Difference between revisions of "FG: Dayside Kinetic Processes in Global Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction"

From gem
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(37 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''A venue for joint modeling and observational efforts to understand kinetic processes in a global context.'''
 
'''A venue for joint modeling and observational efforts to understand kinetic processes in a global context.'''
 +
 +
 +
We’re currently using an online form to collect your ideas, opinions, and feedback on future plans and activities for the Focus Group. Please use this link to submit your input, especially if you were unable to attend the Summer Workshop: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScvvPORcIEAYS6Y19noaucJ5PLtEsbeedRld7oJwPAEE0jCeQ/viewform
  
  
 
===Focus Group Chairs===
 
===Focus Group Chairs===
  
*Heli Hietala, University of California Los Angeles, (heli@igpp.ucla.edu)
+
*Heli Hietala, University of California Los Angeles, (heli[at]igpp.ucla.edu) & University of Turku, Finland
*Xochitl Blanco-Cano, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (xbc@geofisica.unam.mx)
+
*Xochitl Blanco-Cano, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (xbc[at]geofisica.unam.mx)
*Gabor Toth, University of Michigan, (gtoth@umich.edu)
+
*Gabor Toth, University of Michigan, (gtoth[at]umich.edu)
*Andrew P. Dimmock, Aalto University, Finland, (andrew.dimmock@aalto.fi)
+
*Andrew P. Dimmock, Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala, Sweden, (andrew.dimmock[at]irfu.se)
 +
*Ying Zou, University of Alabama in Huntsville, USA, (yz0025[at]uah.edu)
 +
 
  
 
'''Term:''' Five years (2016-2020)
 
'''Term:''' Five years (2016-2020)
  
==Proposal==
+
===Dayside Kinetics Challenge===
 +
 
 +
Details of the dayside kinetics challenge can be found [https://ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/support/GEM/Dayside_Kinetic_Processes/Dayside_Kinetic_Challenge/Introduction.php here]
  
=====Topic=====
 
Kinetic processes on the order of ion and electron scales are inherent and abundant throughout dayside regions such as the foreshock, bow shock, and the magnetosheath. Nonlinear dynamics allow small variations to grow to structures of up to Earth radii in scale, resulting in significant spatial and temporal variations in dayside plasma properties. Impinging on the magnetopause these structures may facilitate/inhibit magnetic reconnection. Localized magnetopause indentations caused, e.g., by impacts of magnetosheath high-speed jets can drive surface waves and/or low frequency compressional waves within the dayside  magnetosphere. These waves can excite field-line resonances, which modify the drift paths of radiation belt electrons resulting in belt depletion through magnetopause shadowing. Extreme transients like foreshock bubbles cause drastic global scale disturbances in the whole magnetosphere-ionosphere system.
 
  
'''We propose a focus group (FG) that will be a synergy of both modeling and experimental efforts, to address to what extent dayside kinetic processes regulate the global magnetospheric dynamics. Understanding these cross-scale coupling processes is crucial in the development and validation of models which aim to accurately and reliably characterize and predict the solar wind–magnetosphere coupling.'''
+
==Introduction to the focus group==
  
 +
=====Topic=====
  
 +
Kinetic processes on the order of ion and electron scales are inherent and abundant throughout dayside regions such as the foreshock, bow shock, and the magnetosheath. Nonlinear dynamics allow small variations to grow to structures of up to Earth radii in scale, resulting in significant spatial and temporal variations in dayside plasma properties. Impinging on the magnetopause these structures may facilitate/inhibit magnetic reconnection. Localized magnetopause indentations caused, e.g., by impacts of magnetosheath high-speed jets can drive surface waves and/or low frequency compressional waves within the dayside magnetosphere. These waves can excite field-line resonances, which modify the drift paths of radiation belt electrons resulting in belt depletion through magnetopause shadowing. Extreme transients like foreshock bubbles cause drastic global scale disturbances in the whole magnetosphere-ionosphere system.
  
