmos.ucla.edu)]

  • Tuesday June 22: 10:30-12:15:

Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions (PMI)

Conveners: From: Jerry Goldstein <jgoldstein [at] swri.edu> and Maria Spasojevic <mariaspasojevic [at] stanford.edu>

The Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions (PMI) focus group will hold several sessions at the 2010 GEM Workshop, during 20-25 June 2010.

We invite short presentations (several slides) related to any of the PMI's broad topics:

+ Wave-Particle Interactions

+ Plume Dynamics & Recirculation

+ Plasma Density Structure & Evolution.

Specific topics of interest:

  • Dynamics of energetic particles
  • Wave theory and observations
  • Simulations or models of acceleration or loss
  • Morphology and dynamics of cold plasma density
  • Global circulation of plasmaspheric plumes
  • Dayside distribution of cold plasma ions
  • Fine scale plasma structure and flow turbulence.
  • Plume plasma and magnetospheric reconnection.

or any other topic you feel would be of interest to the PMI focus group.

If you would like to present, please e-mail your tentative title/topic to:

JGoldstein [at] swri.edu.

Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes

Conveners: Vassilis Angelopoulos (Vassilis[at] ucla.edu); Kazuo Shiokawa (Shiokawa [at] stelab.nagoya-u.ac.jp) ; Andrei Runov (arunov [at] igpp.ucla.edu) and Shin Ohtani (Ohtani [at] jhuapl.edu)

Our focus group, "Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes", will have 4 sessions at the upcoming GEM Workshop in Snowmass (June 20-25, 2010). They are scheduled on June 24 (Thu) and 25 (Fri).

We have four topical areas identified, which are:

1. Onset timing: observations/theory/simulations (Angelopoulos)

2. How do onset signatures propagate to near Earth and to the ground? (Runov)

3. Ground-space mapping of physical processes before/during/after onset (Ohtani)

4. Substorm processes near transition between stretched and dipole field lines (Shiokawa)

We would like to invite you to participate, and if you have any request or question, please contact the person of the topical area of your interest, whose name is in the parentheses for each topic.

The description of our focus group is posted at: http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG12._Substorm_Expansion_Onset:_The_First_10_Minutes

Modes of Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Energy Transfer

Convener: Larry Kepko (larry.kepko [at] unh.edu) and Bob McPherron (rmcpherron [at] igpp.ucla.edu)


The Modes of Magnetospheric Response focus group will hold three sessions at the upcoming GEM Workshop (June 20-25) in Snowmass, CO, covering the following topics:

1. Dayside observations during sawtooth events, the role of polar cap saturation, and implications for the magnetospheric response. Specifically, are particle injections on the dayside dispersionless or dispersive? Can sawtooth observations be understood as substorms that penetrate deep into the inner magnetosphere, or do sawtooth represent a fundamentally different state of the magnetosphere? We particularly encourage participants to bring data that addresses the issue of dayside injection and/or dipolarization.

2. Non-linear coupling and the role of pre-conditioning in determining the response mode. Example topics and questions include: Systematic errors in activity indices; Seasonal effects on coupling functions; mass-loading effects on convection; The storm/substorm/SMC relationship.

3. Magnetospheric response and solar wind energy transfer during the extreme solar minimum.

This focus group has as its aim the improvement of knowledge of the physical mechanisms that provide different dynamical modes of response of the magnetotail to the solar wind. These include substorms, steady magnetospheric convection, sawtooth injection events, pseudo breakups, and poleward boundary intensifications. A complete description of the FG and its goals can be found at http://bit.ly/beGmTF

Schedule Change

To minimize overlap with the "First 10 Minutes" focus group the "Modes of Magnetospheric Response" has been moved to the following dates and times:

Wednesday 6/23, 10:30 am - 12:15 pm, and 3:30-5:00 pm Thursday 6/24, 10:30 am - 12:15 pm

Please contact us if you are interested in presenting in one of the sessions [Larry Kepko (larry.kepko [at] unh.edu) and Bob McPherron (rmcpherron [at] igpp.ucla.edu)]:

1. Dayside observations during sawtooth events, the role of polar cap saturation, and implications for the magnetospheric response. Specifically, are particle injections on the dayside dispersionless or dispersive? Can sawtooth observations be understood as substorms that penetrate deep into the inner magnetosphere, or do sawtooth represent a fundamentally different state of the magnetosphere? We particularly encourage participants to bring data that addresses the issue of dayside injection and/or dipolarization.

