Difference between revisions of "2010 Summer Workshop"

From gem
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Image:SilvertreeSView.jpg]]
 
[[Image:SilvertreeSView.jpg]]
  
GEM will be holding its annual summer workshop June 21-26, 2009 at the Snowmass Conference Center in Snowmass, Colorado.  Online registration can be made at the [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html GEM Workshop Web Site] by June 14, 2009. The GEM Workshop Web Site also provides the workshop [http://www.ece.vt.edu/GEM-2009/ agenda]. 
+
GEM will be holding its annual summer workshop at the Snowmass Conference Center in Snowmass, Colorado during June 20-25, 2010A special student program will be held on Sunday, June 20.
  
The following GEM sessions are calling for presentationsPoster titles must be submitted to the workshop website no later than Friday, June 12.
+
Logistical information and workshop agenda can be found at the [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html GEM Workshop Web Site].   
  
(Note: In the e-mail addresses below the symbol @ is replaced by " [at] ".)
+
Listed below are the call for presentations by various GEM focus groups before the Workshop. (Note: In the e-mail addresses below the symbol @ is replaced by " [at] ".)
  
 
== GGCM Metrics and Validation ==
 
== GGCM Metrics and Validation ==
Line 11: Line 11:
 
''Conveners: Aaron Ridley <ridley [at] umich.edu> and Masha Kuznetsova <Maria.M.Kuznetsova [at] nasa.gov>''
 
''Conveners: Aaron Ridley <ridley [at] umich.edu> and Masha Kuznetsova <Maria.M.Kuznetsova [at] nasa.gov>''
  
The GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group would like to invite modelers to
+
A new Dst index metrics study is added to the GEM Modeling Challenge
participate in a model comparison.  The goal of this comparison is to
+
organized by the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group. Community
examine how the different models handle basic solar wind and interplanetary
+
Coordinating Modeling Center (CCMC) is supporting the Challenge.
magnetic field coupling with the magnetosphere. We invite modelers to bring
+
To participate in the Challenge please submit your model results using
simulation results in which the following conditions are simulated:
+
the web interface prior to June 1st, 2010.
  
0. Zero dipole tilt.
+
The results of the Challenge will be discussed at the GGCM Metrics and
 +
Validation Session at the GEM 2010 Summer Workshop. Joint publication
 +
by all participants is planned. For more details, go to the Challenge
 +
Web site: http://ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/support/GEM_metrics_08/
  
1. Constant Pedersen conductances in the ionosphere of 5 mho.  Zero Hall
+
Please send questions, comments and suggestions to: Masha Kuznetsova
conductance.  This condition is to simplify things, since everyone has a
+
(Maria.M.Kuznetsova[at]nasa.gov) and Aaron Ridley (ridley[at]umich.edu).
different implementation of the aurora.  We need to discuss how to do a more
 
realistic conductance, but have everyone do the same thing.  We will discuss
 
this at GEM.
 
 
 
2. Solar wind density is constant at 5/cc.  Temperature is constant at
 
100,000 K.  Vx is constant at -400 km/s, while Vy and Vz = 0.
 
 
 
3. The IMF starts at Bz=-5 nT, By=Bx=0.0.  And varies as the following:
 
 
 
yyyy  mm dd hh mm ss Bx By Bz
 
 
 
2000 03 21 00 00 00 0.0 0.0 -5.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 02 00 00 0.0 0.0 -5.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 02 10 00 0.0 0.0 -10.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 04 00 00 0.0 0.0 -10.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 04 10 00 0.0 0.0 -20.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 06 00 00 0.0 0.0 -20.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 06 10 00 0.0 0.0 -30.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 08 00 00 0.0 0.0 -30.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 08 10 00 0.0 0.0 -40.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 10 00 00 0.0 0.0 -40.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 10 10 00 0.0 0.0 -50.0
 
 
 
2000 03 21 12 00 00 0.0 0.0 -50.0
 
 
 
We would like to examine:
 
 
 
1. The ionospheric potential patterns and the cross polar cap potential. 
 
Please bring plots of the CPCP versus time for the entire time period.
 
 
 
2. The mapping of currents from the ionosphere to the magnetosphere (and
 
beyond, as some see it.)
 
 
 
3. The development of the ring current. Please bring plots of Dst (if you
 
can calculate Dst).
 
 
 
4. The structure of the magnetosphere, including:
 
 
 
(a) the position of the
 
magnetopause and bow shock - please bring plots of the magnetopause location
 
and bowshock location versus time;
 
 
 
(b) the length of the tail - please bring
 
plots of the location of the last closed field-line (in the magnetosphere)
 
versus time; and
 
 
 
(c) the shape of the magnetosphere - please bring plots of
 
the magnetospheric current (Jy), plotting from X=~-100->~32; z=~-50->~50 at  
 
times just before the IMF Bz changes orientation (i.e., 1:45, 3:45, 5:45,
 
7:45, 9:45, 11:45).
 
 
 
We are more than willing to consider other models, rather than just global
 
MHD simulations. For example, empirical models could be utilized.  Ring
 
current models could also be utilized (one of the interesting issues that is
 
being discussed is whether there is saturation of the inner magnetosphere
 
when the outer magnetosphere is saturated).
 
 
 
We would also like to discuss varying different parameters, if other are
 
interested.  We will discuss this further at GEM.
 
 
 
''Aaron Ridley and Masha Kuznetsova''
 
  
 
== GGCM Modules and Methods ==
 
== GGCM Modules and Methods ==
  
''Conveners: John Dorelli <john.dorelli [at] nasa.gov>''
+
''Conveners: Brian Sullivan (bsullivan [at]artemis.sr.unh.edu); John Dorelli (john.dorelli [at] nasa.gov)and Michael Shay (shay [at] udel.edu) ''
 
 
The GGCM Methods and Modules Focus group would like to invite participants
 
to two sessions to be held at the summer GEM workshop in Snowmass June 21-26.
 
Both sessions will be held Wednesday, June 24:
 
 
 
'''Session 1 (10:30 am):  What role does electron dissipation play in open
 
boundary condition simulations of magnetic reconnection?'''
 
 
 
In this session, we would like to continue where we left off last year,
 
addressing the following issues:
 
 
 
1. What is the role of secondary magnetic islands?  Are they an irrelevant
 
by-product, or do they play an essential role in determining the aspect
 
ratio of the dissipation region?
 
 
 
2.  What limits the aspect ratio of the electron dissipation region?
 
 
 
3.  How does the reconnection rate scale with dissipation scale parameters
 
(e.g., resistivity or electron mass) in simulations (electron MHD, Hall MHD,
 
hybrid, fully kinetic)?
 
 
 
'''Session 2 (1:30 pm):  How do we accurately model magnetospheric reconnection
 
on a global scale?'''
 
 
 
Topics for this session include:
 
 
 
1.  How does the physics of reconnection depend on the ad hoc resistivity
 
model used in global MHD codes?  In particular, how does reconnection scale
 
with resistivity in the high Lundquist number limit? What is the effect of
 
numerical resistivity? Can we reproduce Petschek reconnection by localizing
 
the plasma resistivity? What is the effect of current dependent resistivity?
 
 
 
2.  How does dayside magnetopause reconnection work in global MHD codes?
 
Is reconnection locally controlled or externally driven?  Does the Cassak-
 
Shay formula apply to the dayside magnetopause?
 
 
 
3.  What is the status of global Hall MHD modeling?  What are the most
 
robust numerical approaches?  What are the new results coming from the
 
latest generation of global Hall MHD magnetosphere codes?
 
 
 
4.  What is the status of other non-MHD approaches to global magnetosphere
 
modeling (e.g., global hybrid codes)?  Are there any new ideas on the
 
horizon?
 
 
 
If you are interested in participating in either of these sessions, please
 
email one of the focus group co-chairs:
 
 
 
''john.dorelli [at] nasa.gov or brian.sullivan [at] unh.edu.''
 
 
 
== Bow Shock Phenomena and their Magnetospheric Impacts ==
 
 
 
''Conveners: N. Omidi <omidi [at] solanasci.com>, D. Sibeck <david.g.sibeck [at] nasa.gov>''
 
 
 
During the 2009 GEM Summer workshop at Snowmass Colorado, a session on the
 
bow shock and its magnetospheric impacts will be held on Monday June 22nd.
 
This marks the last year of the Bow Shock Focus Group and in addition to
 
discussion of recent observations, modeling, and theory of the bow shock and
 
related processes in the foreshock and the magnetosheath we will discuss
 
future plans. In particular, N. Omidi will provide a summary of
 
accomplishments and current status and D. Sibeck will discuss future
 
missions followed by solicitation and discussion of ideas about future
 
directions and plans.
 
 
 
Those who are interested and wish to show a few
 
relevant slides are invited to contact the conveners:
 
 
 
''omidi [at] solanasci.com, David.G.Sibeck [at] nasa.gov.''
 
 
 
For updated information please see http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html .
 
 
 
== Plasma Entry and Tranport into and within the Magnetotail (PET) ==
 
 
 
''Conveners: Antonius Otto <ao [at] how.gi.alaska.edu>, Jay R. Johnson <jrj [at] pppl.gov>, and Simon Wing <Simon.Wing [at] jhuapl.edu>''
 
  
We would like to invite contributions to the PET focus group at the upcoming  
+
The GGCM Methods and Modules Focus Group will hold 2 sessions at the
GEM workshop in Snowmass on June 21-26, 2009. The sessions will be held in
+
upcoming GEM Summer Workshop in Snowmass (June 20-25, 2010). The
a workshop (NOT AGU) style in which each speaker will be allotted time for a
+
sessions will be at 10:30 and 1:30 on Wednesday.
2-3 slides, in order to ensure enough time for discussion.  In order to
 
encourage this, at least one of the slides should deal with unresolved
 
issues.  Speakers are encouraged to end the presentation with outstanding
 
questions rather than a summary of what has/have been accomplished.  It is
 
expected that there will be three sessions: (1) Plasma entry into the
 
Magnetosphere; (2) Plasma transport in the plasma sheet; and (3) M-I
 
coupling and magnetotail transport.  Sessions 1 and 2 have been tentatively
 
scheduled on Jun 22 Tues afternoon while session 3 on Jun 23 Wed afternoon
 
(See http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html for the definitive schedule).  If
 
you have not already done so, please send the title(s) and session(s) of
 
your contribution(s) to us at your earliest convenience at the email
 
addresses listed below.
 