  
Line 26: Line 33:
 
- For statistical mapping details see: Dimmock & Nykyri, 2013 (DOI:10.1002/jgra.50465) and Dimmock et al, 2015 (DOI:10.1002/2014JA020734)
 
- For statistical mapping details see: Dimmock & Nykyri, 2013 (DOI:10.1002/jgra.50465) and Dimmock et al, 2015 (DOI:10.1002/2014JA020734)
 
<br>
 
<br>
- Vlasiator is developed by the European Research Council Starting grant Quantifying energy circulation in space plasma (200141-QuESpace) received by the Vlasiator PI. Vlasiator has also received funding from the Academy of Finland. Vlasiator copyright belongs to the Finnish Meteorological Institute. [http://vlasiator.fmi.fi Vlasiator FMI webpage]</small>
+
- Vlasiator is developed by the European Research Council Starting grant Quantifying energy circulation in space plasma (200141-QuESpace) received by the Vlasiator PI. Vlasiator has also received funding from the Academy of Finland. Vlasiator copyright belongs to the Finnish Meteorological Institute. [http://vlasiator.fmi.fi Vlasiator FMI webpage]
 +
<br>
 +
- The development of MHD-EPIC is supported by the Space Hazards Induced near Earth by Large, Dynamic Storms (SHIELDS) project DE-AC52-06NA25396, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy through the Los Alamos National Laboratory Directed Research and Development program and by the INSPIRE NSF grant PHY-1513379</small>
 
]]
 
]]
  
=====Timeliness=====
 
  
The proposed FG is particularly timely given '''the availability of numerous global dayside kinetic models.''' To name a few, MHD-EPIC (a two-way coupled MHD-Particle-in-Cell simulation), Vlasiator (a hybrid-Vlasov simulation treating ions as distribution functions), and several 3D hybrid models exist to-date. However, there is a need to make data from kinetic models easily accessible to the community.
+
'''This focus group aims to be a synergy of both modeling and experimental efforts, to address to what extent dayside kinetic processes regulate the global magnetospheric dynamics. Understanding these cross-scale coupling processes is crucial in the development and validation of models which aim to accurately and reliably characterize and predict the solar wind–magnetosphere coupling.'''
  
Currently we have access to '''unprecedented observational coverage of the dayside magnetosphere''' through THEMIS and Cluster. MMS will provide a vast amount of dayside observations between 2015 and 2016 near its 12Re apogee and in winter 2017-2018, it will make a sweep across the whole dayside in its extended, 25Re apogee configuration. These observations will be complemented by planned conjunctions with other spacecraft (THEMIS, Van Allen Probes, ARTEMIS, Cluster, Geotail) and ground-based assets in the framework of the Heliospheric System Observatory (HSO).
 
 
The proposed FG will also play a central role in preparation for the upcoming missions THOR (turbulent energy dissipation and particle acceleration on the dayside) and SMILE (soft X-ray imaging of the magnetopause and cusps with simultaneous UV imaging of the Northern aurora).
 
 
Combining the novel numerical models and the new observations will require intensive interdisciplinary interactions between scientists from different communities. '''The only current dayside FG (Transients) will end in 2016. Thus a new dayside kinetics FG is needed to provide a venue for such interactions and a nurturing environment for new dayside students.'''
 
  
 +
=====Goals & Deliverables=====
  
=====Fit=====
 
 
The dayside kinetics FG will build on the knowledge and experience gained by '''Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures (→2016)''', and utilize them when analyzing the new simulations and observations. Close coordination during the overplapping year (2016) will ensure a smooth transition and continuity of activities. The proposed FG will have many synergistic activities with the '''Reconnection in the Magnetosphere (→2017)''', providing a natural venue to discuss the effects of solar wind transients, foreshock and magnetosheath dynamics on dayside reconnection as well as the  magnetospheric effects of reconnection generated structures. In addition, the proposed FG '''will complement the modeling activities of several other FGs.'''
 