2. Non-linear coupling and the role of pre-conditioning in determining the response mode. Example topics and questions include: Systematic errors in activity indices; Seasonal effects on coupling functions; mass-loading effects on convection; The storm/substorm/SMC relationship.

3. Magnetospheric response, state of the magnetosphere, and solar wind energy transfer during the extreme solar minimum.

Magnetosheath Studies

Convener: Steven Petrinec (steve.petrinec [at] gmail.com) and Katariina Nykyri (nykyrik [at] erau.edu)

Magnetosheath focus group will hold sessions at the next GEM workshop on 21-25th of June, 2010 in Snowmass Village Colorado. We invite short presentations related to any of the focus group topics.

The Primary Objectives and Expected Activities of the FG:

1. To produce more comprehensive models of large scale magnetosheath flow and field patterns, and geometry of the magnetosheath region

2. To improve understanding of magnetosheath plasma instabilities and wave particle interactions: Spatial distribution and characteristics

3. To develop a better understanding of the effects on magnetospheric dynamics due to processes occurring in the magnetosheath and due to characteristic magnetosheath properties.

The focus group proposal with specific science questions can be found at http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/GEM_FG_MSheath_proposal.pdf.

We especially encourage data-analysts utilizing in-situ spacecraft measurements from Themis and Cluster missions, theoretical modelers, global and local modelers to participate in this workshop and present your findings. We also encourage presentations of studies of magnetosheaths around other solar system bodies, as they relate to the terrestrial magnetosheath.

See GEM website for further details: http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/

Radiation-Belt and Waves Modeling (RBWM)

Conveners: Yuri Shprits, UCLA (yshprits [at] atmos.ucla.edu); Scot Elkington, LASP (Scot.Elkington [at] lasp.colorado.edu); Jacob Bortnik, UCLA (jbortnik [at] atmos.ucla.edu);Craig Kletzing, U. Iowa (craig-kletzing [at] uiowa.edu)

The Radiation-Belt and Waves Modeling (RBWM) focus group will hold several sessions at the 2010 GEM Workshop, during 20-25 June 2010.

We invite short presentations (several slides) related to any of RBWM's broad topics:

- Wave excitation, propagation and distribution (ULF, VLF, etc.)

- Dynamical modeling of the radiation belts (acceleration, loss, etc.)

- Wave-particle interactions (linear, nonlinear, non-resonant)

The RBWM focus group kicks off this year, and aims to achieve a first- principles understanding of the coupled dynamic variability of the radiation-belts, and the wave environment that controls it. A few sample questions that are of particular interest to this focus group are:

- what are the physical processes responsible for wave excitation?

- what are the spatiotemporal distributions of various plasma waves and what are their relative roles in producing acceleration/loss?

- what are the roles of linear, nonlinear, and non-diffusive wave- particle interactions in RB dynamics?

- what are the quantitative effects of transport via interactions with ULF waves?

- what is the role of the seed population in radiation belt dynamics?

- why do some storms produce flux increases, decreases, or no variation?

If you would like to learn more about this focus group, or submit a presentation, please use the following resources:

Wiki page http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG:_Radiation_Belts_and_Wave_Modeling

We look forward to your participation

Radiation Belts and Wave Modeling (RBWM) session description:

We will have 6 sessions this year: You can submit the title of your presentation online by following the link below to reserve a time slot during each individual session. We invite potential contributions and encourage to limit presentations to approximately 5 min.

http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?hl=en&formkey=dEhELVhvSXg5VS1HQmd3dzhCY3BaMGc6MQ


Tues PM 1: RBWM 1 -- Dynamical modeling of the radiation belts (Model development, verification, validation) (Scot Elkington and Yuri Shprits)

During this session we will discuss the development of new and improvement of existing models of particle transport, scattering, and acceleration in the radiation belts. We will discuss future plans for model inter-comparison and for comparison of models with observations.


Tues PM 2: RBWM 2 -- Dynamical modeling of the radiation belts (Preparing Radiation Belt models for RBSP data) (Scot Elkington and Yuri Shprits)

During this session we will concentrate on comparing model results with observations from RBSP and other missions such as ORBITALS, ERG, and BARREL.