  
'''The following lists a brief description of these three sessions.'''
+
The overarching goal of this focus group is to understand the physics
 +
of collisionless magnetic reconnection on magnetospheric length scales
 +
(100-1000 ion inertial lengths). We invite potential contributors to
 +
participate with short presentations on the following topics:
  
''Plasma Entry into the Magnetosphere''
+
1. Scaling of reconnection with local and kinetic scale parameters in
 +
MHD, multifluid, and kinetic models.
  
The session invites contributions on (a) morphology (plasma properties, time
+
2. Plasmoid instabilities in high Lundquist number current sheets
scales, dawn dusk-asymmetry etc.) of plasma entry at the magnetospheric
 
boundaries, (b) mechanisms, models, and observation specific for northward
 
IMF, (c) mechanism and physics for southward IMF,  and (d) entry rates and
 
physics that processes the newly entering plasma (modification of
 
distribution functions, local entropy, fluxtube entropy,..)
 
  
''Plasma Transport in the Plasmasheet''
+
3. Dependence (or independence) of the dayside reconnection rate on
 +
solar wind parameters.
  
This session focuses on the topics of (a) convective vs turbulent transport
+
or any other topics of interest to the focus group. This is the final
for northward and southward IMF, (b) constraints to convection (entropy,  
+
year of the GGCM Methods and Modules Focus Group. Looking forward, as
boundary conditions), (c) mapping of convection to the ionosphere,
+
this focus group comes to an end, a major goal for this year's
observations, ionospheric influence on convection or turbulence, (d)
+
sessions will be to agree on a way to present the most significant
mechanisms and related observations for convection and turbulence in the  
+
results of geophysical magnetic reconnection research to the greater
plasma sheet (recovery phase, bursty bulk flows; steady magnetospheric
+
GEM community and to identify a few outstanding questions to address
convection, etc.).
+
as we plan for future focus groups centered on the multi-scale physics
 +
of reconnection in the magnetosphere. A more detailed description of
 +
the objectives of this focus group can be found at
  
''M-I Coupling and Magnetotail Transport''
+
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG2._GGCM_Modules_and_Meth
 +
ods
  
The session invites contributions on (a) the morphology of ion outflow
+
Potential Contributors are encouraged to contact Brian Sullivan
(Fluxes, outflow locations, concentrations and distribution in the plasma
+
(brian.sullivan [at] unh.edu) with the title of their presentation.
sheet), (b) time scales of ion outflow, (c) solar wind dependence, (d)
 
heating of the cold ionospheric material, (e) ionospheric influence on
 
transport in the magnetosphere.
 
  
== Dayside Magnetopause Reconnection ==
+
== Plasma Entry and Transport into and within the Magnetotail (PET) ==
  
''Conveners: Jean Berchem <jberchem [at] igpp.ucla.edu>, Nick Omidi <omidi [at] solanasci.com>''
+
''Conveners: Antonius Otto <ao [at] how.gi.alaska.edu>,Jay R. Johnson <jrj [at] pppl.gov>, and Simon Wing <Simon.Wing [at] jhuapl.edu>''
  
We are soliciting contributions to the Dayside Magnetopause Reconnection
+
We would like to invite contributions to the PET focus group at the
session that will be held at the upcoming GEM workshop in Snowmass on June  
+
upcoming GEM workshop in Snowmass on June 21-25, 2010.  The sessions
21-26, 2009.
+
will be held in a workshop (NOT AGU) style in which each speaker will
 +
be allotted time for a 2-3 slides, in order to ensure enough time for
 +
discussion.  In order to encourage this, at least one of the slides
 +
should deal with unresolved issues.  Speakers are encouraged to end
 +
the presentation with outstanding questions rather than a summary of
 +
what has/have been accomplished.  It is expected that there will be
 +
three sessions:
 +
(1) ion outflow effects on the plasma sheet;
 +
(2) Constraints on plasma sheet entry and transport; and
 +
(3) GEM challenge, northward and southward IMF.
  
The session will bring together people interested in the occurrence of
+
All three sessions have been tentatively scheduled on Monday Jun 21
magnetic reconnection at the dayside magnetopause. Given the wide range of
+
(See http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html for the definitive schedule).
scales involved in reconnection processes, the discussion will address both
+
If you have not already done so, please send the title(s) and
local and global aspects through a variety of modeling techniques including
+
session(s) of your contribution(s) to us at your earliest convenience
full particle, hybrid, multi-fluid and MHD simulations, as well as in-situ
+
at the email addresses given above.
and ground-based observations. Our main goals this year will be to summarize
 
recent progress and to focus on outstanding questions. Since the session
 
will be held in a workshop style, each speaker is encouraged to present only
 
a few slides to ensure enough time for discussion.  
 
 
 
To facilitate scheduling, please send us a tentative title for your  
 
contribution at your earliest convenience.
 
 
 
''Jean Berchem and Nick Omidi''
 
  
 
== Physical Processes in the Cusps: Plasma Transport and Energization ==
 
== Physical Processes in the Cusps: Plasma Transport and Energization ==
  
''Conveners: K.J. Trattner, N. Omidi and D. Sibeck''
+
''Conveners: K.J. Trattner(trattner [at] mail.spasci.com), N. Omidi (omidi [at] solanasci.com) and D. Sibeck (david.g.sibeck [at] nasa.gov)''
  
During the 2009 Summer GEM workshop in Snowmass Colorado, a number of  
+
Presentations are solicited for the CUSP Focus Group to be held during
sessions on the physical processes in the cusp will be held. The main  
+
the 2010 Summer GEM workshop in Snowmass Colorado. This is the last
objective of these sessions is to utilize observations, modeling, and theory  
+
year of the Cusp Focus Group who's main objective is to utilize
of the cusp and its role in particle acceleration and plasma transport to
+
observations, modeling, and theory of the cusp and its role in
assess the current status of the field and forge collaborative efforts
+
particle acceleration and plasma transport. Based on the topics in
towards addressing outstanding issues in the future. Based on the topics in  
+
earlier years and the discussions during the mini-workshop held during
earlier years and the discussions during the mini-workshop held during the  
+
the 2009 Fall AGU, the Focus Group addresses the following topics:
2008 Fall AGU, we plan to focus on the following topics:
 
  
 
1. Plasma transport into the cusp.
 
1. Plasma transport into the cusp.
Line 255: Line 101:
 
2. Energization of ions in diamagnetic cavities.
 
2. Energization of ions in diamagnetic cavities.
  
3. Origin of waves observed in the cusp and their role in particle scattering and acceleration.
+
3. Origin of waves observed in the cusp and their role in particle
 +
scattering and acceleration.
  
 
4. Interaction of FTE's with the cusp.
 
4. Interaction of FTE's with the cusp.
  
5. The source region of energetic ions and electrons observed in the cusp.
+
5. The source region of energetic ions and electrons observed in the
 +
cusp.
  
6. Ionospheric signatures of such processes such as Poleward Moving Auroral Forms
+
6. Ionospheric signatures of such processes such as Poleward Moving
 +
Auroral Forms
  
It is the ultimate goal of the workshop to enhance our understanding of the  
+
It is the ultimate goal of the workshop to enhance our understanding
cusp physics, its coupling to other parts of the system such as the bow  
+
of the cusp physics, its coupling to other parts of the system such as
shock, magnetopause and the ionosphere and the important role it plays in  
+
the bow shock, magnetopause and the ionosphere and the important role
dayside transport and energization. Observational and theoretical  
+
it plays in dayside transport and energization. Observational and
contributions to this session are hereby solicited.
+
theoretical contributions to this session are hereby solicited.
  
Those interested in these topics are invited to attend and contribute  
+
Those interested in these topics are invited to attend and contribute
through showing a few slides and/or participation in the discussions.
+
through showing a few slides and/or participation in the discussions.
Information regarding hotel reservations and travel arrangements will be  
+
Information regarding hotel reservations and travel arrangements will
posted on the GEM website (http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem) in the near future.   
+
be posted on the GEM website (http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem) in the near
Those wishing to give a presentation or with questions regarding the
+
future.   
workshop should contact the conveners:
 
  
''trattner [at] mail.spasci.com, omidi [at]solanasci.com or david.g.sibeck [at] nasa.gov.
+
Those wishing to give a presentation or with questions
''
+
regarding the workshop should contact the conveners:
 
+
''trattner [at] mail.spasci.com, omidi [at] solanasci.com or
== Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling, Electrodynamics and Transport (MICET) (No session) ==
+
david.g.sibeck [at] nasa.gov.''
 
 
(The MICET Focus Group officially ended in 2008.)
 
  
 
== Near Earth Magnetosphere: Plasma, Fields and Coupling ==
 
== Near Earth Magnetosphere: Plasma, Fields and Coupling ==
Line 287: Line 133:
 
''Conveners: Focus Group co-chairs: Sorin Zaharia <szaharia [at] lanl.gov>,''  
 
''Conveners: Focus Group co-chairs: Sorin Zaharia <szaharia [at] lanl.gov>,''  
 
''Stan Sazykin <sazykin [at] rice.edu> and Benoit Lavraud <Benoit.Lavraud [at] cesr.fr>''
 
''Stan Sazykin <sazykin [at] rice.edu> and Benoit Lavraud <Benoit.Lavraud [at] cesr.fr>''
 
We would like to invite potential contributors to the Near Earth
 
Magnetosphere: Plasma, Fields and Coupling Focus Group at the upcoming GEM
 
Summer Workshop in Snowmass (June 21-26, 2009) to participate with modeling,
 
theoretical and observational studies related to the topics below. Our focus
 
group will have 3 breakout sessions on June 24 (Wed.) (for the full schedule
 
of the workshop see http://www.ece.vt.edu/GEM-2009).
 