 
 
=====Goals & Deliverables=====
 
  
 
[[Image:goals_and_deliverables.png|thumb|upright=3.0|left]]
 
[[Image:goals_and_deliverables.png|thumb|upright=3.0|left]]
Line 54: Line 52:
 
*Response of magnetopause processes to upstream variations: reconnection, surface waves, and Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices
 
*Response of magnetopause processes to upstream variations: reconnection, surface waves, and Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices
 
*Response of the dayside inner-magnetosphere: excitation of waves; radiation belt effects
 
*Response of the dayside inner-magnetosphere: excitation of waves; radiation belt effects
 +
  
 
The deliverables include:
 
The deliverables include:
Line 59: Line 58:
 
*Database of spacecraft conjunctions under different solar wind conditions providing both the coverage and the suitable observational data products (fields, particle distribution functions) for validation of current and future global kinetic models.
 
*Database of spacecraft conjunctions under different solar wind conditions providing both the coverage and the suitable observational data products (fields, particle distribution functions) for validation of current and future global kinetic models.
 
*Modelling challenge: Events Comparison of different models with multi-point observations from MMSera events chosen by the community. The results will put the novel observations into global context.
 
*Modelling challenge: Events Comparison of different models with multi-point observations from MMSera events chosen by the community. The results will put the novel observations into global context.
*Modelling challenge: Statistics Dayside dynamics in 2D and 3D kinetic and MHD models under different upstream conditions (IMF angle, solar wind velocity) and season (dipole tilt). The results will be compared with observational statistics. This challenge will reveal how similar/different the results are for the different approximations, and point ways to improved future models.
+
*Modelling challenge: Statistics Dayside dynamics in 2D and 3D kinetic and MHD models under different upstream conditions (IMF angle, solar wind velocity) and season (dipole tilt). The results will be compared with observational statistics. This challenge will reveal how similar/different the results are for the different approximations, and point ways to improve future models.
 
 
  
'''Research Area:''' Solar Wind Magnetosphere Interaction (SWMI) and Global System Modeling (GSM)
 
  
 
=====Expected Activities=====
 
=====Expected Activities=====
During the first years we will have coordinated activities with the Transients FG and the Reconnection FG
+
During the first years we will have coordinated activities with the Transients FG and the Reconnection FG on linking local, conjugate dayside observations to global dynamics via simulations. In the run-up to the MMS extended-configuration dayside season we will discuss optimal data acquisition strategies, informed by numerical models, joint with HSO activities. In 2018 we will collect the first observations from this phase.
on linking local, conjugate dayside observations to global dynamics via simulations. In the run-up to the MMS
+
The two modeling challenges will run in parallel. The common starting point is a single, short time interval with constant solar wind conditions matching an observed spacecraft conjunction. Towards the end of the FG the Events challenge will proceed to actual storms and solar wind discontinuities. The Statistics challenge has more emphasis on model-model comparisons, and the in situ validation will be against observational statistics, first from THEMIS/Cluster and then from MMS.
extended-configuration dayside season we will discuss optimal data acquisition strategies, informed by
+
As a part of the modeling challenges we will agree on a road map to make the data from kinetic models available and accessible to the community. Towards 2020 we will discuss how to achieve kinetic physics in operational space weather models.
numerical models, joint with HSO activities. In 2018 we will collect the first observations from this phase.
 
 
 
The two modeling challenges will run in parallel. The common starting point is a single, short time interval
 
with constant solar wind conditions matching an observed spacecraft conjunction. Towards the end of the FG
 
the Events challenge will proceed to actual storms and solar wind discontinuities. The Statistics challenge
 
has more emphasis on model-model comparisons, and the in situ validation will be against observational
 
statistics, first from THEMIS/Cluster and then from MMS.
 
 
 
As a part of the modeling challenges we will agree on a road map to make the data from kinetic models
 
available and accessible to the community. Towards 2020 we will discuss how to achieve kinetic physics in
 
operational space weather models.
 
  
 
'''You can download the actual proposal''' [[Media:DaysideKinetic.pdf|here]]
 
'''You can download the actual proposal''' [[Media:DaysideKinetic.pdf|here]]
Line 84: Line 70:
  
 
==Workshops==
 
==Workshops==
===GEM Summer Workshop 2016===
+
Here you can find summaries of previous workshops and planned session for future ones. Each workshop from summer 2016 is listed below.
June 19-24, 2016 at the Santa Fe Convention Centre
 
 
 
====Planned Sessions====
 
 
 
Below lists planned sessions for the upcoming 2016 GEM-CEDAR workshop. The complete (tentative) schedule can be found [http://www.cpe.vt.edu/gem/2016GEM_SessionSchedule.pdf here].
 