Wed AM 2: RBWM 3 -- Wave-particle interactions (Particle scattering and transport) (Scot Elkington and Yuri Shprits)

We will discuss quasi-liner and non-liner pitch-angle, energy, and radial scattering and will discuss other potentially important acceleration and loss mechanisms operating in the radiation belts.


Wed PM 1: RBWM 4 -- Wave excitation, propagation, and distribution (ULF) (Jacob Bortnik and Craig Kletzing)

We will discuss excitation, propagation and distribution of ULF waves. We would like to invite contributions concerning modeling and observations.


Wed PM 2: RBWM 5 -- Wave excitation, propagation and distribution (VLF) (Jacob Bortnik and Craig Kletzing)

We will discuss excitation, propagation and distribution of VLF waves. We would like to invite contributions concerning modeling and observations.


Thur AM 2: RBWM 6 -- Planning session (Jacob Bortnik, Scot Elkington, Craig Kletzing, and Yuri Shprits)

We will discuss future plans of model development, validation, and verification. We will discuss potential future GEM challenges and will outline a plan for future GEM meetings.

Dayside FACs and Energy Deposition--Dayside FED

Delores Knipp (delores.knipp [at] gmail.com); Stefan Eriksson (eriksson [a]t lasp.colorado.edu), Geoff Crowley (gcrowley [at] astraspace.net), Ramon Lopez (rlopez [at] uta.edu)

We would like to invite contributions to the Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition (FED) focus group at the upcoming GEM workshop in Snowmass on June 21-25, 2010. This new focus group is organizing to explain the relation between enhanced dayside Poynting flux and field-aligned currents, sources of field-aligned currents in the solar wind and magnetosphere and their impacts in the ionosphere-thermosphere system. The GF goals and other information are at:

http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG:_Dayside_FACs_and_Energy_Deposition

The FED focus group will hold two sessions at the upcoming GEM Workshop (June 20-25) in Snowmass, covering data, theory, modeling aspects of the following topics:

- Dayside Poynting Flux, Joule Heating and Their Relation to Field Aligned Currents

- Particle Energy Deposition on the Dayside

- Dissipation of Magnetospheric Energy in the Dayside Thermosphere

- Thermospheric Density Enhancements and Traveling Atmo/Iono- spheric Disturbances

- Solar Wind Drivers for Extreme Dayside Poynting Flux Events

We will discuss the types of NSF GEM investigations to bring this forward toward a conclusion by 2012.

The sessions will be held in a workshop (NOT AGU) style in which each speaker will be allotted time for a 3-4 slides, in order to ensure enough time for discussion. At least one of the slides should deal with unresolved issues. Speakers are encouraged to end their presentation with outstanding questions that could provide a basis for a session at next year's joint GEM-CEDAR meeting.

Both sessions have been tentatively scheduled on Monday Jun 21 (See http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html for the definitive schedule). If you have not already done so, please send the title(s) and session(s) of your contribution(s) to us at your earliest convenience at the email addresses listed below.

Delores Knipp (delores.knipp [at] gmail.com)

Stefan Eriksson (eriksson [a]t lasp.colorado.edu)

Geoff Crowley (gcrowley [at] astraspace.net)

Ray Lopez (rlopez [at] uta.edu)

[Special breakout session] Comparative Planetary Magnetospheric Physics

Conveners: Larry Kepko (larry dot kepko at nasa dot gov) and Mike Liemohn (liemohn at umich dot edu)

We invite all interested GEM attendees to participate in a special "comparative planetary magnetospheric physics" breakout session at the upcoming GEM workshop on Tuesday from 3:30-5:00 pm. The focus will be on how to utilize the knowledge gained from examining similar physical processes in the different systems to further the goals of GEM. These processes include MI coupling, dayside interactions, solar wind energy coupling, etc., and span the entirety of the GEM focus areas. We do not anticipate formal presentations. Rather, this is an open forum for discussion. Please bring your thinking caps!

GEM will also have two related plenary session tutorials, one by Margaret Kivelson, "Learning about Earth's plasma processes from studies of other magnetospheres," on Tuesday morning and a second by Jim Slavin, "Reconnection in planetary magnetic tails," on Thursday morning.