 
(1) Better observational knowledge/empirical models of fields and particles
 
relevant to the near-Earth magnetosphere (including plasma sheet models to
 
be used as input for near-Earth magnetosphere models); studies related to
 
better knowledge of the electric fields (convection and induced) are
 
particularly encouraged.
 
 
(2) Improvements in physics-based modeling, including coupling between
 
different elements in the models (plasma, electric and magnetic fields), as
 
well as inner-outer magnetosphere coupling; studies that address the effect
 
of the above coupling on the inner magnetosphere structure/dynamics,
 
including potential improvement of consistency with observations. A
 
significant part of this session will be devoted to presentations of results
 
related to the Near-Earth Magnetosphere Modeling Challenge. A description of
 
the Challenge can also be found at the Wiki address above.
 
 
Potential contributors are urged to contact the conveners indicating their
 
interest in participating. The sessions will be held workshop-style, with
 
contributers encouraged to limit their number of slides to maximum 5. Please
 
send the title of your contribution to us at the email addresses above.
 
 
Besides the 2 sessions dedicated to the topics above, a 3rd session will be
 
devoted to refining the direction of the focus group in the future;
 
community input is both welcome and appreciated. It is the ultimate goal of
 
the focus group to improve physical knowledge and modeling of the near-Earth
 
(< 10 RE) magnetosphere and its coupling with the outer magnetosphere. An
 
outline of the major topics of interest of the focus group can be found at:
 
 
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG8._Near_Earth_Magnetosphere:_plasma%2C_fields%2C_and_coupling
 
  
== Space Radiation Climatology ==
+
The Near Earth Magnetosphere: Plasma, Fields and Coupling Focus Group
 +
will hold 3 sessions at the upcoming GEM Summer Workshop in Snowmass
 +
(June 20-25, 2010).
  
''Conveners: Paul O'Brien (paul.obrien [at] aero.org) and Geoff Reeves (reeves [at] lanl.gov)''
+
We invite potential contributors to participate with short
 +
presentations on the following topics:
  
The Space Radiation Climatology Focus Group will host a joint meeting with the Next Generation Radiation Specifications Consortium (NGRSC). NGRSC-focused sessions will occur on Wednesday, and GEM-SRC focused sessions will occur on Thursday. See http://www.virbo.org/GEM_NGRSC_2009 for more information.
+
1). Effect of plasma on storm-time electric and magnetic fields
  
The NGRSC focus is development of radiation specification models to replace the out-of-date AE-8 and AP-8 models. The new models will improve upon AE-8 and AP-8 by being more accurate and more capable. New capabilities will include worst case environments and extended particle energy coverage. These new capabilities will help address spacecraft charging and surface dose effects which are not addressed by the current generation of specification models, except in select orbits. The workshop consisted of about 25 participants from Aerospace, Air Force Research Lab, Los Alamos National Lab, NOAA, ONERA (The French Aerospace Lab), Naval Research Lab, UCLA, and the University of Texas. Workshop presentations typically include updates on satellite particle radiation data inter-calibration, statistical models and methods, and data assimilation. Support for this effort comes from a wide array of sources, including the NRO's Proton Spectrometer Belt Research (PSBR) program and NASA's Living With a Star (LWS) program, NSF's Geospace Environment Modelling (GEM) program, and The Aerospace Corporation's IR&D program. 
+
2). Plasma sheet effect on ring current dynamics
  
 +
3). Electric fields in the near-Earth magnetosphere (potential and inductive)
  
''Wednesday AM: NGRSC Project Updates (I)''
+
4). Coupling of physics-based inner magnetosphere with global magnetosphere models
  
This schedule will be, if anything, more workshoppy even than GEM. We will try to allocate about 20-30 minutes of open discussion time per presentation.
+
or any other topics of interest to the focus group. It is the ultimate
 +
goal of the focus group to improve physical knowledge and modeling of
 +
the near-Earth (closer than 10 RE) magnetosphere and its coupling with
 +
the outer magnetosphere; a more detailed description of the focus
 +
group objectives can be found at
  
Talks in this session include AE9/AP9 and LANL/DREAM project updates.
+
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG8._Near_Earth_Magnetosphere:_plasma%2C_fields%2C_and_coupling
  
''Wednesday PM1: NGRSC Project Updates (II)''
+
Potential contributors are encouraged to contact Sorin Zaharia
 +
(szaharia at lanl.gov) with the title of their presentation.
  
Talks in this session include Aerospace and (possibly) ONERA-DESP/CRATERRE project updates
+
== Space Radiation Climatology ==
 
 
''Wednesday PM2: Tools Updates et Cetera''
 
 
 
Talks in this session include updates of IRBEM-LIB, intercalibration methodology, fast L*, and the inversion library.
 
 
 
''Thursday AM: Recent science results from long-term simulations and data analysis''
 
 
 
Chair: O'Brien.
 
 
 
''Thursday our focus changes to more traditional GEM workshop questions of science, methods, and coordination of future work.''
 
 
 
Talks scheduled so far: Weigel, Shprits, O'Brien
 
 
 
''Thursday PM1: Implementation and methodology lessons learned''
 
 
 
Chair: Shprits
 
  
Talks scheduled so far: Ni, Kondrashov
+
''Conveners: Paul O'Brien (paul.obrien [at] aero.org);Geoff Reeves (reeves [at] lanl.gov), Bob Weigel (rweigel-at-gmu.edu), and Reiner Friedel (friedel-at-lanl.gov)''
  
''Thursday PM2: Data/reanalysis sharing and future plans''
 
  
Chair: Weigel
+
It's almost time for the GEM Summer Workshop, joint with CEDAR. The
 +
Space Radiation Climatology Focus Group (FG9) will meet for three
 +
breakout sessions: two on Thursday June 24th: 1:30-3:30 and 3:30-5,
 +
and one on Friday, the 25th, 10:30-12:15. We will be discussing the
 +
past year's results in reanalysis, data assimilation, climatology
 +
models, and long-term data/analysis. One of our sessions (the first
 +
one) will be joint with the new radiation belt focus group.
  
Highlight: Themis SST overview by the PI, Larson.
+
We already have a number of exciting talks lined up, but there's
 +
plenty of room for more. We encourage interested parties to send talk
 +
ideas to Paul O'Brien, Bob Weigel, and/or Reiner Friedel (Geoff will
 +
not be able to attend this year). If you are presenting an FG9-related
 +
poster, please sign up for the **Thursday** Poster Session and
 +
advertise on the Wiki. http://www.virbo.org/GEM_FG9_2010
  
Talks scheduled so far: Weigel, Chen, Denton
+
To view the FG9 email archive or to join the email group, go to
 +
http://groups.google.com/group/gem-2007-space-radiation-climatology-fg9
  
 
== Diffuse Auroral Precipitation ==
 
== Diffuse Auroral Precipitation ==
  
 
''Conveners: Richard Thorne <rmt [at] atmos.ucla.edu>''
 
''Conveners: Richard Thorne <rmt [at] atmos.ucla.edu>''
 
There will be four separate breakout sessions devoted to the Diffuse Auroral
 
Precipitation Focus Group at the 2009 GEM workshop.
 
  
'''Session 1'''
+
The Diffuse Aurora Focus Group plans to hold 4 breakout sessions at
 +
the 2010 GEM meeting in Snowmass this summer. Potential contributors
 +
are invited to contact the session chairs listed below with a title of
 +
their talk, and prepare a brief presentation for the workshop.
  
Tu, 23 June, 1:30 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.
+
'''1. Relationship between auroral phenomenology and scattering mechanisms'''
 +
[Co-chairs, Binbin Ni (bbni[at}atmos.ucla.edu)
 +
and Robert Michell (rmichell[at]swri.edu)]
  
DAP 1:   " Understanding Diffuse Auroral Structure "
+
*Monday June 21: 10:30-12:15:  
  
Co-chaired by Marilla Samara (msamara [at] swri.edu) and Robert Michell
+
'''2. Modulation of DA brightness by large-scale magnetospheric processes.'''
(rmichell [at] swri.edu).
+
[Co-chairs, Marilia Samara
 +
(marilia.samara[at]swri.org) and Jacob Bortnik (jbortnik[at]gmail.com )]
  
We invite contributions relating to the wide range of observable auroral
+
*Monday June 21: 1:3-3:00:
structures and their classification. Diffuse aurora contains a wide range of
 
structures including the most fine scale features. However, the mechanisms
 
causing structure in aurora, whether discrete or diffuse, need to be defined
 
within a larger theoretical understanding, which requires consistency in
 
verification resulting from observations of all types of structures.
 
  
Therefore, we would like to broaden the discussion to include more than what
+
'''3. Spatial and temporal extent and spatio-temporal occurrence of DA/scattering mechanisms'''
is often deemed to be diffuse auroral structure. A main re-occurring theme
+
[Co-chairs, Toshi Nishimura
is the confusion on what is actually termed diffuse aurora and most
+
(toshi[at]atmos.ucla.edu) and Richard Thorne (rmt[at]atmos.ucla.edu)]
importantly how to recognize it in optical data.
 
  
Topics for discussion will include:
+
*Monday June 21: 3:30-5:00:  
  
1. Variety of auroral structure (and characteristics) observed to date with
+
'''4. Importance of the DA for Geospace at the system level. Plans for next year.'''
ground imagers, satellite-borne imagers and their counterparts in the in
+
[Chair, Richard Thorne (rmt[at]atmos.ucla.edu)]
situ particle measurements.
 
  
2. Working definition of diffuse aurora: Historical context and observations.
+
*Tuesday June 22: 10:30-12:15:
Is it ever really structureless?
 
  
3. Current knowledge of what these diffuse auroral structures tell us about
+
== Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions (PMI) ==
in situ and wave scattering processes (connection to the other 2 sessions).
 