 
 
 
 
'''Tuesday PM1: Dayside magnetopause processes and transport'''
 
 
 
Coronado + DeVargas Room 72
 
 
 
Joint session:
 
* Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures
 
* Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetosphere
 
* Dayside Kinetic Processes in Global Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction
 
 
 
 
 
'''Wednesday GEM, PM1: Magnetospheric signatures of dayside transients'''
 
 
 
Sweeney E/F /Theatre Combo = 540 CEDAR Plenary Room 72
 
 
 
Joint session:
 
* Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures
 
* ULF wave Modeling, Effects, and Applications
 
* Dayside Kinetic Processes in Global Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction
 
  
 +
- [[2021 Virtual mini GEM]]
  
'''Thursday PM1: Kick-off session of the first dayside modelling challenge'''
+
- [[2020 Virtual Summer Workshop]]
  
Coronado + DeVargas Room 72
+
- [[2019 Summer Workshop, Santa Fe, NM]]
  
Joint session:
+
- [[2018 Mini GEM, Washington DC]]
* Modelling Methods and Validation
 
* Dayside Kinetic Processes in Global Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction
 
  
 +
- [[2018 Summer Workshop, Santa Fe, NM]]
  
'''Friday GEM PM2: Kinetic and transient processes in the foreshock, bow shock, and magnetosheath'''
+
- [[2017 Summer Workshop, Portsmouth, VA]]
  
Coronado + DeVargas Room 72
+
- [[2016 Summer Workshop, Santa-Fe, NM]]
  
Joint session:
+
- [[2016 Mini GEM, San Francisco, Ca]]
* Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures
 
* Dayside Kinetic Processes in Global Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction
 

Latest revision as of 01:34, 22 January 2021

A venue for joint modeling and observational efforts to understand kinetic processes in a global context.


We’re currently using an online form to collect your ideas, opinions, and feedback on future plans and activities for the Focus Group. Please use this link to submit your input, especially if you were unable to attend the Summer Workshop: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScvvPORcIEAYS6Y19noaucJ5PLtEsbeedRld7oJwPAEE0jCeQ/viewform


Focus Group Chairs

  • Heli Hietala, University of California Los Angeles, (heli[at]igpp.ucla.edu) & University of Turku, Finland
  • Xochitl Blanco-Cano, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (xbc[at]geofisica.unam.mx)
  • Gabor Toth, University of Michigan, (gtoth[at]umich.edu)
  • Andrew P. Dimmock, Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala, Sweden, (andrew.dimmock[at]irfu.se)
  • Ying Zou, University of Alabama in Huntsville, USA, (yz0025[at]uah.edu)


Term: Five years (2016-2020)

Dayside Kinetics Challenge

Details of the dayside kinetics challenge can be found here


Introduction to the focus group

Topic

Kinetic processes on the order of ion and electron scales are inherent and abundant throughout dayside regions such as the foreshock, bow shock, and the magnetosheath. Nonlinear dynamics allow small variations to grow to structures of up to Earth radii in scale, resulting in significant spatial and temporal variations in dayside plasma properties. Impinging on the magnetopause these structures may facilitate/inhibit magnetic reconnection. Localized magnetopause indentations caused, e.g., by impacts of magnetosheath high-speed jets can drive surface waves and/or low frequency compressional waves within the dayside magnetosphere. These waves can excite field-line resonances, which modify the drift paths of radiation belt electrons resulting in belt depletion through magnetopause shadowing. Extreme transients like foreshock bubbles cause drastic global scale disturbances in the whole magnetosphere-ionosphere system.


