Difference between revisions of "M3-I2 GEM-CEDAR Sessions"

From gem
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 68: Line 68:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| How do we get ion upflow & outflow right?  
 
| How do we get ion upflow & outflow right?  
| Shasha Zho
+
| Shasha Zou
 
| University of Michigan
 
| University of Michigan
 
| Discussion
 
| Discussion

Revision as of 08:29, 31 May 2016

Links and information:

2016 GEM/CEDAR:



M3-I2 Sessions on Merged Modeling & Measurement of Injection Ionospheric Plasma into the Magnetosphere and Its Effects (M3-I2)



MONDAY PM1: Effects of Ionospheric Ion Injections on the Magnetosphere
QUESTION Speaker/Moderator/Contributor Institution Topic, point to be made, presentation of asset
Charles R. Chappell Vanderbilt University Overview Focus Area
Daniel Welling University of Michigan Review MHD Modeling Status
How do we get the regional GGCM effects correct? Moderator: Barbara Giles GPL NASA GSFC Discussion
Your Name Your institution Main Point


MONDAY PM2: Shortcomings of Models of Polar Wind and the Ionospheric Boundary
QUESTION Speaker/Moderator/Contributor Institution Topic, point to be made, presentation of asset
Roger Varney SRI Modeling the Polar Wind: Ion Energization
Invited Speaker Institution Description
How do we get ion upflow & outflow right? Shasha Zou University of Michigan Discussion
Your Name Your institution Main Point


FRIDAY PM1: Recap and Planning for M3-I3 Model-Measurement Comparisons
QUESTION Speaker/Moderator/Contributor Institution Topic, point to be made, presentation of asset
Robert Strangway IIGP, UCLA Ion Injection in the Magnetosphere
Stephen Fuselier SWRI Measurements
Planning for 2016 and then next 5 years? Vince Eccles Utah State University Discussion
Your Name Your Institution Main point


FRIDAY PM2: Face-to-Face Planning
QUESTION Speaker/Moderator/Contributor Institution Topic, point to be made, presentation of asset
Collaborations? Proposals?