What future measurements and models will add to the current understanding?
 
  
Input on how to further shape this session is welcome and encouraged.
+
''Conveners: From: Jerry Goldstein <jgoldstein [at] swri.edu> and Maria Spasojevic <mariaspasojevic [at] stanford.edu>''
  
 +
The Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions (PMI) focus group will
 +
hold several sessions at the 2010 GEM Workshop, during 20-25 June 2010.
  
'''Session 2'''
+
We invite short presentations (several slides) related to any of the
 +
PMI's broad topics:
  
Tu, 23 June, 3:30 - 5:00 p.m.
+
+  Wave-Particle Interactions
  
DAP 2:  "The Relationship Between Diffuse Aurora and the Dynamics and Structure of the Magnetosphere"
+
+  Plume Dynamics & Recirculation
  
Co-chaired by Eric Donovan (edonovan [at] ucalgary.ca) Marilia Samara and Robert Mitchell
+
+  Plasma Density Structure & Evolution.
  
A number of different types of aurora are classified as diffuse. These
+
Specific topics of interest:
aurora are caused by a number of distinct precipitation mechanisms which
+
*  Dynamics of energetic particles
sometimes overlap in space. Unlike discrete aurora, in most instances
+
*  Wave theory and observations
diffuse aurora is a more or less direct consequence of a process or
+
*  Simulations or models of acceleration or loss
processes in the magnetosphere, and so temporal variations of and
+
*  Morphology and dynamics of cold plasma density
spatial gradients in brightness are thought to convey significant
+
*  Global circulation of plasmaspheric plumes
information about those magnetospheric processes. Further, diffuse
+
*  Dayside distribution of cold plasma ions
auroral precipitation plays some role in the loss of magnetospheric
+
*  Fine scale plasma structure and flow turbulence.
particles and in carrying large- and possibly small-scale currents, and
+
*  Plume plasma and magnetospheric reconnection.
so the diffuse aurora is important in the system-level behavior of
 
geospace.
 
  
In this session we will be exploring the use of diffuse aurora to remote
+
or any other topic you feel would be of interest to the PMI focus
sense magnetospheric dynamics, and the role of diffuse aurora in those
+
group.
dynamics. We encourage contributions about (1) the physical meaning (in
 
terms of magnetospheric dynamics and topology) of diffuse auroral
 
boundaries and their temporal evolution, variations in brightness, as
 
well as (2) the importance of diffuse aurora in carrying large-scale
 
currents and magnetospheric particle loss. We encourage presentations
 
based on observational and theoretical/modelling work. We are hoping for
 
presentations describing work that utilizes coordinated ground-based
 
(ASIs, induction coil & fluxgate magnetometers, riometers, ISRs, etc)
 
and in situ (THEMIS, FAST, Polar, Geotail, LANL, etc) observations.
 
  
Topics for discussion will include
+
If you would like to present, please e-mail your tentative title/topic
 +
to:
  
1. How is the motion of diffuse auroral structures related to
+
JGoldstein [at] swri.edu.
magnetospheric convection?
 
  
2. The poleward boundary of the diffuse “redline” aurora has been widely
+
== Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes ==
used as a proxy for the open-closed field line boundary. In terms of the
 
magnetosphere, what does the equatorward boundary of the redline aurora
 
correspond to?
 
  
3. What is the "state of the art" in terms of using intensity ratios to
+
''Conveners: Vassilis Angelopoulos  (Vassilis[at] ucla.edu); Kazuo Shiokawa (Shiokawa [at] stelab.nagoya-u.ac.jp) ; Andrei Runov (arunov [at] igpp.ucla.edu)  and Shin Ohtani  (Ohtani [at] jhuapl.edu)''
infer characteristics of precipitating particles?
 
  
4. What is the instantaneous spatial extent of different types of
+
Our focus group, "Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes",
diffuse aurora?
+
will have 4 sessions at the upcoming GEM Workshop in Snowmass (June
 +
20-25, 2010).  They are scheduled on June 24 (Thu) and 25 (Fri). 
  
5. How do large-scale processes (eg., solar wind pressure pulses, ULF
+
We have four topical areas identified, which are:
waves including Pi2s, etc) modulate diffuse auroral brightness?
 
  
6. How do diffuse aurora of different types relate to currents?
+
1. Onset timing: observations/theory/simulations (Angelopoulos)
  
7. How do diffuse aurora of different relate to magnetospheric particle
+
2. How do onset signatures propagate to near Earth and to the ground?
loss?
+
(Runov)
  
 +
3. Ground-space mapping of physical processes before/during/after
 +
onset (Ohtani)
  
 +
4. Substorm processes near transition between stretched and dipole
 +
field lines (Shiokawa)
  
'''Session 3'''
+
We would like to invite you to participate, and if you have any
 +
request or question, please contact the person of the topical area of
 +
your interest, whose name is in the parentheses for each topic.
  
Wed, 24 June, 10:30 a.m. - 12:15 p.m.
+
The description of our focus group is posted at:
 +
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG12._Substorm_Expansion_Onset:_The_First_10_Minutes
  
DAP 3 "Modeling Electron Scattering Rates by ECH waves and Chorus"
+
== Modes of Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Energy Transfer ==
  
Co-chaired by Richard Thorne  (rmt [at] atmos.ucla.edu) and Binbin Ni
+
''Convener: Larry Kepko (larry.kepko [at] unh.edu) and Bob McPherron (rmcpherron [at] igpp.ucla.edu)''
(bbni [at] atmos.ucla.edu).
 
  
This session will examine the global morphology, spectral properties, and
 
variability of two classes of magnetospheric plasma waves, electrostatic
 
electron cyclotron harmonic (ECH) and electromagnetic whistler mode chorus
 
plasma waves, which are capable of scattering plasma sheet electrons,
 
leading to diffuse auroral precipitation. Theoretical calculations of pitch-
 
angle scattering rates from each class of wave will be presented to assess
 
their potential contribution to the global pattern of diffuse auroral
 
precipitation.
 
  
 +
The Modes of Magnetospheric Response focus group will hold three
 +
sessions at the upcoming GEM Workshop (June 20-25) in Snowmass, CO,
 +
covering the following topics:
  
'''Session 4'''
+
1. Dayside observations during sawtooth events, the role of polar cap
 +
saturation, and implications for the magnetospheric response.
 +
Specifically, are particle injections on the dayside dispersionless or
 +
dispersive? Can sawtooth observations be understood as substorms that
 +
penetrate deep into the inner magnetosphere, or do sawtooth represent
 +
a fundamentally different state of the magnetosphere? We particularly
 +
encourage participants to bring data that addresses the issue of
 +
dayside injection and/or dipolarization.
  
Wed, 24 June, 1:30 – 5:00 p.m.
+
2. Non-linear coupling and the role of pre-conditioning in determining
 +
the response mode. Example topics and questions include: Systematic
 +
errors in activity indices; Seasonal effects on coupling functions;
 +
mass-loading effects on convection; The storm/substorm/SMC
 +
relationship.
  
DAP 4:  "Required Inputs for Global Modeling: Plans for 2009-2010
+
3. Magnetospheric response and solar wind energy transfer during the
Activities"
+
extreme solar minimum.
  
Co-chaired by Margaret Chen (Margaret.W.Chen [at] aero.org) and Richard Thorne (rmt [at] atmos.ucla.edu)
+
This focus group has as its aim the improvement of knowledge of the
 +
physical mechanisms that provide different dynamical modes of response
 +
of the magnetotail to the solar wind. These include substorms, steady
 +
magnetospheric convection, sawtooth injection events, pseudo breakups,
 +
and poleward boundary intensifications. A complete description of the
 +
FG and its goals can be found at http://bit.ly/beGmTF
  
In this session we will discuss how data and theoretical scattering rates
+
'''Schedule Change'''
can best be implemented in future models of the global distribution of
 
diffuse auroral precipitation. We will also outline plans and objectives for
 
the next year of the campaign.
 
  
 +
To minimize overlap with the "First 10 Minutes" focus group the "Modes of Magnetospheric Response" has been moved to the following dates and times:
  
Anyone interested in contributing to any of these sessions is encouraged to
+
Wednesday 6/23, 10:30 am - 12:15 pm, and 3:30-5:00 pm
contact the relevant session chairs.
+
Thursday 6/24, 10:30 am - 12:15 pm
  
== Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions ==
+
Please contact us if you are interested in presenting in one of the sessions [''Larry Kepko (larry.kepko [at] unh.edu) and Bob McPherron (rmcpherron [at] igpp.ucla.edu)'']:
  
''Conveners: From: Jerry Goldstein <jgoldstein [at] swri.edu> and Maria Spasojevic <mariaspasojevic [at] stanford.edu>''
+
1. Dayside observations during sawtooth events, the role of polar cap saturation, and implications for the magnetospheric response. Specifically, are particle injections on the dayside dispersionless or dispersive? Can sawtooth observations be understood as substorms that penetrate deep into the inner magnetosphere, or do sawtooth represent a fundamentally different state of the magnetosphere? We particularly encourage participants to bring data that addresses the issue of dayside injection and/or dipolarization.
  
The 2009 GEM workshop will feature FIVE sessions for the Focus Group
+
2. Non-linear coupling and the role of pre-conditioning in determining the response mode. Example topics and questions include: Systematic errors in activity indices; Seasonal effects on coupling functions; mass-loading effects on convection; The storm/substorm/SMC relationship.
"Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions" (PMI).  This focus group seeks to
 
improve our understanding of the two-way coupling between the plasmasphere
 
and magnetosphere.  The PMI Focus Group website can be reached here:
 
http://tinyurl.com/pmiFGwiki
 
  
Anyone interested in participating or contributing is encouraged to email
+
3. Magnetospheric response, state of the magnetosphere, and solar wind energy transfer during the extreme solar minimum.
Jerry Goldstein (jgoldstein [at] swri.edu) or Maria Spasojevic
 
(mariaspasojevic [at] stanford.edu).
 