From left -> right: 1. Statistical maps of dayside THEMIS magnetosheath observations between 2008 - 2015 binned onto a 0.5x0.5 Re grid on the equatorial plane. These statistics are for all solar wind conditions and show ion temperature anisotropy (left), normalised magnetic field strength (centre) and normalised flow speed (right). 2. Hybrid-Vlasov simulation of the magnetic field magnitude in the ecliptic plane using Vlasiator. The spacecraft orbits illustrate the Geospace System Observatory in spring 2016, 3. MHD-EPIC: Magnetic field lines colored by their strength, the total current on the cut planes and 3D iso-contours of the ion density exceeding 20 amu/cc. The enhanced density blobs are associated with twisted magnetic field lines.

- For statistical mapping details see: Dimmock & Nykyri, 2013 (DOI:10.1002/jgra.50465) and Dimmock et al, 2015 (DOI:10.1002/2014JA020734)
- Vlasiator is developed by the European Research Council Starting grant Quantifying energy circulation in space plasma (200141-QuESpace) received by the Vlasiator PI. Vlasiator has also received funding from the Academy of Finland. Vlasiator copyright belongs to the Finnish Meteorological Institute. Vlasiator FMI webpage
- The development of MHD-EPIC is supported by the Space Hazards Induced near Earth by Large, Dynamic Storms (SHIELDS) project DE-AC52-06NA25396, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy through the Los Alamos National Laboratory Directed Research and Development program and by the INSPIRE NSF grant PHY-1513379


This focus group aims to be a synergy of both modeling and experimental efforts, to address to what extent dayside kinetic processes regulate the global magnetospheric dynamics. Understanding these cross-scale coupling processes is crucial in the development and validation of models which aim to accurately and reliably characterize and predict the solar wind–magnetosphere coupling.


Goals & Deliverables
Goals and deliverables.png

Broad goals of the focus group are to contribute to the understanding of (including but not limited to):

  • Bow shock and foreshock dynamics: particle acceleration in foreshock transients; effect of foreshock transients on bow shock structure and their transmission downstream
  • Magnetosheath: propagation of meso-scale variations such as high speed jets and filamentary density structures; reconnection in turbulence; waves generated by instabilities and FTEs
  • Response of magnetopause processes to upstream variations: reconnection, surface waves, and Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices
  • Response of the dayside inner-magnetosphere: excitation of waves; radiation belt effects


The deliverables include:

  • Database of spacecraft conjunctions under different solar wind conditions providing both the coverage and the suitable observational data products (fields, particle distribution functions) for validation of current and future global kinetic models.
  • Modelling challenge: Events Comparison of different models with multi-point observations from MMSera events chosen by the community. The results will put the novel observations into global context.
  • Modelling challenge: Statistics Dayside dynamics in 2D and 3D kinetic and MHD models under different upstream conditions (IMF angle, solar wind velocity) and season (dipole tilt). The results will be compared with observational statistics. This challenge will reveal how similar/different the results are for the different approximations, and point ways to improve future models.


Expected Activities

During the first years we will have coordinated activities with the Transients FG and the Reconnection FG on linking local, conjugate dayside observations to global dynamics via simulations. In the run-up to the MMS extended-configuration dayside season we will discuss optimal data acquisition strategies, informed by numerical models, joint with HSO activities. In 2018 we will collect the first observations from this phase. The two modeling challenges will run in parallel. The common starting point is a single, short time interval with constant solar wind conditions matching an observed spacecraft conjunction. Towards the end of the FG the Events challenge will proceed to actual storms and solar wind discontinuities. The Statistics challenge has more emphasis on model-model comparisons, and the in situ validation will be against observational statistics, first from THEMIS/Cluster and then from MMS. As a part of the modeling challenges we will agree on a road map to make the data from kinetic models available and accessible to the community. Towards 2020 we will discuss how to achieve kinetic physics in operational space weather models.

You can download the actual proposal here


Workshops

Here you can find summaries of previous workshops and planned session for future ones. Each workshop from summer 2016 is listed below.

- 2021 Virtual mini GEM

- 2020 Virtual Summer Workshop

- 2019 Summer Workshop, Santa Fe, NM

- 2018 Mini GEM, Washington DC

- 2018 Summer Workshop, Santa Fe, NM

- 2017 Summer Workshop, Portsmouth, VA

- 2016 Summer Workshop, Santa-Fe, NM

- 2016 Mini GEM, San Francisco, Ca