Difference between revisions of "FG: Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures"
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
===Comparison of Transient Phenomena at the Bow Shock=== | ===Comparison of Transient Phenomena at the Bow Shock=== | ||
− | {| Class="wikitable" | + | {| border="1" Class="wikitable" |
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Depletion in the density and magnetic field strength | + | !!! HFAs !! SHFAs !! Foreshock Bubbles !! Foreshock Cavities !! Foreshock Cavitons!!Foreshock compressional boundary !!Density Holes !!SLAMs |
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Depletion in the density and magnetic field strength || Yes || Yes || Yes || Yes || Yes || Yes on the turbulent side || Yes || Yes | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Compressions at edges|| Yes ||Yes ||Only on the upstream edge ||Yes|| Yes ||Yes ||Yes ||Yes | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Presence of energetic (>30 keV) particles ||Yes|| Yes ||Yes || Yes ||Yes ||No ||Yes ||No | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Significant flow deflection || Yes|| Yes ||Yes || No ||No ||No ||Yes ||No | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Significant plasma heating ||Yes ||Yes ||Yes ||Modest|| No ||No ||Yes ||No | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Associated with an IMF discontinuity ||Yes ||No ||Yes ||Sometimes|| No ||No ||Yes ||No | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Duration ||Minutes|| Minutes ||Minutes ||Minutes ||Minutes ||Minutes ||Seconds||~10 s | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Scale size|| A few RE ||A few RE ||Up to 10 RE ||A few RE ||~ RE|| ~ RE ||Ion gyroradius ||Ion gyroradius | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Generation Mechanisms ||Interaction of IMF discontinuities with the bow shock ||Interaction of foreshock cavitons with the bowshock | ||
+ | ||Kinetic interactions between suprathermal, backstreaming ions and incident solar wind plasma with embedded IMF discontinuities that move through and alter the ion foreshock. | ||
+ | ||Antisunward-moving slabs of magnetic field lines connected to the bow shock that are sandwiched between broader regions of magnetic field lines that remain unconnected to the bow shock. | ||
+ | ||Nonlinear evolution of ULF waves || Backstreaming ions result in increased pressure within the foreshock region leading to its expansion against the pristine solar wind and the generation of FCB. | ||
+ | ||Possibly due to backstreaming particles interacting with the original solar wind ||Nonlinear wave steepening | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 05:10, 9 May 2013
Chairs
Hui Zhang, University of Alaska Fairbanks (hzhang@gi.alaska.edu)
Q.-G. Zong, University of Massachusetts Lowell (Qiugang_Zong@uml.edu)
Michael Ruohoniemi, Virginia Polytechnic and State University (mikeruo@vt.edu)
David Murr, Augsburg College (murrdl@augsburg.edu)
Description
The "Transient Phenomena at the Magnetopause and Bow Shock and Their Ground Signatures" focus group will employ both observations and simulations to investigate the transient phenomena at the magnetopause and bow shock and their ground signatures. The goal of this focus group is to provide a fundamental physical understanding of the transient phenomena at the magnetopause and bow shock including magnetic reconnection, FTEs, and Hot Flow Anomalies. This focus group encourages participation from communities interested in spacecraft observations (e.g., THEMIS and Cluster), ground-based observations (all-sky camera, radar, magnetometer), and global simulations. Coordinated multi-point observations are especially encouraged. This focus group is unique in the sense that it connects phenomena in regions ranging from the distant solar wind, bow shock, magnetosheath, and magnetosphere, all the way down to the ionosphere. Thus it will attract participation from a broad community including CEDAR and SHINE who do not normally interact.
Comparison of Transient Phenomena at the Bow Shock
HFAs | SHFAs | Foreshock Bubbles | Foreshock Cavities | Foreshock Cavitons | Foreshock compressional boundary | Density Holes | SLAMs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Depletion in the density and magnetic field strength | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes on the turbulent side | Yes | Yes |
Compressions at edges | Yes | Yes | Only on the upstream edge | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Presence of energetic (>30 keV) particles | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
Significant flow deflection | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No |
Significant plasma heating | Yes | Yes | Yes | Modest | No | No | Yes | No |
Associated with an IMF discontinuity | Yes | No | Yes | Sometimes | No | No | Yes | No |
Duration | Minutes | Minutes | Minutes | Minutes | Minutes | Minutes | Seconds | ~10 s |
Scale size | A few RE | A few RE | Up to 10 RE | A few RE | ~ RE | ~ RE | Ion gyroradius | Ion gyroradius |
Generation Mechanisms | Interaction of IMF discontinuities with the bow shock | Interaction of foreshock cavitons with the bowshock | Kinetic interactions between suprathermal, backstreaming ions and incident solar wind plasma with embedded IMF discontinuities that move through and alter the ion foreshock. | Antisunward-moving slabs of magnetic field lines connected to the bow shock that are sandwiched between broader regions of magnetic field lines that remain unconnected to the bow shock. | Nonlinear evolution of ULF waves | Backstreaming ions result in increased pressure within the foreshock region leading to its expansion against the pristine solar wind and the generation of FCB. | Possibly due to backstreaming particles interacting with the original solar wind | Nonlinear wave steepening
|