  
'''The five (5) PMI sessions to be held at the upcoming 2009 GEM:'''
+
== Magnetosheath Studies ==
  
''MON 22 JUN: 10:30am - 12:15pm PMI Breakout 1A:''
+
''Convener: Steven Petrinec (steve.petrinec [at] gmail.com) and Katariina Nykyri (nykyrik [at] erau.edu)''
  
"Wave Growth and Propagation"
+
Magnetosheath focus group will hold sessions at the next GEM workshop
 +
on 21-25th of June, 2010 in Snowmass Village Colorado. We invite short
 +
presentations related to any of the focus group topics.
  
''MON 22 JUN: 1:30 - 3:00pm PMI Breakout 1B:''
+
The Primary Objectives and Expected Activities of the FG:
  
"Plasma Influence on Wave Particle Interactions"
+
1. To produce more comprehensive models of large scale magnetosheath
 +
flow and field patterns, and geometry of the magnetosheath region
  
''MON 22 JUN: 3:30 - 5:00pm PMI Breakout 2:''
+
2. To improve understanding of magnetosheath plasma instabilities and
 +
wave particle interactions: Spatial distribution and characteristics
  
"Plume Transport, Evolution, and Influence"
+
3. To develop a better understanding of the effects on magnetospheric
 +
dynamics due to processes occurring in the magnetosheath and due to
 +
characteristic magnetosheath properties.
  
''TUE 23 JUN: 10:30am - 12:15pm PMI Breakout 3:''
+
The focus group proposal with specific science questions can be found
 +
at
 +
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/GEM_FG_MSheath_proposal.pdf.
  
"Plasma Density Structure and Evolution"
+
We especially encourage data-analysts utilizing in-situ spacecraft
 +
measurements from Themis and Cluster missions, theoretical modelers,
 +
global and local modelers to participate in this workshop and present
 +
your findings. We also encourage presentations of studies of
 +
magnetosheaths around other solar system bodies, as they relate to the
 +
terrestrial magnetosheath.
  
''THU 25 JUN: 3:30 - 5:00pm Joint PMI-CEDAR session:''
+
See GEM website for further details: http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/
  
"Plasmasphere, Magnetosphere, Ionosphere:  Overall System Response"
+
== Radiation-Belt and Waves Modeling (RBWM) ==
  
More complete descriptions of these sessions are listed below under "SESSION
+
''Conveners: Yuri Shprits, UCLA (yshprits [at] atmos.ucla.edu); Scot Elkington, LASP (Scot.Elkington [at] lasp.colorado.edu); Jacob Bortnik, UCLA (jbortnik [at] atmos.ucla.edu);Craig Kletzing, U. Iowa (craig-kletzing [at] uiowa.edu)''
DESCRIPTIONS".
 
  
Interested in participating or contributing?  Contact:
+
The Radiation-Belt and Waves Modeling (RBWM) focus group will
 +
hold several sessions at the 2010 GEM Workshop, during 20-25 June 2010.
  
Jerry Goldstein (jgoldstein [at] swri.edu)
+
We invite short presentations (several slides) related to any of
Maria Spasojevic (mariaspasojevic [at] stanford.edu).
+
RBWM's broad topics:
  
'''SESSION DESCRIPTIONS'''
+
- Wave excitation, propagation and distribution (ULF, VLF, etc.)
  
MON 22 JUN: 10:30am - 12:15pm PMI Breakout 1A: "Wave Growth and
+
- Dynamical modeling of the radiation belts (acceleration, loss, etc.)
Propagation"
 
  
''How does the evolving global distribution of cold plasma govern the growth
+
- Wave-particle interactions (linear, nonlinear, non-resonant)
and propagation of waves that control energetic particle distributions &
 
dynamics?''
 
  
This session focuses on the influence of ambient plasma upon how waves are
+
The RBWM focus group kicks off this year, and aims to achieve a first-
produced, and how they propagate.  To be examined are the conditions for
+
principles understanding of the coupled dynamic variability of the
growth and propagation of various waves including EMIC, whistlers (hiss,
+
radiation-belts, and the wave environment that controls it. A few
chorus), ULF, especially the influence of ambient plasma properties (such
+
sample questions that are of particular interest to this focus group
as density, composition, and spatial  structure on various scale sizes).
+
are:
  
 +
- what are the physical processes responsible for wave excitation?
  
MON 22 JUN: 1:30 - 3:00pm PMI Breakout 1B: "Plasma Influence on Wave
+
- what are the spatiotemporal distributions of various plasma waves
Particle Interactions"
+
and what are their relative roles in producing acceleration/loss?
  
''How do ambient plasma properties such as temperature, density, and  
+
- what are the roles of linear, nonlinear, and non-diffusive wave-
composition influence wave particle interactions?''
+
particle interactions in RB dynamics?
  
This session focuses on how ambient plasma influences the waves-particle
+
- what are the quantitative effects of transport via interactions with
interactions themselves, examining how various plasma properties (such as
+
ULF waves?
density, composition, and spatial structure on various scale sizes) help
 
govern the effectiveness of various waves in changing the energy or pitch
 
angle of energetic particles.
 
  
 +
- what is the role of the seed population in radiation belt dynamics?
  
MON 22 JUN: 3:30 - 5:00pm PMI Breakout 2:
+
- why do some storms produce flux increases, decreases, or no
"Plume Transport, Evolution, and Influence"
+
variation?
  
''How is eroded plasmaspheric material transported, how does it evolve and
+
If you would like to learn more about this focus group, or submit a
influence reconnection?''
+
presentation, please use the following resources:
  
This session will examine the formation, dynamics, and fate of
+
Wiki page
plasmaspheric  plume plasma. Specific topics to be addressed include (but
+
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG:_Radiation_Belts_and_Wave_Modeling
are not limited to): observation or modeling of cold, dense plasma mixed
 
with magnetospheric plasma, plume plasma at reconnection sites or on open
 
field lines, recirculation or redistribution of cold, dense plasma into the
 
cusp and plasmasheet.
 
  
 +
We look forward to your participation
  
TUE 23 JUN: 10:30am - 12:15pm PMI Breakout 3:
+
'''Radiation Belts and Wave Modeling (RBWM) session description:'''
"Plasma Density Structure and Evolution"
+
 +
We will have 6 sessions this year: You can submit the title of your presentation online by following the link below to reserve a time slot during each individual session. We invite potential contributions and encourage to limit presentations to approximately 5 min.
 +
 +
http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?hl=en&formkey=dEhELVhvSXg5VS1HQmd3dzhCY3BaMGc6MQ
 +
 +
 +
''Tues PM 1: RBWM 1 -- Dynamical modeling of the radiation belts (Model development, verification, validation) (Scot Elkington and Yuri Shprits)''
  
''How do various plasma density structures originate and evolve during various
+
During this session we will discuss the development of new and improvement of existing models of particle transport, scattering, and acceleration in the radiation belts.  We will discuss future plans for model inter-comparison and for comparison of models with observations.
phases of geomagnetic activity?''
 
  
This session will focus upon outstanding questions about the dynamics of
+
density structures in the plasmaspheric. Potential topics to be covered
+
''Tues PM 2: RBWM 2 -- Dynamical modeling of the radiation belts (Preparing Radiation Belt models for RBSP data) (Scot Elkington and Yuri Shprits)''
include, plume, fine structure & turbulence, plasma instabilities, refilling,
+
   
ionosphere-thermosphere-plasmasphere interactions, and subcorotation.
+
During this session we will concentrate on comparing model results with observations from RBSP and other missions such as ORBITALS, ERG, and BARREL.  
  
 +
 +
''Wed AM 2: RBWM 3 -- Wave-particle interactions (Particle scattering and transport) (Scot Elkington and Yuri Shprits)''
 +
         
 +
We will discuss quasi-liner and non-liner pitch-angle, energy, and radial scattering and will discuss other potentially important acceleration and loss mechanisms operating in the radiation belts.
  
THU 25 JUN: 3:30 - 5:00pm; Joint PMI-CEDAR session:
 
  
"Plasmasphere, Magnetosphere, Ionosphere:  Overall System Response"
+
''Wed PM 1: RBWM 4 -- Wave excitation, propagation, and distribution (ULF) (Jacob Bortnik and Craig Kletzing)''
 +
         
 +
We will discuss excitation, propagation and distribution of ULF waves. We would like to invite contributions concerning modeling and observations.
  
''How do PMI processes influence the overall system response to storms?''
+
 
 +
''Wed PM 2: RBWM 5 -- Wave excitation, propagation and distribution (VLF) (Jacob Bortnik and Craig Kletzing)''
  
This session will investigate the effects of redistribution of thermal ions
+
We will discuss excitation, propagation and distribution of VLF waves. We would like to invite contributions concerning modeling and observations.
(ionospheric and plasmaspheric) on the stormtime response of the overall
 
magnetospheric system. The goal is to develop our understanding of the
 
interaction among components of the larger system.
 
  
''Contact:''
+
 
''Jerry Goldstein (jgoldstein [at] swri.edu), Maria Spasojevic''
+
''Thur AM 2: RBWM 6 -- Planning session (Jacob Bortnik, Scot Elkington, Craig Kletzing, and Yuri Shprits)''
''(mariaspasojevic [at] stanford.edu)''
 
  
== Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes ==
+
We will discuss future plans of model development, validation, and verification. We will discuss potential future GEM challenges and will outline a plan for future GEM meetings.
  
This is the 1st announcement of the focus group "Expansion Onset: The First
+
== Dayside FACs and Energy Deposition--Dayside FED ==
10 Minutes" for the upcoming GEM workshop in Snowmass (June 21-26, 2009;
 
http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html).
 
  
We will have 4 breakout sessions on
+
''Delores Knipp (delores.knipp [at] gmail.com); Stefan Eriksson (eriksson [a]t lasp.colorado.edu), Geoff Crowley (gcrowley [at] astraspace.net), Ramon Lopez (rlopez [at] uta.edu)''
June 25 (Thu) and 26(Fri) (for the current schedule of the overall workshop
 
see http://www.ece.vt.edu/GEM-2009).
 
