Difference between revisions of "FG12. Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This is the first year for our new focus group, "Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes". We had 3 breakout sessions for three topical areas, that is, substorm onset timing, breakup aurora, and mapping. | This is the first year for our new focus group, "Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes". We had 3 breakout sessions for three topical areas, that is, substorm onset timing, breakup aurora, and mapping. | ||
− | + | This substorm-onset matrix contains all the presentations of GEM Substorm | |
− | + | FG on June 24-25, 2010 as well as some previous references. | |
− | + | It shows relevance of various observations/modelings to various | |
− | + | substorm-onset physical models. Comments and suggestions are very welcome. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 13:07, 24 September 2010
2008 GEM Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes[1]
Conveners: Vassilis Angelopoulos <vassilis @ucla.edu>, Shin Ohtani <Shin.Ohtani @ jhuapl.edu> and Kazuo Shiokawa <shiokawa@ stelab.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
This is the first year for our new focus group, "Substorm Expansion Onset: The First 10 Minutes". We had 3 breakout sessions for three topical areas, that is, substorm onset timing, breakup aurora, and mapping.
This substorm-onset matrix contains all the presentations of GEM Substorm FG on June 24-25, 2010 as well as some previous references. It shows relevance of various observations/modelings to various substorm-onset physical models. Comments and suggestions are very welcome.