  
Following are four topics and primary questions we will discuss this year.
+
We would like to invite contributions to the Dayside FAC and Energy
 +
Deposition (FED) focus group at the upcoming GEM workshop in Snowmass
 +
on June 21-25, 2010.  This new focus group is organizing to explain
 +
the relation between enhanced dayside Poynting flux and field-aligned
 +
currents, sources of field-aligned currents in the solar wind and
 +
magnetosphere and their impacts in the ionosphere-thermosphere system.
 +
The GF goals and other information are at:
  
1) Onset Timing
+
http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG:_Dayside_FACs_and_Energy_Deposition
What is the time sequence of onset-related phenomena observed in space and
 
on the ground, and what are the implications for substorm initiation?
 
  
2) M-I Coupling
+
The FED focus group will hold two sessions at the upcoming GEM
How does aurora evolve around substorm onsets?  How are magnetospheric and
+
Workshop (June 20-25) in Snowmass, covering data, theory, modeling
ionospheric onset signatures connected in terms of auroral precipitation and
+
aspects of the following topics:
currents, and what can we learn about substorm initiation from simultaneous
 
ground-satellite observations?
 
  
3) Onset Signature Propagation
+
- Dayside Poynting Flux, Joule Heating and Their Relation to Field Aligned Currents
How do onset-related signatures propagate in the magnetosphere?  How does
 
the uncertainty of propagation time affect our understanding of substorm
 
initiation?
 
  
4) Mapping
+
- Particle Energy Deposition on the Dayside
How does the presence and evolution of pre-onset and expansion-phase current
 
systems affect the link between auroral and plasma sheet locations and
 
processes?
 
  
Sessions will be scheduled based on responses to this announcement.  Those
+
- Dissipation of Magnetospheric Energy in the Dayside Thermosphere
who are interested in participating in the discussion are encouraged to
 
email to Andrei Runov (arunov at igpp.ucla.edu), the session coordinator,
 
with c.c. to other conveners.
 
  
We look forward to seeing you there.
+
- Thermospheric Density Enhancements and Traveling Atmo/Iono- spheric Disturbances
  
''Vassilis Angelopoulos (vassilis [at] ucla.edu)''
+
- Solar Wind Drivers for Extreme Dayside Poynting Flux Events
 
 
''Kazuo Shiokawa (Shiokawa [at] stelab.nagoya-u.ac.jp)''
 
 
 
''Andrei Runov (arunov [at] igpp.ucla.edu)''
 
 
 
''Shin Ohtani (ohtani [at] jhuapl.edu)''
 
 
 
== Modes of Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Energy Transfer ==
 
  
''Convener: Larry Kepko <larry.kepko [at] unh.edu>''
+
We will discuss the types of NSF GEM investigations to bring this
 +
forward toward a conclusion by 2012.
  
The Modes of Transport focus group will hold 2 breakout sessions at
+
The sessions will be held in a workshop (NOT AGU) style in which each
the upcoming GEM Workshop in Snowmass (June 21-26, 2009). Both
+
speaker will be allotted time for a 3-4 slides, in order to ensure
sessions will be held on the afternoon of Tuesday, June 23. This focus
+
enough time for discussion. At least one of the slides should deal
group seeks to improve our knowledge of the physical mechanisms that
+
with unresolved issues.  Speakers are encouraged to end their
provide for different dynamical modes of response of the magnetotail
+
presentation with outstanding questions that could provide a basis for
to the solar wind.
+
a session at next year's joint GEM-CEDAR meeting.
  
1) This first session seeks event, statistical and theoretical studies
+
Both sessions have been tentatively scheduled on Monday Jun 21
of solar wind coupling and magnetospheric response. Topics include
+
(See http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html for the definitive schedule).
(but are not limited to) sawtooth events, steady magnetospheric
+
If you have not already done so, please send the title(s) and
convection, and pseudo-breakups.
+
session(s) of your contribution(s) to us at your earliest convenience
 +
at the email addresses listed below.
  
2) In this second session we seek to: a) Identify questions that can be
+
Delores Knipp (delores.knipp [at] gmail.com)
addressed with global MHD simulations and b) Find events, particularly
 
during the THEMIS era, that can be used to answer the questions
 
developed in (a). This session will be old-school workshop format, so
 
participants are encouraged to bring plots and data for particular
 
events.
 
  
''Interested participants should email either Larry Kepko (larry.kepko
+
Stefan Eriksson (eriksson [a]t lasp.colorado.edu)
[at] unh.edu) or Bob McPherron (rmcpherron [at] igpp.ucla.edu).''
 
  
== Geospace System ==
+
Geoff Crowley (gcrowley [at] astraspace.net)
  
'''Prospectus for a "Geospace System" Focus Group: Call for Participation'''
+
Ray Lopez (rlopez [at] uta.edu)
  
Friday, June 26, 10:30-12:15
+
== [Special breakout session] Comparative Planetary Magnetospheric Physics ==
  
''From: Bill Lotko <wlotko [at] dartmouth.edu> and George Siscoe <siscoe [at] skynet.bu.edu>''
+
Conveners: ''Larry Kepko (larry dot kepko at nasa dot gov) and Mike Liemohn (liemohn at umich dot edu)''
  
We would like to initiate a discussion among the magnetospheric and aeronomy communities (portions, at least) on the prospect of undertaking a global, system-dynamics study of the coupled solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere-thermosphere system, which we identify simply as the geospace system. The suggestion responds to two circumstances: first, 50 years of magnetospheric research have shown the geospace system to be interactively coupled in multiple ways from the solar wind to the thermosphere, and second, as GEM moves in its long-range program from the 'divide-and-conquer' stage to the more challenging synthesis stage, a focus group devoted to problems of the coupled system will leverage scientific progress in each GEM research area. The magnitude of the task to comprehend the global system in its coupled complexity is almost certainly too great for a single, scientist-centered research team and probably too great for the multiple teams of a single institution. Instead it would seem to require a sustained collaborative effort by experts of manifold specialties distributed among many institutions. It might even take the combined collaboration of the GEM community and a sizable portion of the CEDAR community.
+
We invite all interested GEM attendees to participate in a special "comparative planetary magnetospheric physics" breakout session at the upcoming GEM workshop on Tuesday from 3:30-5:00 pm. The focus will be on how to utilize the knowledge gained from examining similar physical processes in the different systems to further the goals of GEM. These processes include MI coupling, dayside interactions, solar wind energy coupling, etc., and span the entirety of the GEM focus areas. We do not anticipate formal presentations. Rather, this is an open forum for discussion. Please bring your thinking caps!
  
The priorities of such a focus group must be enlightened by community interest. To begin the conversation we can suggest among many possible directions several problems, each global in scope and of considerable current interest. We have asked some GEM participants to help initiate the discussion with a few slides on each problem. They include: 1) the dayside reconnection potential, its relationship to the polar cap potential, and the saturation of both at large IMF; 2) global resonance, periodicity of the magnetospheric response, and sawtooth phenomena; 3) ionospheric-magnetospheric plasma circulation, including ionospheric outflows, and its effects on plasmasheet and inner magnetospheric dynamics; and 4) prompt penetration electric fields and their relationship to the dayside ionospheric superfountain, storm enhanced density, and plasmaspheric plumes. While some aspects of these global problems can be treated as regional phenomena, differentiated by distinct physical processes, their dynamics seem to evolve as an integrated whole during extreme solar wind conditions. The geospace system thus behaves coherently across a broad spatiotemporal range, making it difficult to unravel its causal behavior by considering the response in terms of isolated elements or processes. Integration of global problems of this type into a system-dynamics picture spans the expertise of all five GEM research areas and several CEDAR working groups. We invite participation from the GEM community in deciding whether the time is right for this focus group, and, if so, how best to structure its direction.
+
GEM will also have two related plenary session tutorials, one by Margaret Kivelson, "Learning about Earth's plasma processes from studies of other magnetospheres," on Tuesday morning and a second by Jim Slavin, "Reconnection in planetary magnetic tails," on Thursday morning.

Latest revision as of 08:27, 4 June 2010

SilvertreeSView.jpg

GEM will be holding its annual summer workshop at the Snowmass Conference Center in Snowmass, Colorado during June 20-25, 2010. A special student program will be held on Sunday, June 20.

Logistical information and workshop agenda can be found at the GEM Workshop Web Site.

Listed below are the call for presentations by various GEM focus groups before the Workshop. (Note: In the e-mail addresses below the symbol @ is replaced by " [at] ".)

GGCM Metrics and Validation

Conveners: Aaron Ridley <ridley [at] umich.edu> and Masha Kuznetsova <Maria.M.Kuznetsova [at] nasa.gov>

A new Dst index metrics study is added to the GEM Modeling Challenge organized by the GGCM Metrics and Validation Focus Group. Community Coordinating Modeling Center (CCMC) is supporting the Challenge. To participate in the Challenge please submit your model results using the web interface prior to June 1st, 2010.

The results of the Challenge will be discussed at the GGCM Metrics and Validation Session at the GEM 2010 Summer Workshop. Joint publication by all participants is planned. For more details, go to the Challenge Web site: http://ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/support/GEM_metrics_08/

Please send questions, comments and suggestions to: Masha Kuznetsova (Maria.M.Kuznetsova[at]nasa.gov) and Aaron Ridley (ridley[at]umich.edu).

GGCM Modules and Methods

Conveners: Brian Sullivan (bsullivan [at]artemis.sr.unh.edu); John Dorelli (john.dorelli [at] nasa.gov)and Michael Shay (shay [at] udel.edu)

The GGCM Methods and Modules Focus Group will hold 2 sessions at the upcoming GEM Summer Workshop in Snowmass (June 20-25, 2010). The sessions will be at 10:30 and 1:30 on Wednesday.

The overarching goal of this focus group is to understand the physics of collisionless magnetic reconnection on magnetospheric length scales (100-1000 ion inertial lengths). We invite potential contributors to participate with short presentations on the following topics:

1. Scaling of reconnection with local and kinetic scale parameters in MHD, multifluid, and kinetic models.

2. Plasmoid instabilities in high Lundquist number current sheets

3. Dependence (or independence) of the dayside reconnection rate on solar wind parameters.

or any other topics of interest to the focus group. This is the final year of the GGCM Methods and Modules Focus Group. Looking forward, as this focus group comes to an end, a major goal for this year's sessions will be to agree on a way to present the most significant results of geophysical magnetic reconnection research to the greater GEM community and to identify a few outstanding questions to address as we plan for future focus groups centered on the multi-scale physics of reconnection in the magnetosphere. A more detailed description of the objectives of this focus group can be found at

http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG2._GGCM_Modules_and_Meth ods

Potential Contributors are encouraged to contact Brian Sullivan (brian.sullivan [at] unh.edu) with the title of their presentation.

Plasma Entry and Transport into and within the Magnetotail (PET)

Conveners: Antonius Otto <ao [at] how.gi.alaska.edu>,Jay R. Johnson <jrj [at] pppl.gov>, and Simon Wing <Simon.Wing [at] jhuapl.edu>

We would like to invite contributions to the PET focus group at the upcoming GEM workshop in Snowmass on June 21-25, 2010. The sessions will be held in a workshop (NOT AGU) style in which each speaker will be allotted time for a 2-3 slides, in order to ensure enough time for discussion. In order to encourage this, at least one of the slides should deal with unresolved issues. Speakers are encouraged to end the presentation with outstanding questions rather than a summary of what has/have been accomplished. It is expected that there will be three sessions: (1) ion outflow effects on the plasma sheet; (2) Constraints on plasma sheet entry and transport; and (3) GEM challenge, northward and southward IMF.

All three sessions have been tentatively scheduled on Monday Jun 21 (See http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html for the definitive schedule). If you have not already done so, please send the title(s) and session(s) of your contribution(s) to us at your earliest convenience at the email addresses given above.

Physical Processes in the Cusps: Plasma Transport and Energization

Conveners: K.J. Trattner(trattner [at] mail.spasci.com), N. Omidi (omidi [at] solanasci.com) and D. Sibeck (david.g.sibeck [at] nasa.gov)

Presentations are solicited for the CUSP Focus Group to be held during the 2010 Summer GEM workshop in Snowmass Colorado. This is the last year of the Cusp Focus Group who's main objective is to utilize observations, modeling, and theory of the cusp and its role in particle acceleration and plasma transport. Based on the topics in earlier years and the discussions during the mini-workshop held during the 2009 Fall AGU, the Focus Group addresses the following topics:

1. Plasma transport into the cusp.

2. Energization of ions in diamagnetic cavities.

3. Origin of waves observed in the cusp and their role in particle scattering and acceleration.

4. Interaction of FTE's with the cusp.

5. The source region of energetic ions and electrons observed in the cusp.

6. Ionospheric signatures of such processes such as Poleward Moving Auroral Forms

It is the ultimate goal of the workshop to enhance our understanding of the cusp physics, its coupling to other parts of the system such as the bow shock, magnetopause and the ionosphere and the important role it plays in dayside transport and energization. Observational and theoretical contributions to this session are hereby solicited.

Those interested in these topics are invited to attend and contribute through showing a few slides and/or participation in the discussions. Information regarding hotel reservations and travel arrangements will be posted on the GEM website (http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem) in the near future.

Those wishing to give a presentation or with questions regarding the workshop should contact the conveners: trattner [at] mail.spasci.com, omidi [at] solanasci.com or david.g.sibeck [at] nasa.gov.

Near Earth Magnetosphere: Plasma, Fields and Coupling

Conveners: Focus Group co-chairs: Sorin Zaharia <szaharia [at] lanl.gov>, Stan Sazykin <sazykin [at] rice.edu> and Benoit Lavraud <Benoit.Lavraud [at] cesr.fr>

The Near Earth Magnetosphere: Plasma, Fields and Coupling Focus Group will hold 3 sessions at the upcoming GEM Summer Workshop in Snowmass (June 20-25, 2010).

We invite potential contributors to participate with short presentations on the following topics:

1). Effect of plasma on storm-time electric and magnetic fields

2). Plasma sheet effect on ring current dynamics

3). Electric fields in the near-Earth magnetosphere (potential and inductive)

4). Coupling of physics-based inner magnetosphere with global magnetosphere models

or any other topics of interest to the focus group. It is the ultimate goal of the focus group to improve physical knowledge and modeling of the near-Earth (closer than 10 RE) magnetosphere and its coupling with the outer magnetosphere; a more detailed description of the focus group objectives can be found at

http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG8._Near_Earth_Magnetosphere:_plasma%2C_fields%2C_and_coupling

Potential contributors are encouraged to contact Sorin Zaharia (szaharia at lanl.gov) with the title of their presentation.

Space Radiation Climatology

Conveners: Paul O'Brien (paul.obrien [at] aero.org);Geoff Reeves (reeves [at] lanl.gov), Bob Weigel (rweigel-at-gmu.edu), and Reiner Friedel (friedel-at-lanl.gov)


It's almost time for the GEM Summer Workshop, joint with CEDAR. The Space Radiation Climatology Focus Group (FG9) will meet for three breakout sessions: two on Thursday June 24th: 1:30-3:30 and 3:30-5, and one on Friday, the 25th, 10:30-12:15. We will be discussing the past year's results in reanalysis, data assimilation, climatology models, and long-term data/analysis. One of our sessions (the first one) will be joint with the new radiation belt focus group.

We already have a number of exciting talks lined up, but there's plenty of room for more. We encourage interested parties to send talk ideas to Paul O'Brien, Bob Weigel, and/or Reiner Friedel (Geoff will not be able to attend this year). If you are presenting an FG9-related poster, please sign up for the **Thursday** Poster Session and advertise on the Wiki. http://www.virbo.org/GEM_FG9_2010

To view the FG9 email archive or to join the email group, go to http://groups.google.com/group/gem-2007-space-radiation-climatology-fg9

Diffuse Auroral Precipitation

Conveners: Richard Thorne <rmt [at] atmos.ucla.edu>

The Diffuse Aurora Focus Group plans to hold 4 breakout sessions at the 2010 GEM meeting in Snowmass this summer. Potential contributors are invited to contact the session chairs listed below with a title of their talk, and prepare a brief presentation for the workshop.

1. Relationship between auroral phenomenology and scattering mechanisms [Co-chairs, Binbin Ni (bbni[at}atmos.ucla.edu) and Robert Michell (rmichell[at]swri.edu)]

  • Monday June 21: 10:30-12:15:

2. Modulation of DA brightness by large-scale magnetospheric processes. [Co-chairs, Marilia Samara (marilia.samara[at]swri.org) and Jacob Bortnik (jbortnik[at]gmail.com )]

  • Monday June 21: 1:3-3:00:

3. Spatial and temporal extent and spatio-temporal occurrence of DA/scattering mechanisms [Co-chairs, Toshi Nishimura (toshi[at]atmos.ucla.edu) and Richard Thorne (rmt[at]atmos.ucla.edu)]

  • Monday June 21: 3:30-5:00:

4. Importance of the DA for Geospace at the system level. Plans for next year. [Chair, Richard Thorne (rmt[at]atmos.ucla.edu)]

  • Tuesday June 22: 10:30-12:15:

Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions (PMI)

Conveners: From: Jerry Goldstein <jgoldstein [at] swri.edu> and Maria Spasojevic <mariaspasojevic [at] stanford.edu>

The Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions (PMI) focus group will hold several sessions at the 2010 GEM Workshop, during 20-25 June 2010.

We invite short presentations (several slides) related to any of the PMI's broad topics:

+ Wave-Particle Interactions

+ Plume Dynamics & Recirculation

+ Plasma Density Structure & Evolution.

Specific topics of interest:

  • Dynamics of energetic particles
  • Wave theory and observations
  • Simulations or models of acceleration or loss
  • Morphology and dynamics of cold plasma density
  • Global circulation of plasmaspheric plumes
  • Dayside distribution of cold plasma ions
  • Fine scale plasma structure and flow turbulence.
  • Plume plasma and magnetospheric reconnection.

or any other topic you feel would be of interest to the PMI focus group.

If you would like to present, please e-mail your tentative title/topic to:

JGoldstein [at] swri.edu.

Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes

Conveners: Vassilis Angelopoulos (Vassilis[at] ucla.edu); Kazuo Shiokawa (Shiokawa [at] stelab.nagoya-u.ac.jp) ; Andrei Runov (arunov [at] igpp.ucla.edu) and Shin Ohtani (Ohtani [at] jhuapl.edu)

Our focus group, "Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes", will have 4 sessions at the upcoming GEM Workshop in Snowmass (June 20-25, 2010). They are scheduled on June 24 (Thu) and 25 (Fri).

We have four topical areas identified, which are:

1. Onset timing: observations/theory/simulations (Angelopoulos)

2. How do onset signatures propagate to near Earth and to the ground? (Runov)

3. Ground-space mapping of physical processes before/during/after onset (Ohtani)

4. Substorm processes near transition between stretched and dipole field lines (Shiokawa)

We would like to invite you to participate, and if you have any request or question, please contact the person of the topical area of your interest, whose name is in the parentheses for each topic.

The description of our focus group is posted at: http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG12._Substorm_Expansion_Onset:_The_First_10_Minutes

Modes of Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Energy Transfer

Convener: Larry Kepko (larry.kepko [at] unh.edu) and Bob McPherron (rmcpherron [at] igpp.ucla.edu)


The Modes of Magnetospheric Response focus group will hold three sessions at the upcoming GEM Workshop (June 20-25) in Snowmass, CO, covering the following topics:

1. Dayside observations during sawtooth events, the role of polar cap saturation, and implications for the magnetospheric response. Specifically, are particle injections on the dayside dispersionless or dispersive? Can sawtooth observations be understood as substorms that penetrate deep into the inner magnetosphere, or do sawtooth represent a fundamentally different state of the magnetosphere? We particularly encourage participants to bring data that addresses the issue of dayside injection and/or dipolarization.

2. Non-linear coupling and the role of pre-conditioning in determining the response mode. Example topics and questions include: Systematic errors in activity indices; Seasonal effects on coupling functions; mass-loading effects on convection; The storm/substorm/SMC relationship.

3. Magnetospheric response and solar wind energy transfer during the extreme solar minimum.

This focus group has as its aim the improvement of knowledge of the physical mechanisms that provide different dynamical modes of response of the magnetotail to the solar wind. These include substorms, steady magnetospheric convection, sawtooth injection events, pseudo breakups, and poleward boundary intensifications. A complete description of the FG and its goals can be found at http://bit.ly/beGmTF

Schedule Change

To minimize overlap with the "First 10 Minutes" focus group the "Modes of Magnetospheric Response" has been moved to the following dates and times:

Wednesday 6/23, 10:30 am - 12:15 pm, and 3:30-5:00 pm Thursday 6/24, 10:30 am - 12:15 pm

Please contact us if you are interested in presenting in one of the sessions [Larry Kepko (larry.kepko [at] unh.edu) and Bob McPherron (rmcpherron [at] igpp.ucla.edu)]:

1. Dayside observations during sawtooth events, the role of polar cap saturation, and implications for the magnetospheric response. Specifically, are particle injections on the dayside dispersionless or dispersive? Can sawtooth observations be understood as substorms that penetrate deep into the inner magnetosphere, or do sawtooth represent a fundamentally different state of the magnetosphere? We particularly encourage participants to bring data that addresses the issue of dayside injection and/or dipolarization.

2. Non-linear coupling and the role of pre-conditioning in determining the response mode. Example topics and questions include: Systematic errors in activity indices; Seasonal effects on coupling functions; mass-loading effects on convection; The storm/substorm/SMC relationship.

3. Magnetospheric response, state of the magnetosphere, and solar wind energy transfer during the extreme solar minimum.

Magnetosheath Studies

Convener: Steven Petrinec (steve.petrinec [at] gmail.com) and Katariina Nykyri (nykyrik [at] erau.edu)

Magnetosheath focus group will hold sessions at the next GEM workshop on 21-25th of June, 2010 in Snowmass Village Colorado. We invite short presentations related to any of the focus group topics.

The Primary Objectives and Expected Activities of the FG:

1. To produce more comprehensive models of large scale magnetosheath flow and field patterns, and geometry of the magnetosheath region

2. To improve understanding of magnetosheath plasma instabilities and wave particle interactions: Spatial distribution and characteristics

3. To develop a better understanding of the effects on magnetospheric dynamics due to processes occurring in the magnetosheath and due to characteristic magnetosheath properties.

The focus group proposal with specific science questions can be found at http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawiki/pdf/GEM_FG_MSheath_proposal.pdf.

We especially encourage data-analysts utilizing in-situ spacecraft measurements from Themis and Cluster missions, theoretical modelers, global and local modelers to participate in this workshop and present your findings. We also encourage presentations of studies of magnetosheaths around other solar system bodies, as they relate to the terrestrial magnetosheath.

See GEM website for further details: http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/

Radiation-Belt and Waves Modeling (RBWM)

Conveners: Yuri Shprits, UCLA (yshprits [at] atmos.ucla.edu); Scot Elkington, LASP (Scot.Elkington [at] lasp.colorado.edu); Jacob Bortnik, UCLA (jbortnik [at] atmos.ucla.edu);Craig Kletzing, U. Iowa (craig-kletzing [at] uiowa.edu)

The Radiation-Belt and Waves Modeling (RBWM) focus group will hold several sessions at the 2010 GEM Workshop, during 20-25 June 2010.

We invite short presentations (several slides) related to any of RBWM's broad topics:

- Wave excitation, propagation and distribution (ULF, VLF, etc.)

- Dynamical modeling of the radiation belts (acceleration, loss, etc.)

- Wave-particle interactions (linear, nonlinear, non-resonant)

The RBWM focus group kicks off this year, and aims to achieve a first- principles understanding of the coupled dynamic variability of the radiation-belts, and the wave environment that controls it. A few sample questions that are of particular interest to this focus group are:

- what are the physical processes responsible for wave excitation?

- what are the spatiotemporal distributions of various plasma waves and what are their relative roles in producing acceleration/loss?

- what are the roles of linear, nonlinear, and non-diffusive wave- particle interactions in RB dynamics?

- what are the quantitative effects of transport via interactions with ULF waves?

- what is the role of the seed population in radiation belt dynamics?

- why do some storms produce flux increases, decreases, or no variation?

If you would like to learn more about this focus group, or submit a presentation, please use the following resources:

Wiki page http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG:_Radiation_Belts_and_Wave_Modeling

We look forward to your participation

Radiation Belts and Wave Modeling (RBWM) session description:

We will have 6 sessions this year: You can submit the title of your presentation online by following the link below to reserve a time slot during each individual session. We invite potential contributions and encourage to limit presentations to approximately 5 min.

http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?hl=en&formkey=dEhELVhvSXg5VS1HQmd3dzhCY3BaMGc6MQ


Tues PM 1: RBWM 1 -- Dynamical modeling of the radiation belts (Model development, verification, validation) (Scot Elkington and Yuri Shprits)

During this session we will discuss the development of new and improvement of existing models of particle transport, scattering, and acceleration in the radiation belts. We will discuss future plans for model inter-comparison and for comparison of models with observations.


Tues PM 2: RBWM 2 -- Dynamical modeling of the radiation belts (Preparing Radiation Belt models for RBSP data) (Scot Elkington and Yuri Shprits)

During this session we will concentrate on comparing model results with observations from RBSP and other missions such as ORBITALS, ERG, and BARREL.


Wed AM 2: RBWM 3 -- Wave-particle interactions (Particle scattering and transport) (Scot Elkington and Yuri Shprits)

We will discuss quasi-liner and non-liner pitch-angle, energy, and radial scattering and will discuss other potentially important acceleration and loss mechanisms operating in the radiation belts.


Wed PM 1: RBWM 4 -- Wave excitation, propagation, and distribution (ULF) (Jacob Bortnik and Craig Kletzing)

We will discuss excitation, propagation and distribution of ULF waves. We would like to invite contributions concerning modeling and observations.


Wed PM 2: RBWM 5 -- Wave excitation, propagation and distribution (VLF) (Jacob Bortnik and Craig Kletzing)

We will discuss excitation, propagation and distribution of VLF waves. We would like to invite contributions concerning modeling and observations.


Thur AM 2: RBWM 6 -- Planning session (Jacob Bortnik, Scot Elkington, Craig Kletzing, and Yuri Shprits)

We will discuss future plans of model development, validation, and verification. We will discuss potential future GEM challenges and will outline a plan for future GEM meetings.

Dayside FACs and Energy Deposition--Dayside FED

Delores Knipp (delores.knipp [at] gmail.com); Stefan Eriksson (eriksson [a]t lasp.colorado.edu), Geoff Crowley (gcrowley [at] astraspace.net), Ramon Lopez (rlopez [at] uta.edu)

We would like to invite contributions to the Dayside FAC and Energy Deposition (FED) focus group at the upcoming GEM workshop in Snowmass on June 21-25, 2010. This new focus group is organizing to explain the relation between enhanced dayside Poynting flux and field-aligned currents, sources of field-aligned currents in the solar wind and magnetosphere and their impacts in the ionosphere-thermosphere system. The GF goals and other information are at:

http://gem.epss.ucla.edu/mediawikiwiki/index.php/FG:_Dayside_FACs_and_Energy_Deposition

The FED focus group will hold two sessions at the upcoming GEM Workshop (June 20-25) in Snowmass, covering data, theory, modeling aspects of the following topics:

- Dayside Poynting Flux, Joule Heating and Their Relation to Field Aligned Currents

- Particle Energy Deposition on the Dayside

- Dissipation of Magnetospheric Energy in the Dayside Thermosphere

- Thermospheric Density Enhancements and Traveling Atmo/Iono- spheric Disturbances

- Solar Wind Drivers for Extreme Dayside Poynting Flux Events

We will discuss the types of NSF GEM investigations to bring this forward toward a conclusion by 2012.

The sessions will be held in a workshop (NOT AGU) style in which each speaker will be allotted time for a 3-4 slides, in order to ensure enough time for discussion. At least one of the slides should deal with unresolved issues. Speakers are encouraged to end their presentation with outstanding questions that could provide a basis for a session at next year's joint GEM-CEDAR meeting.

Both sessions have been tentatively scheduled on Monday Jun 21 (See http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/index.html for the definitive schedule). If you have not already done so, please send the title(s) and session(s) of your contribution(s) to us at your earliest convenience at the email addresses listed below.

Delores Knipp (delores.knipp [at] gmail.com)

Stefan Eriksson (eriksson [a]t lasp.colorado.edu)

Geoff Crowley (gcrowley [at] astraspace.net)

Ray Lopez (rlopez [at] uta.edu)

[Special breakout session] Comparative Planetary Magnetospheric Physics

Conveners: Larry Kepko (larry dot kepko at nasa dot gov) and Mike Liemohn (liemohn at umich dot edu)

We invite all interested GEM attendees to participate in a special "comparative planetary magnetospheric physics" breakout session at the upcoming GEM workshop on Tuesday from 3:30-5:00 pm. The focus will be on how to utilize the knowledge gained from examining similar physical processes in the different systems to further the goals of GEM. These processes include MI coupling, dayside interactions, solar wind energy coupling, etc., and span the entirety of the GEM focus areas. We do not anticipate formal presentations. Rather, this is an open forum for discussion. Please bring your thinking caps!

GEM will also have two related plenary session tutorials, one by Margaret Kivelson, "Learning about Earth's plasma processes from studies of other magnetospheres," on Tuesday morning and a second by Jim Slavin, "Reconnection in planetary magnetic tails," on Thursday morning.